Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness
Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ergonomics 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.115-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 127 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Ergonomics |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Rose, Janette Bearman, Chris Naweed, Anjum Dorrian, Jillian |
description | Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed.
Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA.
Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2211640702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2114699954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5BCXgxk3HJM3VlSLeQFBQ1yGTphppG01ah3l7U2bGhQtX4cD3_yfnA-AIoxlGEp0hhCnCpZoRhOUMMyIUw1tgikvOCyap2AbTkSlGaAL2UvrIY4kV2QWTEhHOCBZT8PwUg3Wuggvfv0Nrht6H7hwOyXdv8NvFuWngZwx9sKGBpjPNMvkE-wBbZ9IQHUy-H8wYgmZhoutcSgdgpzZNcofrdx-83ly_XN0VD4-391eXD4WllPTFnHMkraSIitJZQmVdKc4tUUpJmU-0kmMiSYUVI0iUSlWWCkEQq5kwSNByH5yuevMHvwaXet36ZF3TmM6FIWmCMeW5jY3oyR_0Iwwxn5OpjHGKBCKZYivKxpBSdLX-jL41cakx0qN1vbGuR-t6bT3njtftw7x11W9qozkDFyvAd3WIrVmE2FS6N8smxDqazvqky_93_ABycI7G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211640702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</title><source>Taylor & Francis E-Journals</source><creator>Rose, Janette ; Bearman, Chris ; Naweed, Anjum ; Dorrian, Jillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Janette ; Bearman, Chris ; Naweed, Anjum ; Dorrian, Jillian</creatorcontrib><description>Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed.
Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA.
Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30265217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Abbreviations ; Change detection ; Cognitive ability ; Experiments ; Information processing ; Situation awareness ; situation awareness measurement ; Situational awareness ; Space life sciences ; train simulator study ; Valproic acid ; verbal protocol analysis</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.115-127</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5534-4295 ; 0000-0001-9892-9878 ; 0000-0001-9559-8233 ; 0000-0002-6485-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30265217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Janette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naweed, Anjum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrian, Jillian</creatorcontrib><title>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed.
Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA.
Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis</description><subject>Abbreviations</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Situation awareness</subject><subject>situation awareness measurement</subject><subject>Situational awareness</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>train simulator study</subject><subject>Valproic acid</subject><subject>verbal protocol analysis</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5BCXgxk3HJM3VlSLeQFBQ1yGTphppG01ah3l7U2bGhQtX4cD3_yfnA-AIoxlGEp0hhCnCpZoRhOUMMyIUw1tgikvOCyap2AbTkSlGaAL2UvrIY4kV2QWTEhHOCBZT8PwUg3Wuggvfv0Nrht6H7hwOyXdv8NvFuWngZwx9sKGBpjPNMvkE-wBbZ9IQHUy-H8wYgmZhoutcSgdgpzZNcofrdx-83ly_XN0VD4-391eXD4WllPTFnHMkraSIitJZQmVdKc4tUUpJmU-0kmMiSYUVI0iUSlWWCkEQq5kwSNByH5yuevMHvwaXet36ZF3TmM6FIWmCMeW5jY3oyR_0Iwwxn5OpjHGKBCKZYivKxpBSdLX-jL41cakx0qN1vbGuR-t6bT3njtftw7x11W9qozkDFyvAd3WIrVmE2FS6N8smxDqazvqky_93_ABycI7G</recordid><startdate>20190102</startdate><enddate>20190102</enddate><creator>Rose, Janette</creator><creator>Bearman, Chris</creator><creator>Naweed, Anjum</creator><creator>Dorrian, Jillian</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-4295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-9878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-8233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190102</creationdate><title>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</title><author>Rose, Janette ; Bearman, Chris ; Naweed, Anjum ; Dorrian, Jillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abbreviations</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Situation awareness</topic><topic>situation awareness measurement</topic><topic>Situational awareness</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>train simulator study</topic><topic>Valproic acid</topic><topic>verbal protocol analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Janette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naweed, Anjum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrian, Jillian</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Janette</au><au>Bearman, Chris</au><au>Naweed, Anjum</au><au>Dorrian, Jillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2019-01-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>115-127</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed.
Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA.
Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>30265217</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-4295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-9878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-8233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-1643</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-0139 |
ispartof | Ergonomics, 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.115-127 |
issn | 0014-0139 1366-5847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2211640702 |
source | Taylor & Francis E-Journals |
subjects | Abbreviations Change detection Cognitive ability Experiments Information processing Situation awareness situation awareness measurement Situational awareness Space life sciences train simulator study Valproic acid verbal protocol analysis |
title | Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proceed%20with%20caution:%20using%20verbal%20protocol%20analysis%20to%20measure%20situation%20awareness&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Rose,%20Janette&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=115-127&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2114699954%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211640702&rft_id=info:pmid/30265217&rfr_iscdi=true |