TCTAP A-011 Early Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment Strategies in Octogenarians with Acute Coronary Syndrome: One-year Clinical Outcome, a Single Centre Experience

The Conservative treatment group had higher in-hospital mortality compared to invasive group (17.3% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.1108). Subgroup analysis of EIS showed statistically significant one-year mortality difference between Trans-Radial PCI and Trans-Femoral PCI (9.3% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.0157).Conclusion Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019-04, Vol.73 (15), p.S7-S7
Hauptverfasser: Thomachan, Vipin Mughilassery, Shehab, Abdullah M.A., Siddiqui, Ahmed, Shamsi, Ali, Jamil, Gohar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Conservative treatment group had higher in-hospital mortality compared to invasive group (17.3% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.1108). Subgroup analysis of EIS showed statistically significant one-year mortality difference between Trans-Radial PCI and Trans-Femoral PCI (9.3% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.0157).Conclusion This retrospective data analysis study shows that early invasive strategy, though underutilized in octogenarians with ACS, is technically feasible with successful coronary revascularization in the majority of patients and appears superior to conservative strategy in terms of MACE by one year. Compared with the conservative strategy, early invasive treatment in octogenarians with ACS was associated with low in-hospital mortality, six and twelve-month all-cause mortality and twelve-month cardiac mortality.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.037