Efficacy of Acetic Acid or Chitosan for Reducing the Prevalence of Salmonella- and Escherichia coli O157:H7–Contaminated Leafy Green Plants in Field Systems
Outbreaks associated with fresh-cut leafy greens continue to occur despite efforts to implement horticultural practices that minimize introduction of enteric pathogens to the crop. The experimental trials in this study were designed to examine the efficacy of an acetic acid (AA)- and chitosan-based...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food protection 2019-05, Vol.82 (5), p.854-861 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 861 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 854 |
container_title | Journal of food protection |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Erickson, Marilyn C Liao, Jye-Yin Payton, Alison S Cook, Peter W Adhikari, Koushik Wang, Shangci Bautista, Jesus Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz |
description | Outbreaks associated with fresh-cut leafy greens continue to occur despite efforts to implement horticultural practices that minimize introduction of enteric pathogens to the crop. The experimental trials in this study were designed to examine the efficacy of an acetic acid (AA)- and chitosan-based spray treatment, applied 1 day prior to harvest, for reducing the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (O157) and Salmonella in field-grown leafy greens contaminated at levels detectable only through enrichment culture. Responses to the treatment solution were variable and depended on the type of leafy green (leafy lettuce, spinach, or cabbage), cultivar, pathogen, and AA concentration (0.3 to 0.7%). No significant differences in E. coli O157 prevalence were found for untreated and treated cabbage heads and spinach plants (P > 0.05). In contrast, treatment significantly affected Salmonella on 'Bravo F1 ' green cabbage and '7-Green' spinach (P < 0.05), with odds ratios of 2.2 and 3.3 for finding the pathogen on untreated versus treated greens, respectively. Salmonella was also 7.1 times more likely to be found on an untreated lettuce plant than on a lettuce plant sprayed with a 0.7% AA treatment solution (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 12.2; P < 0.0001). In studies addressing the efficacy of chitosan (0.1 or 0.3%), this chemical failed to reduce the prevalence of either pathogen on lettuce (P > 0.05). Similarly, spraying with 0.3% AA did not affect the prevalence of Salmonella on lettuce plants (P > 0.05); however, treatment solutions with 0.4% AA reduced the likelihood of detecting Salmonella in treated versus untreated plants by 6.6 times (95% CI, 2.1 to 20.9; P ¼ 0.0007). After the lettuce was harvested and hand washed, consumers failed to distinguish either visually or organoleptically between untreated lettuce and lettuce sprayed with an acetic acid solution (P > 0.05). These results indicate that acetic acid could be used to reduce the microbiological risk of preharvest leafy greens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4315/0362-028XJFP-18-347 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2214926012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2214926012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22149260123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj81KxDAUhYMoWH-ewM0F19Ek7Uyn7qS0DiJYHBfuhpDe2gxpokkqdOc7uPfhfBIriGtXH4fzncUh5Iyziyzli0uWLgVlYvV0WzeUr2ia5Xsk4UWW0YIV-T5J_oxDchTCjjEmCrFMyGfVdVpJNYHr4Fph1GqGbsF5KHsdXZAWujk8YDsqbZ8h9giNxzdp0Cr8mW2kGZxFYyQFaVuogurRa9VrCcoZDfd8kV-t86_3j9LZKAdtZcQW7lB2E9x4RAuNkTYG0BZqjaaFzRQiDuGEHHTSBDz95TE5r6vHck1fvHsdMcTtzo3eztVWCJ7NlxgX6f-sb1ggYW4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2214926012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Acetic Acid or Chitosan for Reducing the Prevalence of Salmonella- and Escherichia coli O157:H7–Contaminated Leafy Green Plants in Field Systems</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Erickson, Marilyn C ; Liao, Jye-Yin ; Payton, Alison S ; Cook, Peter W ; Adhikari, Koushik ; Wang, Shangci ; Bautista, Jesus ; Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</creator><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Marilyn C ; Liao, Jye-Yin ; Payton, Alison S ; Cook, Peter W ; Adhikari, Koushik ; Wang, Shangci ; Bautista, Jesus ; Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</creatorcontrib><description>Outbreaks associated with fresh-cut leafy greens continue to occur despite efforts to implement horticultural practices that minimize introduction of enteric pathogens to the crop. The experimental trials in this study were designed to examine the efficacy of an acetic acid (AA)- and chitosan-based spray treatment, applied 1 day prior to harvest, for reducing the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (O157) and Salmonella in field-grown leafy greens contaminated at levels detectable only through enrichment culture. Responses to the treatment solution were variable and depended on the type of leafy green (leafy lettuce, spinach, or cabbage), cultivar, pathogen, and AA concentration (0.3 to 0.7%). No significant differences in E. coli O157 prevalence were found for untreated and treated cabbage heads and spinach plants (P > 0.05). In contrast, treatment significantly affected Salmonella on 'Bravo F1 ' green cabbage and '7-Green' spinach (P < 0.05), with odds ratios of 2.2 and 3.3 for finding the pathogen on untreated versus treated greens, respectively. Salmonella was also 7.1 times more likely to be found on an untreated lettuce plant than on a lettuce plant sprayed with a 0.7% AA treatment solution (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 12.2; P < 0.0001). In studies addressing the efficacy of chitosan (0.1 or 0.3%), this chemical failed to reduce the prevalence of either pathogen on lettuce (P > 0.05). Similarly, spraying with 0.3% AA did not affect the prevalence of Salmonella on lettuce plants (P > 0.05); however, treatment solutions with 0.4% AA reduced the likelihood of detecting Salmonella in treated versus untreated plants by 6.6 times (95% CI, 2.1 to 20.9; P ¼ 0.0007). After the lettuce was harvested and hand washed, consumers failed to distinguish either visually or organoleptically between untreated lettuce and lettuce sprayed with an acetic acid solution (P > 0.05). These results indicate that acetic acid could be used to reduce the microbiological risk of preharvest leafy greens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028XJFP-18-347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Acids ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteria ; Brassica oleracea ; Chitosan ; Confidence intervals ; Cultivars ; E coli ; Effectiveness ; Epidemics ; Escherichia coli ; Flowers & plants ; Food contamination & poisoning ; Food safety ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Herbicides ; Horticulture ; Intervention ; Lettuce ; Organic chemistry ; Outbreaks ; Pathogens ; Precipitation ; Prevention ; Product development ; Salmonella ; Seeds ; Spinach ; Spinacia ; Spraying ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2019-05, Vol.82 (5), p.854-861</ispartof><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services May 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2214926012?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Marilyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Jye-Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Alison S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Koushik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shangci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautista, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Acetic Acid or Chitosan for Reducing the Prevalence of Salmonella- and Escherichia coli O157:H7–Contaminated Leafy Green Plants in Field Systems</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><description>Outbreaks associated with fresh-cut leafy greens continue to occur despite efforts to implement horticultural practices that minimize introduction of enteric pathogens to the crop. The experimental trials in this study were designed to examine the efficacy of an acetic acid (AA)- and chitosan-based spray treatment, applied 1 day prior to harvest, for reducing the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (O157) and Salmonella in field-grown leafy greens contaminated at levels detectable only through enrichment culture. Responses to the treatment solution were variable and depended on the type of leafy green (leafy lettuce, spinach, or cabbage), cultivar, pathogen, and AA concentration (0.3 to 0.7%). No significant differences in E. coli O157 prevalence were found for untreated and treated cabbage heads and spinach plants (P > 0.05). In contrast, treatment significantly affected Salmonella on 'Bravo F1 ' green cabbage and '7-Green' spinach (P < 0.05), with odds ratios of 2.2 and 3.3 for finding the pathogen on untreated versus treated greens, respectively. Salmonella was also 7.1 times more likely to be found on an untreated lettuce plant than on a lettuce plant sprayed with a 0.7% AA treatment solution (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 12.2; P < 0.0001). In studies addressing the efficacy of chitosan (0.1 or 0.3%), this chemical failed to reduce the prevalence of either pathogen on lettuce (P > 0.05). Similarly, spraying with 0.3% AA did not affect the prevalence of Salmonella on lettuce plants (P > 0.05); however, treatment solutions with 0.4% AA reduced the likelihood of detecting Salmonella in treated versus untreated plants by 6.6 times (95% CI, 2.1 to 20.9; P ¼ 0.0007). After the lettuce was harvested and hand washed, consumers failed to distinguish either visually or organoleptically between untreated lettuce and lettuce sprayed with an acetic acid solution (P > 0.05). These results indicate that acetic acid could be used to reduce the microbiological risk of preharvest leafy greens.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Brassica oleracea</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lettuce</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Spinach</subject><subject>Spinacia</subject><subject>Spraying</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj81KxDAUhYMoWH-ewM0F19Ek7Uyn7qS0DiJYHBfuhpDe2gxpokkqdOc7uPfhfBIriGtXH4fzncUh5Iyziyzli0uWLgVlYvV0WzeUr2ia5Xsk4UWW0YIV-T5J_oxDchTCjjEmCrFMyGfVdVpJNYHr4Fph1GqGbsF5KHsdXZAWujk8YDsqbZ8h9giNxzdp0Cr8mW2kGZxFYyQFaVuogurRa9VrCcoZDfd8kV-t86_3j9LZKAdtZcQW7lB2E9x4RAuNkTYG0BZqjaaFzRQiDuGEHHTSBDz95TE5r6vHck1fvHsdMcTtzo3eztVWCJ7NlxgX6f-sb1ggYW4</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Erickson, Marilyn C</creator><creator>Liao, Jye-Yin</creator><creator>Payton, Alison S</creator><creator>Cook, Peter W</creator><creator>Adhikari, Koushik</creator><creator>Wang, Shangci</creator><creator>Bautista, Jesus</creator><creator>Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Acetic Acid or Chitosan for Reducing the Prevalence of Salmonella- and Escherichia coli O157:H7–Contaminated Leafy Green Plants in Field Systems</title><author>Erickson, Marilyn C ; Liao, Jye-Yin ; Payton, Alison S ; Cook, Peter W ; Adhikari, Koushik ; Wang, Shangci ; Bautista, Jesus ; Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22149260123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Brassica oleracea</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lettuce</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Spinach</topic><topic>Spinacia</topic><topic>Spraying</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Marilyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Jye-Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Alison S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adhikari, Koushik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shangci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautista, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erickson, Marilyn C</au><au>Liao, Jye-Yin</au><au>Payton, Alison S</au><au>Cook, Peter W</au><au>Adhikari, Koushik</au><au>Wang, Shangci</au><au>Bautista, Jesus</au><au>Pérez, Juan Carlos Díaz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Acetic Acid or Chitosan for Reducing the Prevalence of Salmonella- and Escherichia coli O157:H7–Contaminated Leafy Green Plants in Field Systems</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>854</spage><epage>861</epage><pages>854-861</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><abstract>Outbreaks associated with fresh-cut leafy greens continue to occur despite efforts to implement horticultural practices that minimize introduction of enteric pathogens to the crop. The experimental trials in this study were designed to examine the efficacy of an acetic acid (AA)- and chitosan-based spray treatment, applied 1 day prior to harvest, for reducing the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (O157) and Salmonella in field-grown leafy greens contaminated at levels detectable only through enrichment culture. Responses to the treatment solution were variable and depended on the type of leafy green (leafy lettuce, spinach, or cabbage), cultivar, pathogen, and AA concentration (0.3 to 0.7%). No significant differences in E. coli O157 prevalence were found for untreated and treated cabbage heads and spinach plants (P > 0.05). In contrast, treatment significantly affected Salmonella on 'Bravo F1 ' green cabbage and '7-Green' spinach (P < 0.05), with odds ratios of 2.2 and 3.3 for finding the pathogen on untreated versus treated greens, respectively. Salmonella was also 7.1 times more likely to be found on an untreated lettuce plant than on a lettuce plant sprayed with a 0.7% AA treatment solution (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 12.2; P < 0.0001). In studies addressing the efficacy of chitosan (0.1 or 0.3%), this chemical failed to reduce the prevalence of either pathogen on lettuce (P > 0.05). Similarly, spraying with 0.3% AA did not affect the prevalence of Salmonella on lettuce plants (P > 0.05); however, treatment solutions with 0.4% AA reduced the likelihood of detecting Salmonella in treated versus untreated plants by 6.6 times (95% CI, 2.1 to 20.9; P ¼ 0.0007). After the lettuce was harvested and hand washed, consumers failed to distinguish either visually or organoleptically between untreated lettuce and lettuce sprayed with an acetic acid solution (P > 0.05). These results indicate that acetic acid could be used to reduce the microbiological risk of preharvest leafy greens.</abstract><cop>Des Moines</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.4315/0362-028XJFP-18-347</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2019-05, Vol.82 (5), p.854-861 |
issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2214926012 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acetic acid Acids Antimicrobial agents Bacteria Brassica oleracea Chitosan Confidence intervals Cultivars E coli Effectiveness Epidemics Escherichia coli Flowers & plants Food contamination & poisoning Food safety Harvest Harvesting Herbicides Horticulture Intervention Lettuce Organic chemistry Outbreaks Pathogens Precipitation Prevention Product development Salmonella Seeds Spinach Spinacia Spraying Vegetables |
title | Efficacy of Acetic Acid or Chitosan for Reducing the Prevalence of Salmonella- and Escherichia coli O157:H7–Contaminated Leafy Green Plants in Field Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Acetic%20Acid%20or%20Chitosan%20for%20Reducing%20the%20Prevalence%20of%20Salmonella-%20and%20Escherichia%20coli%20O157:H7%E2%80%93Contaminated%20Leafy%20Green%20Plants%20in%20Field%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Erickson,%20Marilyn%20C&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=854&rft.epage=861&rft.pages=854-861&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028XJFP-18-347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2214926012%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2214926012&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |