Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)
Evaluating fish feeding behaviours is imperative to understanding prey resource use in the field. Previous work on fish feeding has taken place almost exclusively in a laboratory setting, which may impose artificial restrictions. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the constraints the captive setting places...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2019-05, Vol.64 (5), p.926-932 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 932 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 926 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Moran, Clinton J. Rzucidlo, Caroline L. Ellerby, David J. Gerry, Shannon P. |
description | Evaluating fish feeding behaviours is imperative to understanding prey resource use in the field. Previous work on fish feeding has taken place almost exclusively in a laboratory setting, which may impose artificial restrictions. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the constraints the captive setting places on fish feeding behaviours.
We recorded polymorphic (littoral and pelagic) bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) feeding in the laboratory and the field using a high‐speed camera and underwater cameras. Following successful strikes video events, were digitised using ImageJ (laboratory) and Argus (field).
Gape velocity, ram velocity, and body deceleration were higher in the field than in captive fish. Significantly greater gape velocity in field fish suggests that these fish feed with greater suction pressure than captive fish. Prey effects were detected, as brine shrimp feeding events were characterised by slower gape and ram velocities and a smaller gape. Feeding events on brine shrimp in the field were similar to feeding events on worms in the laboratory suggesting an artefact of training.
These results indicate that feeding behaviours measured in the laboratory may not be representative of feeding behaviours in the wild. Further consideration of organismal performance and laboratory constraints should be taken in future functional studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/fwb.13274 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2207216301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2207216301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-96a6cbc3ca44b0add4033046c7b1565041f82b237b851a02a435f8ccdd34c0e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8ssdAh7fkjH4xQUUCKxAJitGzHaVwlcbATqvx7AmHlllue9-7Ri9A1gTWZZlMe1ZowmvITtCAsiSPKaXqKFgA8iWJI4RxdhHAAgCxO6QKpXCrnZe_8iLVrQ--lbfuAXYtLYwrb7rEylfyybvAB2xZ3rh4b57vKaqzqwextXeMwtKUNFb7NTecaG3AjtXe6sn4Iq0t0Vso6mKu_vUTvu8e37XOUvz69bO_zSDNGeXSXyEQrzbTkXIEsCg6MTdY6VSROYuCkzKiiLFVZTCRQyVlcZloXBeMaDGFLdDPf7bz7HEzoxWGSbqeXglJIKUkY_FCrmZoEQ_CmFJ23jfSjICB-KhRTheK3wondzOzR1mb8HxS7j4c58Q2QjXO4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2207216301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Moran, Clinton J. ; Rzucidlo, Caroline L. ; Ellerby, David J. ; Gerry, Shannon P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moran, Clinton J. ; Rzucidlo, Caroline L. ; Ellerby, David J. ; Gerry, Shannon P.</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating fish feeding behaviours is imperative to understanding prey resource use in the field. Previous work on fish feeding has taken place almost exclusively in a laboratory setting, which may impose artificial restrictions. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the constraints the captive setting places on fish feeding behaviours.
We recorded polymorphic (littoral and pelagic) bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) feeding in the laboratory and the field using a high‐speed camera and underwater cameras. Following successful strikes video events, were digitised using ImageJ (laboratory) and Argus (field).
Gape velocity, ram velocity, and body deceleration were higher in the field than in captive fish. Significantly greater gape velocity in field fish suggests that these fish feed with greater suction pressure than captive fish. Prey effects were detected, as brine shrimp feeding events were characterised by slower gape and ram velocities and a smaller gape. Feeding events on brine shrimp in the field were similar to feeding events on worms in the laboratory suggesting an artefact of training.
These results indicate that feeding behaviours measured in the laboratory may not be representative of feeding behaviours in the wild. Further consideration of organismal performance and laboratory constraints should be taken in future functional studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic crustaceans ; Cameras ; Decapoda ; Deceleration ; Digitization ; Feeding ; field feeding ; Fish ; Fish feeds ; Freshwater fishes ; GoPro ; kinematics ; Laboratories ; Lepomis macrochirus ; Littoral environments ; Prey ; ram ; Saline water ; Suction ; Training ; Underwater cameras ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (5), p.926-932</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-96a6cbc3ca44b0add4033046c7b1565041f82b237b851a02a435f8ccdd34c0e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-96a6cbc3ca44b0add4033046c7b1565041f82b237b851a02a435f8ccdd34c0e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9919-7437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.13274$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.13274$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moran, Clinton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rzucidlo, Caroline L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellerby, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerry, Shannon P.</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Evaluating fish feeding behaviours is imperative to understanding prey resource use in the field. Previous work on fish feeding has taken place almost exclusively in a laboratory setting, which may impose artificial restrictions. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the constraints the captive setting places on fish feeding behaviours.
We recorded polymorphic (littoral and pelagic) bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) feeding in the laboratory and the field using a high‐speed camera and underwater cameras. Following successful strikes video events, were digitised using ImageJ (laboratory) and Argus (field).
Gape velocity, ram velocity, and body deceleration were higher in the field than in captive fish. Significantly greater gape velocity in field fish suggests that these fish feed with greater suction pressure than captive fish. Prey effects were detected, as brine shrimp feeding events were characterised by slower gape and ram velocities and a smaller gape. Feeding events on brine shrimp in the field were similar to feeding events on worms in the laboratory suggesting an artefact of training.
These results indicate that feeding behaviours measured in the laboratory may not be representative of feeding behaviours in the wild. Further consideration of organismal performance and laboratory constraints should be taken in future functional studies.</description><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Deceleration</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>field feeding</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish feeds</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>GoPro</subject><subject>kinematics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lepomis macrochirus</subject><subject>Littoral environments</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>ram</subject><subject>Saline water</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Underwater cameras</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8ssdAh7fkjH4xQUUCKxAJitGzHaVwlcbATqvx7AmHlllue9-7Ri9A1gTWZZlMe1ZowmvITtCAsiSPKaXqKFgA8iWJI4RxdhHAAgCxO6QKpXCrnZe_8iLVrQ--lbfuAXYtLYwrb7rEylfyybvAB2xZ3rh4b57vKaqzqwextXeMwtKUNFb7NTecaG3AjtXe6sn4Iq0t0Vso6mKu_vUTvu8e37XOUvz69bO_zSDNGeXSXyEQrzbTkXIEsCg6MTdY6VSROYuCkzKiiLFVZTCRQyVlcZloXBeMaDGFLdDPf7bz7HEzoxWGSbqeXglJIKUkY_FCrmZoEQ_CmFJ23jfSjICB-KhRTheK3wondzOzR1mb8HxS7j4c58Q2QjXO4</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Moran, Clinton J.</creator><creator>Rzucidlo, Caroline L.</creator><creator>Ellerby, David J.</creator><creator>Gerry, Shannon P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-7437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)</title><author>Moran, Clinton J. ; Rzucidlo, Caroline L. ; Ellerby, David J. ; Gerry, Shannon P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3324-96a6cbc3ca44b0add4033046c7b1565041f82b237b851a02a435f8ccdd34c0e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Deceleration</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>field feeding</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish feeds</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>GoPro</topic><topic>kinematics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lepomis macrochirus</topic><topic>Littoral environments</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>ram</topic><topic>Saline water</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Underwater cameras</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moran, Clinton J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rzucidlo, Caroline L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellerby, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerry, Shannon P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moran, Clinton J.</au><au>Rzucidlo, Caroline L.</au><au>Ellerby, David J.</au><au>Gerry, Shannon P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>926</spage><epage>932</epage><pages>926-932</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Evaluating fish feeding behaviours is imperative to understanding prey resource use in the field. Previous work on fish feeding has taken place almost exclusively in a laboratory setting, which may impose artificial restrictions. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the constraints the captive setting places on fish feeding behaviours.
We recorded polymorphic (littoral and pelagic) bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) feeding in the laboratory and the field using a high‐speed camera and underwater cameras. Following successful strikes video events, were digitised using ImageJ (laboratory) and Argus (field).
Gape velocity, ram velocity, and body deceleration were higher in the field than in captive fish. Significantly greater gape velocity in field fish suggests that these fish feed with greater suction pressure than captive fish. Prey effects were detected, as brine shrimp feeding events were characterised by slower gape and ram velocities and a smaller gape. Feeding events on brine shrimp in the field were similar to feeding events on worms in the laboratory suggesting an artefact of training.
These results indicate that feeding behaviours measured in the laboratory may not be representative of feeding behaviours in the wild. Further consideration of organismal performance and laboratory constraints should be taken in future functional studies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.13274</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9919-7437</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2019-05, Vol.64 (5), p.926-932 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2207216301 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aquatic crustaceans Cameras Decapoda Deceleration Digitization Feeding field feeding Fish Fish feeds Freshwater fishes GoPro kinematics Laboratories Lepomis macrochirus Littoral environments Prey ram Saline water Suction Training Underwater cameras Velocity |
title | Laboratory constraints on feeding behaviours in polymorphic bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T09%3A12%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20constraints%20on%20feeding%20behaviours%20in%20polymorphic%20bluegill%20sunfish%20(Lepomis%20macrochirus)&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Moran,%20Clinton%20J.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=926&rft.epage=932&rft.pages=926-932&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.13274&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2207216301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2207216301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |