Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults
Summary Objectives To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults. Study design Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 2019-05, Vol.90 (5), p.680-689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 689 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 680 |
container_title | Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Mesinovic, Jakub McMillan, Lachlan B. Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine Zengin, Ayse De Courten, Barbora Ebeling, Peter R. Scott, David |
description | Summary
Objectives
To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults.
Study design
Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women).
Main outcome measures
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey.
Results
Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P > 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men.
Conclusions
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cen.13947 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2210483917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210483917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EglJYcAFkiRWLtI4_sbtEVflICBbAOrKdCRildrETSnccgTNyEgIt7JjNaKSnN9JD6Cgno7yfsQU_ytmEyy00yFkhMkoLsY0GhBGSkaLge2g_pWdCiFBE7qI9RiTlrJgMULiDt8_3j7QA62pnsU4pWKdbF3zCBtolgMfOp65xHkdILrXaW8DaV9gED3iho55DCzH1GA6vEJfgHp_aHyIYSIBDU0HEuuqaNh2gnVo3CQ43e4gezmf308vs-vbianp2nVkmhMysIUYyKygFI-VECaFUVWslQQjNeZXz_qRFIWvNTKG0rYVUVmrKgRuuKBuik7V3EcNLB6ktn0MXff-ypDQnXLFJLnvqdE3ZGFKKUJeL6OY6rsqclN9pyz5t-ZO2Z483xs7Mofojf1v2wHgNLF0Dq_9N5XR2s1Z-AUZBhTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210483917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mesinovic, Jakub ; McMillan, Lachlan B. ; Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine ; Zengin, Ayse ; De Courten, Barbora ; Ebeling, Peter R. ; Scott, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Mesinovic, Jakub ; McMillan, Lachlan B. ; Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine ; Zengin, Ayse ; De Courten, Barbora ; Ebeling, Peter R. ; Scott, David</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Objectives
To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults.
Study design
Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women).
Main outcome measures
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey.
Results
Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P > 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men.
Conclusions
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cen.13947</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30724369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Body weight ; bone ; Bone mass ; Bone mineral density ; Cancellous bone ; Computed tomography ; density ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Fasting ; geometry ; Glucose ; Insulin ; Insulin resistance ; Laboratory testing ; microarchitecture ; Obesity ; Older people ; Overweight ; Physical activity ; Radius ; Sensitivity analysis ; Tibia ; Tomography ; Women</subject><ispartof>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2019-05, Vol.90 (5), p.680-689</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1297-2731</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcen.13947$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcen.13947$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30724369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mesinovic, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Lachlan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengin, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Courten, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, David</creatorcontrib><title>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</title><title>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><description>Summary
Objectives
To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults.
Study design
Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women).
Main outcome measures
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey.
Results
Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P > 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men.
Conclusions
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone mass</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Cancellous bone</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>density</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>geometry</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin resistance</subject><subject>Laboratory testing</subject><subject>microarchitecture</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Radius</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0300-0664</issn><issn>1365-2265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EglJYcAFkiRWLtI4_sbtEVflICBbAOrKdCRildrETSnccgTNyEgIt7JjNaKSnN9JD6Cgno7yfsQU_ytmEyy00yFkhMkoLsY0GhBGSkaLge2g_pWdCiFBE7qI9RiTlrJgMULiDt8_3j7QA62pnsU4pWKdbF3zCBtolgMfOp65xHkdILrXaW8DaV9gED3iho55DCzH1GA6vEJfgHp_aHyIYSIBDU0HEuuqaNh2gnVo3CQ43e4gezmf308vs-vbianp2nVkmhMysIUYyKygFI-VECaFUVWslQQjNeZXz_qRFIWvNTKG0rYVUVmrKgRuuKBuik7V3EcNLB6ktn0MXff-ypDQnXLFJLnvqdE3ZGFKKUJeL6OY6rsqclN9pyz5t-ZO2Z483xs7Mofojf1v2wHgNLF0Dq_9N5XR2s1Z-AUZBhTU</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Mesinovic, Jakub</creator><creator>McMillan, Lachlan B.</creator><creator>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</creator><creator>Zengin, Ayse</creator><creator>De Courten, Barbora</creator><creator>Ebeling, Peter R.</creator><creator>Scott, David</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-2731</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</title><author>Mesinovic, Jakub ; McMillan, Lachlan B. ; Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine ; Zengin, Ayse ; De Courten, Barbora ; Ebeling, Peter R. ; Scott, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3557-cb0b73c522eb77985588dfa87e55a44d148df2667fa3b68acf578c7a24e4b4823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone mass</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Cancellous bone</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>density</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>geometry</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin resistance</topic><topic>Laboratory testing</topic><topic>microarchitecture</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Radius</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mesinovic, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Lachlan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zengin, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Courten, Barbora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mesinovic, Jakub</au><au>McMillan, Lachlan B.</au><au>Shore‐Lorenti, Catherine</au><au>Zengin, Ayse</au><au>De Courten, Barbora</au><au>Ebeling, Peter R.</au><au>Scott, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults</atitle><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>680</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>680-689</pages><issn>0300-0664</issn><eissn>1365-2265</eissn><abstract>Summary
Objectives
To determine sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in overweight and obese community‐dwelling older adults.
Study design
Cross‐sectional study of 79 community‐dwelling overweight and obese adults (mean ± SD age 62.8 ± 7.9 years; body mass index 32.3 ± 6.1 kg/m2; 58% women).
Main outcome measures
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography assessed distal radius and tibia trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and proximal radius and tibia cortical vBMD, periosteal circumference, endosteal circumference and stress‐strain index. The Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA‐IR) score was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values. Lean mass was assessed using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. Total minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were calculated using the Active Australia Survey.
Results
Men and women in this cohort had no significant differences in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA‐IR values and diabetes prevalence (all P > 0.05). In women, HOMA‐IR was positively correlated with proximal radius periosteal and endosteal circumference (r = 0.331; P = 0.034 and r = 0.325; P = 0.038, respectively). These associations became nonsignificant in multivariable regression analyses; however, HOMA‐IR was negatively associated with proximal radius cortical vBMD (B = −4.79; 95% CI −8.66, −0.92) after adjusting for age, lean mass and MVPA. All associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters became nonsignificant in a sensitivity analysis excluding individuals with diabetes, or self‐reported use of glucose‐lowering medications. There were no associations between HOMA‐IR and bone parameters in men.
Conclusions
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance was negatively associated with radial cortical vBMD in overweight and obese older women, but not in men. Further studies are needed to clarify sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone health in overweight and obese older adults.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30724369</pmid><doi>10.1111/cen.13947</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-2731</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-0664 |
ispartof | Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2019-05, Vol.90 (5), p.680-689 |
issn | 0300-0664 1365-2265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2210483917 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Body mass index Body weight bone Bone mass Bone mineral density Cancellous bone Computed tomography density Diabetes Diabetes mellitus Fasting geometry Glucose Insulin Insulin resistance Laboratory testing microarchitecture Obesity Older people Overweight Physical activity Radius Sensitivity analysis Tibia Tomography Women |
title | Sex‐specific associations between insulin resistance and bone parameters in overweight and obese older adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A47%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%E2%80%90specific%20associations%20between%20insulin%20resistance%20and%20bone%20parameters%20in%20overweight%20and%20obese%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20endocrinology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Mesinovic,%20Jakub&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=680&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=680-689&rft.issn=0300-0664&rft.eissn=1365-2265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cen.13947&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210483917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210483917&rft_id=info:pmid/30724369&rfr_iscdi=true |