Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Wetlands are critical components of freshwater biodiversity and provide ecosystem services, but human activities have resulted in large‐scale loss of these habitats across the globe. To offset this loss, mitigation wetlands are frequently constructed, but their ability to replicate the functions of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2019-05, Vol.64 (5), p.942-953 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 953 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 942 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Swartz, Leah K. Hossack, Blake R. Muths, Erin Newell, Robert L. Lowe, Winsor H. |
description | Wetlands are critical components of freshwater biodiversity and provide ecosystem services, but human activities have resulted in large‐scale loss of these habitats across the globe. To offset this loss, mitigation wetlands are frequently constructed, but their ability to replicate the functions of natural wetlands remains uncertain. Further, monitoring of mitigation wetlands is limited and often focuses exclusively on vegetation and physical characteristics.
Wetland fauna are assumed to be present if suitable habitat restoration is achieved, but this assumption is rarely tested. We used the macroinvertebrate community as a proxy for wetland function to compare recently created mitigation wetlands, natural wetlands impacted but not destroyed by road construction activity, and unimpacted reference wetlands along a highway corridor in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Unlike most other studies of invertebrate communities in created wetlands which have occurred in warm climates, our study area has a cold temperate climate with short growing seasons.
We estimated macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness and used linear models to test for effects of wetland design features (wetland age, isolation, depth, vegetation, size, and pH) on invertebrate richness. We also used non‐metric multidimensional scaling to visualise differences in community composition among wetland types and used indicator species analysis to determine which taxa were causing observed differences.
Taxonomic richness of macroinvertebrates was lower in created wetlands than impacted or reference wetlands, whereas richness was similar in impacted and reference wetlands. Wetland age was positively correlated with taxonomic richness. The amount of aquatic vegetation in wetlands had the greatest influence on taxonomic richness, so that recently created wetlands with little vegetation had the simplest invertebrate communities. Community composition of invertebrates in created wetlands also differed from community composition in reference and impacted wetlands. Most notably, created wetlands lacked some passive dispersers that were common in other wetland types, although we found no relationship between taxonomic richness and wetland isolation.
Overall, constructed wetlands had diminished and altered macroinvertebrate communities relative to reference and impacted wetlands, suggesting that periods in excess of 5 years may be required for wetland mitigation projects in cold temperate climates to attain fu |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/fwb.13276 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2207216458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2207216458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-83eeead9a18d789e07e0b1ab1ef22ae9c58058d47ed5760a061228de2d04de563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk2M6Hk7FUbUGqxAJCTJYTX6irxG5thyj_nkBYueWW53lP9yJ0S8mCjvNQ9-WCxoxnZ2hG4yyNWML4OZoRkmRRSji5RFfeHwghecrZDO2Xp04GXeFWVs5q8wUuQOlkAFzZtu2MDgN24I_WePA4WNxDaKRRuNVBf46qNVgbHPaAtw5Gz-EPaBrb-2AN4HVl_eADtNfoopaNh5u_PUdvm_Xr6inavWyfV8tdVLGCZ1EeA4BUhaS54nkBhAMpqSwp1IxJKKo0J2muEg4q5RmRJKOM5QqYIomCNIvn6G7KPTp76sAHcbCdM-NJwRjhjGZJmo_U_USNT3vvoBZHp1vpBkGJ-ClSjEWK3yJH9mFie93A8D8oNu-Pk_ENy8N3Hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207216458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Swartz, Leah K. ; Hossack, Blake R. ; Muths, Erin ; Newell, Robert L. ; Lowe, Winsor H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Leah K. ; Hossack, Blake R. ; Muths, Erin ; Newell, Robert L. ; Lowe, Winsor H.</creatorcontrib><description>Wetlands are critical components of freshwater biodiversity and provide ecosystem services, but human activities have resulted in large‐scale loss of these habitats across the globe. To offset this loss, mitigation wetlands are frequently constructed, but their ability to replicate the functions of natural wetlands remains uncertain. Further, monitoring of mitigation wetlands is limited and often focuses exclusively on vegetation and physical characteristics.
Wetland fauna are assumed to be present if suitable habitat restoration is achieved, but this assumption is rarely tested. We used the macroinvertebrate community as a proxy for wetland function to compare recently created mitigation wetlands, natural wetlands impacted but not destroyed by road construction activity, and unimpacted reference wetlands along a highway corridor in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Unlike most other studies of invertebrate communities in created wetlands which have occurred in warm climates, our study area has a cold temperate climate with short growing seasons.
We estimated macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness and used linear models to test for effects of wetland design features (wetland age, isolation, depth, vegetation, size, and pH) on invertebrate richness. We also used non‐metric multidimensional scaling to visualise differences in community composition among wetland types and used indicator species analysis to determine which taxa were causing observed differences.
Taxonomic richness of macroinvertebrates was lower in created wetlands than impacted or reference wetlands, whereas richness was similar in impacted and reference wetlands. Wetland age was positively correlated with taxonomic richness. The amount of aquatic vegetation in wetlands had the greatest influence on taxonomic richness, so that recently created wetlands with little vegetation had the simplest invertebrate communities. Community composition of invertebrates in created wetlands also differed from community composition in reference and impacted wetlands. Most notably, created wetlands lacked some passive dispersers that were common in other wetland types, although we found no relationship between taxonomic richness and wetland isolation.
Overall, constructed wetlands had diminished and altered macroinvertebrate communities relative to reference and impacted wetlands, suggesting that periods in excess of 5 years may be required for wetland mitigation projects in cold temperate climates to attain full functionality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Aquatic plants ; Artificial wetlands ; Biodiversity ; Brittleness ; Clean Water Act ; Communities ; Community composition ; Composition ; Critical components ; Ecosystem services ; Environmental restoration ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Growing season ; Highway construction ; Indicator organisms ; Indicator species ; Inland water environment ; Invertebrates ; Macroinvertebrates ; Mitigation ; Multidimensional scaling ; Physical characteristics ; Physical properties ; Restoration ; Road construction ; Scaling ; species richness ; Taxonomy ; Vegetation ; wetland creation ; Wetlands ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (5), p.942-953</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-83eeead9a18d789e07e0b1ab1ef22ae9c58058d47ed5760a061228de2d04de563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-83eeead9a18d789e07e0b1ab1ef22ae9c58058d47ed5760a061228de2d04de563</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2315-8727 ; 0000-0001-7456-9564 ; 0000-0002-5498-3132 ; 0000-0001-5782-0200</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.13276$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.13276$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Leah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossack, Blake R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muths, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Winsor H.</creatorcontrib><title>Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Wetlands are critical components of freshwater biodiversity and provide ecosystem services, but human activities have resulted in large‐scale loss of these habitats across the globe. To offset this loss, mitigation wetlands are frequently constructed, but their ability to replicate the functions of natural wetlands remains uncertain. Further, monitoring of mitigation wetlands is limited and often focuses exclusively on vegetation and physical characteristics.
Wetland fauna are assumed to be present if suitable habitat restoration is achieved, but this assumption is rarely tested. We used the macroinvertebrate community as a proxy for wetland function to compare recently created mitigation wetlands, natural wetlands impacted but not destroyed by road construction activity, and unimpacted reference wetlands along a highway corridor in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Unlike most other studies of invertebrate communities in created wetlands which have occurred in warm climates, our study area has a cold temperate climate with short growing seasons.
We estimated macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness and used linear models to test for effects of wetland design features (wetland age, isolation, depth, vegetation, size, and pH) on invertebrate richness. We also used non‐metric multidimensional scaling to visualise differences in community composition among wetland types and used indicator species analysis to determine which taxa were causing observed differences.
Taxonomic richness of macroinvertebrates was lower in created wetlands than impacted or reference wetlands, whereas richness was similar in impacted and reference wetlands. Wetland age was positively correlated with taxonomic richness. The amount of aquatic vegetation in wetlands had the greatest influence on taxonomic richness, so that recently created wetlands with little vegetation had the simplest invertebrate communities. Community composition of invertebrates in created wetlands also differed from community composition in reference and impacted wetlands. Most notably, created wetlands lacked some passive dispersers that were common in other wetland types, although we found no relationship between taxonomic richness and wetland isolation.
Overall, constructed wetlands had diminished and altered macroinvertebrate communities relative to reference and impacted wetlands, suggesting that periods in excess of 5 years may be required for wetland mitigation projects in cold temperate climates to attain full functionality.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Clean Water Act</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Critical components</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Highway construction</subject><subject>Indicator organisms</subject><subject>Indicator species</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Multidimensional scaling</subject><subject>Physical characteristics</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Road construction</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>species richness</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>wetland creation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGk2M6Hk7FUbUGqxAJCTJYTX6irxG5thyj_nkBYueWW53lP9yJ0S8mCjvNQ9-WCxoxnZ2hG4yyNWML4OZoRkmRRSji5RFfeHwghecrZDO2Xp04GXeFWVs5q8wUuQOlkAFzZtu2MDgN24I_WePA4WNxDaKRRuNVBf46qNVgbHPaAtw5Gz-EPaBrb-2AN4HVl_eADtNfoopaNh5u_PUdvm_Xr6inavWyfV8tdVLGCZ1EeA4BUhaS54nkBhAMpqSwp1IxJKKo0J2muEg4q5RmRJKOM5QqYIomCNIvn6G7KPTp76sAHcbCdM-NJwRjhjGZJmo_U_USNT3vvoBZHp1vpBkGJ-ClSjEWK3yJH9mFie93A8D8oNu-Pk_ENy8N3Hg</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Swartz, Leah K.</creator><creator>Hossack, Blake R.</creator><creator>Muths, Erin</creator><creator>Newell, Robert L.</creator><creator>Lowe, Winsor H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-8727</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-9564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-3132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5782-0200</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem</title><author>Swartz, Leah K. ; Hossack, Blake R. ; Muths, Erin ; Newell, Robert L. ; Lowe, Winsor H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2976-83eeead9a18d789e07e0b1ab1ef22ae9c58058d47ed5760a061228de2d04de563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Clean Water Act</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Critical components</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Highway construction</topic><topic>Indicator organisms</topic><topic>Indicator species</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Multidimensional scaling</topic><topic>Physical characteristics</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Road construction</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>species richness</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>wetland creation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Leah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossack, Blake R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muths, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Winsor H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swartz, Leah K.</au><au>Hossack, Blake R.</au><au>Muths, Erin</au><au>Newell, Robert L.</au><au>Lowe, Winsor H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>953</epage><pages>942-953</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Wetlands are critical components of freshwater biodiversity and provide ecosystem services, but human activities have resulted in large‐scale loss of these habitats across the globe. To offset this loss, mitigation wetlands are frequently constructed, but their ability to replicate the functions of natural wetlands remains uncertain. Further, monitoring of mitigation wetlands is limited and often focuses exclusively on vegetation and physical characteristics.
Wetland fauna are assumed to be present if suitable habitat restoration is achieved, but this assumption is rarely tested. We used the macroinvertebrate community as a proxy for wetland function to compare recently created mitigation wetlands, natural wetlands impacted but not destroyed by road construction activity, and unimpacted reference wetlands along a highway corridor in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Unlike most other studies of invertebrate communities in created wetlands which have occurred in warm climates, our study area has a cold temperate climate with short growing seasons.
We estimated macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness and used linear models to test for effects of wetland design features (wetland age, isolation, depth, vegetation, size, and pH) on invertebrate richness. We also used non‐metric multidimensional scaling to visualise differences in community composition among wetland types and used indicator species analysis to determine which taxa were causing observed differences.
Taxonomic richness of macroinvertebrates was lower in created wetlands than impacted or reference wetlands, whereas richness was similar in impacted and reference wetlands. Wetland age was positively correlated with taxonomic richness. The amount of aquatic vegetation in wetlands had the greatest influence on taxonomic richness, so that recently created wetlands with little vegetation had the simplest invertebrate communities. Community composition of invertebrates in created wetlands also differed from community composition in reference and impacted wetlands. Most notably, created wetlands lacked some passive dispersers that were common in other wetland types, although we found no relationship between taxonomic richness and wetland isolation.
Overall, constructed wetlands had diminished and altered macroinvertebrate communities relative to reference and impacted wetlands, suggesting that periods in excess of 5 years may be required for wetland mitigation projects in cold temperate climates to attain full functionality.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.13276</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-8727</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-9564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5498-3132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5782-0200</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (5), p.942-953 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2207216458 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Aquatic plants Artificial wetlands Biodiversity Brittleness Clean Water Act Communities Community composition Composition Critical components Ecosystem services Environmental restoration Freshwater Freshwater ecosystems Growing season Highway construction Indicator organisms Indicator species Inland water environment Invertebrates Macroinvertebrates Mitigation Multidimensional scaling Physical characteristics Physical properties Restoration Road construction Scaling species richness Taxonomy Vegetation wetland creation Wetlands Zoobenthos |
title | Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A24%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aquatic%20macroinvertebrate%20community%20responses%20to%20wetland%20mitigation%20in%20the%20Greater%20Yellowstone%20Ecosystem&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Swartz,%20Leah%20K.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=953&rft.pages=942-953&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.13276&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2207216458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207216458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |