Scheffe-Marascuilo Comparisons among Independent Binomial Samples

A large-sample technique attributable to Leonard Marascuilo, which is based on Henry Scheffe's well-known multiple comparison procedure, was programmed with the SAS System. The focus was on comparisons among independent binomial samples. As in Scheffe's "data snooping" analytic m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational and psychological measurement 1997-12, Vol.57 (6), p.1047-1051
Hauptverfasser: LeBlanc, William G., Williams, Richard H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1051
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1047
container_title Educational and psychological measurement
container_volume 57
creator LeBlanc, William G.
Williams, Richard H.
description A large-sample technique attributable to Leonard Marascuilo, which is based on Henry Scheffe's well-known multiple comparison procedure, was programmed with the SAS System. The focus was on comparisons among independent binomial samples. As in Scheffe's "data snooping" analytic method, the comparisons can be planned or post hoc, they can be simple or complex, and they need not be orthogonal, but none of them will be statistically significant unless the omnibus statistic, which in this case is chi-square rather than F, is statistically significant. This SAS program can be applied when thedesign is not balanced.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0013164497057006013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221521537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A252382953</galeid><ericid>EJ554832</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0013164497057006013</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A252382953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a469t-cdec354a1a2aa425e2bd7ededfdaa2610dade1ca8618879d3b9418e57162c6173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9vFCEUxSdGE9fqJ9CHifo6LZc_A_O4bqrWtOlD9XlyC3dWmhkYYffBb18m21RN1gKBwPkdbuBU1VtgpwBanzEGAlopO82UZqwt22fVCpTijTDGPK9WC9EsyMvqVc53rDQJsKrWN_YnDQM1V5gw270fY72J04zJ5xhyjVMM2_oiOJqpTGFXf_IhTh7H-ganeaT8unox4JjpzcN6Uv34fP5987W5vP5ysVlfNijbbtdYR1YoiYAcUXJF_NZpcuQGh8hbYA4dgUXTgjG6c-K2k2BIaWi5bUGLk-r94d45xV97yrv-Lu5TKCV7zkGVIRbow_8gkFpyMKIVf6gtjtT7MMRdQjv5bPs1V1wY3qmFao5QWwqUcIyBBl-O_-FPj_ClO5q8PWoQB4NNMedEQz8nP2H63QPrl1z7I7kW18eHJ5a8cBwSBuvzo5UzZYB3BXt3wCh5-6ief1NKGsGLzA5yxi399UlPFL4HcXC1SA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474218363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scheffe-Marascuilo Comparisons among Independent Binomial Samples</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>LeBlanc, William G. ; Williams, Richard H.</creator><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, William G. ; Williams, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><description>A large-sample technique attributable to Leonard Marascuilo, which is based on Henry Scheffe's well-known multiple comparison procedure, was programmed with the SAS System. The focus was on comparisons among independent binomial samples. As in Scheffe's "data snooping" analytic method, the comparisons can be planned or post hoc, they can be simple or complex, and they need not be orthogonal, but none of them will be statistically significant unless the omnibus statistic, which in this case is chi-square rather than F, is statistically significant. This SAS program can be applied when thedesign is not balanced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0013164497057006013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPMEAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Binomial distribution ; Binomials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer processing ; Computer Software ; Computers ; Educational evaluation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Measurement Techniques ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology ; Racial Composition ; Research Design ; Sample Size ; Sampling ; Statistical Analysis ; Statistical Analysis System ; Statistical methods ; Statistical Significance ; Statistical software ; Statistics. Mathematics ; Test Items ; Test methods</subject><ispartof>Educational and psychological measurement, 1997-12, Vol.57 (6), p.1047-1051</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Dec 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a469t-cdec354a1a2aa425e2bd7ededfdaa2610dade1ca8618879d3b9418e57162c6173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0013164497057006013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013164497057006013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27869,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ554832$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2058129$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, William G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><title>Scheffe-Marascuilo Comparisons among Independent Binomial Samples</title><title>Educational and psychological measurement</title><description>A large-sample technique attributable to Leonard Marascuilo, which is based on Henry Scheffe's well-known multiple comparison procedure, was programmed with the SAS System. The focus was on comparisons among independent binomial samples. As in Scheffe's "data snooping" analytic method, the comparisons can be planned or post hoc, they can be simple or complex, and they need not be orthogonal, but none of them will be statistically significant unless the omnibus statistic, which in this case is chi-square rather than F, is statistically significant. This SAS program can be applied when thedesign is not balanced.</description><subject>Binomial distribution</subject><subject>Binomials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer processing</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</subject><subject>Racial Composition</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis System</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Statistical software</subject><subject>Statistics. Mathematics</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><issn>0013-1644</issn><issn>1552-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9vFCEUxSdGE9fqJ9CHifo6LZc_A_O4bqrWtOlD9XlyC3dWmhkYYffBb18m21RN1gKBwPkdbuBU1VtgpwBanzEGAlopO82UZqwt22fVCpTijTDGPK9WC9EsyMvqVc53rDQJsKrWN_YnDQM1V5gw270fY72J04zJ5xhyjVMM2_oiOJqpTGFXf_IhTh7H-ganeaT8unox4JjpzcN6Uv34fP5987W5vP5ysVlfNijbbtdYR1YoiYAcUXJF_NZpcuQGh8hbYA4dgUXTgjG6c-K2k2BIaWi5bUGLk-r94d45xV97yrv-Lu5TKCV7zkGVIRbow_8gkFpyMKIVf6gtjtT7MMRdQjv5bPs1V1wY3qmFao5QWwqUcIyBBl-O_-FPj_ClO5q8PWoQB4NNMedEQz8nP2H63QPrl1z7I7kW18eHJ5a8cBwSBuvzo5UzZYB3BXt3wCh5-6ief1NKGsGLzA5yxi399UlPFL4HcXC1SA</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>LeBlanc, William G.</creator><creator>Williams, Richard H.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Educational and Psychological Measurement, etc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Scheffe-Marascuilo Comparisons among Independent Binomial Samples</title><author>LeBlanc, William G. ; Williams, Richard H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a469t-cdec354a1a2aa425e2bd7ededfdaa2610dade1ca8618879d3b9418e57162c6173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Binomial distribution</topic><topic>Binomials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer processing</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</topic><topic>Racial Composition</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis System</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Statistical software</topic><topic>Statistics. Mathematics</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LeBlanc, William G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LeBlanc, William G.</au><au>Williams, Richard H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ554832</ericid><atitle>Scheffe-Marascuilo Comparisons among Independent Binomial Samples</atitle><jtitle>Educational and psychological measurement</jtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1051</epage><pages>1047-1051</pages><issn>0013-1644</issn><eissn>1552-3888</eissn><coden>EPMEAJ</coden><abstract>A large-sample technique attributable to Leonard Marascuilo, which is based on Henry Scheffe's well-known multiple comparison procedure, was programmed with the SAS System. The focus was on comparisons among independent binomial samples. As in Scheffe's "data snooping" analytic method, the comparisons can be planned or post hoc, they can be simple or complex, and they need not be orthogonal, but none of them will be statistically significant unless the omnibus statistic, which in this case is chi-square rather than F, is statistically significant. This SAS program can be applied when thedesign is not balanced.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0013164497057006013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-1644
ispartof Educational and psychological measurement, 1997-12, Vol.57 (6), p.1047-1051
issn 0013-1644
1552-3888
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_221521537
source Access via SAGE; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Binomial distribution
Binomials
Biological and medical sciences
Comparative Analysis
Computer processing
Computer Software
Computers
Educational evaluation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Measurement Techniques
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology
Racial Composition
Research Design
Sample Size
Sampling
Statistical Analysis
Statistical Analysis System
Statistical methods
Statistical Significance
Statistical software
Statistics. Mathematics
Test Items
Test methods
title Scheffe-Marascuilo Comparisons among Independent Binomial Samples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A37%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scheffe-Marascuilo%20Comparisons%20among%20Independent%20Binomial%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Educational%20and%20psychological%20measurement&rft.au=LeBlanc,%20William%20G.&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1051&rft.pages=1047-1051&rft.issn=0013-1644&rft.eissn=1552-3888&rft.coden=EPMEAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0013164497057006013&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA252382953%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474218363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A252382953&rft_ericid=EJ554832&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0013164497057006013&rfr_iscdi=true