Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?

Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?

This paper indicates that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism indicated as a philosophical framework of neo-constitutionalism. In order to demonstrate this, the evolution of legal positivism and its main theses (separability, deconventionality and sources) are exposed, in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito, 2018-09, Vol.10 (3), p.348
Hauptverfasser: Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho, Júlio César Matias Lobo, Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Positivism
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 348
container_title RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito
container_volume 10
creator Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho
Júlio César Matias Lobo
Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão
description This paper indicates that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism indicated as a philosophical framework of neo-constitutionalism. In order to demonstrate this, the evolution of legal positivism and its main theses (separability, deconventionality and sources) are exposed, in order to demonstrate how they resist the current post-positivist critiques and conclude that only a version of formalistic and legalistic positivism is rejected. An effective alternative to positivism would require the complete incorporation of non-positivist theses (such as Dworkin’s interpretativism), which are incomplete in practice and law studies in Brazil. The research, therefore, is of bibliographic nature with the reading of the specialized doctrine on the subject, besides jurisprudential/documentary analysis.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2210399939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210399939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_22103999393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyjEKwjAUANAgCBbtHQLOhSTfVjM5iOIBBMcSQpSUNL_mJz2_HTyA01veilVKHttGye60YTXRIISQcFAAbcW6pyEe3NsEPiH57GdPI8fZJYuj4z7y6NBipOxzsR6jCUs479j6ZQK5-ueW7W_Xx-XeTAk_xVHuByxpydQrJQVorUHDf-sLJLU2Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210399939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho ; Júlio César Matias Lobo ; Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</creator><creatorcontrib>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho ; Júlio César Matias Lobo ; Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</creatorcontrib><description>This paper indicates that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism indicated as a philosophical framework of neo-constitutionalism. In order to demonstrate this, the evolution of legal positivism and its main theses (separability, deconventionality and sources) are exposed, in order to demonstrate how they resist the current post-positivist critiques and conclude that only a version of formalistic and legalistic positivism is rejected. An effective alternative to positivism would require the complete incorporation of non-positivist theses (such as Dworkin’s interpretativism), which are incomplete in practice and law studies in Brazil. The research, therefore, is of bibliographic nature with the reading of the specialized doctrine on the subject, besides jurisprudential/documentary analysis.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2175-2168</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>São Leopoldo: Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS, Editoria de Periódicos Científicos</publisher><subject>Positivism</subject><ispartof>RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito, 2018-09, Vol.10 (3), p.348</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Júlio César Matias Lobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</creatorcontrib><title>Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?</title><title>RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito</title><description>This paper indicates that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism indicated as a philosophical framework of neo-constitutionalism. In order to demonstrate this, the evolution of legal positivism and its main theses (separability, deconventionality and sources) are exposed, in order to demonstrate how they resist the current post-positivist critiques and conclude that only a version of formalistic and legalistic positivism is rejected. An effective alternative to positivism would require the complete incorporation of non-positivist theses (such as Dworkin’s interpretativism), which are incomplete in practice and law studies in Brazil. The research, therefore, is of bibliographic nature with the reading of the specialized doctrine on the subject, besides jurisprudential/documentary analysis.</description><subject>Positivism</subject><issn>2175-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyjEKwjAUANAgCBbtHQLOhSTfVjM5iOIBBMcSQpSUNL_mJz2_HTyA01veilVKHttGye60YTXRIISQcFAAbcW6pyEe3NsEPiH57GdPI8fZJYuj4z7y6NBipOxzsR6jCUs479j6ZQK5-ueW7W_Xx-XeTAk_xVHuByxpydQrJQVorUHDf-sLJLU2Lg</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho</creator><creator>Júlio César Matias Lobo</creator><creator>Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</creator><general>Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS, Editoria de Periódicos Científicos</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?</title><author>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho ; Júlio César Matias Lobo ; Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_22103999393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Positivism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Júlio César Matias Lobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Juraci Mourão Lopes Filho</au><au>Júlio César Matias Lobo</au><au>Taís Vasconcelos Cidrão</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?</atitle><jtitle>RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>348</spage><pages>348-</pages><eissn>2175-2168</eissn><abstract>This paper indicates that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism indicated as a philosophical framework of neo-constitutionalism. In order to demonstrate this, the evolution of legal positivism and its main theses (separability, deconventionality and sources) are exposed, in order to demonstrate how they resist the current post-positivist critiques and conclude that only a version of formalistic and legalistic positivism is rejected. An effective alternative to positivism would require the complete incorporation of non-positivist theses (such as Dworkin’s interpretativism), which are incomplete in practice and law studies in Brazil. The research, therefore, is of bibliographic nature with the reading of the specialized doctrine on the subject, besides jurisprudential/documentary analysis.</abstract><cop>São Leopoldo</cop><pub>Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos - UNISINOS, Editoria de Periódicos Científicos</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2175-2168
ispartof RECHTD. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito, 2018-09, Vol.10 (3), p.348
issn 2175-2168
language por
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2210399939
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Positivism
title Was legal positivism overcome in neoconstitucionalism?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Was%20legal%20positivism%20overcome%20in%20neoconstitucionalism?&rft.jtitle=RECHTD.%20Revista%20de%20Estudos%20Constitucionais,%20Hermen%C3%AAutica%20e%20Teoria%20do%20Direito&rft.au=Juraci%20Mour%C3%A3o%20Lopes%20Filho&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=348&rft.pages=348-&rft.eissn=2175-2168&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2210399939%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210399939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true