Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II
Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Defense counsel journal 1991-07, Vol.58 (3), p.363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Defense counsel journal |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | May, Ronald A Ruprecht, G Steven Leslie, Robert E Devin, Paul R Linder, Charles W |
description | Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220675175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1141792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2206751753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY30zW2NDBjYeA0sLA01TUwMDTjYOAqLs4yAAJjC3NOBgvHvLzSxByF4NKistRKhfw0BbfMlNSczJJKhcS8FJBwKpDpk1iuo2BoaWmgoKsQkFhUouDpycPAmpaYU5zKC6W5GZTcXEOcPXQLivILS1OLS-Kz8kuL8oBS8UZGBmbmpobmpsZEKQIAuRc0WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220675175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>May, Ronald A ; Ruprecht, G Steven ; Leslie, Robert E ; Devin, Paul R ; Linder, Charles W</creator><creatorcontrib>May, Ronald A ; Ruprecht, G Steven ; Leslie, Robert E ; Devin, Paul R ; Linder, Charles W</creatorcontrib><description>Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-0016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-3906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: International Association of Defense Counsel</publisher><subject>Bonds ; Litigation ; Manycompanies ; State court decisions ; Statutes of limitations ; Sureties ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Defense counsel journal, 1991-07, Vol.58 (3), p.363</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Association of Defense Counsel Jul 1991</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>May, Ronald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, G Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devin, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linder, Charles W</creatorcontrib><title>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</title><title>Defense counsel journal</title><description>Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.</description><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Manycompanies</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Statutes of limitations</subject><subject>Sureties</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0895-0016</issn><issn>2376-3906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY30zW2NDBjYeA0sLA01TUwMDTjYOAqLs4yAAJjC3NOBgvHvLzSxByF4NKistRKhfw0BbfMlNSczJJKhcS8FJBwKpDpk1iuo2BoaWmgoKsQkFhUouDpycPAmpaYU5zKC6W5GZTcXEOcPXQLivILS1OLS-Kz8kuL8oBS8UZGBmbmpobmpsZEKQIAuRc0WA</recordid><startdate>19910701</startdate><enddate>19910701</enddate><creator>May, Ronald A</creator><creator>Ruprecht, G Steven</creator><creator>Leslie, Robert E</creator><creator>Devin, Paul R</creator><creator>Linder, Charles W</creator><general>International Association of Defense Counsel</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910701</creationdate><title>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</title><author>May, Ronald A ; Ruprecht, G Steven ; Leslie, Robert E ; Devin, Paul R ; Linder, Charles W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2206751753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Manycompanies</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Statutes of limitations</topic><topic>Sureties</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>May, Ronald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, G Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devin, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linder, Charles W</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><jtitle>Defense counsel journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>May, Ronald A</au><au>Ruprecht, G Steven</au><au>Leslie, Robert E</au><au>Devin, Paul R</au><au>Linder, Charles W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</atitle><jtitle>Defense counsel journal</jtitle><date>1991-07-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>363</spage><pages>363-</pages><issn>0895-0016</issn><eissn>2376-3906</eissn><abstract>Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>International Association of Defense Counsel</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-0016 |
ispartof | Defense counsel journal, 1991-07, Vol.58 (3), p.363 |
issn | 0895-0016 2376-3906 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220675175 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Bonds Litigation Manycompanies State court decisions Statutes of limitations Sureties Violations |
title | Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Annual%20Survey%20of%20Fidelity%20and%20Surety%20Law,%201990%20-%20Part%20II&rft.jtitle=Defense%20counsel%20journal&rft.au=May,%20Ronald%20A&rft.date=1991-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=363&rft.pages=363-&rft.issn=0895-0016&rft.eissn=2376-3906&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1141792%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220675175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |