Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults

Summary Objectives To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults. Study design Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 2019-05, Vol.90 (5), p.680-689
Hauptverfasser: Mesinovic, Jakub, McMillan, Lachlan B., Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine, Zengin, Ayse, De Courten, Barbora, Ebeling, Peter R., Scott, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 689
container_issue 5
container_start_page 680
container_title Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)
container_volume 90
creator Mesinovic, Jakub
McMillan, Lachlan B.
Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine
Zengin, Ayse
De Courten, Barbora
Ebeling, Peter R.
Scott, David
description Summary Objectives To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults. Study design Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women). Main outcome measures Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey. Results Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P > 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men. Conclusions Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cen.13947
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2210483917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210483917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EglJYcAFkiRWLtI4_sbtEVflICBbAOrKdCRildrETSnccgTNyEgIt7JjNaKSnN9JD6Cgno7yfsQU_ytmEyy00yFkhMkoLsY0GhBGSkaLge2g_pWdCiFBE7qI9RiTlrJgMULiDt8_3j7QA62pnsU4pWKdbF3zCBtolgMfOp65xHkdILrXaW8DaV9gED3iho55DCzH1GA6vEJfgHp_aHyIYSIBDU0HEuuqaNh2gnVo3CQ43e4gezmf308vs-vbianp2nVkmhMysIUYyKygFI-VECaFUVWslQQjNeZXz_qRFIWvNTKG0rYVUVmrKgRuuKBuik7V3EcNLB6ktn0MXff-ypDQnXLFJLnvqdE3ZGFKKUJeL6OY6rsqclN9pyz5t-ZO2Z483xs7Mofojf1v2wHgNLF0Dq_9N5XR2s1Z-AUZBhTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210483917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mesinovic, Jakub ; McMillan, Lachlan B. ; Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine ; Zengin, Ayse ; De Courten, Barbora ; Ebeling, Peter R. ; Scott, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Mesinovic, Jakub ; McMillan, Lachlan B. ; Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine ; Zengin, Ayse ; De Courten, Barbora ; Ebeling, Peter R. ; Scott, David</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objectives To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults. Study design Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women). Main outcome measures Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey. Results Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P &gt; 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men. Conclusions Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cen.13947</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30724369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Body weight ; bone ; Bone mass ; Bone mineral density ; Cancellous bone ; Computed tomography ; density ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Fasting ; geometry ; Glucose ; Insulin ; Insulin resistance ; Laboratory testing ; microarchitecture ; Obesity ; Older people ; Overweight ; Physical activity ; Radius ; Sensitivity analysis ; Tibia ; Tomography ; Women</subject><ispartof>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2019-05, Vol.90 (5), p.680-689</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1297-2731</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcen.13947$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcen.13947$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30724369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mesinovic, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Lachlan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengin, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Courten, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, David</creatorcontrib><title>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</title><title>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><description>Summary Objectives To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults. Study design Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women). Main outcome measures Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey. Results Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P &gt; 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men. Conclusions Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone mass</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Cancellous bone</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>density</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>geometry</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin resistance</subject><subject>Laboratory testing</subject><subject>microarchitecture</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Radius</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0300-0664</issn><issn>1365-2265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EglJYcAFkiRWLtI4_sbtEVflICBbAOrKdCRildrETSnccgTNyEgIt7JjNaKSnN9JD6Cgno7yfsQU_ytmEyy00yFkhMkoLsY0GhBGSkaLge2g_pWdCiFBE7qI9RiTlrJgMULiDt8_3j7QA62pnsU4pWKdbF3zCBtolgMfOp65xHkdILrXaW8DaV9gED3iho55DCzH1GA6vEJfgHp_aHyIYSIBDU0HEuuqaNh2gnVo3CQ43e4gezmf308vs-vbianp2nVkmhMysIUYyKygFI-VECaFUVWslQQjNeZXz_qRFIWvNTKG0rYVUVmrKgRuuKBuik7V3EcNLB6ktn0MXff-ypDQnXLFJLnvqdE3ZGFKKUJeL6OY6rsqclN9pyz5t-ZO2Z483xs7Mofojf1v2wHgNLF0Dq_9N5XR2s1Z-AUZBhTU</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Mesinovic, Jakub</creator><creator>McMillan, Lachlan B.</creator><creator>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</creator><creator>Zengin, Ayse</creator><creator>De Courten, Barbora</creator><creator>Ebeling, Peter R.</creator><creator>Scott, David</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-2731</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</title><author>Mesinovic, Jakub ; McMillan, Lachlan B. ; Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine ; Zengin, Ayse ; De Courten, Barbora ; Ebeling, Peter R. ; Scott, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone mass</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Cancellous bone</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>density</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>geometry</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin resistance</topic><topic>Laboratory testing</topic><topic>microarchitecture</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Radius</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mesinovic, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Lachlan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengin, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Courten, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mesinovic, Jakub</au><au>McMillan, Lachlan B.</au><au>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</au><au>Zengin, Ayse</au><au>De Courten, Barbora</au><au>Ebeling, Peter R.</au><au>Scott, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</atitle><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>680</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>680-689</pages><issn>0300-0664</issn><eissn>1365-2265</eissn><abstract>Summary Objectives To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults. Study design Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women). Main outcome measures Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey. Results Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P &gt; 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men. Conclusions Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30724369</pmid><doi>10.1111/cen.13947</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-2731</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-0664
ispartof Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2019-05, Vol.90 (5), p.680-689
issn 0300-0664
1365-2265
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2210483917
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Body mass index
Body weight
bone
Bone mass
Bone mineral density
Cancellous bone
Computed tomography
density
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Fasting
geometry
Glucose
Insulin
Insulin resistance
Laboratory testing
microarchitecture
Obesity
Older people
Overweight
Physical activity
Radius
Sensitivity analysis
Tibia
Tomography
Women
title Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A47%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%E2%80%90specific%20associations%20between%20insulin%20resistance%20and%20bone%20parameters%20in%20overweight%20and%20obese%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20endocrinology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mesinovic,%20Jakub&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=680&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=680-689&rft.issn=0300-0664&rft.eissn=1365-2265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cen.13947&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210483917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210483917&rft_id=info:pmid/30724369&rfr_iscdi=true