Understanding the ecological context of mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems: A person‐centered approach
Aims: The social/environmental context of youth is important for mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health. This study used person‐oriented methods to examine the influences of family, neighborhood, and poverty on late adolescent MEB outcomes. Methods: Latent class analysis was used to discern...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of community psychology 2019-05, Vol.47 (4), p.833-855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 855 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 833 |
container_title | Journal of community psychology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Logan‐Greene, Patricia Linn, Brad Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin Nochajski, Thomas Wieczorek, William F. Rittner, Barbara |
description | Aims:
The social/environmental context of youth is important for mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health. This study used person‐oriented methods to examine the influences of family, neighborhood, and poverty on late adolescent MEB outcomes.
Methods:
Latent class analysis was used to discern significant clusters of at‐risk, diverse young men (N = 625) based on contextual factors; differences in MEB outcomes were examined.
Results:
Four classes emerged. Resourced and Protected youth had low risk across all indicators. Non‐resourced and Protected youth lived in poverty, poor neighborhoods, but had good parenting; despite low delinquency, substance use was elevated. Resourced but High Risk youth had negative parenting but good neighborhoods. Outcomes included elevated delinquency and mental health problems. Non‐resourced and High Risk youth were poor, lived in bad neighborhoods, and experienced abusive parenting; MEB outcomes were poor.
Conclusion:
Findings confirm the unique effects that negative parenting, neighborhoods, and poverty have on adolescent development. Implications are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcop.22156 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2211122463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211122463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-1e22a78683839723fd149575912404903cd1dcdd8fb7bcd13256fd4da20e8a9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EomW58ADIEjdEipfEibmhilVIcIBz5NiTJlUSBztlufEIPCNPgksLR04ea775Z_QhdEDJhBLCTufa9hPGaCI20JgmjERCMLmJxoRIEsVcshHa8X5Owl_ydBuNOBGJEJkYo9enzoDzg-pM3c3wUAEGbRs7q7VqsLbdAG8DtiVuoRtUc4KhtUNtu2UZZnABlXqprQtwBaoZKtw7WzTQ-jN8jvsQbbuvj08dpsGBwaoPfaWrPbRVqsbD_vrdRU-XF4_T6-ju_upmen4XaZ6kIqLAmEozkfGMy5Tx0tBYJmkiKYtJLAnXhhptTFYWaRFqzhJRmtgoRiBTsuC76GiVG9Y-L8AP-dwuXDjf58EYpYzFggfqeEVpZ713UOa9q1vl3nNK8qXjfOk4_3Ec4MN15KJowfyhv1IDQFfAa93A-z9R-e30_mEV-g0GcIi7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211122463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the ecological context of mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems: A person‐centered approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Logan‐Greene, Patricia ; Linn, Brad ; Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin ; Nochajski, Thomas ; Wieczorek, William F. ; Rittner, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Logan‐Greene, Patricia ; Linn, Brad ; Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin ; Nochajski, Thomas ; Wieczorek, William F. ; Rittner, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>Aims:
The social/environmental context of youth is important for mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health. This study used person‐oriented methods to examine the influences of family, neighborhood, and poverty on late adolescent MEB outcomes.
Methods:
Latent class analysis was used to discern significant clusters of at‐risk, diverse young men (N = 625) based on contextual factors; differences in MEB outcomes were examined.
Results:
Four classes emerged. Resourced and Protected youth had low risk across all indicators. Non‐resourced and Protected youth lived in poverty, poor neighborhoods, but had good parenting; despite low delinquency, substance use was elevated. Resourced but High Risk youth had negative parenting but good neighborhoods. Outcomes included elevated delinquency and mental health problems. Non‐resourced and High Risk youth were poor, lived in bad neighborhoods, and experienced abusive parenting; MEB outcomes were poor.
Conclusion:
Findings confirm the unique effects that negative parenting, neighborhoods, and poverty have on adolescent development. Implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4392</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22156</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30656686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent Development ; Childrearing practices ; Health problems ; Humans ; Latent Class Analysis ; Low income groups ; Male ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Neighborhoods ; Parenting - psychology ; Parents & parenting ; Poverty ; Poverty - psychology ; Poverty - statistics & numerical data ; Residence Characteristics ; Risk ; Social Environment ; Substance abuse ; Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology ; Substance-Related Disorders - psychology ; Young men ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Journal of community psychology, 2019-05, Vol.47 (4), p.833-855</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-1e22a78683839723fd149575912404903cd1dcdd8fb7bcd13256fd4da20e8a9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-1e22a78683839723fd149575912404903cd1dcdd8fb7bcd13256fd4da20e8a9b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1764-047X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcop.22156$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcop.22156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Logan‐Greene, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linn, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nochajski, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieczorek, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittner, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the ecological context of mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems: A person‐centered approach</title><title>Journal of community psychology</title><addtitle>J Community Psychol</addtitle><description>Aims:
The social/environmental context of youth is important for mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health. This study used person‐oriented methods to examine the influences of family, neighborhood, and poverty on late adolescent MEB outcomes.
Methods:
Latent class analysis was used to discern significant clusters of at‐risk, diverse young men (N = 625) based on contextual factors; differences in MEB outcomes were examined.
Results:
Four classes emerged. Resourced and Protected youth had low risk across all indicators. Non‐resourced and Protected youth lived in poverty, poor neighborhoods, but had good parenting; despite low delinquency, substance use was elevated. Resourced but High Risk youth had negative parenting but good neighborhoods. Outcomes included elevated delinquency and mental health problems. Non‐resourced and High Risk youth were poor, lived in bad neighborhoods, and experienced abusive parenting; MEB outcomes were poor.
Conclusion:
Findings confirm the unique effects that negative parenting, neighborhoods, and poverty have on adolescent development. Implications are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Development</subject><subject>Childrearing practices</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latent Class Analysis</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Parenting - psychology</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Poverty - psychology</subject><subject>Poverty - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Young men</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0090-4392</issn><issn>1520-6629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EomW58ADIEjdEipfEibmhilVIcIBz5NiTJlUSBztlufEIPCNPgksLR04ea775Z_QhdEDJhBLCTufa9hPGaCI20JgmjERCMLmJxoRIEsVcshHa8X5Owl_ydBuNOBGJEJkYo9enzoDzg-pM3c3wUAEGbRs7q7VqsLbdAG8DtiVuoRtUc4KhtUNtu2UZZnABlXqprQtwBaoZKtw7WzTQ-jN8jvsQbbuvj08dpsGBwaoPfaWrPbRVqsbD_vrdRU-XF4_T6-ju_upmen4XaZ6kIqLAmEozkfGMy5Tx0tBYJmkiKYtJLAnXhhptTFYWaRFqzhJRmtgoRiBTsuC76GiVG9Y-L8AP-dwuXDjf58EYpYzFggfqeEVpZ713UOa9q1vl3nNK8qXjfOk4_3Ec4MN15KJowfyhv1IDQFfAa93A-z9R-e30_mEV-g0GcIi7</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Logan‐Greene, Patricia</creator><creator>Linn, Brad</creator><creator>Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin</creator><creator>Nochajski, Thomas</creator><creator>Wieczorek, William F.</creator><creator>Rittner, Barbara</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-047X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Understanding the ecological context of mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems: A person‐centered approach</title><author>Logan‐Greene, Patricia ; Linn, Brad ; Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin ; Nochajski, Thomas ; Wieczorek, William F. ; Rittner, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-1e22a78683839723fd149575912404903cd1dcdd8fb7bcd13256fd4da20e8a9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Development</topic><topic>Childrearing practices</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latent Class Analysis</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Parenting - psychology</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Poverty - psychology</topic><topic>Poverty - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Young men</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Logan‐Greene, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linn, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nochajski, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieczorek, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittner, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of community psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Logan‐Greene, Patricia</au><au>Linn, Brad</au><au>Hartinger‐Saunders, Robin</au><au>Nochajski, Thomas</au><au>Wieczorek, William F.</au><au>Rittner, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the ecological context of mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems: A person‐centered approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>855</epage><pages>833-855</pages><issn>0090-4392</issn><eissn>1520-6629</eissn><abstract>Aims:
The social/environmental context of youth is important for mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) health. This study used person‐oriented methods to examine the influences of family, neighborhood, and poverty on late adolescent MEB outcomes.
Methods:
Latent class analysis was used to discern significant clusters of at‐risk, diverse young men (N = 625) based on contextual factors; differences in MEB outcomes were examined.
Results:
Four classes emerged. Resourced and Protected youth had low risk across all indicators. Non‐resourced and Protected youth lived in poverty, poor neighborhoods, but had good parenting; despite low delinquency, substance use was elevated. Resourced but High Risk youth had negative parenting but good neighborhoods. Outcomes included elevated delinquency and mental health problems. Non‐resourced and High Risk youth were poor, lived in bad neighborhoods, and experienced abusive parenting; MEB outcomes were poor.
Conclusion:
Findings confirm the unique effects that negative parenting, neighborhoods, and poverty have on adolescent development. Implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30656686</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcop.22156</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-047X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4392 |
ispartof | Journal of community psychology, 2019-05, Vol.47 (4), p.833-855 |
issn | 0090-4392 1520-6629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2211122463 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescent Development Childrearing practices Health problems Humans Latent Class Analysis Low income groups Male Mental disorders Mental health Neighborhoods Parenting - psychology Parents & parenting Poverty Poverty - psychology Poverty - statistics & numerical data Residence Characteristics Risk Social Environment Substance abuse Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology Substance-Related Disorders - psychology Young men Youth |
title | Understanding the ecological context of mental, emotional, and behavioral health problems: A person‐centered approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20ecological%20context%20of%20mental,%20emotional,%20and%20behavioral%20health%20problems:%20A%20person%E2%80%90centered%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20psychology&rft.au=Logan%E2%80%90Greene,%20Patricia&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=855&rft.pages=833-855&rft.issn=0090-4392&rft.eissn=1520-6629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcop.22156&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2211122463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211122463&rft_id=info:pmid/30656686&rfr_iscdi=true |