Financial reporting regulation and small research-intensive firms

Reporting rules required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have a retarding effect on small business capital formation. The SEC has recently become concerned with impediments to capital formation arising from the high cost of complian...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of small business management 1982-01, Vol.20 (1), p.44
Hauptverfasser: Horwitz, Bertrand, Kolodny, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 44
container_title Journal of small business management
container_volume 20
creator Horwitz, Bertrand
Kolodny, Richard
description Reporting rules required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have a retarding effect on small business capital formation. The SEC has recently become concerned with impediments to capital formation arising from the high cost of compliance with its rules, and has held hearings on problems of small businesses. In 2 important instances the impact of uniform accounting measurement rules on small businesses has been considered: 1. controversy about the single most appropriate method to use for measuring the effects of the tax savings arising from the investment credit, and 2. the FASB deliberation on the appropriate measurement rule for the accounting of unsuccessful drilling and exploration costs in the oil and gas industry. The appropriate uniform method to account for research and development (R & D) became grounds for debate in the early 1970s. Tests conducted on the economic effects of expensing only (rather the deferring) indicate an association between the decline of R & D outlays for affected firms and the effective data of FASB Statement No. 2 (expense only). This empirical evidence suggests that the rule should be reviewed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220990929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66159714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-e70b45ba842ce352c4618b56ef74b82225086e6163c071a5a7f1dfb920dcfb533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jU1LAzEURYMoOFb_w-A-8PImn8tSrAoFN124K0kmqSnTzJjM-Put6NrVvXAu516RhgkOVKJ6vyYNAFcUldK35K7WEwAoaXhD1tuUbfbJDm0J01jmlI-XdlwGO6cxtzb3bT3b4QfXYIv_oCnPIdf0FdqYyrnek5tohxoe_nJF9tun_eaF7t6eXzfrHZ0ENzQocFw4qzn60An0XDLthAxRcacRUYCWQTLZeVDMCqsi66MzCL2PTnTdijz-aqcyfi6hzofTuJR8eTwggjFg0Pw7YqCE5hK7bzKJUg0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210758462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Financial reporting regulation and small research-intensive firms</title><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><creator>Horwitz, Bertrand ; Kolodny, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Bertrand ; Kolodny, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Reporting rules required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have a retarding effect on small business capital formation. The SEC has recently become concerned with impediments to capital formation arising from the high cost of compliance with its rules, and has held hearings on problems of small businesses. In 2 important instances the impact of uniform accounting measurement rules on small businesses has been considered: 1. controversy about the single most appropriate method to use for measuring the effects of the tax savings arising from the investment credit, and 2. the FASB deliberation on the appropriate measurement rule for the accounting of unsuccessful drilling and exploration costs in the oil and gas industry. The appropriate uniform method to account for research and development (R &amp; D) became grounds for debate in the early 1970s. Tests conducted on the economic effects of expensing only (rather the deferring) indicate an association between the decline of R &amp; D outlays for affected firms and the effective data of FASB Statement No. 2 (expense only). This empirical evidence suggests that the rule should be reviewed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2778</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-627X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSBMAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milwaukee: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Capital expenditures ; Capital formation ; Capital investments ; Congressional committees ; Costs ; Disclosure ; Exposure drafts ; FASB statements ; Federal regulation ; Financial reporting ; R&amp;D ; Regulations ; Research &amp; development ; Revisions ; Small business</subject><ispartof>Journal of small business management, 1982-01, Vol.20 (1), p.44</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Council for Small Business Jan 1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodny, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Financial reporting regulation and small research-intensive firms</title><title>Journal of small business management</title><description>Reporting rules required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have a retarding effect on small business capital formation. The SEC has recently become concerned with impediments to capital formation arising from the high cost of compliance with its rules, and has held hearings on problems of small businesses. In 2 important instances the impact of uniform accounting measurement rules on small businesses has been considered: 1. controversy about the single most appropriate method to use for measuring the effects of the tax savings arising from the investment credit, and 2. the FASB deliberation on the appropriate measurement rule for the accounting of unsuccessful drilling and exploration costs in the oil and gas industry. The appropriate uniform method to account for research and development (R &amp; D) became grounds for debate in the early 1970s. Tests conducted on the economic effects of expensing only (rather the deferring) indicate an association between the decline of R &amp; D outlays for affected firms and the effective data of FASB Statement No. 2 (expense only). This empirical evidence suggests that the rule should be reviewed.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>Capital formation</subject><subject>Capital investments</subject><subject>Congressional committees</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Exposure drafts</subject><subject>FASB statements</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Small business</subject><issn>0047-2778</issn><issn>1540-627X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jU1LAzEURYMoOFb_w-A-8PImn8tSrAoFN124K0kmqSnTzJjM-Put6NrVvXAu516RhgkOVKJ6vyYNAFcUldK35K7WEwAoaXhD1tuUbfbJDm0J01jmlI-XdlwGO6cxtzb3bT3b4QfXYIv_oCnPIdf0FdqYyrnek5tohxoe_nJF9tun_eaF7t6eXzfrHZ0ENzQocFw4qzn60An0XDLthAxRcacRUYCWQTLZeVDMCqsi66MzCL2PTnTdijz-aqcyfi6hzofTuJR8eTwggjFg0Pw7YqCE5hK7bzKJUg0</recordid><startdate>19820101</startdate><enddate>19820101</enddate><creator>Horwitz, Bertrand</creator><creator>Kolodny, Richard</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820101</creationdate><title>Financial reporting regulation and small research-intensive firms</title><author>Horwitz, Bertrand ; Kolodny, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p549-e70b45ba842ce352c4618b56ef74b82225086e6163c071a5a7f1dfb920dcfb533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>Capital formation</topic><topic>Capital investments</topic><topic>Congressional committees</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Exposure drafts</topic><topic>FASB statements</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Small business</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horwitz, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodny, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of small business management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horwitz, Bertrand</au><au>Kolodny, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Financial reporting regulation and small research-intensive firms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of small business management</jtitle><date>1982-01-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><pages>44-</pages><issn>0047-2778</issn><eissn>1540-627X</eissn><coden>JSBMAU</coden><abstract>Reporting rules required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have a retarding effect on small business capital formation. The SEC has recently become concerned with impediments to capital formation arising from the high cost of compliance with its rules, and has held hearings on problems of small businesses. In 2 important instances the impact of uniform accounting measurement rules on small businesses has been considered: 1. controversy about the single most appropriate method to use for measuring the effects of the tax savings arising from the investment credit, and 2. the FASB deliberation on the appropriate measurement rule for the accounting of unsuccessful drilling and exploration costs in the oil and gas industry. The appropriate uniform method to account for research and development (R &amp; D) became grounds for debate in the early 1970s. Tests conducted on the economic effects of expensing only (rather the deferring) indicate an association between the decline of R &amp; D outlays for affected firms and the effective data of FASB Statement No. 2 (expense only). This empirical evidence suggests that the rule should be reviewed.</abstract><cop>Milwaukee</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2778
ispartof Journal of small business management, 1982-01, Vol.20 (1), p.44
issn 0047-2778
1540-627X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220990929
source EBSCO Business Source Complete
subjects Accounting
Capital expenditures
Capital formation
Capital investments
Congressional committees
Costs
Disclosure
Exposure drafts
FASB statements
Federal regulation
Financial reporting
R&D
Regulations
Research & development
Revisions
Small business
title Financial reporting regulation and small research-intensive firms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A53%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Financial%20reporting%20regulation%20and%20small%20research-intensive%20firms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20small%20business%20management&rft.au=Horwitz,%20Bertrand&rft.date=1982-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.pages=44-&rft.issn=0047-2778&rft.eissn=1540-627X&rft.coden=JSBMAU&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E66159714%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210758462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true