National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity
Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers freq...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forestry 2008, Vol.106 (1), p.17-24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 24 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Journal of forestry |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | White, E.M Stynes, D.J |
description | Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jof/106.1.17 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220803284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1470843711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3860606cf1c155dc62d2b1c66a3606f91c2e0bcba1192cd896425eb84c4f7d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PAyEQhonRxFq9eZd4dlsGKMseTeNX0uhBe0aWhUpTlxVok_57sTVzmMnMM-9kXoSugUyANGy6Dm4KRExgAvUJGkHDZMVqLk7RiBBKK6AEztFFSmtCiBSMj9Dnq84-9HqDXYg2ZbzzyecQcRps3_l-hfXORr2yCeu-w_nLYt-7zdb2xuLgcI5-qPJ-sIdxtCbagyDWJvudz_tLdOb0Jtmr_zxGy8eHj_lztXh7epnfLyrDKM-VY1KQEsaBgdmsM4J2tAUjhGal7Row1JLWtBqgoaaTjeB0ZlvJDXd1x9gY3R51hxh-tuUTtQ7bWB5LilIiCaOSF-juCJkYUorWqSH6bx33Coj6s7AsuVIIBQrqgt8ccaeD0qvok1q-Fw9Zca9uyn32C9umbqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220803284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>White, E.M ; Stynes, D.J</creator><creatorcontrib>White, E.M ; Stynes, D.J</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jof/106.1.17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Estimates ; Forest management ; forest recreation ; Hotels & motels ; national forests ; outdoor recreation ; recreation users ; Tourism ; Travel industry ; visitors</subject><ispartof>Journal of forestry, 2008, Vol.106 (1), p.17-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Jan/Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3860606cf1c155dc62d2b1c66a3606f91c2e0bcba1192cd896425eb84c4f7d33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4011,27905,27906,27907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stynes, D.J</creatorcontrib><title>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</title><title>Journal of forestry</title><description>Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.</description><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest recreation</subject><subject>Hotels & motels</subject><subject>national forests</subject><subject>outdoor recreation</subject><subject>recreation users</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Travel industry</subject><subject>visitors</subject><issn>0022-1201</issn><issn>1938-3746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1PAyEQhonRxFq9eZd4dlsGKMseTeNX0uhBe0aWhUpTlxVok_57sTVzmMnMM-9kXoSugUyANGy6Dm4KRExgAvUJGkHDZMVqLk7RiBBKK6AEztFFSmtCiBSMj9Dnq84-9HqDXYg2ZbzzyecQcRps3_l-hfXORr2yCeu-w_nLYt-7zdb2xuLgcI5-qPJ-sIdxtCbagyDWJvudz_tLdOb0Jtmr_zxGy8eHj_lztXh7epnfLyrDKM-VY1KQEsaBgdmsM4J2tAUjhGal7Row1JLWtBqgoaaTjeB0ZlvJDXd1x9gY3R51hxh-tuUTtQ7bWB5LilIiCaOSF-juCJkYUorWqSH6bx33Coj6s7AsuVIIBQrqgt8ccaeD0qvok1q-Fw9Zca9uyn32C9umbqw</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>White, E.M</creator><creator>Stynes, D.J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</title><author>White, E.M ; Stynes, D.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3860606cf1c155dc62d2b1c66a3606f91c2e0bcba1192cd896425eb84c4f7d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest recreation</topic><topic>Hotels & motels</topic><topic>national forests</topic><topic>outdoor recreation</topic><topic>recreation users</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Travel industry</topic><topic>visitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stynes, D.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, E.M</au><au>Stynes, D.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>17-24</pages><issn>0022-1201</issn><eissn>1938-3746</eissn><abstract>Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jof/106.1.17</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1201 |
ispartof | Journal of forestry, 2008, Vol.106 (1), p.17-24 |
issn | 0022-1201 1938-3746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220803284 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Estimates Forest management forest recreation Hotels & motels national forests outdoor recreation recreation users Tourism Travel industry visitors |
title | National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20forest%20visitor%20spending%20averages%20and%20the%20influence%20of%20trip-type%20and%20recreation%20activity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry&rft.au=White,%20E.M&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=17-24&rft.issn=0022-1201&rft.eissn=1938-3746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jof/106.1.17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1470843711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220803284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |