Protocol Adherence of Community Sites in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to identify patterns and characteristics associated with site adherence to the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial protocol. METHODS: The PAD Trial recruited community sites to evaluate the impact on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2003-05, Vol.10 (5), p.453-453
Hauptverfasser: O'Connor, Robert E, Schron, Eleanor, Anton, Andy, Holohan, Jennifer, Peberdy, Mary A, Reed, David, Van Ottingham, Lois, Birnbaum, Alice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 453
container_issue 5
container_start_page 453
container_title Academic emergency medicine
container_volume 10
creator O'Connor, Robert E
Schron, Eleanor
Anton, Andy
Holohan, Jennifer
Peberdy, Mary A
Reed, David
Van Ottingham, Lois
Birnbaum, Alice
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to identify patterns and characteristics associated with site adherence to the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial protocol. METHODS: The PAD Trial recruited community sites to evaluate the impact on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) when automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are added to a volunteer-based lay OOH-CA response team. Sites were grouped into either residential or public (hotel/convention, shopping, community center, entertainment, participant recreation, transit, office, industrial and other). Volunteers at each site were trained to perform either CPR or CPR + AED skills according to site randomization assignments. Four types of site non-adherence have been defined: crossover (from assigned treatment arm), administrative drop (location closed or withdrew, unrelated to randomization), withdrawal (site decided not to participate in the trial), and never trained (unable to complete training). Statistical analysis used chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 1304 entities participated, 211 did not adhere to the protocol, with 29 (2%) crossovers 45 (3%) administrative drops, 50 (4%) withdrawals, and 87 (7%) never trained. Adherence ranged from 73% (industrial, residential) to 97% (hotel/convention). When compared with public, residential sites had a higher percentage that dropped out (12% vs. 2%) or were administratively dropped. (9% vs. 2%) (p
doi_str_mv 10.1197/aemj.10.5.453-a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220788879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>332486311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c679-10ee0a0ae6589099eac9addaaf9f4e16112aed5a7c21cf7bd4581d2a7626a3b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1rwzAYhEVpoWnauavo7kSSI8kaQ_oJgQSaXbyWXxEF20ole8i_r0M73R0cd_AQ8szZgnOjl4DdaTEFuVjJsoAbMuNyMkJzcTt5pkyhpCrvyUPOJ8aY1EbPyG6f4hBdbOm6OWLC3iGNnm5i1419GC70OwyYaejpcES6H-s2OLp2DnOmr-hDnULbwhBiTw8pQPtI7jy0GZ_-dU4O72-HzWex3X18bdbbwiltCs4QGTBAJSvDjEFwBpoGwBu_Qq44F4CNBO0Ed17XzUpWvBGglVBQ1qqck5e_2XOKPyPmwZ7imPrp0QrBdFVV2kyl5V_JpZhzQm_PKXSQLpYze2Vmr8yuQdqJmYXyF6NsYPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220788879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Protocol Adherence of Community Sites in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>O'Connor, Robert E ; Schron, Eleanor ; Anton, Andy ; Holohan, Jennifer ; Peberdy, Mary A ; Reed, David ; Van Ottingham, Lois ; Birnbaum, Alice</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Robert E ; Schron, Eleanor ; Anton, Andy ; Holohan, Jennifer ; Peberdy, Mary A ; Reed, David ; Van Ottingham, Lois ; Birnbaum, Alice</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to identify patterns and characteristics associated with site adherence to the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial protocol. METHODS: The PAD Trial recruited community sites to evaluate the impact on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) when automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are added to a volunteer-based lay OOH-CA response team. Sites were grouped into either residential or public (hotel/convention, shopping, community center, entertainment, participant recreation, transit, office, industrial and other). Volunteers at each site were trained to perform either CPR or CPR + AED skills according to site randomization assignments. Four types of site non-adherence have been defined: crossover (from assigned treatment arm), administrative drop (location closed or withdrew, unrelated to randomization), withdrawal (site decided not to participate in the trial), and never trained (unable to complete training). Statistical analysis used chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 1304 entities participated, 211 did not adhere to the protocol, with 29 (2%) crossovers 45 (3%) administrative drops, 50 (4%) withdrawals, and 87 (7%) never trained. Adherence ranged from 73% (industrial, residential) to 97% (hotel/convention). When compared with public, residential sites had a higher percentage that dropped out (12% vs. 2%) or were administratively dropped. (9% vs. 2%) (p &lt;/= 0.001) Public sites had a higher proportion of sites where volunteers were never trained. (7% vs. 3%) (p &lt;/= 0.05) Both types of sites had 2% crossover rates. (p = NS) Twenty-four (83%) of the crossovers crossed from the CPR to the CPR+ AED arm. CONCLUSION: Adherence to the PAD protocol was good overall (84%) but varied by type of site. Residential sites had a significantly higher proportion of dropouts compared with public, which had a higher proportion of sites never trained. Crossovers were higher in sites randomized to the CPR arm, but did not vary by type of site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-2712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1197/aemj.10.5.453-a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Plaines: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Academic emergency medicine, 2003-05, Vol.10 (5), p.453-453</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts May 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schron, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anton, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holohan, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peberdy, Mary A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Ottingham, Lois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birnbaum, Alice</creatorcontrib><title>Protocol Adherence of Community Sites in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial</title><title>Academic emergency medicine</title><description>OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to identify patterns and characteristics associated with site adherence to the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial protocol. METHODS: The PAD Trial recruited community sites to evaluate the impact on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) when automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are added to a volunteer-based lay OOH-CA response team. Sites were grouped into either residential or public (hotel/convention, shopping, community center, entertainment, participant recreation, transit, office, industrial and other). Volunteers at each site were trained to perform either CPR or CPR + AED skills according to site randomization assignments. Four types of site non-adherence have been defined: crossover (from assigned treatment arm), administrative drop (location closed or withdrew, unrelated to randomization), withdrawal (site decided not to participate in the trial), and never trained (unable to complete training). Statistical analysis used chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 1304 entities participated, 211 did not adhere to the protocol, with 29 (2%) crossovers 45 (3%) administrative drops, 50 (4%) withdrawals, and 87 (7%) never trained. Adherence ranged from 73% (industrial, residential) to 97% (hotel/convention). When compared with public, residential sites had a higher percentage that dropped out (12% vs. 2%) or were administratively dropped. (9% vs. 2%) (p &lt;/= 0.001) Public sites had a higher proportion of sites where volunteers were never trained. (7% vs. 3%) (p &lt;/= 0.05) Both types of sites had 2% crossover rates. (p = NS) Twenty-four (83%) of the crossovers crossed from the CPR to the CPR+ AED arm. CONCLUSION: Adherence to the PAD protocol was good overall (84%) but varied by type of site. Residential sites had a significantly higher proportion of dropouts compared with public, which had a higher proportion of sites never trained. Crossovers were higher in sites randomized to the CPR arm, but did not vary by type of site.</description><issn>1069-6563</issn><issn>1553-2712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1rwzAYhEVpoWnauavo7kSSI8kaQ_oJgQSaXbyWXxEF20ole8i_r0M73R0cd_AQ8szZgnOjl4DdaTEFuVjJsoAbMuNyMkJzcTt5pkyhpCrvyUPOJ8aY1EbPyG6f4hBdbOm6OWLC3iGNnm5i1419GC70OwyYaejpcES6H-s2OLp2DnOmr-hDnULbwhBiTw8pQPtI7jy0GZ_-dU4O72-HzWex3X18bdbbwiltCs4QGTBAJSvDjEFwBpoGwBu_Qq44F4CNBO0Ed17XzUpWvBGglVBQ1qqck5e_2XOKPyPmwZ7imPrp0QrBdFVV2kyl5V_JpZhzQm_PKXSQLpYze2Vmr8yuQdqJmYXyF6NsYPs</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>O'Connor, Robert E</creator><creator>Schron, Eleanor</creator><creator>Anton, Andy</creator><creator>Holohan, Jennifer</creator><creator>Peberdy, Mary A</creator><creator>Reed, David</creator><creator>Van Ottingham, Lois</creator><creator>Birnbaum, Alice</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Protocol Adherence of Community Sites in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial</title><author>O'Connor, Robert E ; Schron, Eleanor ; Anton, Andy ; Holohan, Jennifer ; Peberdy, Mary A ; Reed, David ; Van Ottingham, Lois ; Birnbaum, Alice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c679-10ee0a0ae6589099eac9addaaf9f4e16112aed5a7c21cf7bd4581d2a7626a3b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schron, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anton, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holohan, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peberdy, Mary A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Ottingham, Lois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birnbaum, Alice</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Connor, Robert E</au><au>Schron, Eleanor</au><au>Anton, Andy</au><au>Holohan, Jennifer</au><au>Peberdy, Mary A</au><au>Reed, David</au><au>Van Ottingham, Lois</au><au>Birnbaum, Alice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Protocol Adherence of Community Sites in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial</atitle><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>453-453</pages><issn>1069-6563</issn><eissn>1553-2712</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to identify patterns and characteristics associated with site adherence to the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial protocol. METHODS: The PAD Trial recruited community sites to evaluate the impact on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) when automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are added to a volunteer-based lay OOH-CA response team. Sites were grouped into either residential or public (hotel/convention, shopping, community center, entertainment, participant recreation, transit, office, industrial and other). Volunteers at each site were trained to perform either CPR or CPR + AED skills according to site randomization assignments. Four types of site non-adherence have been defined: crossover (from assigned treatment arm), administrative drop (location closed or withdrew, unrelated to randomization), withdrawal (site decided not to participate in the trial), and never trained (unable to complete training). Statistical analysis used chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 1304 entities participated, 211 did not adhere to the protocol, with 29 (2%) crossovers 45 (3%) administrative drops, 50 (4%) withdrawals, and 87 (7%) never trained. Adherence ranged from 73% (industrial, residential) to 97% (hotel/convention). When compared with public, residential sites had a higher percentage that dropped out (12% vs. 2%) or were administratively dropped. (9% vs. 2%) (p &lt;/= 0.001) Public sites had a higher proportion of sites where volunteers were never trained. (7% vs. 3%) (p &lt;/= 0.05) Both types of sites had 2% crossover rates. (p = NS) Twenty-four (83%) of the crossovers crossed from the CPR to the CPR+ AED arm. CONCLUSION: Adherence to the PAD protocol was good overall (84%) but varied by type of site. Residential sites had a significantly higher proportion of dropouts compared with public, which had a higher proportion of sites never trained. Crossovers were higher in sites randomized to the CPR arm, but did not vary by type of site.</abstract><cop>Des Plaines</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1197/aemj.10.5.453-a</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-6563
ispartof Academic emergency medicine, 2003-05, Vol.10 (5), p.453-453
issn 1069-6563
1553-2712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220788879
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Protocol Adherence of Community Sites in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T01%3A39%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Protocol%20Adherence%20of%20Community%20Sites%20in%20the%20Public%20Access%20Defibrillation%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Academic%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=O'Connor,%20Robert%20E&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=453-453&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1197/aemj.10.5.453-a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E332486311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220788879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true