Microfiltration operating costs
In February 1994, the San Jose (Calif.) Water Company began operating a 5-mgd (19 × 10³-m³/d) microfiltration (MF) plant as part of the Saratoga Water Treatment Plant. The cost of operating the MF plant during 1995 was determined for all noncapitalized expenditures including power, operator labor, c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal - American Water Works Association 1997-10, Vol.89 (10), p.40-49 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 49 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 40 |
| container_title | Journal - American Water Works Association |
| container_volume | 89 |
| creator | Gere, Andrew R. |
| description | In February 1994, the San Jose (Calif.) Water Company began operating a 5-mgd (19 × 10³-m³/d) microfiltration (MF) plant as part of the Saratoga Water Treatment Plant. The cost of operating the MF plant during 1995 was determined for all noncapitalized expenditures including power, operator labor, chemicals, membrane replacement, maintenance, and repairs. Actual operating costs were $309/mil gal ($82 × 10³/m³). Production costs for a direct filtration plant treating similar water during the same time period were 20 percent of those for the Saratoga MF plant, largely because of a significant economy of scale and lower power costs. Treatment plant performance, reliability, and operating experience affect the overall cost of treated water. In its fourth year of operation, the MF plant continues to be appropriate for this water supply because it is reliable and easy to operate and provides superior finished water quality. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08304.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221576024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41296040</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41296040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-ca1ae82d11e72416930080448e584cdae7fff111d6987a5dd2c08ab2cd51f3c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCYiqYpsw40fisIsQL6mIDajsLNexUaKQFDsV7d-TkKp7Vh5r7pw7cwmZI8QIQG-qGIXASErGYsyyNO5WIBnweHtEJofWMZkAAItQwMcpOQuh6r8okE_I1UtpfOvKuvO6K9tm1q7tUDWfM9OGLpyTE6frYC_275S8P9y_3T1Fi9fH57t8ERmWSh4ZjdpKWiDalHJMMgYggXNpheSm0DZ1ziFikWQy1aIoqAGpV9QUAh0zkk3JfOSuffu9saFTVbvxTW-pKEWRJkB5L7odRf3KIXjr1NqXX9rvFIIa8lCVGo5Ww9FqyEPt81Dbfvh676CD0bXzujFlOBAoCJA86WX5KPspa7v7h4HKl8v8r-4ZlyOjCl3rDwyONEuAA_sFCvx9hQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221576024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microfiltration operating costs</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gere, Andrew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gere, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><description>In February 1994, the San Jose (Calif.) Water Company began operating a 5-mgd (19 × 10³-m³/d) microfiltration (MF) plant as part of the Saratoga Water Treatment Plant. The cost of operating the MF plant during 1995 was determined for all noncapitalized expenditures including power, operator labor, chemicals, membrane replacement, maintenance, and repairs. Actual operating costs were $309/mil gal ($82 × 10³/m³). Production costs for a direct filtration plant treating similar water during the same time period were 20 percent of those for the Saratoga MF plant, largely because of a significant economy of scale and lower power costs. Treatment plant performance, reliability, and operating experience affect the overall cost of treated water. In its fourth year of operation, the MF plant continues to be appropriate for this water supply because it is reliable and easy to operate and provides superior finished water quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-150X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-8833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08304.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAWWA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denver, CO: American Water Works Association</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Capital costs ; Compliance ; Costs ; Design ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Exact sciences and technology ; Maintenance costs ; Microfiltration ; Operating costs ; P branes ; Pollution ; Production costs ; Pumps ; Repair & maintenance ; Shutdowns ; Storms ; Surface water ; Water Quality ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Journal - American Water Works Association, 1997-10, Vol.89 (10), p.40-49</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 1997 AWWA</rights><rights>1997 American Water Works Association</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Water Works Association Oct 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-ca1ae82d11e72416930080448e584cdae7fff111d6987a5dd2c08ab2cd51f3c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-ca1ae82d11e72416930080448e584cdae7fff111d6987a5dd2c08ab2cd51f3c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41296040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41296040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2050846$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gere, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><title>Microfiltration operating costs</title><title>Journal - American Water Works Association</title><description>In February 1994, the San Jose (Calif.) Water Company began operating a 5-mgd (19 × 10³-m³/d) microfiltration (MF) plant as part of the Saratoga Water Treatment Plant. The cost of operating the MF plant during 1995 was determined for all noncapitalized expenditures including power, operator labor, chemicals, membrane replacement, maintenance, and repairs. Actual operating costs were $309/mil gal ($82 × 10³/m³). Production costs for a direct filtration plant treating similar water during the same time period were 20 percent of those for the Saratoga MF plant, largely because of a significant economy of scale and lower power costs. Treatment plant performance, reliability, and operating experience affect the overall cost of treated water. In its fourth year of operation, the MF plant continues to be appropriate for this water supply because it is reliable and easy to operate and provides superior finished water quality.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Maintenance costs</subject><subject>Microfiltration</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>P branes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Pumps</subject><subject>Repair & maintenance</subject><subject>Shutdowns</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0003-150X</issn><issn>1551-8833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCYiqYpsw40fisIsQL6mIDajsLNexUaKQFDsV7d-TkKp7Vh5r7pw7cwmZI8QIQG-qGIXASErGYsyyNO5WIBnweHtEJofWMZkAAItQwMcpOQuh6r8okE_I1UtpfOvKuvO6K9tm1q7tUDWfM9OGLpyTE6frYC_275S8P9y_3T1Fi9fH57t8ERmWSh4ZjdpKWiDalHJMMgYggXNpheSm0DZ1ziFikWQy1aIoqAGpV9QUAh0zkk3JfOSuffu9saFTVbvxTW-pKEWRJkB5L7odRf3KIXjr1NqXX9rvFIIa8lCVGo5Ww9FqyEPt81Dbfvh676CD0bXzujFlOBAoCJA86WX5KPspa7v7h4HKl8v8r-4ZlyOjCl3rDwyONEuAA_sFCvx9hQ</recordid><startdate>199710</startdate><enddate>199710</enddate><creator>Gere, Andrew R.</creator><general>American Water Works Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199710</creationdate><title>Microfiltration operating costs</title><author>Gere, Andrew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-ca1ae82d11e72416930080448e584cdae7fff111d6987a5dd2c08ab2cd51f3c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Maintenance costs</topic><topic>Microfiltration</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>P branes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Pumps</topic><topic>Repair & maintenance</topic><topic>Shutdowns</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gere, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gere, Andrew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microfiltration operating costs</atitle><jtitle>Journal - American Water Works Association</jtitle><date>1997-10</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>40-49</pages><issn>0003-150X</issn><eissn>1551-8833</eissn><coden>JAWWA5</coden><abstract>In February 1994, the San Jose (Calif.) Water Company began operating a 5-mgd (19 × 10³-m³/d) microfiltration (MF) plant as part of the Saratoga Water Treatment Plant. The cost of operating the MF plant during 1995 was determined for all noncapitalized expenditures including power, operator labor, chemicals, membrane replacement, maintenance, and repairs. Actual operating costs were $309/mil gal ($82 × 10³/m³). Production costs for a direct filtration plant treating similar water during the same time period were 20 percent of those for the Saratoga MF plant, largely because of a significant economy of scale and lower power costs. Treatment plant performance, reliability, and operating experience affect the overall cost of treated water. In its fourth year of operation, the MF plant continues to be appropriate for this water supply because it is reliable and easy to operate and provides superior finished water quality.</abstract><cop>Denver, CO</cop><pub>American Water Works Association</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08304.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-150X |
| ispartof | Journal - American Water Works Association, 1997-10, Vol.89 (10), p.40-49 |
| issn | 0003-150X 1551-8833 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_221576024 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Applied sciences Capital costs Compliance Costs Design Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination Exact sciences and technology Maintenance costs Microfiltration Operating costs P branes Pollution Production costs Pumps Repair & maintenance Shutdowns Storms Surface water Water Quality Water treatment Water treatment and pollution Water treatment plants |
| title | Microfiltration operating costs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T21%3A41%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microfiltration%20operating%20costs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20-%20American%20Water%20Works%20Association&rft.au=Gere,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=1997-10&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=40-49&rft.issn=0003-150X&rft.eissn=1551-8833&rft.coden=JAWWA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1997.tb08304.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41296040%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221576024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41296040&rfr_iscdi=true |