Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric
In the 1830s, antislavery advocates used highly sexualized language to recruit Northerners into the growing immediatist movement. The "voyeuristic abolitionism" they developed in speeches, pamphlets and periodicals served to shock and mobilize men and especially women, who were urged to id...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the early Republic 2008-04, Vol.28 (1), p.83-114 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Journal of the early Republic |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Lasser, Carol |
description | In the 1830s, antislavery advocates used highly sexualized language to recruit Northerners into the growing immediatist movement. The "voyeuristic abolitionism" they developed in speeches, pamphlets and periodicals served to shock and mobilize men and especially women, who were urged to identify with the enslaved of their own sex, and then to act to save these victims. Engaging women in such explicit discussions and encouraging female efforts to strike against slavery challenged established gender norms. Yet as the antislavery movement evolved beyond moral suasion into a political strategy, most abolitionists curtailed their use of sexualized imagery, and women's participation in the antislavery movement took its own form. The rise and fall of the rhetoric of "voyeuristic abolitionism" can be charted by studying the vocabulary used in magazines and other popular publications of the era, now searchable electronically through the American Periodical Series. The explosive potential of this language can also be seen in the ways in which it was employed -and avoided-in the U.S. Congress. By the 1850s, some Americans-among them African American authors and antislavery women, including most notably Harriet Beecher Stowe--found ways to reference the moral evils of slavery without invoking explicitly sexual language. In the end, attacks on slavery framed in political terms prevailed over the voyeuristic abolitionism that had first drawn women into the antislavery coalition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/jer.2008.0014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220959070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A174322756</galeid><jstor_id>30043571</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A174322756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9490250fb6164b7d5d6d97fbb1d6447616e87cb1dfd7683c493bcfb0593b0d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1r3DAQxUVJoZttjz0WRM_xdmRJ1jq3JaRpIVBokl6FrI9GZm2lkrZk__uO2RCKQIOG9zTD7xHykcGGccm_jD5vWoDtBoCJN2TFpOQNdC2ckRW0SjYMr3fkvJQRFW3H5Io8_EpHf8ix1Gjpbkj7WGOaY5ku6Z1_vqA3fnY-X1AzO1ofPb3PZi4h5cksOpoC3c01lr356_OR_nz0NeVo35O3weyL__BS1-Th6_X91bfm9sfN96vdbWO5gtr0oodWQhg61olBOek616swDMx1Qijs-q2y-ApOdVtuRc8HGwaQWMEpw9fk8-nfp5z-HHypekyHPONI3bbQyx4UoGhzEv02e6_jHFLNxuJxfoo2zT5E7O-YErxFQB0ampPB5lRK9kE_5TiZfNQM9EJaI2m9kNYLadSL1y1Gb-t0KP6_RTjGAPpuSWMJAxRDJ-_R9ulkGwtCe53BAQSXivF_7v6KbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220959070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Lasser, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Carol</creatorcontrib><description>In the 1830s, antislavery advocates used highly sexualized language to recruit Northerners into the growing immediatist movement. The "voyeuristic abolitionism" they developed in speeches, pamphlets and periodicals served to shock and mobilize men and especially women, who were urged to identify with the enslaved of their own sex, and then to act to save these victims. Engaging women in such explicit discussions and encouraging female efforts to strike against slavery challenged established gender norms. Yet as the antislavery movement evolved beyond moral suasion into a political strategy, most abolitionists curtailed their use of sexualized imagery, and women's participation in the antislavery movement took its own form. The rise and fall of the rhetoric of "voyeuristic abolitionism" can be charted by studying the vocabulary used in magazines and other popular publications of the era, now searchable electronically through the American Periodical Series. The explosive potential of this language can also be seen in the ways in which it was employed -and avoided-in the U.S. Congress. By the 1850s, some Americans-among them African American authors and antislavery women, including most notably Harriet Beecher Stowe--found ways to reference the moral evils of slavery without invoking explicitly sexual language. In the end, attacks on slavery framed in political terms prevailed over the voyeuristic abolitionism that had first drawn women into the antislavery coalition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-1275</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-0620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-0620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jer.2008.0014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Society for Historians of the Early American Republic</publisher><subject>Abolition of slavery ; Abolitionism ; Abolitionists ; American literature ; American slavery ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Bourne, George ; Brown, William Wells (1814?-1884) ; Child, Lydia Maria Francis (1802-1880) ; Crimes against ; Females ; Gender roles ; History ; Men ; Morality ; Periodicals ; Political activism ; Political rhetoric ; Politics ; Rhetoric ; Sin ; Slavery ; Slaves ; Truth ; White people ; Women ; Works</subject><ispartof>Journal of the early Republic, 2008-04, Vol.28 (1), p.83-114</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Society for Historians of the Early American Republic</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 Society for Historians of the Early American Republic.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 University of Pennsylvania Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of Pennsylvania Press Spring 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9490250fb6164b7d5d6d97fbb1d6447616e87cb1dfd7683c493bcfb0593b0d7a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30043571$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30043571$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Carol</creatorcontrib><title>Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric</title><title>Journal of the early Republic</title><description>In the 1830s, antislavery advocates used highly sexualized language to recruit Northerners into the growing immediatist movement. The "voyeuristic abolitionism" they developed in speeches, pamphlets and periodicals served to shock and mobilize men and especially women, who were urged to identify with the enslaved of their own sex, and then to act to save these victims. Engaging women in such explicit discussions and encouraging female efforts to strike against slavery challenged established gender norms. Yet as the antislavery movement evolved beyond moral suasion into a political strategy, most abolitionists curtailed their use of sexualized imagery, and women's participation in the antislavery movement took its own form. The rise and fall of the rhetoric of "voyeuristic abolitionism" can be charted by studying the vocabulary used in magazines and other popular publications of the era, now searchable electronically through the American Periodical Series. The explosive potential of this language can also be seen in the ways in which it was employed -and avoided-in the U.S. Congress. By the 1850s, some Americans-among them African American authors and antislavery women, including most notably Harriet Beecher Stowe--found ways to reference the moral evils of slavery without invoking explicitly sexual language. In the end, attacks on slavery framed in political terms prevailed over the voyeuristic abolitionism that had first drawn women into the antislavery coalition.</description><subject>Abolition of slavery</subject><subject>Abolitionism</subject><subject>Abolitionists</subject><subject>American literature</subject><subject>American slavery</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Bourne, George</subject><subject>Brown, William Wells (1814?-1884)</subject><subject>Child, Lydia Maria Francis (1802-1880)</subject><subject>Crimes against</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Political activism</subject><subject>Political rhetoric</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sin</subject><subject>Slavery</subject><subject>Slaves</subject><subject>Truth</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Works</subject><issn>0275-1275</issn><issn>1553-0620</issn><issn>1553-0620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1r3DAQxUVJoZttjz0WRM_xdmRJ1jq3JaRpIVBokl6FrI9GZm2lkrZk__uO2RCKQIOG9zTD7xHykcGGccm_jD5vWoDtBoCJN2TFpOQNdC2ckRW0SjYMr3fkvJQRFW3H5Io8_EpHf8ix1Gjpbkj7WGOaY5ku6Z1_vqA3fnY-X1AzO1ofPb3PZi4h5cksOpoC3c01lr356_OR_nz0NeVo35O3weyL__BS1-Th6_X91bfm9sfN96vdbWO5gtr0oodWQhg61olBOek616swDMx1Qijs-q2y-ApOdVtuRc8HGwaQWMEpw9fk8-nfp5z-HHypekyHPONI3bbQyx4UoGhzEv02e6_jHFLNxuJxfoo2zT5E7O-YErxFQB0ampPB5lRK9kE_5TiZfNQM9EJaI2m9kNYLadSL1y1Gb-t0KP6_RTjGAPpuSWMJAxRDJ-_R9ulkGwtCe53BAQSXivF_7v6KbA</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Lasser, Carol</creator><general>Society for Historians of the Early American Republic</general><general>University of Pennsylvania Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric</title><author>Lasser, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-9490250fb6164b7d5d6d97fbb1d6447616e87cb1dfd7683c493bcfb0593b0d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Abolition of slavery</topic><topic>Abolitionism</topic><topic>Abolitionists</topic><topic>American literature</topic><topic>American slavery</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Bourne, George</topic><topic>Brown, William Wells (1814?-1884)</topic><topic>Child, Lydia Maria Francis (1802-1880)</topic><topic>Crimes against</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Political activism</topic><topic>Political rhetoric</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sin</topic><topic>Slavery</topic><topic>Slaves</topic><topic>Truth</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Works</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasser, Carol</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of the early Republic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasser, Carol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the early Republic</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>83-114</pages><issn>0275-1275</issn><issn>1553-0620</issn><eissn>1553-0620</eissn><abstract>In the 1830s, antislavery advocates used highly sexualized language to recruit Northerners into the growing immediatist movement. The "voyeuristic abolitionism" they developed in speeches, pamphlets and periodicals served to shock and mobilize men and especially women, who were urged to identify with the enslaved of their own sex, and then to act to save these victims. Engaging women in such explicit discussions and encouraging female efforts to strike against slavery challenged established gender norms. Yet as the antislavery movement evolved beyond moral suasion into a political strategy, most abolitionists curtailed their use of sexualized imagery, and women's participation in the antislavery movement took its own form. The rise and fall of the rhetoric of "voyeuristic abolitionism" can be charted by studying the vocabulary used in magazines and other popular publications of the era, now searchable electronically through the American Periodical Series. The explosive potential of this language can also be seen in the ways in which it was employed -and avoided-in the U.S. Congress. By the 1850s, some Americans-among them African American authors and antislavery women, including most notably Harriet Beecher Stowe--found ways to reference the moral evils of slavery without invoking explicitly sexual language. In the end, attacks on slavery framed in political terms prevailed over the voyeuristic abolitionism that had first drawn women into the antislavery coalition.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Society for Historians of the Early American Republic</pub><doi>10.1353/jer.2008.0014</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-1275 |
ispartof | Journal of the early Republic, 2008-04, Vol.28 (1), p.83-114 |
issn | 0275-1275 1553-0620 1553-0620 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220959070 |
source | JSTOR |
subjects | Abolition of slavery Abolitionism Abolitionists American literature American slavery Beliefs, opinions and attitudes Bourne, George Brown, William Wells (1814?-1884) Child, Lydia Maria Francis (1802-1880) Crimes against Females Gender roles History Men Morality Periodicals Political activism Political rhetoric Politics Rhetoric Sin Slavery Slaves Truth White people Women Works |
title | Voyeuristic Abolitionism: Sex, Gender, and the Transformation of Antislavery Rhetoric |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A02%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voyeuristic%20Abolitionism:%20Sex,%20Gender,%20and%20the%20Transformation%20of%20Antislavery%20Rhetoric&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20early%20Republic&rft.au=Lasser,%20Carol&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=83-114&rft.issn=0275-1275&rft.eissn=1553-0620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jer.2008.0014&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA174322756%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220959070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A174322756&rft_jstor_id=30043571&rfr_iscdi=true |