Education stock and its implication for income inequality: The case of Asian economies

This study develops a quadratic relationship between education and income inequality among Asian developing economies for the period from 1960 to 2015. Panel cointegration and fully modified OLS is applied for the estimation of long‐run coefficients. The results show that initial, primary, secondary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of development economics 2019-05, Vol.23 (2), p.1050-1066
Hauptverfasser: Arshed, Noman, Anwar, Awais, Hassan, Muhammad Shahid, Bukhari, Samra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1066
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1050
container_title Review of development economics
container_volume 23
creator Arshed, Noman
Anwar, Awais
Hassan, Muhammad Shahid
Bukhari, Samra
description This study develops a quadratic relationship between education and income inequality among Asian developing economies for the period from 1960 to 2015. Panel cointegration and fully modified OLS is applied for the estimation of long‐run coefficients. The results show that initial, primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollment increases inequality. However, the effect of education on income inequality becomes negative after a certain threshold level (i.e., 97.5% for primary, 43.5% for secondary, and 11% for tertiary). Thus, this result proves the Kuznets phenomenon of an inverted U‐shape relationship for primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollments.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rode.12585
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2212754148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2212754148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3675-66978388bcfe76f7a5f51e4afd6b2e8056b106e91f82d26ba773da46c3481f0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HAm7A12Ww-1lup9QMKBaleQzabYOrupk12kf57U7dn5_IOzDPzDi8AtxjNcKqH4GszwzkV9AxMcMF4VhKGz1NPGMkYY-UluIpxixAqMaYT8LmsB6165zsYe6-_oepq6PoIXbtr3GlifYCu0741Scx-UI3rD49w82WgVtFAb-E8OtVBo33nW2fiNbiwqonm5qRT8PG83Cxes9X65W0xX2WaME7TQyUXRIhKW8OZ5Ypaik2hbM2q3AhEWYURMyW2Iq9zVinOSa0KpkkhsEWWTMHdeHcX_H4wsZdbP4QuWco8xzmnBS5Eou5HSgcfYzBW7oJrVThIjOQxN3nMTf7llmA8wj-uMYd_SPm-flqOO78Y-2_z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2212754148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Education stock and its implication for income inequality: The case of Asian economies</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Arshed, Noman ; Anwar, Awais ; Hassan, Muhammad Shahid ; Bukhari, Samra</creator><creatorcontrib>Arshed, Noman ; Anwar, Awais ; Hassan, Muhammad Shahid ; Bukhari, Samra</creatorcontrib><description>This study develops a quadratic relationship between education and income inequality among Asian developing economies for the period from 1960 to 2015. Panel cointegration and fully modified OLS is applied for the estimation of long‐run coefficients. The results show that initial, primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollment increases inequality. However, the effect of education on income inequality becomes negative after a certain threshold level (i.e., 97.5% for primary, 43.5% for secondary, and 11% for tertiary). Thus, this result proves the Kuznets phenomenon of an inverted U‐shape relationship for primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-6669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rode.12585</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Economic models ; education—income inequality Kuznets curve ; Income inequality ; panel cointegration ; panel FMOLS</subject><ispartof>Review of development economics, 2019-05, Vol.23 (2), p.1050-1066</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3675-66978388bcfe76f7a5f51e4afd6b2e8056b106e91f82d26ba773da46c3481f0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3675-66978388bcfe76f7a5f51e4afd6b2e8056b106e91f82d26ba773da46c3481f0f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8940-5391 ; 0000-0002-0170-454X ; 0000-0002-8133-0575 ; 0000-0003-0228-9672</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frode.12585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frode.12585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arshed, Noman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Awais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Muhammad Shahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukhari, Samra</creatorcontrib><title>Education stock and its implication for income inequality: The case of Asian economies</title><title>Review of development economics</title><description>This study develops a quadratic relationship between education and income inequality among Asian developing economies for the period from 1960 to 2015. Panel cointegration and fully modified OLS is applied for the estimation of long‐run coefficients. The results show that initial, primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollment increases inequality. However, the effect of education on income inequality becomes negative after a certain threshold level (i.e., 97.5% for primary, 43.5% for secondary, and 11% for tertiary). Thus, this result proves the Kuznets phenomenon of an inverted U‐shape relationship for primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollments.</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>education—income inequality Kuznets curve</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>panel cointegration</subject><subject>panel FMOLS</subject><issn>1363-6669</issn><issn>1467-9361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HAm7A12Ww-1lup9QMKBaleQzabYOrupk12kf57U7dn5_IOzDPzDi8AtxjNcKqH4GszwzkV9AxMcMF4VhKGz1NPGMkYY-UluIpxixAqMaYT8LmsB6165zsYe6-_oepq6PoIXbtr3GlifYCu0741Scx-UI3rD49w82WgVtFAb-E8OtVBo33nW2fiNbiwqonm5qRT8PG83Cxes9X65W0xX2WaME7TQyUXRIhKW8OZ5Ypaik2hbM2q3AhEWYURMyW2Iq9zVinOSa0KpkkhsEWWTMHdeHcX_H4wsZdbP4QuWco8xzmnBS5Eou5HSgcfYzBW7oJrVThIjOQxN3nMTf7llmA8wj-uMYd_SPm-flqOO78Y-2_z</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Arshed, Noman</creator><creator>Anwar, Awais</creator><creator>Hassan, Muhammad Shahid</creator><creator>Bukhari, Samra</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-5391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-454X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8133-0575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-9672</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Education stock and its implication for income inequality: The case of Asian economies</title><author>Arshed, Noman ; Anwar, Awais ; Hassan, Muhammad Shahid ; Bukhari, Samra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3675-66978388bcfe76f7a5f51e4afd6b2e8056b106e91f82d26ba773da46c3481f0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>education—income inequality Kuznets curve</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>panel cointegration</topic><topic>panel FMOLS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arshed, Noman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Awais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Muhammad Shahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bukhari, Samra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arshed, Noman</au><au>Anwar, Awais</au><au>Hassan, Muhammad Shahid</au><au>Bukhari, Samra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Education stock and its implication for income inequality: The case of Asian economies</atitle><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1050</spage><epage>1066</epage><pages>1050-1066</pages><issn>1363-6669</issn><eissn>1467-9361</eissn><abstract>This study develops a quadratic relationship between education and income inequality among Asian developing economies for the period from 1960 to 2015. Panel cointegration and fully modified OLS is applied for the estimation of long‐run coefficients. The results show that initial, primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollment increases inequality. However, the effect of education on income inequality becomes negative after a certain threshold level (i.e., 97.5% for primary, 43.5% for secondary, and 11% for tertiary). Thus, this result proves the Kuznets phenomenon of an inverted U‐shape relationship for primary, secondary, and tertiary enrollments.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/rode.12585</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-5391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0170-454X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8133-0575</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-9672</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1363-6669
ispartof Review of development economics, 2019-05, Vol.23 (2), p.1050-1066
issn 1363-6669
1467-9361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2212754148
source Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Economic models
education—income inequality Kuznets curve
Income inequality
panel cointegration
panel FMOLS
title Education stock and its implication for income inequality: The case of Asian economies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T02%3A16%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Education%20stock%20and%20its%20implication%20for%20income%20inequality:%20The%20case%20of%20Asian%20economies&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20development%20economics&rft.au=Arshed,%20Noman&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1050&rft.epage=1066&rft.pages=1050-1066&rft.issn=1363-6669&rft.eissn=1467-9361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rode.12585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2212754148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2212754148&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true