r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness
Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational and psychological measurement 2008-02, Vol.68 (1), p.42 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Educational and psychological measurement |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Gilpin, Andrew R |
description | Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221578682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1412916581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2215786823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi70KwjAYAIMoGH_eITg3kN-aVURxcRHnlhQjtITE5ksE394OPoC33HI3Q5hrLag0xswRZoxLymullmgFMLAJxTlGLDVQOuLG0r-tdyE3Fbm6bOkhWP-BHipiw4PcYlcgBwewQYun9eC2P6_R7ny6Hy_0leJYHOR2iCVNM7RCcL03tRHyr-gLyy4zxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221578682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Gilpin, Andrew R</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilpin, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><description>Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Educational evaluation ; Experiments ; Meta-analysis ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Normal distribution ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 2008-02, Vol.68 (1), p.42</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilpin, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><title>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNi70KwjAYAIMoGH_eITg3kN-aVURxcRHnlhQjtITE5ksE394OPoC33HI3Q5hrLag0xswRZoxLymullmgFMLAJxTlGLDVQOuLG0r-tdyE3Fbm6bOkhWP-BHipiw4PcYlcgBwewQYun9eC2P6_R7ny6Hy_0leJYHOR2iCVNM7RCcL03tRHyr-gLyy4zxw</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Gilpin, Andrew R</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</title><author>Gilpin, Andrew R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2215786823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilpin, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilpin, Andrew R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><pages>42-</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><abstract>Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-1644 |
ispartof | Educational and psychological measurement, 2008-02, Vol.68 (1), p.42 |
issn | 0013-1644 1552-3888 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_221578682 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Educational evaluation Experiments Meta-analysis Monte Carlo simulation Normal distribution Systematic review |
title | r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T02%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=r%5Esub%20equivalent%5E,%20Meta-Analysis,%20and%20Robustness&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Gilpin,%20Andrew%20R&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.pages=42-&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1412916581%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221578682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |