P.2.15 Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and mortality at a trichlorophenol plant in new zealand

ObjectivesTo describe how 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure influenced mortality in a cohort of workers exposed more recently, and at lower levels, than other cohorts of trichlorophenol process workers.MethodsA cohort study of 1599 men and women working between January 1, 1969 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2019-04, Vol.76 (Suppl 1), p.A91-A91
Hauptverfasser: Mcbride, David, Collins, James, Bender, Thomas, Bodner, Kenneth, Aylward, Lesa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A91
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A91
container_title Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
container_volume 76
creator Mcbride, David
Collins, James
Bender, Thomas
Bodner, Kenneth
Aylward, Lesa
description ObjectivesTo describe how 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure influenced mortality in a cohort of workers exposed more recently, and at lower levels, than other cohorts of trichlorophenol process workers.MethodsA cohort study of 1599 men and women working between January 1, 1969 and November 1, 1988 at a plant producing the herbicide 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5 T) with TCDD as a contaminant.A toxicokinetic model developed in a previous follow up was updated to estimate cumulative TCDD exposure for each individual in the study. Calculation of cause-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) compared those never and ever exposed to TCDD. Dose-response trends were assessed firstly through SMRs stratified in quartiles of cumulative TCCD exposure, and secondly with a proportional hazards model.ResultsThe toxicokinetic model intercept of 5.1 parts per trillion (ppt) of TCDD was consistent with background New Zealand TCDD concentrations among older members of the population. Exposed workers had non-significant increases in all cancer deaths SMR=1.08, 95% CI 0.86–1.34, deaths from soft tissue sarcoma, SMR=2.38, 95% CI: 0.06–13.26, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, SMR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.32–4.59, diabetes, SMR=1.27, 95% CI: 0.55–2.50 and ischaemic heart disease, SMR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.96–1.50. Lung cancer deaths SMR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.56–1.53, were fewer than expected. Neither the stratified SMR nor proportional hazard analysis showed a dose response relationship.ConclusionWe found neither an excess of all cancers, or any specific cancer, nor a trend with TCDD exposure. This argues against the carcinogenicity of TCDD at lower levels of exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/OEM-2019-EPI.248
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2213748386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2213748386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1478-ff6f761db298572bd0d3846f2fcfb2d2cd006af22ab64e4e273227afdd815c2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwM1pipA72JXHSEVUBKhW1A8yWE9tqqjQOjivaTiz8UX4JrsLOdHfSu6-H0C2jEWMxf1gWrwQom5JiNY8gyc_QiCUZJdkU-HnI45QRmjF2ia76fkMpi7MYRqhbRRCx9Ofru9h3tt85jb3FMIkn2SQnXnsnq3VjnVV1qdujJR1Rtd3XLZatwlvrvGxqf8DSY4m9qwe4W-vWNrhrZOtxYFv9iY9ahlJdowsjm17f_MUxen8q3mYvZLF8ns8eF6QMZ-fEGG4yzlQJ0zzNoFRUxXnCDZjKlKCgUpRyaQBkyROdaAjfQCaNUjlLKyjjMbob5nbOfux078XG7lwbVgqA8HySxzkPFB2oytm-d9qIztVb6Q6CUXHyKoJXcfIqglcRvIaW-6Gl3G7-p38B23J5mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213748386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P.2.15 Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and mortality at a trichlorophenol plant in new zealand</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Mcbride, David ; Collins, James ; Bender, Thomas ; Bodner, Kenneth ; Aylward, Lesa</creator><creatorcontrib>Mcbride, David ; Collins, James ; Bender, Thomas ; Bodner, Kenneth ; Aylward, Lesa</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectivesTo describe how 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure influenced mortality in a cohort of workers exposed more recently, and at lower levels, than other cohorts of trichlorophenol process workers.MethodsA cohort study of 1599 men and women working between January 1, 1969 and November 1, 1988 at a plant producing the herbicide 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5 T) with TCDD as a contaminant.A toxicokinetic model developed in a previous follow up was updated to estimate cumulative TCDD exposure for each individual in the study. Calculation of cause-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) compared those never and ever exposed to TCDD. Dose-response trends were assessed firstly through SMRs stratified in quartiles of cumulative TCCD exposure, and secondly with a proportional hazards model.ResultsThe toxicokinetic model intercept of 5.1 parts per trillion (ppt) of TCDD was consistent with background New Zealand TCDD concentrations among older members of the population. Exposed workers had non-significant increases in all cancer deaths SMR=1.08, 95% CI 0.86–1.34, deaths from soft tissue sarcoma, SMR=2.38, 95% CI: 0.06–13.26, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, SMR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.32–4.59, diabetes, SMR=1.27, 95% CI: 0.55–2.50 and ischaemic heart disease, SMR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.96–1.50. Lung cancer deaths SMR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.56–1.53, were fewer than expected. Neither the stratified SMR nor proportional hazard analysis showed a dose response relationship.ConclusionWe found neither an excess of all cancers, or any specific cancer, nor a trend with TCDD exposure. This argues against the carcinogenicity of TCDD at lower levels of exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/OEM-2019-EPI.248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Carcinogenicity ; Carcinogens ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Confidence intervals ; Contaminants ; Coronary artery disease ; Diabetes mellitus ; Dioxins ; Exposure ; Fatalities ; Hazard assessment ; Health risk assessment ; Heart diseases ; Herbicides ; Lung cancer ; Lymphoma ; Mortality ; Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma ; Occupational exposure ; Quartiles ; Sarcoma ; Soft tissue sarcoma ; Soft tissues ; Statistical models ; TCDD ; Toxic hazards ; Trichlorophenol ; Trichlorophenols</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2019-04, Vol.76 (Suppl 1), p.A91-A91</ispartof><rights>2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2019 2019, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mcbride, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylward, Lesa</creatorcontrib><title>P.2.15 Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and mortality at a trichlorophenol plant in new zealand</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><description>ObjectivesTo describe how 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure influenced mortality in a cohort of workers exposed more recently, and at lower levels, than other cohorts of trichlorophenol process workers.MethodsA cohort study of 1599 men and women working between January 1, 1969 and November 1, 1988 at a plant producing the herbicide 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5 T) with TCDD as a contaminant.A toxicokinetic model developed in a previous follow up was updated to estimate cumulative TCDD exposure for each individual in the study. Calculation of cause-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) compared those never and ever exposed to TCDD. Dose-response trends were assessed firstly through SMRs stratified in quartiles of cumulative TCCD exposure, and secondly with a proportional hazards model.ResultsThe toxicokinetic model intercept of 5.1 parts per trillion (ppt) of TCDD was consistent with background New Zealand TCDD concentrations among older members of the population. Exposed workers had non-significant increases in all cancer deaths SMR=1.08, 95% CI 0.86–1.34, deaths from soft tissue sarcoma, SMR=2.38, 95% CI: 0.06–13.26, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, SMR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.32–4.59, diabetes, SMR=1.27, 95% CI: 0.55–2.50 and ischaemic heart disease, SMR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.96–1.50. Lung cancer deaths SMR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.56–1.53, were fewer than expected. Neither the stratified SMR nor proportional hazard analysis showed a dose response relationship.ConclusionWe found neither an excess of all cancers, or any specific cancer, nor a trend with TCDD exposure. This argues against the carcinogenicity of TCDD at lower levels of exposure.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinogenicity</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Dioxins</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Quartiles</subject><subject>Sarcoma</subject><subject>Soft tissue sarcoma</subject><subject>Soft tissues</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>TCDD</subject><subject>Toxic hazards</subject><subject>Trichlorophenol</subject><subject>Trichlorophenols</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwM1pipA72JXHSEVUBKhW1A8yWE9tqqjQOjivaTiz8UX4JrsLOdHfSu6-H0C2jEWMxf1gWrwQom5JiNY8gyc_QiCUZJdkU-HnI45QRmjF2ia76fkMpi7MYRqhbRRCx9Ofru9h3tt85jb3FMIkn2SQnXnsnq3VjnVV1qdujJR1Rtd3XLZatwlvrvGxqf8DSY4m9qwe4W-vWNrhrZOtxYFv9iY9ahlJdowsjm17f_MUxen8q3mYvZLF8ns8eF6QMZ-fEGG4yzlQJ0zzNoFRUxXnCDZjKlKCgUpRyaQBkyROdaAjfQCaNUjlLKyjjMbob5nbOfux078XG7lwbVgqA8HySxzkPFB2oytm-d9qIztVb6Q6CUXHyKoJXcfIqglcRvIaW-6Gl3G7-p38B23J5mg</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Mcbride, David</creator><creator>Collins, James</creator><creator>Bender, Thomas</creator><creator>Bodner, Kenneth</creator><creator>Aylward, Lesa</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>P.2.15 Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and mortality at a trichlorophenol plant in new zealand</title><author>Mcbride, David ; Collins, James ; Bender, Thomas ; Bodner, Kenneth ; Aylward, Lesa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1478-ff6f761db298572bd0d3846f2fcfb2d2cd006af22ab64e4e273227afdd815c2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinogenicity</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Dioxins</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Quartiles</topic><topic>Sarcoma</topic><topic>Soft tissue sarcoma</topic><topic>Soft tissues</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>TCDD</topic><topic>Toxic hazards</topic><topic>Trichlorophenol</topic><topic>Trichlorophenols</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mcbride, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylward, Lesa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mcbride, David</au><au>Collins, James</au><au>Bender, Thomas</au><au>Bodner, Kenneth</au><au>Aylward, Lesa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P.2.15 Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and mortality at a trichlorophenol plant in new zealand</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A91</spage><epage>A91</epage><pages>A91-A91</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>ObjectivesTo describe how 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure influenced mortality in a cohort of workers exposed more recently, and at lower levels, than other cohorts of trichlorophenol process workers.MethodsA cohort study of 1599 men and women working between January 1, 1969 and November 1, 1988 at a plant producing the herbicide 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5 T) with TCDD as a contaminant.A toxicokinetic model developed in a previous follow up was updated to estimate cumulative TCDD exposure for each individual in the study. Calculation of cause-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) compared those never and ever exposed to TCDD. Dose-response trends were assessed firstly through SMRs stratified in quartiles of cumulative TCCD exposure, and secondly with a proportional hazards model.ResultsThe toxicokinetic model intercept of 5.1 parts per trillion (ppt) of TCDD was consistent with background New Zealand TCDD concentrations among older members of the population. Exposed workers had non-significant increases in all cancer deaths SMR=1.08, 95% CI 0.86–1.34, deaths from soft tissue sarcoma, SMR=2.38, 95% CI: 0.06–13.26, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, SMR=1.57, 95% CI: 0.32–4.59, diabetes, SMR=1.27, 95% CI: 0.55–2.50 and ischaemic heart disease, SMR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.96–1.50. Lung cancer deaths SMR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.56–1.53, were fewer than expected. Neither the stratified SMR nor proportional hazard analysis showed a dose response relationship.ConclusionWe found neither an excess of all cancers, or any specific cancer, nor a trend with TCDD exposure. This argues against the carcinogenicity of TCDD at lower levels of exposure.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/OEM-2019-EPI.248</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-0711
ispartof Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2019-04, Vol.76 (Suppl 1), p.A91-A91
issn 1351-0711
1470-7926
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2213748386
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Cancer
Carcinogenicity
Carcinogens
Cardiovascular diseases
Confidence intervals
Contaminants
Coronary artery disease
Diabetes mellitus
Dioxins
Exposure
Fatalities
Hazard assessment
Health risk assessment
Heart diseases
Herbicides
Lung cancer
Lymphoma
Mortality
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Occupational exposure
Quartiles
Sarcoma
Soft tissue sarcoma
Soft tissues
Statistical models
TCDD
Toxic hazards
Trichlorophenol
Trichlorophenols
title P.2.15 Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and mortality at a trichlorophenol plant in new zealand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P.2.15%E2%80%85Exposure%20to%202,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin%20and%20mortality%20at%20a%20trichlorophenol%20plant%20in%20new%20zealand&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Mcbride,%20David&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A91&rft.epage=A91&rft.pages=A91-A91&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/OEM-2019-EPI.248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2213748386%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213748386&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true