Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands

Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agroforestry systems 2008-05, Vol.73 (1), p.23-36
Hauptverfasser: Bellow, J. G, Hudson, R. F, Nair, P. K. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Agroforestry systems
container_volume 73
creator Bellow, J. G
Hudson, R. F
Nair, P. K. R
description Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220935020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896338431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRxDn9AJ4kJh7RFyi0HJfFf4mJB_VMaAtbTVcqsGT79rLU6M0TJDy_3_vyIHRJ4ZYClHeRQiFKAlARRUGQ3RGaUVEyomQFx2gGVJak4FKeorMYPwFAybKaIb1o_Zg6P-DRJzukzvTYO-zCtkskBWtJbaJtsVkF73ywMYU9znTcmL7HzoRNxN2A09riuK1T8GPX5Ip1t1r3ZmjjOTpxpo_24ueco4-H-_flE3l5fXxeLl5IU3CRSOGgACFt29CCtgWz1MpGcENL50AopSDfTEN55WoKqqrLVjouWFWqmpu25XN0PfWOwX9t85r602_DkEdqxkBxAQwyRCeoCT7GYJ0eQ7cxYa8p6INGPWnUWaM-aNS7nLn5KTYx_8wFMzRd_A0yYILLPGCO2MTF_DSsbPhb4L_yqynkjNdZcS7-eGNAeWYqrqjk32rWjLI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220935020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bellow, J. G ; Hudson, R. F ; Nair, P. K. R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellow, J. G ; Hudson, R. F ; Nair, P. K. R</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGSYE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural and farming systems ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cereal crops ; Comparative studies ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; Family size ; farmers ; Farms ; Forestry ; Fruit trees ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns ; Infrastructure ; land ownership ; Life Sciences ; market access ; simulation models ; Small farms ; small-scale farming ; sociodemographic characteristics ; Studies ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2008-05, Vol.73 (1), p.23-36</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20253609$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellow, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R</creatorcontrib><title>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.</description><subject>Agricultural and farming systems</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>Family size</subject><subject>farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fruit trees</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>land ownership</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>market access</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>small-scale farming</subject><subject>sociodemographic characteristics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRxDn9AJ4kJh7RFyi0HJfFf4mJB_VMaAtbTVcqsGT79rLU6M0TJDy_3_vyIHRJ4ZYClHeRQiFKAlARRUGQ3RGaUVEyomQFx2gGVJak4FKeorMYPwFAybKaIb1o_Zg6P-DRJzukzvTYO-zCtkskBWtJbaJtsVkF73ywMYU9znTcmL7HzoRNxN2A09riuK1T8GPX5Ip1t1r3ZmjjOTpxpo_24ueco4-H-_flE3l5fXxeLl5IU3CRSOGgACFt29CCtgWz1MpGcENL50AopSDfTEN55WoKqqrLVjouWFWqmpu25XN0PfWOwX9t85r602_DkEdqxkBxAQwyRCeoCT7GYJ0eQ7cxYa8p6INGPWnUWaM-aNS7nLn5KTYx_8wFMzRd_A0yYILLPGCO2MTF_DSsbPhb4L_yqynkjNdZcS7-eGNAeWYqrqjk32rWjLI</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Bellow, J. G</creator><creator>Hudson, R. F</creator><creator>Nair, P. K. R</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</title><author>Bellow, J. G ; Hudson, R. F ; Nair, P. K. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-4f04056edc141d42e1e6c53a17ff05999017fac138fb1098b7d6f352879b3add3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and farming systems</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>Family size</topic><topic>farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fruit trees</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>land ownership</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>market access</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>small-scale farming</topic><topic>sociodemographic characteristics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellow, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, P. K. R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellow, J. G</au><au>Hudson, R. F</au><au>Nair, P. K. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>23-36</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><coden>AGSYE6</coden><abstract>Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4366
ispartof Agroforestry systems, 2008-05, Vol.73 (1), p.23-36
issn 0167-4366
1572-9680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220935020
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural and farming systems
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Agroforestry
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cereal crops
Comparative studies
Crop yield
Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage
Family size
farmers
Farms
Forestry
Fruit trees
Fruits
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Generalities. Cropping systems and patterns
Infrastructure
land ownership
Life Sciences
market access
simulation models
Small farms
small-scale farming
sociodemographic characteristics
Studies
Trees
title Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adoption%20potential%20of%20fruit-tree-based%20agroforestry%20on%20small%20farms%20in%20the%20subtropical%20highlands&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Bellow,%20J.%20G&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=23-36&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft.coden=AGSYE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-008-9105-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896338431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220935020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true