Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales
A reliability generalization of 51 samples employing one of the NEO personality scales was conducted. Reliability generalization is a meta-analytic method for examining the variability in the reliability of scores by determining which sample characteristics are related to differences in score reliab...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational and psychological measurement 2000-04, Vol.60 (2), p.236-254 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 254 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 236 |
| container_title | Educational and psychological measurement |
| container_volume | 60 |
| creator | Caruso, John C. |
| description | A reliability generalization of 51 samples employing one of the NEO personality scales was conducted. Reliability generalization is a meta-analytic method for examining the variability in the reliability of scores by determining which sample characteristics are related to differences in score reliability. It was found that there was a large amount of variability in the reliability of NEO scores, both between and within personality domains. The sample characteristics that are related to score reliability were dependent on NEO domain. Agreeableness scores appear to be the weakest of the domains assessed by the NEO scales in terms of reliability, particularly in clinical samples, for male-only samples, and when temporal consistency was the criterion for reliability. The reliability of Openness to Experience scores was low when the NEO-Five Factor Inventory was used. The advantages of conceptualizing reliability as a property of scores, and not tests, are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00131640021970484 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221542465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ605954</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00131640021970484</sage_id><sourcerecordid>52192079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-7d67efafad78fa9be17ba0597f9bd8be660e42a589bf24202e962f62af8b6aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gOAi6Dp17mSeSyltVYqKj3W4ae9oSmzqTLqov97UiAjSu7mL851zH4ydAh8AGHPJOWSgJecCnOHSyj3WA6VEmllr91lvq6ctIA_ZUYwL3pYE6DH7SFWJRVmVzSaZ0JICVuUnNmW9TGqfNG-U3FGdPFCI9RK_qacZVhSP2YHHKtLJT--zl_HoeXidTu8nN8OraYqZcU1q5tqQR49zYz26gsAUyJUz3hVzW5DWnKRAZV3hhRRckNPCa4HeFhoRsj4773JXof5YU2zyRb0O7SoxFwKUFFKrFrrYBYE0UgjjtG4p6KhZqGMM5PNVKN8xbHLg-faL-b8vtp6zzkOhnP3yo1vd3qC28qCTI77Sn6E7874AlE55eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474227966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Caruso, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Caruso, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>A reliability generalization of 51 samples employing one of the NEO personality scales was conducted. Reliability generalization is a meta-analytic method for examining the variability in the reliability of scores by determining which sample characteristics are related to differences in score reliability. It was found that there was a large amount of variability in the reliability of NEO scores, both between and within personality domains. The sample characteristics that are related to score reliability were dependent on NEO domain. Agreeableness scores appear to be the weakest of the domains assessed by the NEO scales in terms of reliability, particularly in clinical samples, for male-only samples, and when temporal consistency was the criterion for reliability. The reliability of Openness to Experience scores was low when the NEO-Five Factor Inventory was used. The advantages of conceptualizing reliability as a property of scores, and not tests, are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00131640021970484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Effect Size ; Estimation (Mathematics) ; Generalization ; Meta Analysis ; NEO Personality Inventory ; Personality ; Personality Assessment ; Personality Measures ; Psychological tests ; Reliability ; Scores</subject><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 2000-04, Vol.60 (2), p.236-254</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Apr 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-7d67efafad78fa9be17ba0597f9bd8be660e42a589bf24202e962f62af8b6aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-7d67efafad78fa9be17ba0597f9bd8be660e42a589bf24202e962f62af8b6aa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00131640021970484$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00131640021970484$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ605954$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caruso, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>A reliability generalization of 51 samples employing one of the NEO personality scales was conducted. Reliability generalization is a meta-analytic method for examining the variability in the reliability of scores by determining which sample characteristics are related to differences in score reliability. It was found that there was a large amount of variability in the reliability of NEO scores, both between and within personality domains. The sample characteristics that are related to score reliability were dependent on NEO domain. Agreeableness scores appear to be the weakest of the domains assessed by the NEO scales in terms of reliability, particularly in clinical samples, for male-only samples, and when temporal consistency was the criterion for reliability. The reliability of Openness to Experience scores was low when the NEO-Five Factor Inventory was used. The advantages of conceptualizing reliability as a property of scores, and not tests, are discussed.</description><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Estimation (Mathematics)</subject><subject>Generalization</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>NEO Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Assessment</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Scores</subject><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gOAi6Dp17mSeSyltVYqKj3W4ae9oSmzqTLqov97UiAjSu7mL851zH4ydAh8AGHPJOWSgJecCnOHSyj3WA6VEmllr91lvq6ctIA_ZUYwL3pYE6DH7SFWJRVmVzSaZ0JICVuUnNmW9TGqfNG-U3FGdPFCI9RK_qacZVhSP2YHHKtLJT--zl_HoeXidTu8nN8OraYqZcU1q5tqQR49zYz26gsAUyJUz3hVzW5DWnKRAZV3hhRRckNPCa4HeFhoRsj4773JXof5YU2zyRb0O7SoxFwKUFFKrFrrYBYE0UgjjtG4p6KhZqGMM5PNVKN8xbHLg-faL-b8vtp6zzkOhnP3yo1vd3qC28qCTI77Sn6E7874AlE55eA</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Caruso, John C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Educational and Psychological Measurement, etc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales</title><author>Caruso, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-7d67efafad78fa9be17ba0597f9bd8be660e42a589bf24202e962f62af8b6aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Estimation (Mathematics)</topic><topic>Generalization</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>NEO Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Assessment</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caruso, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caruso, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ605954</ericid><atitle>Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>236-254</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><abstract>A reliability generalization of 51 samples employing one of the NEO personality scales was conducted. Reliability generalization is a meta-analytic method for examining the variability in the reliability of scores by determining which sample characteristics are related to differences in score reliability. It was found that there was a large amount of variability in the reliability of NEO scores, both between and within personality domains. The sample characteristics that are related to score reliability were dependent on NEO domain. Agreeableness scores appear to be the weakest of the domains assessed by the NEO scales in terms of reliability, particularly in clinical samples, for male-only samples, and when temporal consistency was the criterion for reliability. The reliability of Openness to Experience scores was low when the NEO-Five Factor Inventory was used. The advantages of conceptualizing reliability as a property of scores, and not tests, are discussed.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00131640021970484</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-1644 |
| ispartof | Educational and psychological measurement, 2000-04, Vol.60 (2), p.236-254 |
| issn | 0013-1644 1552-3888 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_221542465 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Effect Size Estimation (Mathematics) Generalization Meta Analysis NEO Personality Inventory Personality Personality Assessment Personality Measures Psychological tests Reliability Scores |
| title | Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A29%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20Generalization%20of%20the%20Neo%20Personality%20Scales&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=Caruso,%20John%20C.&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=236-254&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00131640021970484&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E52192079%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474227966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ605954&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00131640021970484&rfr_iscdi=true |