Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis

Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1839-1851
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Na, Quesada, Benjamin, Xia, Longlong, Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus, Goodale, Christine L., Kiese, Ralf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1851
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1839
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 25
creator Wang, Na
Quesada, Benjamin
Xia, Longlong
Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus
Goodale, Christine L.
Kiese, Ralf
description Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (>3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (>3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate. Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.14603
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2209806407</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2209806407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1Ow0AQRlcIREKg4AJoJSoKJ7Ne21mXIQoBKRIN0Fqz9m7kyD9h11ZIlyNQcADOwlFyEjYk0DHNN8XTp5lHyCWDPnMzmKeyz4II-BHpMh6Fnh-I6Hi3h4HHgPEOObN2AQDch-iUdDgIYCKCLnmZaK3SxtJa07TIS2wUXaEp82pO64qmaKQLXbRvytK8onOD1hZYZXa7-fj6HNF5UUssaKka3G7escJibXN7Tk40FlZdHLJHnu8mT-N7b_Y4fRiPZl4asJh77sA4UMgxFIyF3MdMCoBhxlAGUiETOlKx4DGIGBiir_UQZAppGGaScz_kPXK9712a-rVVtkkWdWvcETbxfYgFRAEMHXWzp1JTW2uUTpbGvWrWCYNkZzBxBpMfg469OjS2slTZH_mrzAGDPbDKC7X-vymZjm_3ld8pbXuv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2209806407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wang, Na ; Quesada, Benjamin ; Xia, Longlong ; Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus ; Goodale, Christine L. ; Kiese, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Na ; Quesada, Benjamin ; Xia, Longlong ; Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus ; Goodale, Christine L. ; Kiese, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (&gt;3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (&gt;3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate. Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14603</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30801860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aridity ; Brittleness ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; carbon fluxes ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; climate warming ; Cold ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; Experiments ; Fluctuations ; Fluxes ; global ; Global warming ; grassland ; Grasslands ; Meta-analysis ; Net Primary Productivity ; Plant production ; Primary production ; Productivity ; Respiration ; Soil ; Storage ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Terrestrial environments</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1839-1851</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2814-4888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.14603$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.14603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30801860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Longlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiese, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (&gt;3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (&gt;3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate. Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.</description><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>carbon fluxes</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>climate warming</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>global</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Plant production</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1Ow0AQRlcIREKg4AJoJSoKJ7Ne21mXIQoBKRIN0Fqz9m7kyD9h11ZIlyNQcADOwlFyEjYk0DHNN8XTp5lHyCWDPnMzmKeyz4II-BHpMh6Fnh-I6Hi3h4HHgPEOObN2AQDch-iUdDgIYCKCLnmZaK3SxtJa07TIS2wUXaEp82pO64qmaKQLXbRvytK8onOD1hZYZXa7-fj6HNF5UUssaKka3G7escJibXN7Tk40FlZdHLJHnu8mT-N7b_Y4fRiPZl4asJh77sA4UMgxFIyF3MdMCoBhxlAGUiETOlKx4DGIGBiir_UQZAppGGaScz_kPXK9712a-rVVtkkWdWvcETbxfYgFRAEMHXWzp1JTW2uUTpbGvWrWCYNkZzBxBpMfg469OjS2slTZH_mrzAGDPbDKC7X-vymZjm_3ld8pbXuv</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Wang, Na</creator><creator>Quesada, Benjamin</creator><creator>Xia, Longlong</creator><creator>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</creator><creator>Goodale, Christine L.</creator><creator>Kiese, Ralf</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-4888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</title><author>Wang, Na ; Quesada, Benjamin ; Xia, Longlong ; Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus ; Goodale, Christine L. ; Kiese, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-13594ea3a5811532adb8007d1ab4bea18f6e983908901aa2ff70bc0c55db33253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>carbon fluxes</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>climate warming</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>global</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Plant production</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quesada, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Longlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodale, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiese, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Na</au><au>Quesada, Benjamin</au><au>Xia, Longlong</au><au>Butterbach‐Bahl, Klaus</au><au>Goodale, Christine L.</au><au>Kiese, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1839</spage><epage>1851</epage><pages>1839-1851</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Climate warming will affect terrestrial ecosystems in many ways, and warming‐induced changes in terrestrial carbon (C) cycling could accelerate or slow future warming. So far, warming experiments have shown a wide range of C flux responses, across and within biome types. However, past meta‐analyses of C flux responses have lacked sufficient sample size to discern relative responses for a given biome type. For instance grasslands contribute greatly to global terrestrial C fluxes, and to date grassland warming experiments provide the opportunity to evaluate concurrent responses of both plant and soil C fluxes. Here, we compiled data from 70 sites (in total 622 observations) to evaluate the response of C fluxes to experimental warming across three grassland types (cold, temperate, and semi‐arid), warming methods, and short (≤3 years) and longer‐term (&gt;3 years) experiment lengths. Overall, our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production (e.g., net primary productivity (NPP) 15.4%; aboveground NPP (ANPP) by 7.6%, belowground NPP (BNPP) by 11.6%) and soil respiration (Rs) (9.5%). However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. In semi‐arid and temperate grasslands, ecosystem respiration (Reco) was more sensitive to warming than gross primary productivity (GPP), while the opposite was observed for cold grasslands, where warming produced a net increase in whole‐ecosystem C storage. However, the stimulatory effect of warming on ANPP and Rs observed in short‐term studies (≤3 years) in both cold and temperate grasslands disappeared in longer‐term experiments (&gt;3 years). These results highlight the importance of conducting long‐term warming experiments, and in examining responses across a wide range of climate. Our meta‐analysis revealed that experimental warming stimulated C fluxes in grassland ecosystems with regard to both plant production and soil respiration. However, the magnitude of C flux stimulation varied significantly across cold, temperate and semi‐arid grasslands, in that responses for most C fluxes were larger in cold than temperate or semi‐arid ecosystems. Averaging over all grassland data, C flux response rates did not represent any of the three grassland types.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30801860</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.14603</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-4888</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1839-1851
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2209806407
source Wiley Journals
subjects Aridity
Brittleness
Carbon
Carbon cycle
carbon fluxes
Climate
Climate change
Climate effects
climate warming
Cold
Ecosystems
Environmental changes
Experiments
Fluctuations
Fluxes
global
Global warming
grassland
Grasslands
Meta-analysis
Net Primary Productivity
Plant production
Primary production
Productivity
Respiration
Soil
Storage
Terrestrial ecosystems
Terrestrial environments
title Effects of climate warming on carbon fluxes in grasslands— A global meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20climate%20warming%20on%20carbon%20fluxes%20in%20grasslands%E2%80%94%C2%A0A%20global%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Wang,%20Na&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1839&rft.epage=1851&rft.pages=1839-1851&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.14603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2209806407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2209806407&rft_id=info:pmid/30801860&rfr_iscdi=true