Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis
Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1839-1851 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1851 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1839 |
container_title | Global change biology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Wang, Na Quesada, Benjamin Xia, Longlong Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus Goodale, Christine L. Kiese, Ralf |
description | Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (>3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (>3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate.
Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.14603 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2209806407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2209806407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1Ow0AQRlcIREKg4AJoJSoKJ7Ne21mXIQoBKRIN0Fqz9m7kyD9h11ZIlyNQcADOwlFyEjYk0DHNN8XTp5lHyCWDPnMzmKeyz4II-BHpMh6Fnh-I6Hi3h4HHgPEOObN2AQDch-iUdDgIYCKCLnmZaK3SxtJa07TIS2wUXaEp82pO64qmaKQLXbRvytK8onOD1hZYZXa7-fj6HNF5UUssaKka3G7escJibXN7Tk40FlZdHLJHnu8mT-N7b_Y4fRiPZl4asJh77sA4UMgxFIyF3MdMCoBhxlAGUiETOlKx4DGIGBiir_UQZAppGGaScz_kPXK9712a-rVVtkkWdWvcETbxfYgFRAEMHXWzp1JTW2uUTpbGvWrWCYNkZzBxBpMfg469OjS2slTZH_mrzAGDPbDKC7X-vymZjm_3ld8pbXuv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209806407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wang, Na ; Quesada, Benjamin ; Xia, Longlong ; Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus ; Goodale, Christine L. ; Kiese, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Na ; Quesada, Benjamin ; Xia, Longlong ; Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus ; Goodale, Christine L. ; Kiese, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (>3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (>3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate.
Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14603</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30801860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aridity ; Brittleness ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; carbon fluxes ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; climate warming ; Cold ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Experiments ; Fluctuations ; Fluxes ; global ; Global warming ; grassland ; Grasslands ; Meta-analysis ; Net Primary Productivity ; Plant production ; Primary production ; Productivity ; Respiration ; Soil ; Storage ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Terrestrial environments</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1839-1851</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2814-4888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.14603$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.14603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30801860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Longlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiese, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (>3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (>3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate.
Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.</description><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>carbon fluxes</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>climate warming</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>global</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Plant production</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1Ow0AQRlcIREKg4AJoJSoKJ7Ne21mXIQoBKRIN0Fqz9m7kyD9h11ZIlyNQcADOwlFyEjYk0DHNN8XTp5lHyCWDPnMzmKeyz4II-BHpMh6Fnh-I6Hi3h4HHgPEOObN2AQDch-iUdDgIYCKCLnmZaK3SxtJa07TIS2wUXaEp82pO64qmaKQLXbRvytK8onOD1hZYZXa7-fj6HNF5UUssaKka3G7escJibXN7Tk40FlZdHLJHnu8mT-N7b_Y4fRiPZl4asJh77sA4UMgxFIyF3MdMCoBhxlAGUiETOlKx4DGIGBiir_UQZAppGGaScz_kPXK9712a-rVVtkkWdWvcETbxfYgFRAEMHXWzp1JTW2uUTpbGvWrWCYNkZzBxBpMfg469OjS2slTZH_mrzAGDPbDKC7X-vymZjm_3ld8pbXuv</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Wang, Na</creator><creator>Quesada, Benjamin</creator><creator>Xia, Longlong</creator><creator>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</creator><creator>Goodale, Christine L.</creator><creator>Kiese, Ralf</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-4888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</title><author>Wang, Na ; Quesada, Benjamin ; Xia, Longlong ; Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus ; Goodale, Christine L. ; Kiese, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>carbon fluxes</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>climate warming</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>global</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Plant production</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Longlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiese, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Na</au><au>Quesada, Benjamin</au><au>Xia, Longlong</au><au>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</au><au>Goodale, Christine L.</au><au>Kiese, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1839</spage><epage>1851</epage><pages>1839-1851</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (>3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (>3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate.
Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30801860</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.14603</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-4888</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
ispartof | Global change biology, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1839-1851 |
issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2209806407 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Aridity Brittleness Carbon Carbon cycle carbon fluxes Climate Climate change Climate effects climate warming Cold Ecosystems Environmental changes Experiments Fluctuations Fluxes global Global warming grassland Grasslands Meta-analysis Net Primary Productivity Plant production Primary production Productivity Respiration Soil Storage Terrestrial ecosystems Terrestrial environments |
title | Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20climate%20warming%20on%20carbon%20fluxes%20in%20grasslands%E2%80%94%C2%A0A%20global%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Wang,%20Na&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1839&rft.epage=1851&rft.pages=1839-1851&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.14603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2209806407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209806407&rft_id=info:pmid/30801860&rfr_iscdi=true |