Resource geography II: What makes resources political?

What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in human geography 2019-06, Vol.43 (3), p.553-564
1. Verfasser: Huber, Matt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 564
container_issue 3
container_start_page 553
container_title Progress in human geography
container_volume 43
creator Huber, Matt
description What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0309132518768604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2213832729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0309132518768604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2213832729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgOeV2f2M_EiUvwoFARRPIbNZpK2pibupof-9ya0IAieZuD93pvhMXaJcI1o7Q1IyFAKjak1qQF1xCaorOUg0vSYTUaZj_opO4txDQDaCj1h5pViuw2ekpraOrhuuUvm89vkY-n6ZOM-KSbhQMSka5tVv_KuuTtnJ5VrIl0c5pS9Pz68zZ754uVpPrtfcC819lyBgrRSJRqndSm9zYwg5YettACmKqRDNKX1mhSVBNIXFZQio0JrRAdyyq72uV1ov7cU-3w9_PI1nMyFQJlKYUU2ULCnfGhjDFTlXVhtXNjlCPnYTv63ncHC95boavoN_Zf_AXEwYqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213832729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Huber, Matt</creator><creatorcontrib>Huber, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309132518768604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access control ; Elections ; Geography ; Human geography ; Meaning ; Nation states ; Political power ; Politics ; Resources ; State power ; Statehood ; Territoriality</subject><ispartof>Progress in human geography, 2019-06, Vol.43 (3), p.553-564</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309132518768604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132518768604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huber, Matt</creatorcontrib><title>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</title><title>Progress in human geography</title><description>What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>Statehood</subject><subject>Territoriality</subject><issn>0309-1325</issn><issn>1477-0288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgOeV2f2M_EiUvwoFARRPIbNZpK2pibupof-9ya0IAieZuD93pvhMXaJcI1o7Q1IyFAKjak1qQF1xCaorOUg0vSYTUaZj_opO4txDQDaCj1h5pViuw2ekpraOrhuuUvm89vkY-n6ZOM-KSbhQMSka5tVv_KuuTtnJ5VrIl0c5pS9Pz68zZ754uVpPrtfcC819lyBgrRSJRqndSm9zYwg5YettACmKqRDNKX1mhSVBNIXFZQio0JrRAdyyq72uV1ov7cU-3w9_PI1nMyFQJlKYUU2ULCnfGhjDFTlXVhtXNjlCPnYTv63ncHC95boavoN_Zf_AXEwYqg</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Huber, Matt</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</title><author>Huber, Matt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-40408f4d16a55d3c7962e4cd3cd7006fb3a116d7c5e4ede03cbf0d29eb5511a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>Statehood</topic><topic>Territoriality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huber, Matt</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huber, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource geography II: What makes resources political?</atitle><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>553-564</pages><issn>0309-1325</issn><eissn>1477-0288</eissn><abstract>What makes resources political? We often imagine that politics is something done to resources (i.e. larger contestations over access to and control over resources). In this second “progress report”, I question whether resource politics is simply about fighting over stuff. How does the materiality of resources themselves shape broader conceptions of “the political” in general? I highlight the role of resources in shaping three central meanings of the political or politics. First, the commonsense ideology of politics as electoral contests over political power. Second, the state – as the sphere of “the political” – is constructed as a geographical entity based on a specific form of territoriality. Third, the nation-state reflects a complex political duality: both an institutional state apparatus and a cultural imaginary of shared nationhood. I conclude with some thoughts on the need to expand the terrain of the political in resource geography.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0309132518768604</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1325
ispartof Progress in human geography, 2019-06, Vol.43 (3), p.553-564
issn 0309-1325
1477-0288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2213832729
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access control
Elections
Geography
Human geography
Meaning
Nation states
Political power
Politics
Resources
State power
Statehood
Territoriality
title Resource geography II: What makes resources political?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource%20geography%20II:%20What%20makes%20resources%20political?&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=Huber,%20Matt&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=553-564&rft.issn=0309-1325&rft.eissn=1477-0288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309132518768604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2213832729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213832729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0309132518768604&rfr_iscdi=true