Resource geography II: What makes resources political?
What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in human geography 2019-06, Vol.43 (3), p.553-564 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 564 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Progress in human geography |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Huber, Matt |
description | What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0309132518768604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2213832729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0309132518768604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2213832729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgOeV2f2M_EiUvwoFARRPIbNZpK2pibupof-9ya0IAieZuD93pvhMXaJcI1o7Q1IyFAKjak1qQF1xCaorOUg0vSYTUaZj_opO4txDQDaCj1h5pViuw2ekpraOrhuuUvm89vkY-n6ZOM-KSbhQMSka5tVv_KuuTtnJ5VrIl0c5pS9Pz68zZ754uVpPrtfcC819lyBgrRSJRqndSm9zYwg5YettACmKqRDNKX1mhSVBNIXFZQio0JrRAdyyq72uV1ov7cU-3w9_PI1nMyFQJlKYUU2ULCnfGhjDFTlXVhtXNjlCPnYTv63ncHC95boavoN_Zf_AXEwYqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213832729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Huber, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Huber, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309132518768604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access control ; Elections ; Geography ; Human geography ; Meaning ; Nation states ; Political power ; Politics ; Resources ; State power ; Statehood ; Territoriality</subject><ispartof>Progress in human geography, 2019-06, Vol.43 (3), p.553-564</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309132518768604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132518768604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huber, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</title><title>Progress in human geography</title><description>What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>Statehood</subject><subject>Territoriality</subject><issn>0309-1325</issn><issn>1477-0288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgOeV2f2M_EiUvwoFARRPIbNZpK2pibupof-9ya0IAieZuD93pvhMXaJcI1o7Q1IyFAKjak1qQF1xCaorOUg0vSYTUaZj_opO4txDQDaCj1h5pViuw2ekpraOrhuuUvm89vkY-n6ZOM-KSbhQMSka5tVv_KuuTtnJ5VrIl0c5pS9Pz68zZ754uVpPrtfcC819lyBgrRSJRqndSm9zYwg5YettACmKqRDNKX1mhSVBNIXFZQio0JrRAdyyq72uV1ov7cU-3w9_PI1nMyFQJlKYUU2ULCnfGhjDFTlXVhtXNjlCPnYTv63ncHC95boavoN_Zf_AXEwYqg</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Huber, Matt</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</title><author>Huber, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>Statehood</topic><topic>Territoriality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huber, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huber, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</atitle><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>553-564</pages><issn>0309-1325</issn><eissn>1477-0288</eissn><abstract>What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0309132518768604</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1325 |
ispartof | Progress in human geography, 2019-06, Vol.43 (3), p.553-564 |
issn | 0309-1325 1477-0288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2213832729 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Access control Elections Geography Human geography Meaning Nation states Political power Politics Resources State power Statehood Territoriality |
title | Resource geography II: What makes resources political? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource%20geography%20II:%20What%20makes%20resources%20political?&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=Huber,%20Matt&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=553-564&rft.issn=0309-1325&rft.eissn=1477-0288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309132518768604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2213832729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213832729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0309132518768604&rfr_iscdi=true |