Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II

Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Defense counsel journal 1991-07, Vol.58 (3), p.363
Hauptverfasser: May, Ronald A, Ruprecht, G Steven, Leslie, Robert E, Devin, Paul R, Linder, Charles W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 363
container_title Defense counsel journal
container_volume 58
creator May, Ronald A
Ruprecht, G Steven
Leslie, Robert E
Devin, Paul R
Linder, Charles W
description Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220675175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1141792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2206751753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY30zW2NDBjYeA0sLA01TUwMDTjYOAqLs4yAAJjC3NOBgvHvLzSxByF4NKistRKhfw0BbfMlNSczJJKhcS8FJBwKpDpk1iuo2BoaWmgoKsQkFhUouDpycPAmpaYU5zKC6W5GZTcXEOcPXQLivILS1OLS-Kz8kuL8oBS8UZGBmbmpobmpsZEKQIAuRc0WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220675175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>May, Ronald A ; Ruprecht, G Steven ; Leslie, Robert E ; Devin, Paul R ; Linder, Charles W</creator><creatorcontrib>May, Ronald A ; Ruprecht, G Steven ; Leslie, Robert E ; Devin, Paul R ; Linder, Charles W</creatorcontrib><description>Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-0016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-3906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: International Association of Defense Counsel</publisher><subject>Bonds ; Litigation ; Manycompanies ; State court decisions ; Statutes of limitations ; Sureties ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Defense counsel journal, 1991-07, Vol.58 (3), p.363</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Association of Defense Counsel Jul 1991</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>May, Ronald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, G Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devin, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linder, Charles W</creatorcontrib><title>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</title><title>Defense counsel journal</title><description>Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.</description><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Manycompanies</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Statutes of limitations</subject><subject>Sureties</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>0895-0016</issn><issn>2376-3906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY30zW2NDBjYeA0sLA01TUwMDTjYOAqLs4yAAJjC3NOBgvHvLzSxByF4NKistRKhfw0BbfMlNSczJJKhcS8FJBwKpDpk1iuo2BoaWmgoKsQkFhUouDpycPAmpaYU5zKC6W5GZTcXEOcPXQLivILS1OLS-Kz8kuL8oBS8UZGBmbmpobmpsZEKQIAuRc0WA</recordid><startdate>19910701</startdate><enddate>19910701</enddate><creator>May, Ronald A</creator><creator>Ruprecht, G Steven</creator><creator>Leslie, Robert E</creator><creator>Devin, Paul R</creator><creator>Linder, Charles W</creator><general>International Association of Defense Counsel</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910701</creationdate><title>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</title><author>May, Ronald A ; Ruprecht, G Steven ; Leslie, Robert E ; Devin, Paul R ; Linder, Charles W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2206751753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Manycompanies</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Statutes of limitations</topic><topic>Sureties</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>May, Ronald A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruprecht, G Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leslie, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devin, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linder, Charles W</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><jtitle>Defense counsel journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>May, Ronald A</au><au>Ruprecht, G Steven</au><au>Leslie, Robert E</au><au>Devin, Paul R</au><au>Linder, Charles W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II</atitle><jtitle>Defense counsel journal</jtitle><date>1991-07-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>363</spage><pages>363-</pages><issn>0895-0016</issn><eissn>2376-3906</eissn><abstract>Procedural issues that have been addressed in Miller Act bond cases include: 1. the waiver of a claimant's right to arbitrate because of active participation in litigation, 2. the right of a facilities manager for the government to recover under a Miller Act performance bond, and 3. the failure of a surety's conduct to create an estoppel to assert the one-year statute of limitations. Regarding state and local bonds, 3 cases reached diverse results regarding statutory notice requirements. In Turner Construction Inc. versus American States Insurance Co. (1990), Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the obligee's cause of action on a performance bond accrues when the principal fails to perform, not on the obligee's first knowledge of the problem or defect. Cases relating to fidelity and financial institution bonds addressed the definition of dishonesty, liability to third parties, and causation.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>International Association of Defense Counsel</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-0016
ispartof Defense counsel journal, 1991-07, Vol.58 (3), p.363
issn 0895-0016
2376-3906
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220675175
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Bonds
Litigation
Manycompanies
State court decisions
Statutes of limitations
Sureties
Violations
title Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 1990 - Part II
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Annual%20Survey%20of%20Fidelity%20and%20Surety%20Law,%201990%20-%20Part%20II&rft.jtitle=Defense%20counsel%20journal&rft.au=May,%20Ronald%20A&rft.date=1991-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=363&rft.pages=363-&rft.issn=0895-0016&rft.eissn=2376-3906&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1141792%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220675175&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true