A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AN OUT-OF-HOURS CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE
Until 1979, the out-of-hours chemical pathology service was the conventional oncall service in which the medical laboratory scientific officers (MLSOs) carried out analyses at the direct request of clinical staff. In 1980, during an industrial dispute, junior ward doctors were trained to use three s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 1985-04, Vol.325 (8433), p.859-861 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 861 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8433 |
container_start_page | 859 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 325 |
creator | Morgan, D.Brian Faye, Sherry Gunn, IanR Clegg, Gillian Grant, AndrewM |
description | Until 1979, the out-of-hours chemical pathology service was the conventional oncall service in which the medical laboratory scientific officers (MLSOs) carried out analyses at the direct request of clinical staff. In 1980, during an industrial dispute, junior ward doctors were trained to use three simple instruments which are maintained by the chemical pathology department. In January, 1981, when the dispute was settled, the doctors continued to use these instruments. Analyses they could not make were done by the MLSO on call, but only after the requests were monitored by a chemical pathologist or biochemist. The result was an 80% reduction in the number of calls. When the monitoring was withdrawn in 1983, there was some increase in the number of MLSO calls, but this was still 35% less than that with the conventional system despite a 4-fold increase in the total number of analyses done out of hours between 1979 and 1984. Surveys in 1984 and in early 1985 revealed that most doctors preferred using the instruments to asking an MLSO to make the analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92217-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2209995285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673685922172</els_id><sourcerecordid>2209995285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-8a06f6a8c15d0ee7a6f3568da2bd951597715dbfc9265486b60e6570343bf1953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOD9-ghDQC72oJmmTNFcSSrsNtnW0nR9XIU1TqOg2kyn47-0-8Narc3Ge9z2cB4ArjO4xwuyhRDhCAeMhu43pnSAE84AcgQGOeBTQiL8cg8EfcgrOvH9DCEUM0QF4ljDJp3NZjMt8BvMMykmVFjNZjZ9SKItCzobpNJ1VJczyAsoeWVRBngWjfFGUMBml03EiJ3Auq1E-yYevsEyLp3GSXoCTVr97e3mY52CRpVUyCnpomwgM4WITxBqxlunYYNoga7lmbUhZ3GhSN4JiKjjvN3VrBGE0ilnNkGWUozAK6xYLGp6D633v2q0-v6zfqLfVl1v2JxUhSAhBSbyl6J4ybuW9s61au-5Dux-Fkdo6VDuHaitIxVTtHCrS524O7dob_d46vTSd_wsLJGiEWI897jHbf_rdWae86ezS2KZz1mxUs-r-OfQLErJ8Uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209995285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AN OUT-OF-HOURS CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Morgan, D.Brian ; Faye, Sherry ; Gunn, IanR ; Clegg, Gillian ; Grant, AndrewM</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D.Brian ; Faye, Sherry ; Gunn, IanR ; Clegg, Gillian ; Grant, AndrewM</creatorcontrib><description>Until 1979, the out-of-hours chemical pathology service was the conventional oncall service in which the medical laboratory scientific officers (MLSOs) carried out analyses at the direct request of clinical staff. In 1980, during an industrial dispute, junior ward doctors were trained to use three simple instruments which are maintained by the chemical pathology department. In January, 1981, when the dispute was settled, the doctors continued to use these instruments. Analyses they could not make were done by the MLSO on call, but only after the requests were monitored by a chemical pathologist or biochemist. The result was an 80% reduction in the number of calls. When the monitoring was withdrawn in 1983, there was some increase in the number of MLSO calls, but this was still 35% less than that with the conventional system despite a 4-fold increase in the total number of analyses done out of hours between 1979 and 1984. Surveys in 1984 and in early 1985 revealed that most doctors preferred using the instruments to asking an MLSO to make the analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92217-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; General aspects ; Medical sciences ; Organic chemistry ; Pathology ; Physicians ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1985-04, Vol.325 (8433), p.859-861</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 13, 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-8a06f6a8c15d0ee7a6f3568da2bd951597715dbfc9265486b60e6570343bf1953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-8a06f6a8c15d0ee7a6f3568da2bd951597715dbfc9265486b60e6570343bf1953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92217-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9095406$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D.Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faye, Sherry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, IanR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, AndrewM</creatorcontrib><title>A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AN OUT-OF-HOURS CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Until 1979, the out-of-hours chemical pathology service was the conventional oncall service in which the medical laboratory scientific officers (MLSOs) carried out analyses at the direct request of clinical staff. In 1980, during an industrial dispute, junior ward doctors were trained to use three simple instruments which are maintained by the chemical pathology department. In January, 1981, when the dispute was settled, the doctors continued to use these instruments. Analyses they could not make were done by the MLSO on call, but only after the requests were monitored by a chemical pathologist or biochemist. The result was an 80% reduction in the number of calls. When the monitoring was withdrawn in 1983, there was some increase in the number of MLSO calls, but this was still 35% less than that with the conventional system despite a 4-fold increase in the total number of analyses done out of hours between 1979 and 1984. Surveys in 1984 and in early 1985 revealed that most doctors preferred using the instruments to asking an MLSO to make the analysis.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOD9-ghDQC72oJmmTNFcSSrsNtnW0nR9XIU1TqOg2kyn47-0-8Narc3Ge9z2cB4ArjO4xwuyhRDhCAeMhu43pnSAE84AcgQGOeBTQiL8cg8EfcgrOvH9DCEUM0QF4ljDJp3NZjMt8BvMMykmVFjNZjZ9SKItCzobpNJ1VJczyAsoeWVRBngWjfFGUMBml03EiJ3Auq1E-yYevsEyLp3GSXoCTVr97e3mY52CRpVUyCnpomwgM4WITxBqxlunYYNoga7lmbUhZ3GhSN4JiKjjvN3VrBGE0ilnNkGWUozAK6xYLGp6D633v2q0-v6zfqLfVl1v2JxUhSAhBSbyl6J4ybuW9s61au-5Dux-Fkdo6VDuHaitIxVTtHCrS524O7dob_d46vTSd_wsLJGiEWI897jHbf_rdWae86ezS2KZz1mxUs-r-OfQLErJ8Uw</recordid><startdate>19850413</startdate><enddate>19850413</enddate><creator>Morgan, D.Brian</creator><creator>Faye, Sherry</creator><creator>Gunn, IanR</creator><creator>Clegg, Gillian</creator><creator>Grant, AndrewM</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Lancet</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850413</creationdate><title>A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AN OUT-OF-HOURS CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE</title><author>Morgan, D.Brian ; Faye, Sherry ; Gunn, IanR ; Clegg, Gillian ; Grant, AndrewM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-8a06f6a8c15d0ee7a6f3568da2bd951597715dbfc9265486b60e6570343bf1953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, D.Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faye, Sherry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, IanR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, AndrewM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, D.Brian</au><au>Faye, Sherry</au><au>Gunn, IanR</au><au>Clegg, Gillian</au><au>Grant, AndrewM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AN OUT-OF-HOURS CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>1985-04-13</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>325</volume><issue>8433</issue><spage>859</spage><epage>861</epage><pages>859-861</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Until 1979, the out-of-hours chemical pathology service was the conventional oncall service in which the medical laboratory scientific officers (MLSOs) carried out analyses at the direct request of clinical staff. In 1980, during an industrial dispute, junior ward doctors were trained to use three simple instruments which are maintained by the chemical pathology department. In January, 1981, when the dispute was settled, the doctors continued to use these instruments. Analyses they could not make were done by the MLSO on call, but only after the requests were monitored by a chemical pathologist or biochemist. The result was an 80% reduction in the number of calls. When the monitoring was withdrawn in 1983, there was some increase in the number of MLSO calls, but this was still 35% less than that with the conventional system despite a 4-fold increase in the total number of analyses done out of hours between 1979 and 1984. Surveys in 1984 and in early 1985 revealed that most doctors preferred using the instruments to asking an MLSO to make the analysis.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92217-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 1985-04, Vol.325 (8433), p.859-861 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2209995285 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences General aspects Medical sciences Organic chemistry Pathology Physicians Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine |
title | A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AN OUT-OF-HOURS CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY SERVICE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A58%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20COMPARISON%20OF%20ALTERNATIVE%20ARRANGEMENTS%20FOR%20AN%20OUT-OF-HOURS%20CHEMICAL%20PATHOLOGY%20SERVICE&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Morgan,%20D.Brian&rft.date=1985-04-13&rft.volume=325&rft.issue=8433&rft.spage=859&rft.epage=861&rft.pages=859-861&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92217-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2209995285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209995285&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673685922172&rfr_iscdi=true |