Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton
The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotell...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2019-03, Vol.124 (3), p.3088-3104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 3088 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Motta, J. G. Betts, P. G. Souza Filho, C. R. Thiel, S. Curtis, S. Armit, R. J. |
description | The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism.
Key Points
The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets
The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels
Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JB016829 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2211005861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211005861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpjg-wxJaAx0lcZ0krKK2KQDzWketOwFUaF9uhlK_HVRBixWxm7ujozoOQU2AXwHhxyRnI2YiBkLw4ID0OokiKNBeHvzWkx2Tg_YrFkLEFWY_4B2c_DXpaWUdHyuMam0Cfgmt1aB1S1SzpNHg6XW9qo1UwtunYO_R242xAZ7-s0VEHVdf2FZsooumHaXS0NQ0Nb0gnalujo2Ongm1OyFGlao-Dn9wnLzfXz-PbZH4_mY6v5olKhZQJ5hJQZHmhma40q3KthiAXepgtUSAucAnDIo9nQFaAFIUUVRYrDshR8wWkfXLW-cY931v0oVzZ1jVxZMk5AGO5FHvqvKO0s947rMqNM2vldiWwcv_Z8u9nI552-NbUuPuXLWeTx1GepiDTb7bSerA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211005861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Motta, J. G. ; Betts, P. G. ; Souza Filho, C. R. ; Thiel, S. ; Curtis, S. ; Armit, R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Motta, J. G. ; Betts, P. G. ; Souza Filho, C. R. ; Thiel, S. ; Curtis, S. ; Armit, R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism.
Key Points
The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets
The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels
Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Copper ; Cratons ; crustal structure ; Distribution ; Geological faults ; Geophysics ; Gold ; Gravitation ; Gravity ; Gravity data ; Hydrothermal alteration ; Iron ; Iron oxides ; Isotopes ; Magma ; Magnetism ; mineral deposits ; Mineral resources ; Mineralization ; Potential fields ; Precambrian ; Provinces ; satellite gravity ; Satellites ; Seismic surveys ; Seismic tomography ; Structures ; Switches ; Tectonics ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2019-03, Vol.124 (3), p.3088-3104</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8678-412X ; 0000-0002-7054-2521 ; 0000-0002-5056-4053 ; 0000-0002-2088-7433 ; 0000-0002-2843-8624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JB016829$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JB016829$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motta, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza Filho, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armit, R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism.
Key Points
The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets
The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels
Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>crustal structure</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Gravity data</subject><subject>Hydrothermal alteration</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iron oxides</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>mineral deposits</subject><subject>Mineral resources</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Potential fields</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>satellite gravity</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Seismic tomography</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Switches</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpjg-wxJaAx0lcZ0krKK2KQDzWketOwFUaF9uhlK_HVRBixWxm7ujozoOQU2AXwHhxyRnI2YiBkLw4ID0OokiKNBeHvzWkx2Tg_YrFkLEFWY_4B2c_DXpaWUdHyuMam0Cfgmt1aB1S1SzpNHg6XW9qo1UwtunYO_R242xAZ7-s0VEHVdf2FZsooumHaXS0NQ0Nb0gnalujo2Ongm1OyFGlao-Dn9wnLzfXz-PbZH4_mY6v5olKhZQJ5hJQZHmhma40q3KthiAXepgtUSAucAnDIo9nQFaAFIUUVRYrDshR8wWkfXLW-cY931v0oVzZ1jVxZMk5AGO5FHvqvKO0s947rMqNM2vldiWwcv_Z8u9nI552-NbUuPuXLWeTx1GepiDTb7bSerA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Motta, J. G.</creator><creator>Betts, P. G.</creator><creator>Souza Filho, C. R.</creator><creator>Thiel, S.</creator><creator>Curtis, S.</creator><creator>Armit, R. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-412X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-2521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-4053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-7433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-8624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</title><author>Motta, J. G. ; Betts, P. G. ; Souza Filho, C. R. ; Thiel, S. ; Curtis, S. ; Armit, R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>crustal structure</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Gravity data</topic><topic>Hydrothermal alteration</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iron oxides</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>mineral deposits</topic><topic>Mineral resources</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Potential fields</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>satellite gravity</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Seismic tomography</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Switches</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motta, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza Filho, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armit, R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motta, J. G.</au><au>Betts, P. G.</au><au>Souza Filho, C. R.</au><au>Thiel, S.</au><au>Curtis, S.</au><au>Armit, R. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3088</spage><epage>3104</epage><pages>3088-3104</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism.
Key Points
The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets
The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels
Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JB016829</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-412X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-2521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-4053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-7433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-8624</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2019-03, Vol.124 (3), p.3088-3104 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2211005861 |
source | Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Anomalies Copper Cratons crustal structure Distribution Geological faults Geophysics Gold Gravitation Gravity Gravity data Hydrothermal alteration Iron Iron oxides Isotopes Magma Magnetism mineral deposits Mineral resources Mineralization Potential fields Precambrian Provinces satellite gravity Satellites Seismic surveys Seismic tomography Structures Switches Tectonics Tomography |
title | Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proxies%20for%20Basement%20Structure%20and%20Its%20Implications%20for%20Mesoproterozoic%20Metallogenic%20Provinces%20in%20the%20Gawler%20Craton&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Motta,%20J.%20G.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3088&rft.epage=3104&rft.pages=3088-3104&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JB016829&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2211005861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211005861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |