Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars
Organisational ambidexterity is an important topic in management research having grown meteorically over the past 17 years. Yet, very few studies in marketing examine organisational ambidexterity. Where studies do exist, seldom do they do justice to its theoretical richness and complexity. This comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marketing management 2018-01, Vol.34 (1-2), p.178-229 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 178 |
container_title | Journal of marketing management |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Hughes, Mathew |
description | Organisational ambidexterity is an important topic in management research having grown meteorically over the past 17 years. Yet, very few studies in marketing examine organisational ambidexterity. Where studies do exist, seldom do they do justice to its theoretical richness and complexity. This complexity is a significant hurdle for scholars and managers alike, but theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity can benefit substantively from the input of scholars outside the realm of management. This paper provides scholars and managers with a detailed analyses, documentary and corpus of reference material documenting the development, definition, theoretical assumptions and conceptual treatment, measurement and empirical findings to do with organisational ambidexterity. Drawing on this detailed analysis, the paper identifies the burning research questions marketing scholars should give urgent attention to advance theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2213818307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2213818307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-9826b022e28dbd3c8cd9de471b13915adfd9d7a586a33265a3687ca78508f6e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43ZmTNB_1ToZfMNiNgnfhNEm3zrWdSQfu39u6eXU48LznvDyE3AKbATPsnnGludSfM87AzCDPAbQ8IxPINc9AaHVOJiOTjdAluUppwxiHQuoJ8cu4wrZO2Nddi1uKTVn78NOHWPcHiq2nVR0bugux6mKDrQsPtNzHtm5XNIYUMLo1_d6HNOYTHSDaYPwK_Qgkt-62GNM1uahwm8LNaU7Jx_PT-_w1Wyxf3uaPi8zlwPusMFyVjPPAjS-9cMb5wodcQwmiAIm-GnaN0igUgiuJQhntUBvJTKUCiCm5O97dxe6vk910Q9fhpeUchAEjmB4oeaRc7FKKobK7WA-lDxaYHYXaf6F2FGpPQsUvkkdqww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213818307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hughes, Mathew</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Mathew</creatorcontrib><description>Organisational ambidexterity is an important topic in management research having grown meteorically over the past 17 years. Yet, very few studies in marketing examine organisational ambidexterity. Where studies do exist, seldom do they do justice to its theoretical richness and complexity. This complexity is a significant hurdle for scholars and managers alike, but theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity can benefit substantively from the input of scholars outside the realm of management. This paper provides scholars and managers with a detailed analyses, documentary and corpus of reference material documenting the development, definition, theoretical assumptions and conceptual treatment, measurement and empirical findings to do with organisational ambidexterity. Drawing on this detailed analysis, the paper identifies the burning research questions marketing scholars should give urgent attention to advance theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-257X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-1376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Helensburg: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Handedness ; Marketing ; Measurement ; Organizational performance</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing management, 2018-01, Vol.34 (1-2), p.178-229</ispartof><rights>2018 Westburn Publishers Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-9826b022e28dbd3c8cd9de471b13915adfd9d7a586a33265a3687ca78508f6e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-9826b022e28dbd3c8cd9de471b13915adfd9d7a586a33265a3687ca78508f6e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6859-558X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Mathew</creatorcontrib><title>Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars</title><title>Journal of marketing management</title><description>Organisational ambidexterity is an important topic in management research having grown meteorically over the past 17 years. Yet, very few studies in marketing examine organisational ambidexterity. Where studies do exist, seldom do they do justice to its theoretical richness and complexity. This complexity is a significant hurdle for scholars and managers alike, but theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity can benefit substantively from the input of scholars outside the realm of management. This paper provides scholars and managers with a detailed analyses, documentary and corpus of reference material documenting the development, definition, theoretical assumptions and conceptual treatment, measurement and empirical findings to do with organisational ambidexterity. Drawing on this detailed analysis, the paper identifies the burning research questions marketing scholars should give urgent attention to advance theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity.</description><subject>Handedness</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Organizational performance</subject><issn>0267-257X</issn><issn>1472-1376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QQh43ZmTNB_1ToZfMNiNgnfhNEm3zrWdSQfu39u6eXU48LznvDyE3AKbATPsnnGludSfM87AzCDPAbQ8IxPINc9AaHVOJiOTjdAluUppwxiHQuoJ8cu4wrZO2Nddi1uKTVn78NOHWPcHiq2nVR0bugux6mKDrQsPtNzHtm5XNIYUMLo1_d6HNOYTHSDaYPwK_Qgkt-62GNM1uahwm8LNaU7Jx_PT-_w1Wyxf3uaPi8zlwPusMFyVjPPAjS-9cMb5wodcQwmiAIm-GnaN0igUgiuJQhntUBvJTKUCiCm5O97dxe6vk910Q9fhpeUchAEjmB4oeaRc7FKKobK7WA-lDxaYHYXaf6F2FGpPQsUvkkdqww</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Hughes, Mathew</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-558X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars</title><author>Hughes, Mathew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-9826b022e28dbd3c8cd9de471b13915adfd9d7a586a33265a3687ca78508f6e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Handedness</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Organizational performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Mathew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Mathew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing management</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>178-229</pages><issn>0267-257X</issn><eissn>1472-1376</eissn><abstract>Organisational ambidexterity is an important topic in management research having grown meteorically over the past 17 years. Yet, very few studies in marketing examine organisational ambidexterity. Where studies do exist, seldom do they do justice to its theoretical richness and complexity. This complexity is a significant hurdle for scholars and managers alike, but theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity can benefit substantively from the input of scholars outside the realm of management. This paper provides scholars and managers with a detailed analyses, documentary and corpus of reference material documenting the development, definition, theoretical assumptions and conceptual treatment, measurement and empirical findings to do with organisational ambidexterity. Drawing on this detailed analysis, the paper identifies the burning research questions marketing scholars should give urgent attention to advance theory and practice on organisational ambidexterity.</abstract><cop>Helensburg</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175</doi><tpages>52</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-558X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-257X |
ispartof | Journal of marketing management, 2018-01, Vol.34 (1-2), p.178-229 |
issn | 0267-257X 1472-1376 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2213818307 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Handedness Marketing Measurement Organizational performance |
title | Organisational ambidexterity and firm performance: burning research questions for marketing scholars |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A13%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organisational%20ambidexterity%20and%20firm%20performance:%20burning%20research%20questions%20for%20marketing%20scholars&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20management&rft.au=Hughes,%20Mathew&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=178-229&rft.issn=0267-257X&rft.eissn=1472-1376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1441175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2213818307%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213818307&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |