Effects of Habitat Patch Shape on Population Dynamics of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)
The geometry of habitat patches may affect population dynamics due to differences in edge-to-area ratios for patches of different sizes and shapes. We conducted a field experiment replicated over 2 years employing four square (40 by 40 m) and four rectangular (16 by 100 m) habitat patches of equal s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mammalogy 1993-11, Vol.74 (4), p.1045-1055 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1055 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1045 |
container_title | Journal of mammalogy |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Harper, Steven J. Bollinger, Eric K. Barrett, Gary W. |
description | The geometry of habitat patches may affect population dynamics due to differences in edge-to-area ratios for patches of different sizes and shapes. We conducted a field experiment replicated over 2 years employing four square (40 by 40 m) and four rectangular (16 by 100 m) habitat patches of equal size (1,600 m2) to determine the effects of contrasting shapes of habitat patches on population dynamics of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). We tested the predictions that dispersal rates would be higher, home ranges larger, and population densities lower in rectangular patches compared to square patches. The number of dispersers, but not dispersal rates, was greater in rectangular patches than in square patches only when densities of voles were low. Home ranges were of equal area but different shape in the contrasting shapes of patches. Population density, recruitment, body mass of dispersers, body mass of residents, survival, and age structure were largely unaffected by differences in patch shape. Thus, plasticity of behavior (e. g., changes in shape of home range) appears to have prevented differences in population dynamics between the two patch shapes. We conclude that patch shape does not markedly affect the population dynamics of the meadow vole, and that this species appears to be an edge-tolerant species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1382443 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221457975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1382443</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1382443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4fa12aa2a74b848462a7fcf748680738e3bd9b4311c69f760aa19930191bd9493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKf4LwQR1IdqvtqkjzKnEzYc-PFabrOEdXRNTVJl_73VDX3y5d4D98e5h4PQKSXXjBN5Q7liQvA9NKCpSJN-sH00IISxhHHJDtFRCCtCSCoZGaBibK3RMWBn8QTKKkLEc4h6iZ-X0BrsGjx3bVdDrHp5t2lgXekfemZg4T7xm6tNwJezSnsXu4Bb0zRhU39AU-kuXB2jAwt1MCe7PUSv9-OX0SSZPj08jm6niRaEx0RYoAyAgRSlEkpkvbLaSqEyRSRXhpeLvBScUp3lVmYEgOY5JzSn_UHkfIjOtr6td--dCbFYuc43_cuCMSpSmcu0hy62UJ81BG9s0fpqDX5TUFJ8l1fsyuvJ850dBA219dDoKvziXJGUCPWHrUJ0_l-3L5Bvd1I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221457975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Habitat Patch Shape on Population Dynamics of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Harper, Steven J. ; Bollinger, Eric K. ; Barrett, Gary W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harper, Steven J. ; Bollinger, Eric K. ; Barrett, Gary W.</creatorcontrib><description>The geometry of habitat patches may affect population dynamics due to differences in edge-to-area ratios for patches of different sizes and shapes. We conducted a field experiment replicated over 2 years employing four square (40 by 40 m) and four rectangular (16 by 100 m) habitat patches of equal size (1,600 m2) to determine the effects of contrasting shapes of habitat patches on population dynamics of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). We tested the predictions that dispersal rates would be higher, home ranges larger, and population densities lower in rectangular patches compared to square patches. The number of dispersers, but not dispersal rates, was greater in rectangular patches than in square patches only when densities of voles were low. Home ranges were of equal area but different shape in the contrasting shapes of patches. Population density, recruitment, body mass of dispersers, body mass of residents, survival, and age structure were largely unaffected by differences in patch shape. Thus, plasticity of behavior (e. g., changes in shape of home range) appears to have prevented differences in population dynamics between the two patch shapes. We conclude that patch shape does not markedly affect the population dynamics of the meadow vole, and that this species appears to be an edge-tolerant species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1382443</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMAAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provo, UT: American Society of Mammalogists</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation biology ; Demecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geometric shapes ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat corridors ; Habitats ; Mammalia ; Mammalogy ; Meadows ; Population density ; Population dynamics ; Population ecology ; Rodents ; Vertebrata ; Voles</subject><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 1993-11, Vol.74 (4), p.1045-1055</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 The American Society of Mammalogists</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Mammalogists Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4fa12aa2a74b848462a7fcf748680738e3bd9b4311c69f760aa19930191bd9493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1382443$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1382443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3805048$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harper, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollinger, Eric K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Gary W.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Habitat Patch Shape on Population Dynamics of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>The geometry of habitat patches may affect population dynamics due to differences in edge-to-area ratios for patches of different sizes and shapes. We conducted a field experiment replicated over 2 years employing four square (40 by 40 m) and four rectangular (16 by 100 m) habitat patches of equal size (1,600 m2) to determine the effects of contrasting shapes of habitat patches on population dynamics of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). We tested the predictions that dispersal rates would be higher, home ranges larger, and population densities lower in rectangular patches compared to square patches. The number of dispersers, but not dispersal rates, was greater in rectangular patches than in square patches only when densities of voles were low. Home ranges were of equal area but different shape in the contrasting shapes of patches. Population density, recruitment, body mass of dispersers, body mass of residents, survival, and age structure were largely unaffected by differences in patch shape. Thus, plasticity of behavior (e. g., changes in shape of home range) appears to have prevented differences in population dynamics between the two patch shapes. We conclude that patch shape does not markedly affect the population dynamics of the meadow vole, and that this species appears to be an edge-tolerant species.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geometric shapes</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat corridors</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammalogy</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Voles</subject><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><issn>0022-2372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKf4LwQR1IdqvtqkjzKnEzYc-PFabrOEdXRNTVJl_73VDX3y5d4D98e5h4PQKSXXjBN5Q7liQvA9NKCpSJN-sH00IISxhHHJDtFRCCtCSCoZGaBibK3RMWBn8QTKKkLEc4h6iZ-X0BrsGjx3bVdDrHp5t2lgXekfemZg4T7xm6tNwJezSnsXu4Bb0zRhU39AU-kuXB2jAwt1MCe7PUSv9-OX0SSZPj08jm6niRaEx0RYoAyAgRSlEkpkvbLaSqEyRSRXhpeLvBScUp3lVmYEgOY5JzSn_UHkfIjOtr6td--dCbFYuc43_cuCMSpSmcu0hy62UJ81BG9s0fpqDX5TUFJ8l1fsyuvJ850dBA219dDoKvziXJGUCPWHrUJ0_l-3L5Bvd1I</recordid><startdate>19931101</startdate><enddate>19931101</enddate><creator>Harper, Steven J.</creator><creator>Bollinger, Eric K.</creator><creator>Barrett, Gary W.</creator><general>American Society of Mammalogists</general><general>Brigham Young University, Department of Zoology</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931101</creationdate><title>Effects of Habitat Patch Shape on Population Dynamics of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)</title><author>Harper, Steven J. ; Bollinger, Eric K. ; Barrett, Gary W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4fa12aa2a74b848462a7fcf748680738e3bd9b4311c69f760aa19930191bd9493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geometric shapes</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat corridors</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammalogy</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Voles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harper, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollinger, Eric K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Gary W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harper, Steven J.</au><au>Bollinger, Eric K.</au><au>Barrett, Gary W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Habitat Patch Shape on Population Dynamics of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>1993-11-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1055</epage><pages>1045-1055</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><eissn>0022-2372</eissn><coden>JOMAAL</coden><abstract>The geometry of habitat patches may affect population dynamics due to differences in edge-to-area ratios for patches of different sizes and shapes. We conducted a field experiment replicated over 2 years employing four square (40 by 40 m) and four rectangular (16 by 100 m) habitat patches of equal size (1,600 m2) to determine the effects of contrasting shapes of habitat patches on population dynamics of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). We tested the predictions that dispersal rates would be higher, home ranges larger, and population densities lower in rectangular patches compared to square patches. The number of dispersers, but not dispersal rates, was greater in rectangular patches than in square patches only when densities of voles were low. Home ranges were of equal area but different shape in the contrasting shapes of patches. Population density, recruitment, body mass of dispersers, body mass of residents, survival, and age structure were largely unaffected by differences in patch shape. Thus, plasticity of behavior (e. g., changes in shape of home range) appears to have prevented differences in population dynamics between the two patch shapes. We conclude that patch shape does not markedly affect the population dynamics of the meadow vole, and that this species appears to be an edge-tolerant species.</abstract><cop>Provo, UT</cop><pub>American Society of Mammalogists</pub><doi>10.2307/1382443</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2372 |
ispartof | Journal of mammalogy, 1993-11, Vol.74 (4), p.1045-1055 |
issn | 0022-2372 1545-1542 1545-1542 0022-2372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_221457975 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal behavior Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biological and medical sciences Conservation biology Demecology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geometric shapes Habitat conservation Habitat corridors Habitats Mammalia Mammalogy Meadows Population density Population dynamics Population ecology Rodents Vertebrata Voles |
title | Effects of Habitat Patch Shape on Population Dynamics of Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A22%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Habitat%20Patch%20Shape%20on%20Population%20Dynamics%20of%20Meadow%20Voles%20(Microtus%20pennsylvanicus)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Harper,%20Steven%20J.&rft.date=1993-11-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1055&rft.pages=1045-1055&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft.coden=JOMAAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1382443&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1382443%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221457975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1382443&rfr_iscdi=true |