National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity

Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers freq...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forestry 2008, Vol.106 (1), p.17-24
Hauptverfasser: White, E.M, Stynes, D.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Journal of forestry
container_volume 106
creator White, E.M
Stynes, D.J
description Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jof/106.1.17
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220803284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1470843711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3860606cf1c155dc62d2b1c66a3606f91c2e0bcba1192cd896425eb84c4f7d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PAyEQhonRxFq9eZd4dlsGKMseTeNX0uhBe0aWhUpTlxVok_57sTVzmMnMM-9kXoSugUyANGy6Dm4KRExgAvUJGkHDZMVqLk7RiBBKK6AEztFFSmtCiBSMj9Dnq84-9HqDXYg2ZbzzyecQcRps3_l-hfXORr2yCeu-w_nLYt-7zdb2xuLgcI5-qPJ-sIdxtCbagyDWJvudz_tLdOb0Jtmr_zxGy8eHj_lztXh7epnfLyrDKM-VY1KQEsaBgdmsM4J2tAUjhGal7Row1JLWtBqgoaaTjeB0ZlvJDXd1x9gY3R51hxh-tuUTtQ7bWB5LilIiCaOSF-juCJkYUorWqSH6bx33Coj6s7AsuVIIBQrqgt8ccaeD0qvok1q-Fw9Zca9uyn32C9umbqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220803284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>White, E.M ; Stynes, D.J</creator><creatorcontrib>White, E.M ; Stynes, D.J</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jof/106.1.17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Estimates ; Forest management ; forest recreation ; Hotels &amp; motels ; national forests ; outdoor recreation ; recreation users ; Tourism ; Travel industry ; visitors</subject><ispartof>Journal of forestry, 2008, Vol.106 (1), p.17-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Jan/Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3860606cf1c155dc62d2b1c66a3606f91c2e0bcba1192cd896425eb84c4f7d33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4011,27905,27906,27907</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stynes, D.J</creatorcontrib><title>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</title><title>Journal of forestry</title><description>Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.</description><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest recreation</subject><subject>Hotels &amp; motels</subject><subject>national forests</subject><subject>outdoor recreation</subject><subject>recreation users</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Travel industry</subject><subject>visitors</subject><issn>0022-1201</issn><issn>1938-3746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1PAyEQhonRxFq9eZd4dlsGKMseTeNX0uhBe0aWhUpTlxVok_57sTVzmMnMM-9kXoSugUyANGy6Dm4KRExgAvUJGkHDZMVqLk7RiBBKK6AEztFFSmtCiBSMj9Dnq84-9HqDXYg2ZbzzyecQcRps3_l-hfXORr2yCeu-w_nLYt-7zdb2xuLgcI5-qPJ-sIdxtCbagyDWJvudz_tLdOb0Jtmr_zxGy8eHj_lztXh7epnfLyrDKM-VY1KQEsaBgdmsM4J2tAUjhGal7Row1JLWtBqgoaaTjeB0ZlvJDXd1x9gY3R51hxh-tuUTtQ7bWB5LilIiCaOSF-juCJkYUorWqSH6bx33Coj6s7AsuVIIBQrqgt8ccaeD0qvok1q-Fw9Zca9uyn32C9umbqw</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>White, E.M</creator><creator>Stynes, D.J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</title><author>White, E.M ; Stynes, D.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-f3860606cf1c155dc62d2b1c66a3606f91c2e0bcba1192cd896425eb84c4f7d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest recreation</topic><topic>Hotels &amp; motels</topic><topic>national forests</topic><topic>outdoor recreation</topic><topic>recreation users</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Travel industry</topic><topic>visitors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stynes, D.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, E.M</au><au>Stynes, D.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>17-24</pages><issn>0022-1201</issn><eissn>1938-3746</eissn><abstract>Estimates of national forest recreation visitor spending serve as inputs to regional economic analyses and help to identify the economic linkages between national forest recreation use and local forest communities. When completing recreation-related analyses, managers, planners, and researchers frequently think of visitors in terms of recreation activity. When completing recreation visitor spending analyses we argue that visitors should be segmented based primarily on the type of recreation trip taken. Using survey data collected as part of the US Forest Service National Visitor Use Monitoring program we examine the efficacy of trip-type segmentation relative to one based on recreation activity. We show that spending averages developed for activity groups without regard to trip type provide an incomplete picture of recreation visitor spending. Ultimately, trip type is shown to have a greater role in influencing the level of recreation visitor expenditures than recreation activity. Implications for national forest planning and management are discussed.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jof/106.1.17</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1201
ispartof Journal of forestry, 2008, Vol.106 (1), p.17-24
issn 0022-1201
1938-3746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220803284
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Estimates
Forest management
forest recreation
Hotels & motels
national forests
outdoor recreation
recreation users
Tourism
Travel industry
visitors
title National forest visitor spending averages and the influence of trip-type and recreation activity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20forest%20visitor%20spending%20averages%20and%20the%20influence%20of%20trip-type%20and%20recreation%20activity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry&rft.au=White,%20E.M&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=17-24&rft.issn=0022-1201&rft.eissn=1938-3746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jof/106.1.17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1470843711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220803284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true