Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness

Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergonomics 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.115-127
Hauptverfasser: Rose, Janette, Bearman, Chris, Naweed, Anjum, Dorrian, Jillian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 127
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 62
creator Rose, Janette
Bearman, Chris
Naweed, Anjum
Dorrian, Jillian
description Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed. Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA. Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2211640702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2114699954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5BCXgxk3HJM3VlSLeQFBQ1yGTphppG01ah3l7U2bGhQtX4cD3_yfnA-AIoxlGEp0hhCnCpZoRhOUMMyIUw1tgikvOCyap2AbTkSlGaAL2UvrIY4kV2QWTEhHOCBZT8PwUg3Wuggvfv0Nrht6H7hwOyXdv8NvFuWngZwx9sKGBpjPNMvkE-wBbZ9IQHUy-H8wYgmZhoutcSgdgpzZNcofrdx-83ly_XN0VD4-391eXD4WllPTFnHMkraSIitJZQmVdKc4tUUpJmU-0kmMiSYUVI0iUSlWWCkEQq5kwSNByH5yuevMHvwaXet36ZF3TmM6FIWmCMeW5jY3oyR_0Iwwxn5OpjHGKBCKZYivKxpBSdLX-jL41cakx0qN1vbGuR-t6bT3njtftw7x11W9qozkDFyvAd3WIrVmE2FS6N8smxDqazvqky_93_ABycI7G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211640702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis E-Journals</source><creator>Rose, Janette ; Bearman, Chris ; Naweed, Anjum ; Dorrian, Jillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Janette ; Bearman, Chris ; Naweed, Anjum ; Dorrian, Jillian</creatorcontrib><description>Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed. Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA. Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30265217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Abbreviations ; Change detection ; Cognitive ability ; Experiments ; Information processing ; Situation awareness ; situation awareness measurement ; Situational awareness ; Space life sciences ; train simulator study ; Valproic acid ; verbal protocol analysis</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.115-127</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5534-4295 ; 0000-0001-9892-9878 ; 0000-0001-9559-8233 ; 0000-0002-6485-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30265217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Janette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naweed, Anjum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrian, Jillian</creatorcontrib><title>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed. Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA. Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis</description><subject>Abbreviations</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Situation awareness</subject><subject>situation awareness measurement</subject><subject>Situational awareness</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>train simulator study</subject><subject>Valproic acid</subject><subject>verbal protocol analysis</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5BCXgxk3HJM3VlSLeQFBQ1yGTphppG01ah3l7U2bGhQtX4cD3_yfnA-AIoxlGEp0hhCnCpZoRhOUMMyIUw1tgikvOCyap2AbTkSlGaAL2UvrIY4kV2QWTEhHOCBZT8PwUg3Wuggvfv0Nrht6H7hwOyXdv8NvFuWngZwx9sKGBpjPNMvkE-wBbZ9IQHUy-H8wYgmZhoutcSgdgpzZNcofrdx-83ly_XN0VD4-391eXD4WllPTFnHMkraSIitJZQmVdKc4tUUpJmU-0kmMiSYUVI0iUSlWWCkEQq5kwSNByH5yuevMHvwaXet36ZF3TmM6FIWmCMeW5jY3oyR_0Iwwxn5OpjHGKBCKZYivKxpBSdLX-jL41cakx0qN1vbGuR-t6bT3njtftw7x11W9qozkDFyvAd3WIrVmE2FS6N8smxDqazvqky_93_ABycI7G</recordid><startdate>20190102</startdate><enddate>20190102</enddate><creator>Rose, Janette</creator><creator>Bearman, Chris</creator><creator>Naweed, Anjum</creator><creator>Dorrian, Jillian</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-4295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-9878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-8233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190102</creationdate><title>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</title><author>Rose, Janette ; Bearman, Chris ; Naweed, Anjum ; Dorrian, Jillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b6608c840473ec248fd966c299988080c861282d195207399dc477205f57a0743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abbreviations</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Situation awareness</topic><topic>situation awareness measurement</topic><topic>Situational awareness</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>train simulator study</topic><topic>Valproic acid</topic><topic>verbal protocol analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Janette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naweed, Anjum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrian, Jillian</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Janette</au><au>Bearman, Chris</au><au>Naweed, Anjum</au><au>Dorrian, Jillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2019-01-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>115-127</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>Verbal protocol analysis (VPA) is often used to elicit information about the cognitive processes of operators as it provides rich data and can be used in naturalistic settings. Recently VPA has been used to investigate the acquisition and maintenance of situation awareness (SA), and to make comparisons between groups despite a lack of research regarding the efficacy of using VPA for this purpose. This train simulator experiment investigated whether VPA can effectively measure SA. Novice and expert participants were recorded on an audio device while talking aloud throughout the trials and their verbalisations were transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme developed from the transcripts was used to code the verbalisations. Results did not support the use of VPA as a measure of SA but did show that VPA detected differences in SA errors. Potential reasons for the conflicting findings between this experiment and those conducted by other researchers are discussed. Practitioner summary: This paper examined the validity of verbal protocol analysis (VPA) as a situation awareness (SA) measure. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using a train simulator. Normal VPA did not detect changes in SA but a measure of errors did. Caution should be used when using VPA to measure SA. Abbreviations: LETSSA: low-event task subjective situation awareness technique; SA: situation awareness; SAGAT: situation awareness global assessment technique; TPD: train performance display; VPA: verbal protocol analysis</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>30265217</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-4295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-9878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-8233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-1643</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.115-127
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2211640702
source Taylor & Francis E-Journals
subjects Abbreviations
Change detection
Cognitive ability
Experiments
Information processing
Situation awareness
situation awareness measurement
Situational awareness
Space life sciences
train simulator study
Valproic acid
verbal protocol analysis
title Proceed with caution: using verbal protocol analysis to measure situation awareness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proceed%20with%20caution:%20using%20verbal%20protocol%20analysis%20to%20measure%20situation%20awareness&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Rose,%20Janette&rft.date=2019-01-02&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=115-127&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2018.1527951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2114699954%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211640702&rft_id=info:pmid/30265217&rfr_iscdi=true