Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands
Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agroforestry systems 2008-05, Vol.73 (1), p.23-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Agroforestry systems |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Bellow, J. G Hudson, R. F Nair, P. K. R |
description | Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220935020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896338431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRxDn9AJ4kJh7RFyi0HJfFf4mJB_VMaAtbTVcqsGT79rLU6M0TJDy_3_vyIHRJ4ZYClHeRQiFKAlARRUGQ3RGaUVEyomQFx2gGVJak4FKeorMYPwFAybKaIb1o_Zg6P-DRJzukzvTYO-zCtkskBWtJbaJtsVkF73ywMYU9znTcmL7HzoRNxN2A09riuK1T8GPX5Ip1t1r3ZmjjOTpxpo_24ueco4-H-_flE3l5fXxeLl5IU3CRSOGgACFt29CCtgWz1MpGcENL50AopSDfTEN55WoKqqrLVjouWFWqmpu25XN0PfWOwX9t85r602_DkEdqxkBxAQwyRCeoCT7GYJ0eQ7cxYa8p6INGPWnUWaM-aNS7nLn5KTYx_8wFMzRd_A0yYILLPGCO2MTF_DSsbPhb4L_yqynkjNdZcS7-eGNAeWYqrqjk32rWjLI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220935020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bellow, J. G ; Hudson, R. F ; Nair, P. K. R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellow, J. G ; Hudson, R. F ; Nair, P. K. R</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural and farming systems ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cereal crops ; Comparative studies ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; Family size ; farmers ; Farms ; Forestry ; Fruit trees ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns ; Infrastructure ; land ownership ; Life Sciences ; market access ; simulation models ; Small farms ; small-scale farming ; sociodemographic characteristics ; Studies ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2008-05, Vol.73 (1), p.23-36</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20253609$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellow, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R</creatorcontrib><title>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.</description><subject>Agricultural and farming systems</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>land ownership</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>market access</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>small-scale farming</subject><subject>sociodemographic characteristics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRxDn9AJ4kJh7RFyi0HJfFf4mJB_VMaAtbTVcqsGT79rLU6M0TJDy_3_vyIHRJ4ZYClHeRQiFKAlARRUGQ3RGaUVEyomQFx2gGVJak4FKeorMYPwFAybKaIb1o_Zg6P-DRJzukzvTYO-zCtkskBWtJbaJtsVkF73ywMYU9znTcmL7HzoRNxN2A09riuK1T8GPX5Ip1t1r3ZmjjOTpxpo_24ueco4-H-_flE3l5fXxeLl5IU3CRSOGgACFt29CCtgWz1MpGcENL50AopSDfTEN55WoKqqrLVjouWFWqmpu25XN0PfWOwX9t85r602_DkEdqxkBxAQwyRCeoCT7GYJ0eQ7cxYa8p6INGPWnUWaM-aNS7nLn5KTYx_8wFMzRd_A0yYILLPGCO2MTF_DSsbPhb4L_yqynkjNdZcS7-eGNAeWYqrqjk32rWjLI</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Bellow, J. G</creator><creator>Hudson, R. F</creator><creator>Nair, P. K. R</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</title><author>Bellow, J. G ; Hudson, R. F ; Nair, P. K. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and farming systems</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>land ownership</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>market access</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>small-scale farming</topic><topic>sociodemographic characteristics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellow, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellow, J. G</au><au>Hudson, R. F</au><au>Nair, P. K. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>23-36</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4366 |
ispartof | Agroforestry systems, 2008-05, Vol.73 (1), p.23-36 |
issn | 0167-4366 1572-9680 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220935020 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural and farming systems Agricultural production Agriculture Agroforestry Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Cereal crops Comparative studies Crop yield Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage Family size farmers Farms Forestry Fruit trees Fruits Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns Infrastructure land ownership Life Sciences market access simulation models Small farms small-scale farming sociodemographic characteristics Studies Trees |
title | Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adoption%20potential%20of%20fruit-tree-based%20agroforestry%20on%20small%20farms%20in%20the%20subtropical%20highlands&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Bellow,%20J.%20G&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=23-36&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896338431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220935020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |