Hoarding revisited: there is light at the end of the living room
Since 2013, hoarding disorder has been recognised as a standalone diagnosis in the DSM, affecting an estimated 2–6% of the general population. This article outlines the arguments for and against this separate classification and considers the differentiation of hoarding disorder from normative collec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJPsych advances 2019-01, Vol.25 (1), p.26-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | BJPsych advances |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Pertusa, Alberto Lopez Gaston, Romina Choudry, Abid |
description | Since 2013, hoarding disorder has been recognised as a standalone diagnosis in the DSM, affecting an estimated 2–6% of the general population. This article outlines the arguments for and against this separate classification and considers the differentiation of hoarding disorder from normative collecting. It then discusses aetiology, assessment, course and treatment (both psychological and pharmacological interventions). It concludes with a discussion of ethical and legal considerations, in particular the fact that the inclusion of hoarding disorder as a distinct diagnosis in DSM-5 confers specific protections for people with the disorder under the Equality Act 2010. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1192/bja.2018.39 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2206475924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1192_bja_2018_39</cupid><sourcerecordid>2206475924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-df36a57b327658425eae6a1a4295ceb680e8545bedec33d6ae33bd5c4fc5c1343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9Lw0AUxBdRsNSe_AILHiVx_yfxpBRrhYIXPS-b7Eu6oc3W3bTgtzdpi148veHxmxkYhG4pSSkt2EPZmpQRmqe8uEATRqRKhMrV5a_O8ms0i7ElZKAYzQSZoKelN8G6rsEBDi66Huwj7tcQALuIN65Z99j04wdDZ7Gvj3LjDkeL99sbdFWbTYTZ-U7R5-LlY75MVu-vb_PnVVJxrvrE1lwZmZWcZUrmgkkwoAw1ghWyglLlBHIpZAkWBoNVBjgvraxEXcmKcsGn6O6Uuwv-aw-x163fh26o1IwRJTJZsJG6P1FV8DEGqPUuuK0J35oSPa6kh5X0uJLmxUAnZ9psy-BsA3-h__E_gGJoCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2206475924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hoarding revisited: there is light at the end of the living room</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Pertusa, Alberto ; Lopez Gaston, Romina ; Choudry, Abid</creator><creatorcontrib>Pertusa, Alberto ; Lopez Gaston, Romina ; Choudry, Abid</creatorcontrib><description>Since 2013, hoarding disorder has been recognised as a standalone diagnosis in the DSM, affecting an estimated 2–6% of the general population. This article outlines the arguments for and against this separate classification and considers the differentiation of hoarding disorder from normative collecting. It then discusses aetiology, assessment, course and treatment (both psychological and pharmacological interventions). It concludes with a discussion of ethical and legal considerations, in particular the fact that the inclusion of hoarding disorder as a distinct diagnosis in DSM-5 confers specific protections for people with the disorder under the Equality Act 2010.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-4678</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-4686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1192/bja.2018.39</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Behavior ; Comorbidity ; Hoarding disorder ; Mental disorders ; Obsessive compulsive disorder ; Schizophrenia ; Society ; Traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>BJPsych advances, 2019-01, Vol.25 (1), p.26-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-df36a57b327658425eae6a1a4295ceb680e8545bedec33d6ae33bd5c4fc5c1343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-df36a57b327658425eae6a1a4295ceb680e8545bedec33d6ae33bd5c4fc5c1343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2056467818000397/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pertusa, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez Gaston, Romina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudry, Abid</creatorcontrib><title>Hoarding revisited: there is light at the end of the living room</title><title>BJPsych advances</title><addtitle>BJPsych advances</addtitle><description>Since 2013, hoarding disorder has been recognised as a standalone diagnosis in the DSM, affecting an estimated 2–6% of the general population. This article outlines the arguments for and against this separate classification and considers the differentiation of hoarding disorder from normative collecting. It then discusses aetiology, assessment, course and treatment (both psychological and pharmacological interventions). It concludes with a discussion of ethical and legal considerations, in particular the fact that the inclusion of hoarding disorder as a distinct diagnosis in DSM-5 confers specific protections for people with the disorder under the Equality Act 2010.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Hoarding disorder</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Obsessive compulsive disorder</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>2056-4678</issn><issn>2056-4686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9Lw0AUxBdRsNSe_AILHiVx_yfxpBRrhYIXPS-b7Eu6oc3W3bTgtzdpi148veHxmxkYhG4pSSkt2EPZmpQRmqe8uEATRqRKhMrV5a_O8ms0i7ElZKAYzQSZoKelN8G6rsEBDi66Huwj7tcQALuIN65Z99j04wdDZ7Gvj3LjDkeL99sbdFWbTYTZ-U7R5-LlY75MVu-vb_PnVVJxrvrE1lwZmZWcZUrmgkkwoAw1ghWyglLlBHIpZAkWBoNVBjgvraxEXcmKcsGn6O6Uuwv-aw-x163fh26o1IwRJTJZsJG6P1FV8DEGqPUuuK0J35oSPa6kh5X0uJLmxUAnZ9psy-BsA3-h__E_gGJoCA</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Pertusa, Alberto</creator><creator>Lopez Gaston, Romina</creator><creator>Choudry, Abid</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Hoarding revisited: there is light at the end of the living room</title><author>Pertusa, Alberto ; Lopez Gaston, Romina ; Choudry, Abid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-df36a57b327658425eae6a1a4295ceb680e8545bedec33d6ae33bd5c4fc5c1343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Hoarding disorder</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Obsessive compulsive disorder</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pertusa, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez Gaston, Romina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudry, Abid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>BJPsych advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pertusa, Alberto</au><au>Lopez Gaston, Romina</au><au>Choudry, Abid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hoarding revisited: there is light at the end of the living room</atitle><jtitle>BJPsych advances</jtitle><addtitle>BJPsych advances</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>26-36</pages><issn>2056-4678</issn><eissn>2056-4686</eissn><abstract>Since 2013, hoarding disorder has been recognised as a standalone diagnosis in the DSM, affecting an estimated 2–6% of the general population. This article outlines the arguments for and against this separate classification and considers the differentiation of hoarding disorder from normative collecting. It then discusses aetiology, assessment, course and treatment (both psychological and pharmacological interventions). It concludes with a discussion of ethical and legal considerations, in particular the fact that the inclusion of hoarding disorder as a distinct diagnosis in DSM-5 confers specific protections for people with the disorder under the Equality Act 2010.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1192/bja.2018.39</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2056-4678 |
ispartof | BJPsych advances, 2019-01, Vol.25 (1), p.26-36 |
issn | 2056-4678 2056-4686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2206475924 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Anxiety Behavior Comorbidity Hoarding disorder Mental disorders Obsessive compulsive disorder Schizophrenia Society Traumatic brain injury |
title | Hoarding revisited: there is light at the end of the living room |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hoarding%20revisited:%20there%20is%20light%20at%20the%20end%20of%20the%20living%20room&rft.jtitle=BJPsych%20advances&rft.au=Pertusa,%20Alberto&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=26-36&rft.issn=2056-4678&rft.eissn=2056-4686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1192/bja.2018.39&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2206475924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2206475924&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1192_bja_2018_39&rfr_iscdi=true |