Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton

The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotell...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2019-03, Vol.124 (3), p.3088-3104
Hauptverfasser: Motta, J. G., Betts, P. G., Souza Filho, C. R., Thiel, S., Curtis, S., Armit, R. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3104
container_issue 3
container_start_page 3088
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 124
creator Motta, J. G.
Betts, P. G.
Souza Filho, C. R.
Thiel, S.
Curtis, S.
Armit, R. J.
description The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism. Key Points The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018JB016829
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2211005861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211005861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpjg-wxJaAx0lcZ0krKK2KQDzWketOwFUaF9uhlK_HVRBixWxm7ujozoOQU2AXwHhxyRnI2YiBkLw4ID0OokiKNBeHvzWkx2Tg_YrFkLEFWY_4B2c_DXpaWUdHyuMam0Cfgmt1aB1S1SzpNHg6XW9qo1UwtunYO_R242xAZ7-s0VEHVdf2FZsooumHaXS0NQ0Nb0gnalujo2Ongm1OyFGlao-Dn9wnLzfXz-PbZH4_mY6v5olKhZQJ5hJQZHmhma40q3KthiAXepgtUSAucAnDIo9nQFaAFIUUVRYrDshR8wWkfXLW-cY931v0oVzZ1jVxZMk5AGO5FHvqvKO0s947rMqNM2vldiWwcv_Z8u9nI552-NbUuPuXLWeTx1GepiDTb7bSerA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211005861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Motta, J. G. ; Betts, P. G. ; Souza Filho, C. R. ; Thiel, S. ; Curtis, S. ; Armit, R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Motta, J. G. ; Betts, P. G. ; Souza Filho, C. R. ; Thiel, S. ; Curtis, S. ; Armit, R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism. Key Points The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JB016829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Copper ; Cratons ; crustal structure ; Distribution ; Geological faults ; Geophysics ; Gold ; Gravitation ; Gravity ; Gravity data ; Hydrothermal alteration ; Iron ; Iron oxides ; Isotopes ; Magma ; Magnetism ; mineral deposits ; Mineral resources ; Mineralization ; Potential fields ; Precambrian ; Provinces ; satellite gravity ; Satellites ; Seismic surveys ; Seismic tomography ; Structures ; Switches ; Tectonics ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2019-03, Vol.124 (3), p.3088-3104</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8678-412X ; 0000-0002-7054-2521 ; 0000-0002-5056-4053 ; 0000-0002-2088-7433 ; 0000-0002-2843-8624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JB016829$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JB016829$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motta, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza Filho, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armit, R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism. Key Points The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Cratons</subject><subject>crustal structure</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Gravity data</subject><subject>Hydrothermal alteration</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iron oxides</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>mineral deposits</subject><subject>Mineral resources</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Potential fields</subject><subject>Precambrian</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>satellite gravity</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Seismic tomography</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Switches</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpjg-wxJaAx0lcZ0krKK2KQDzWketOwFUaF9uhlK_HVRBixWxm7ujozoOQU2AXwHhxyRnI2YiBkLw4ID0OokiKNBeHvzWkx2Tg_YrFkLEFWY_4B2c_DXpaWUdHyuMam0Cfgmt1aB1S1SzpNHg6XW9qo1UwtunYO_R242xAZ7-s0VEHVdf2FZsooumHaXS0NQ0Nb0gnalujo2Ongm1OyFGlao-Dn9wnLzfXz-PbZH4_mY6v5olKhZQJ5hJQZHmhma40q3KthiAXepgtUSAucAnDIo9nQFaAFIUUVRYrDshR8wWkfXLW-cY931v0oVzZ1jVxZMk5AGO5FHvqvKO0s947rMqNM2vldiWwcv_Z8u9nI552-NbUuPuXLWeTx1GepiDTb7bSerA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Motta, J. G.</creator><creator>Betts, P. G.</creator><creator>Souza Filho, C. R.</creator><creator>Thiel, S.</creator><creator>Curtis, S.</creator><creator>Armit, R. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-412X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-2521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-4053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-7433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-8624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</title><author>Motta, J. G. ; Betts, P. G. ; Souza Filho, C. R. ; Thiel, S. ; Curtis, S. ; Armit, R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3688-e581e6459c0cfc0f5ca718bc74de6eebed1795691149186986f449121e2ec2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Cratons</topic><topic>crustal structure</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Gravity data</topic><topic>Hydrothermal alteration</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iron oxides</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>mineral deposits</topic><topic>Mineral resources</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Potential fields</topic><topic>Precambrian</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>satellite gravity</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Seismic tomography</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Switches</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motta, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza Filho, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armit, R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motta, J. G.</au><au>Betts, P. G.</au><au>Souza Filho, C. R.</au><au>Thiel, S.</au><au>Curtis, S.</au><au>Armit, R. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3088</spage><epage>3104</epage><pages>3088-3104</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>The link between mineral resources and crustal‐rooted structures has been proposed for many of the world's most significant mineral provinces. Here we utilize a new approach by interpreting potential field data, including satellite gravity data, and high‐resolution continental‐scale magnetotelluric data, constrained with aeromagnetic, and seismic tomography and reflection data, to determine the distribution of crustal‐scale faults in the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler Craton (South Australia). The eastern flank of the craton hosts the supergiant Olympic Dam iron oxide‐copper‐gold (IOCG) deposit within a larger Olympic IOCG province. The central part of the craton contains gold‐only deposits, which define the Central Gawler Gold province. Both of these provinces are part of a Mesoproterozoic mineral system with an extensive hydrothermal alteration footprint, which formed during complicated tectonic mode switches. We show that both types of mineralization are located in proximity to crustal‐scale structures that appear to connect deep crustal fragments, which likely record the amalgamation of the Archean nucleus of the craton during the Neoarchean with subsequent reworking during the Mesoproterozoic. Many of these structures do not have a surface expression but coincide with gradients in magnetism, gravity, and electric resistivity anomalies, the latter data set suggesting they acted as fluid pathways extending to the lower crust. The results indicate that the first‐order controls on the distribution of IOCG and Central Gawler Gold metallogenic provinces are inherited from earlier tectonic events, which formed major crustal boundaries and related structures that are prone to reworking during later tectonism. Key Points The satellite gravity data provide clues to the regional framework of the Gawler Craton, which aligns with different geophysical data sets The Gawler Craton is formed by a threefold Archean substratum that has undergone changes in the Proterozoic down to its deep crustal levels Regional structures were reactivated through time and act as pathways for regional fluid flow throughout the craton</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JB016829</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-412X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-2521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-4053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-7433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-8624</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2019-03, Vol.124 (3), p.3088-3104
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2211005861
source Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Anomalies
Copper
Cratons
crustal structure
Distribution
Geological faults
Geophysics
Gold
Gravitation
Gravity
Gravity data
Hydrothermal alteration
Iron
Iron oxides
Isotopes
Magma
Magnetism
mineral deposits
Mineral resources
Mineralization
Potential fields
Precambrian
Provinces
satellite gravity
Satellites
Seismic surveys
Seismic tomography
Structures
Switches
Tectonics
Tomography
title Proxies for Basement Structure and Its Implications for Mesoproterozoic Metallogenic Provinces in the Gawler Craton
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A54%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proxies%20for%20Basement%20Structure%20and%20Its%20Implications%20for%20Mesoproterozoic%20Metallogenic%20Provinces%20in%20the%20Gawler%20Craton&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Motta,%20J.%20G.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3088&rft.epage=3104&rft.pages=3088-3104&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JB016829&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2211005861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211005861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true