Performance evaluation of breast lesion detection systems with expert delineations: a comparative investigation on mammographic images

Performance of computerized diagnostic systems yearning to be approved by medical regulatory bodies must meet the expectations of human experts. Highly accurate lesion segmentation techniques have thus turned out to be an essential part for clinical acceptability of mammography based computer-aided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multimedia tools and applications 2019-08, Vol.78 (16), p.22421-22444
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Bikesh K., Jain, Pankaj, Banchhor, Sumit K., Verma, Kesari
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22444
container_issue 16
container_start_page 22421
container_title Multimedia tools and applications
container_volume 78
creator Singh, Bikesh K.
Jain, Pankaj
Banchhor, Sumit K.
Verma, Kesari
description Performance of computerized diagnostic systems yearning to be approved by medical regulatory bodies must meet the expectations of human experts. Highly accurate lesion segmentation techniques have thus turned out to be an essential part for clinical acceptability of mammography based computer-aided diagnosis systems. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of six popular breast tumor detection techniques with manual delineations provided by two experienced radiologists on the mammographic images. In our study, 20 mammographic images from the mini-MIAS database are utilized. For the analysis, input mammographic images are first manually cropped to generate the region of interest (ROI). The ROI images are then pre-processed and segmentation is performed using different techniques, namely: expected maximization, K-means, Fuzzy c-Means (FCM), multilevel thresholding, region growing, and particle swarm optimization. The results were compared against the manual tracings. Among the other five segmentation techniques, FCM achieves the highest Jaccard Index (0.73 ± 0.06) and Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.82 ± 0.08) values. Statistical analysis (t-test, Mann Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Chi-Square test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and graphical analysis (Bland Altman and Regression plots) further prove the stability and reliability of the segmentation methods. Segmentation using FCM demonstrates the most accurate results and can be employed for the detection of breast cancer in the mammographic images. Further, it is concluded that computer-aided lesion detection systems can be used to assist Radiologists in routine clinical practice for the detection of breast tumors in mammographic images.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11042-019-7570-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2210289162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210289162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-aa1d785f7f23b2782a9f195bd7fecf70a80e408f7c894186c370736bb97ef9633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMlOwzAQjRBIlMIHcLPEOeCxkzjhhio2qRIc4Gw57jhNlQ3bLbQfwHfjNkicOM3ylhm9KLoEeg2UihsHQBMWUyhikQoa746iCaSCx0IwOA49z2lAKJxGZ86tKIUsZckk-n5Fa3rbqk4jwY1q1srXfUd6Q0qLynnSoNsvFuhRHyC3dR5bRz5rvyT4NaD1AW3qDg9Sd0sU0X07KBvmDZK626DzdfVr3JFWtW1fWTUsa03qVlXozqMToxqHF791Gr0_3L_NnuL5y-Pz7G4eaw6Zj5WChchTIwzjJRM5U4WBIi0XwqA2gqqcYkJzI3ReJJBnmgsqeFaWhUBTZJxPo6vRd7D9xzq8JVf92nbhpGQMKMsLyFhgwcjStnfOopGDDX_arQQq93HLMW4Z4pb7uOUuaNiocYHbVWj_nP8X_QDkMYbS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210289162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of breast lesion detection systems with expert delineations: a comparative investigation on mammographic images</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Singh, Bikesh K. ; Jain, Pankaj ; Banchhor, Sumit K. ; Verma, Kesari</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bikesh K. ; Jain, Pankaj ; Banchhor, Sumit K. ; Verma, Kesari</creatorcontrib><description>Performance of computerized diagnostic systems yearning to be approved by medical regulatory bodies must meet the expectations of human experts. Highly accurate lesion segmentation techniques have thus turned out to be an essential part for clinical acceptability of mammography based computer-aided diagnosis systems. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of six popular breast tumor detection techniques with manual delineations provided by two experienced radiologists on the mammographic images. In our study, 20 mammographic images from the mini-MIAS database are utilized. For the analysis, input mammographic images are first manually cropped to generate the region of interest (ROI). The ROI images are then pre-processed and segmentation is performed using different techniques, namely: expected maximization, K-means, Fuzzy c-Means (FCM), multilevel thresholding, region growing, and particle swarm optimization. The results were compared against the manual tracings. Among the other five segmentation techniques, FCM achieves the highest Jaccard Index (0.73 ± 0.06) and Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.82 ± 0.08) values. Statistical analysis (t-test, Mann Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Chi-Square test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and graphical analysis (Bland Altman and Regression plots) further prove the stability and reliability of the segmentation methods. Segmentation using FCM demonstrates the most accurate results and can be employed for the detection of breast cancer in the mammographic images. Further, it is concluded that computer-aided lesion detection systems can be used to assist Radiologists in routine clinical practice for the detection of breast tumors in mammographic images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-7501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-7570-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Breast ; Breast cancer ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Diagnostic systems ; Image detection ; Image segmentation ; Mammography ; Medical imaging ; Multimedia Information Systems ; Particle swarm optimization ; Performance evaluation ; Regression analysis ; Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems ; Stability analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Multimedia tools and applications, 2019-08, Vol.78 (16), p.22421-22444</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Multimedia Tools and Applications is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-aa1d785f7f23b2782a9f195bd7fecf70a80e408f7c894186c370736bb97ef9633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-aa1d785f7f23b2782a9f195bd7fecf70a80e408f7c894186c370736bb97ef9633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11042-019-7570-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11042-019-7570-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bikesh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banchhor, Sumit K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Kesari</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of breast lesion detection systems with expert delineations: a comparative investigation on mammographic images</title><title>Multimedia tools and applications</title><addtitle>Multimed Tools Appl</addtitle><description>Performance of computerized diagnostic systems yearning to be approved by medical regulatory bodies must meet the expectations of human experts. Highly accurate lesion segmentation techniques have thus turned out to be an essential part for clinical acceptability of mammography based computer-aided diagnosis systems. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of six popular breast tumor detection techniques with manual delineations provided by two experienced radiologists on the mammographic images. In our study, 20 mammographic images from the mini-MIAS database are utilized. For the analysis, input mammographic images are first manually cropped to generate the region of interest (ROI). The ROI images are then pre-processed and segmentation is performed using different techniques, namely: expected maximization, K-means, Fuzzy c-Means (FCM), multilevel thresholding, region growing, and particle swarm optimization. The results were compared against the manual tracings. Among the other five segmentation techniques, FCM achieves the highest Jaccard Index (0.73 ± 0.06) and Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.82 ± 0.08) values. Statistical analysis (t-test, Mann Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Chi-Square test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and graphical analysis (Bland Altman and Regression plots) further prove the stability and reliability of the segmentation methods. Segmentation using FCM demonstrates the most accurate results and can be employed for the detection of breast cancer in the mammographic images. Further, it is concluded that computer-aided lesion detection systems can be used to assist Radiologists in routine clinical practice for the detection of breast tumors in mammographic images.</description><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Multimedia Information Systems</subject><subject>Particle swarm optimization</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1380-7501</issn><issn>1573-7721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMlOwzAQjRBIlMIHcLPEOeCxkzjhhio2qRIc4Gw57jhNlQ3bLbQfwHfjNkicOM3ylhm9KLoEeg2UihsHQBMWUyhikQoa746iCaSCx0IwOA49z2lAKJxGZ86tKIUsZckk-n5Fa3rbqk4jwY1q1srXfUd6Q0qLynnSoNsvFuhRHyC3dR5bRz5rvyT4NaD1AW3qDg9Sd0sU0X07KBvmDZK626DzdfVr3JFWtW1fWTUsa03qVlXozqMToxqHF791Gr0_3L_NnuL5y-Pz7G4eaw6Zj5WChchTIwzjJRM5U4WBIi0XwqA2gqqcYkJzI3ReJJBnmgsqeFaWhUBTZJxPo6vRd7D9xzq8JVf92nbhpGQMKMsLyFhgwcjStnfOopGDDX_arQQq93HLMW4Z4pb7uOUuaNiocYHbVWj_nP8X_QDkMYbS</recordid><startdate>20190830</startdate><enddate>20190830</enddate><creator>Singh, Bikesh K.</creator><creator>Jain, Pankaj</creator><creator>Banchhor, Sumit K.</creator><creator>Verma, Kesari</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190830</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of breast lesion detection systems with expert delineations: a comparative investigation on mammographic images</title><author>Singh, Bikesh K. ; Jain, Pankaj ; Banchhor, Sumit K. ; Verma, Kesari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-aa1d785f7f23b2782a9f195bd7fecf70a80e408f7c894186c370736bb97ef9633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Multimedia Information Systems</topic><topic>Particle swarm optimization</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bikesh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banchhor, Sumit K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Kesari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Bikesh K.</au><au>Jain, Pankaj</au><au>Banchhor, Sumit K.</au><au>Verma, Kesari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of breast lesion detection systems with expert delineations: a comparative investigation on mammographic images</atitle><jtitle>Multimedia tools and applications</jtitle><stitle>Multimed Tools Appl</stitle><date>2019-08-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>22421</spage><epage>22444</epage><pages>22421-22444</pages><issn>1380-7501</issn><eissn>1573-7721</eissn><abstract>Performance of computerized diagnostic systems yearning to be approved by medical regulatory bodies must meet the expectations of human experts. Highly accurate lesion segmentation techniques have thus turned out to be an essential part for clinical acceptability of mammography based computer-aided diagnosis systems. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of six popular breast tumor detection techniques with manual delineations provided by two experienced radiologists on the mammographic images. In our study, 20 mammographic images from the mini-MIAS database are utilized. For the analysis, input mammographic images are first manually cropped to generate the region of interest (ROI). The ROI images are then pre-processed and segmentation is performed using different techniques, namely: expected maximization, K-means, Fuzzy c-Means (FCM), multilevel thresholding, region growing, and particle swarm optimization. The results were compared against the manual tracings. Among the other five segmentation techniques, FCM achieves the highest Jaccard Index (0.73 ± 0.06) and Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.82 ± 0.08) values. Statistical analysis (t-test, Mann Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test, Chi-Square test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and graphical analysis (Bland Altman and Regression plots) further prove the stability and reliability of the segmentation methods. Segmentation using FCM demonstrates the most accurate results and can be employed for the detection of breast cancer in the mammographic images. Further, it is concluded that computer-aided lesion detection systems can be used to assist Radiologists in routine clinical practice for the detection of breast tumors in mammographic images.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11042-019-7570-z</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-7501
ispartof Multimedia tools and applications, 2019-08, Vol.78 (16), p.22421-22444
issn 1380-7501
1573-7721
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2210289162
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Breast
Breast cancer
Computer Communication Networks
Computer Science
Data Structures and Information Theory
Diagnostic systems
Image detection
Image segmentation
Mammography
Medical imaging
Multimedia Information Systems
Particle swarm optimization
Performance evaluation
Regression analysis
Special Purpose and Application-Based Systems
Stability analysis
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Tumors
title Performance evaluation of breast lesion detection systems with expert delineations: a comparative investigation on mammographic images
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A44%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20breast%20lesion%20detection%20systems%20with%20expert%20delineations:%20a%20comparative%20investigation%20on%20mammographic%20images&rft.jtitle=Multimedia%20tools%20and%20applications&rft.au=Singh,%20Bikesh%20K.&rft.date=2019-08-30&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=22421&rft.epage=22444&rft.pages=22421-22444&rft.issn=1380-7501&rft.eissn=1573-7721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11042-019-7570-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210289162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210289162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true