Contributory negligence as a defence to battery

Contributory negligence as a defence to battery

At one time it would have been possible to say with firm confidence that contributory negligence was never a defence to battery except, perhaps when the conduct of the plaintiff was so clearly the cause of the harm that had befallen him that it could be treated as contributory intent. In more recent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars) 1984-11, Vol.4 (3), p.332-342
1. Verfasser: Hudson, A. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Common law
Negligence
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 342
container_issue 3
container_start_page 332
container_title Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars)
container_volume 4
creator Hudson, A. H.
description At one time it would have been possible to say with firm confidence that contributory negligence was never a defence to battery except, perhaps when the conduct of the plaintiff was so clearly the cause of the harm that had befallen him that it could be treated as contributory intent. In more recent years, however, a number of qualifications to any such terse summary have appeared and somewhat surprising conflicts of opinion between various common law jurisdictions have arisen, both on the principal question and a number of associated problems.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1984.tb00450.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2210387400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210387400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2712-26ae623f9525af4c239055f1ee5d6426e73301c4ff805de219beb42602c951423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAYhYMoOKf_oeh1u3w2rTciQ6cwP2D14y6k3ZvROteZZLj-e1s7dimYm5A355yX8yB0TnBE2jOqIiJ5EhJK3iOSJjzyOcZc4Gh7gAb7r0M0wDQmIUukOEYnzlWtiLFUDNBoXK-8LfONr20TrGCxLBewKiDQLtDBHMzvw9dBrr0H25yiI6OXDs529xC93N5k47tw-jS5H19Pw4JKQkMaa4gpM6mgQhteUJZiIQwBEPOY0xgkY5gU3JgEizlQkuaQt3NMi1QQTtkQXfS5a1t_bcB5VdUbu2pXKkoJbptwjP9SEYa5ZJwK3qoue1Vha-csGLW25ae2jSJYdRhVpTpWqmOlOoxqh1FtW_NVb_4ul9D8w6mmN7OMsa5K2CeUzsN2n6Dth4olk0K9PU6UzF4fspl4Vhn7AZnPhxc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210387400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contributory negligence as a defence to battery</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hudson, A. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hudson, A. H.</creatorcontrib><description>At one time it would have been possible to say with firm confidence that contributory negligence was never a defence to battery except, perhaps when the conduct of the plaintiff was so clearly the cause of the harm that had befallen him that it could be treated as contributory intent. In more recent years, however, a number of qualifications to any such terse summary have appeared and somewhat surprising conflicts of opinion between various common law jurisdictions have arisen, both on the principal question and a number of associated problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-121X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1984.tb00450.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Common law ; Negligence</subject><ispartof>Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars), 1984-11, Vol.4 (3), p.332-342</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1984</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hudson, A. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Contributory negligence as a defence to battery</title><title>Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars)</title><description>At one time it would have been possible to say with firm confidence that contributory negligence was never a defence to battery except, perhaps when the conduct of the plaintiff was so clearly the cause of the harm that had befallen him that it could be treated as contributory intent. In more recent years, however, a number of qualifications to any such terse summary have appeared and somewhat surprising conflicts of opinion between various common law jurisdictions have arisen, both on the principal question and a number of associated problems.</description><subject>Common law</subject><subject>Negligence</subject><issn>0261-3875</issn><issn>1748-121X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAYhYMoOKf_oeh1u3w2rTciQ6cwP2D14y6k3ZvROteZZLj-e1s7dimYm5A355yX8yB0TnBE2jOqIiJ5EhJK3iOSJjzyOcZc4Gh7gAb7r0M0wDQmIUukOEYnzlWtiLFUDNBoXK-8LfONr20TrGCxLBewKiDQLtDBHMzvw9dBrr0H25yiI6OXDs529xC93N5k47tw-jS5H19Pw4JKQkMaa4gpM6mgQhteUJZiIQwBEPOY0xgkY5gU3JgEizlQkuaQt3NMi1QQTtkQXfS5a1t_bcB5VdUbu2pXKkoJbptwjP9SEYa5ZJwK3qoue1Vha-csGLW25ae2jSJYdRhVpTpWqmOlOoxqh1FtW_NVb_4ul9D8w6mmN7OMsa5K2CeUzsN2n6Dth4olk0K9PU6UzF4fspl4Vhn7AZnPhxc</recordid><startdate>198411</startdate><enddate>198411</enddate><creator>Hudson, A. H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Butterworth and Co</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>HAGHG</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198411</creationdate><title>Contributory negligence as a defence to battery</title><author>Hudson, A. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2712-26ae623f9525af4c239055f1ee5d6426e73301c4ff805de219beb42602c951423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Common law</topic><topic>Negligence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hudson, A. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 12</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hudson, A. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contributory negligence as a defence to battery</atitle><jtitle>Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars)</jtitle><date>1984-11</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>332-342</pages><issn>0261-3875</issn><eissn>1748-121X</eissn><abstract>At one time it would have been possible to say with firm confidence that contributory negligence was never a defence to battery except, perhaps when the conduct of the plaintiff was so clearly the cause of the harm that had befallen him that it could be treated as contributory intent. In more recent years, however, a number of qualifications to any such terse summary have appeared and somewhat surprising conflicts of opinion between various common law jurisdictions have arisen, both on the principal question and a number of associated problems.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1748-121X.1984.tb00450.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-3875
ispartof Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars), 1984-11, Vol.4 (3), p.332-342
issn 0261-3875
1748-121X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2210387400
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Common law
Negligence
title Contributory negligence as a defence to battery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contributory%20negligence%20as%20a%20defence%20to%20battery&rft.jtitle=Legal%20studies%20(Society%20of%20Legal%20Scholars)&rft.au=Hudson,%20A.%20H.&rft.date=1984-11&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=332-342&rft.issn=0261-3875&rft.eissn=1748-121X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1984.tb00450.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210387400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210387400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true