Phase III Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid To Prevent Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence
Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of colonic neoplasia in preclinical models and in patients with conditions associated with an increased risk for colon cancer. We conducted a phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UDCA to evaluate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005-06, Vol.97 (11), p.846-853 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 853 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 846 |
container_title | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Alberts, David S. Martínez, María Elena Hess, Lisa M. Einspahr, Janine G. Green, Sylvan B. Bhattacharyya, A. K. Guillen, Jose Krutzsch, Mary Batta, Ashok K. Salen, Gerald Fales, Liane Koonce, Kris Parish, Dianne Clouser, Mary Roe, Denise Lance, Peter |
description | Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of colonic neoplasia in preclinical models and in patients with conditions associated with an increased risk for colon cancer. We conducted a phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UDCA to evaluate its ability to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence. Methods: We randomly assigned 1285 individuals who had undergone removal of a colorectal adenoma within the past 6 months to daily treatment with UDCA (8–10 mg/kg of body weight; 661 participants) or with placebo (624 participants) for 3 years or until follow-up colonoscopy. Recurrence rates (number of recurrent adenomas per unit time) were compared by use of a Huber–White variance estimator. Proportions of participants with one or more recurrent adenomas were compared with a Pearson chi-square statistic; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were obtained by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We observed a non–statistically significant 12% reduction in the adenoma recurrence rate associated with UDCA treatment, compared with placebo treatment. However, UDCA treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction (P = .03) in the recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (adjusted OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96). We observed no statistically significant differences between UDCA and placebo groups in recurrence with regard to adenoma size, villous histology, or location. Conclusions: UDCA treatment was associated with a non–statistically significant reduction in total colorectal adenoma recurrence but with a statistically significant 39% reduction in recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. Because severely dysplastic lesions have a high risk of progression to invasive colorectal carcinoma, this finding indicates that future chemoprevention trials of UDCA in individuals with such lesions should be considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jnci/dji144 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_221040451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>858423231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-88a3d31bea2c112b9eca09670ccfc18832cf2e6fd45c71573934111709b3e4673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0FFP2zAQB3BrAo0O9rR3ZCHtCWX4bCdOHqtq0DIkCiraxIvlXi4iJY3BThF8-xm1Ar_cg3--O_8Z-wHiF4hKna16bM_qVQtaf2Ej0IXIJIh8j42EkCYrS6MP2LcYVyKdSuqv7ADySpZK5CM2nz-4SHw2m_FFaF3HfcPvQvQ1-dc3fPBdi3yMbc0Xns8DvVA_8InvfCAckh7X1Pu147eEmxCoRzpi-43rIn3f1UN2d_57MZlmV9cXs8n4KkNd5kPayqlawZKcRAC5rAidqAojEBuEslQSG0lFU-scDeRGVUoDgBHVUpEujDpkJ9u-T8E_bygOduU3oU8jrUzf10LnkNDpFmHwMQZq7FNo1y68WRD2PTz7Hp7dhpf08a7lZrmm-tPu0krg5w64iK5rgkuv46czolCVlsllW9fGgV4_7l14tGlzk9vpv3v7R9_eXN5P_1pQ_wEqQ4Yn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221040451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase III Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid To Prevent Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alberts, David S. ; Martínez, María Elena ; Hess, Lisa M. ; Einspahr, Janine G. ; Green, Sylvan B. ; Bhattacharyya, A. K. ; Guillen, Jose ; Krutzsch, Mary ; Batta, Ashok K. ; Salen, Gerald ; Fales, Liane ; Koonce, Kris ; Parish, Dianne ; Clouser, Mary ; Roe, Denise ; Lance, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Alberts, David S. ; Martínez, María Elena ; Hess, Lisa M. ; Einspahr, Janine G. ; Green, Sylvan B. ; Bhattacharyya, A. K. ; Guillen, Jose ; Krutzsch, Mary ; Batta, Ashok K. ; Salen, Gerald ; Fales, Liane ; Koonce, Kris ; Parish, Dianne ; Clouser, Mary ; Roe, Denise ; Lance, Peter ; Phoenix and Tucson Gastroenterologist Networks</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of colonic neoplasia in preclinical models and in patients with conditions associated with an increased risk for colon cancer. We conducted a phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UDCA to evaluate its ability to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence. Methods: We randomly assigned 1285 individuals who had undergone removal of a colorectal adenoma within the past 6 months to daily treatment with UDCA (8–10 mg/kg of body weight; 661 participants) or with placebo (624 participants) for 3 years or until follow-up colonoscopy. Recurrence rates (number of recurrent adenomas per unit time) were compared by use of a Huber–White variance estimator. Proportions of participants with one or more recurrent adenomas were compared with a Pearson chi-square statistic; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were obtained by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We observed a non–statistically significant 12% reduction in the adenoma recurrence rate associated with UDCA treatment, compared with placebo treatment. However, UDCA treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction (P = .03) in the recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (adjusted OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96). We observed no statistically significant differences between UDCA and placebo groups in recurrence with regard to adenoma size, villous histology, or location. Conclusions: UDCA treatment was associated with a non–statistically significant reduction in total colorectal adenoma recurrence but with a statistically significant 39% reduction in recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. Because severely dysplastic lesions have a high risk of progression to invasive colorectal carcinoma, this finding indicates that future chemoprevention trials of UDCA in individuals with such lesions should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2105</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15928305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNCIEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adenoma - pathology ; Adenoma - prevention & control ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control ; Oncology ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Ursodeoxycholic Acid - adverse effects ; Ursodeoxycholic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005-06, Vol.97 (11), p.846-853</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jun 1, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-88a3d31bea2c112b9eca09670ccfc18832cf2e6fd45c71573934111709b3e4673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-88a3d31bea2c112b9eca09670ccfc18832cf2e6fd45c71573934111709b3e4673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17063942$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alberts, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, María Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einspahr, Janine G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Sylvan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharyya, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillen, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krutzsch, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batta, Ashok K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salen, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fales, Liane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koonce, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parish, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clouser, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lance, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phoenix and Tucson Gastroenterologist Networks</creatorcontrib><title>Phase III Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid To Prevent Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence</title><title>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</title><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><description>Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of colonic neoplasia in preclinical models and in patients with conditions associated with an increased risk for colon cancer. We conducted a phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UDCA to evaluate its ability to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence. Methods: We randomly assigned 1285 individuals who had undergone removal of a colorectal adenoma within the past 6 months to daily treatment with UDCA (8–10 mg/kg of body weight; 661 participants) or with placebo (624 participants) for 3 years or until follow-up colonoscopy. Recurrence rates (number of recurrent adenomas per unit time) were compared by use of a Huber–White variance estimator. Proportions of participants with one or more recurrent adenomas were compared with a Pearson chi-square statistic; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were obtained by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We observed a non–statistically significant 12% reduction in the adenoma recurrence rate associated with UDCA treatment, compared with placebo treatment. However, UDCA treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction (P = .03) in the recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (adjusted OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96). We observed no statistically significant differences between UDCA and placebo groups in recurrence with regard to adenoma size, villous histology, or location. Conclusions: UDCA treatment was associated with a non–statistically significant reduction in total colorectal adenoma recurrence but with a statistically significant 39% reduction in recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. Because severely dysplastic lesions have a high risk of progression to invasive colorectal carcinoma, this finding indicates that future chemoprevention trials of UDCA in individuals with such lesions should be considered.</description><subject>Adenoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenoma - prevention & control</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ursodeoxycholic Acid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ursodeoxycholic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0027-8874</issn><issn>1460-2105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0FFP2zAQB3BrAo0O9rR3ZCHtCWX4bCdOHqtq0DIkCiraxIvlXi4iJY3BThF8-xm1Ar_cg3--O_8Z-wHiF4hKna16bM_qVQtaf2Ej0IXIJIh8j42EkCYrS6MP2LcYVyKdSuqv7ADySpZK5CM2nz-4SHw2m_FFaF3HfcPvQvQ1-dc3fPBdi3yMbc0Xns8DvVA_8InvfCAckh7X1Pu147eEmxCoRzpi-43rIn3f1UN2d_57MZlmV9cXs8n4KkNd5kPayqlawZKcRAC5rAidqAojEBuEslQSG0lFU-scDeRGVUoDgBHVUpEujDpkJ9u-T8E_bygOduU3oU8jrUzf10LnkNDpFmHwMQZq7FNo1y68WRD2PTz7Hp7dhpf08a7lZrmm-tPu0krg5w64iK5rgkuv46czolCVlsllW9fGgV4_7l14tGlzk9vpv3v7R9_eXN5P_1pQ_wEqQ4Yn</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Alberts, David S.</creator><creator>Martínez, María Elena</creator><creator>Hess, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Einspahr, Janine G.</creator><creator>Green, Sylvan B.</creator><creator>Bhattacharyya, A. K.</creator><creator>Guillen, Jose</creator><creator>Krutzsch, Mary</creator><creator>Batta, Ashok K.</creator><creator>Salen, Gerald</creator><creator>Fales, Liane</creator><creator>Koonce, Kris</creator><creator>Parish, Dianne</creator><creator>Clouser, Mary</creator><creator>Roe, Denise</creator><creator>Lance, Peter</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Phase III Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid To Prevent Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence</title><author>Alberts, David S. ; Martínez, María Elena ; Hess, Lisa M. ; Einspahr, Janine G. ; Green, Sylvan B. ; Bhattacharyya, A. K. ; Guillen, Jose ; Krutzsch, Mary ; Batta, Ashok K. ; Salen, Gerald ; Fales, Liane ; Koonce, Kris ; Parish, Dianne ; Clouser, Mary ; Roe, Denise ; Lance, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-88a3d31bea2c112b9eca09670ccfc18832cf2e6fd45c71573934111709b3e4673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenoma - prevention & control</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ursodeoxycholic Acid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ursodeoxycholic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alberts, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, María Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einspahr, Janine G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Sylvan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharyya, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillen, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krutzsch, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batta, Ashok K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salen, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fales, Liane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koonce, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parish, Dianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clouser, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roe, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lance, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phoenix and Tucson Gastroenterologist Networks</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alberts, David S.</au><au>Martínez, María Elena</au><au>Hess, Lisa M.</au><au>Einspahr, Janine G.</au><au>Green, Sylvan B.</au><au>Bhattacharyya, A. K.</au><au>Guillen, Jose</au><au>Krutzsch, Mary</au><au>Batta, Ashok K.</au><au>Salen, Gerald</au><au>Fales, Liane</au><au>Koonce, Kris</au><au>Parish, Dianne</au><au>Clouser, Mary</au><au>Roe, Denise</au><au>Lance, Peter</au><aucorp>Phoenix and Tucson Gastroenterologist Networks</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase III Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid To Prevent Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence</atitle><jtitle>JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute</jtitle><addtitle>JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst</addtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>846</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>846-853</pages><issn>0027-8874</issn><eissn>1460-2105</eissn><coden>JNCIEQ</coden><abstract>Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of colonic neoplasia in preclinical models and in patients with conditions associated with an increased risk for colon cancer. We conducted a phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UDCA to evaluate its ability to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence. Methods: We randomly assigned 1285 individuals who had undergone removal of a colorectal adenoma within the past 6 months to daily treatment with UDCA (8–10 mg/kg of body weight; 661 participants) or with placebo (624 participants) for 3 years or until follow-up colonoscopy. Recurrence rates (number of recurrent adenomas per unit time) were compared by use of a Huber–White variance estimator. Proportions of participants with one or more recurrent adenomas were compared with a Pearson chi-square statistic; adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were obtained by logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We observed a non–statistically significant 12% reduction in the adenoma recurrence rate associated with UDCA treatment, compared with placebo treatment. However, UDCA treatment was associated with a statistically significant reduction (P = .03) in the recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (adjusted OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96). We observed no statistically significant differences between UDCA and placebo groups in recurrence with regard to adenoma size, villous histology, or location. Conclusions: UDCA treatment was associated with a non–statistically significant reduction in total colorectal adenoma recurrence but with a statistically significant 39% reduction in recurrence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. Because severely dysplastic lesions have a high risk of progression to invasive colorectal carcinoma, this finding indicates that future chemoprevention trials of UDCA in individuals with such lesions should be considered.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15928305</pmid><doi>10.1093/jnci/dji144</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8874 |
ispartof | JNCI : Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005-06, Vol.97 (11), p.846-853 |
issn | 0027-8874 1460-2105 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_221040451 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adenoma - pathology Adenoma - prevention & control Adult Aged Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Chemotherapy Clinical trials Colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control Double-Blind Method Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control Oncology Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Treatment Outcome Tumors Ursodeoxycholic Acid - adverse effects Ursodeoxycholic Acid - therapeutic use |
title | Phase III Trial of Ursodeoxycholic Acid To Prevent Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A03%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20III%20Trial%20of%20Ursodeoxycholic%20Acid%20To%20Prevent%20Colorectal%20Adenoma%20Recurrence&rft.jtitle=JNCI%20:%20Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Cancer%20Institute&rft.au=Alberts,%20David%20S.&rft.aucorp=Phoenix%20and%20Tucson%20Gastroenterologist%20Networks&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=846&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=846-853&rft.issn=0027-8874&rft.eissn=1460-2105&rft.coden=JNCIEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jnci/dji144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E858423231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221040451&rft_id=info:pmid/15928305&rfr_iscdi=true |