r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness

Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational and psychological measurement 2008-02, Vol.68 (1), p.42
1. Verfasser: Gilpin, Andrew R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 42
container_title Educational and psychological measurement
container_volume 68
creator Gilpin, Andrew R
description Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221578682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1412916581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2215786823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi70KwjAYAIMoGH_eITg3kN-aVURxcRHnlhQjtITE5ksE394OPoC33HI3Q5hrLag0xswRZoxLymullmgFMLAJxTlGLDVQOuLG0r-tdyE3Fbm6bOkhWP-BHipiw4PcYlcgBwewQYun9eC2P6_R7ny6Hy_0leJYHOR2iCVNM7RCcL03tRHyr-gLyy4zxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221578682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Gilpin, Andrew R</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilpin, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><description>Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Educational evaluation ; Experiments ; Meta-analysis ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Normal distribution ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 2008-02, Vol.68 (1), p.42</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilpin, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><title>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNi70KwjAYAIMoGH_eITg3kN-aVURxcRHnlhQjtITE5ksE394OPoC33HI3Q5hrLag0xswRZoxLymullmgFMLAJxTlGLDVQOuLG0r-tdyE3Fbm6bOkhWP-BHipiw4PcYlcgBwewQYun9eC2P6_R7ny6Hy_0leJYHOR2iCVNM7RCcL03tRHyr-gLyy4zxw</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Gilpin, Andrew R</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</title><author>Gilpin, Andrew R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2215786823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilpin, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilpin, Andrew R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><pages>42-</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><abstract>Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r..., for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated meta-analyses to examine the impact on r... effect sizes of research using independent-groups, pooled-variance t tests with that using a less powerful median test. As expected, estimates based on t were higher. These differences were consistent even in the presence of strong variance heterogeneity when data were distributed normally, but not when data were nonnormal. The results suggested that the use of r... be confined to combining studies using inferential tests with comparable power and robustness; they also cast doubt on the use of r... when data are not distributed normally. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-1644
ispartof Educational and psychological measurement, 2008-02, Vol.68 (1), p.42
issn 0013-1644
1552-3888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_221578682
source Access via SAGE
subjects Educational evaluation
Experiments
Meta-analysis
Monte Carlo simulation
Normal distribution
Systematic review
title r^sub equivalent^, Meta-Analysis, and Robustness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T02%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=r%5Esub%20equivalent%5E,%20Meta-Analysis,%20and%20Robustness&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Gilpin,%20Andrew%20R&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.pages=42-&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1412916581%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221578682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true