Application of surface analysis in study on removal mechanism and abrasive selection during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing
In this work, surface analysis technology is employed to investigate the removal mechanism and the selection of abrasive during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Morphology of abrasives is inspected by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The atomic force microscope (AFM) is used to d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surface and interface analysis 2019-05, Vol.51 (5), p.576-583 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 583 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 576 |
container_title | Surface and interface analysis |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Chen, Gaopan Luo, Haimei Kang, Chengxi Luo, Guihai Zhou, Yan Pan, Guoshun |
description | In this work, surface analysis technology is employed to investigate the removal mechanism and the selection of abrasive during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Morphology of abrasives is inspected by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The atomic force microscope (AFM) is used to determine the surface roughness (Rq) and undulating (PV) of the polished fused silica surface. The results show that abrasive morphology has a tremendous influence on removal rate (MRR) and PV but has little effect on the Rq. The AFM and infrared spectroscopy (IR) analysis show that a soft layer, called “silica gel membrane (SGM),” existed on the polished surface is the critical reason for the differences of MRR, Rq, and PV during CMP. For three kinds of micro‐ceria abrasives, the abrasive with a rougher surface gets more opportunities to contact the surface of fused silica, yielding higher MRR. Regarding different kinds of nano‐abrasives, there are more SGM induced by nano‐ceria abrasive resulting from higher chemical reaction rate. The element contaminations on the polished fused silica have been assessed using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and the results suggest that there are depths of 3.6 and 5.4‐nm element contaminations on the polished surface of fused silica with nano‐ceria and nano‐alumina abrasives, respectively. While the surface polished by nano‐silica is free of heterogeneous element contaminations. Based on study results, a novel polishing slurry is designed by modifying the chemical composition of nano‐silica. Comparing with ceria‐based slurry, the silica‐based slurry has better removal efficiency, and surface quality in fused silica precision machining. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sia.6625 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2206127894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2206127894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f7b8a17769d6e51581d6e173f3447046e26691546c69989bcf9ec6028c1d9be83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBN26mJpmZTLIsxUtBcKGuQyaT2JS5mdOpzAv43GZacefqD-TLCedH6JqSBSWE3YHXC85ZfoJmlEieSEnFKZoRmrGEZYyeowuALSFEpILP0Pey72tv9M53Le4chiE4bSzWra5H8IB9i2E3VCOO98E23V7XuLFmo1sPTWQV1mXQ4PcWg62tOQyqhuDbD-wGsBUGP32AzcY2Mf9eT8e-qz1sIr1EZ07XYK9-c47eH-7fVk_J88vjerV8TgyTaZ64ohSaFgWXFbc5zQWNSYvUpVlWkIxbxrmkecYNl1LI0jhpDSdMGFrJ0op0jm6Oc_vQfQ4WdmrbDSHuCooxwikrhMyiuj0qEzqAYJ3qg290GBUlampZxZbV1HKkyZF--dqO_zr1ul4e_A80SX-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2206127894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of surface analysis in study on removal mechanism and abrasive selection during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chen, Gaopan ; Luo, Haimei ; Kang, Chengxi ; Luo, Guihai ; Zhou, Yan ; Pan, Guoshun</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gaopan ; Luo, Haimei ; Kang, Chengxi ; Luo, Guihai ; Zhou, Yan ; Pan, Guoshun</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, surface analysis technology is employed to investigate the removal mechanism and the selection of abrasive during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Morphology of abrasives is inspected by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The atomic force microscope (AFM) is used to determine the surface roughness (Rq) and undulating (PV) of the polished fused silica surface. The results show that abrasive morphology has a tremendous influence on removal rate (MRR) and PV but has little effect on the Rq. The AFM and infrared spectroscopy (IR) analysis show that a soft layer, called “silica gel membrane (SGM),” existed on the polished surface is the critical reason for the differences of MRR, Rq, and PV during CMP. For three kinds of micro‐ceria abrasives, the abrasive with a rougher surface gets more opportunities to contact the surface of fused silica, yielding higher MRR. Regarding different kinds of nano‐abrasives, there are more SGM induced by nano‐ceria abrasive resulting from higher chemical reaction rate. The element contaminations on the polished fused silica have been assessed using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and the results suggest that there are depths of 3.6 and 5.4‐nm element contaminations on the polished surface of fused silica with nano‐ceria and nano‐alumina abrasives, respectively. While the surface polished by nano‐silica is free of heterogeneous element contaminations. Based on study results, a novel polishing slurry is designed by modifying the chemical composition of nano‐silica. Comparing with ceria‐based slurry, the silica‐based slurry has better removal efficiency, and surface quality in fused silica precision machining.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-2421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sia.6625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>abrasive selection ; Abrasives ; Aluminum oxide ; Atomic force microscopes ; Atomic force microscopy ; Cerium oxides ; Chemical composition ; Chemical reactions ; Chemical-mechanical polishing ; Contamination ; Fused silica ; Infrared analysis ; Infrared spectroscopy ; Morphology ; Organic chemistry ; Photoelectrons ; Precision machining ; removal mechanism ; Repair & maintenance ; Silica gel ; Silicon dioxide ; Slurries ; Spectrum analysis ; surface analysis ; Surface analysis (chemical) ; Surface properties ; Surface roughness ; Technology assessment</subject><ispartof>Surface and interface analysis, 2019-05, Vol.51 (5), p.576-583</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f7b8a17769d6e51581d6e173f3447046e26691546c69989bcf9ec6028c1d9be83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f7b8a17769d6e51581d6e173f3447046e26691546c69989bcf9ec6028c1d9be83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1212-0195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsia.6625$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsia.6625$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gaopan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Haimei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Chengxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Guihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Guoshun</creatorcontrib><title>Application of surface analysis in study on removal mechanism and abrasive selection during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing</title><title>Surface and interface analysis</title><description>In this work, surface analysis technology is employed to investigate the removal mechanism and the selection of abrasive during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Morphology of abrasives is inspected by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The atomic force microscope (AFM) is used to determine the surface roughness (Rq) and undulating (PV) of the polished fused silica surface. The results show that abrasive morphology has a tremendous influence on removal rate (MRR) and PV but has little effect on the Rq. The AFM and infrared spectroscopy (IR) analysis show that a soft layer, called “silica gel membrane (SGM),” existed on the polished surface is the critical reason for the differences of MRR, Rq, and PV during CMP. For three kinds of micro‐ceria abrasives, the abrasive with a rougher surface gets more opportunities to contact the surface of fused silica, yielding higher MRR. Regarding different kinds of nano‐abrasives, there are more SGM induced by nano‐ceria abrasive resulting from higher chemical reaction rate. The element contaminations on the polished fused silica have been assessed using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and the results suggest that there are depths of 3.6 and 5.4‐nm element contaminations on the polished surface of fused silica with nano‐ceria and nano‐alumina abrasives, respectively. While the surface polished by nano‐silica is free of heterogeneous element contaminations. Based on study results, a novel polishing slurry is designed by modifying the chemical composition of nano‐silica. Comparing with ceria‐based slurry, the silica‐based slurry has better removal efficiency, and surface quality in fused silica precision machining.</description><subject>abrasive selection</subject><subject>Abrasives</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Atomic force microscopes</subject><subject>Atomic force microscopy</subject><subject>Cerium oxides</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Chemical-mechanical polishing</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Fused silica</subject><subject>Infrared analysis</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Photoelectrons</subject><subject>Precision machining</subject><subject>removal mechanism</subject><subject>Repair & maintenance</subject><subject>Silica gel</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>surface analysis</subject><subject>Surface analysis (chemical)</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><issn>0142-2421</issn><issn>1096-9918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYq-AgBN26mJpmZTLIsxUtBcKGuQyaT2JS5mdOpzAv43GZacefqD-TLCedH6JqSBSWE3YHXC85ZfoJmlEieSEnFKZoRmrGEZYyeowuALSFEpILP0Pey72tv9M53Le4chiE4bSzWra5H8IB9i2E3VCOO98E23V7XuLFmo1sPTWQV1mXQ4PcWg62tOQyqhuDbD-wGsBUGP32AzcY2Mf9eT8e-qz1sIr1EZ07XYK9-c47eH-7fVk_J88vjerV8TgyTaZ64ohSaFgWXFbc5zQWNSYvUpVlWkIxbxrmkecYNl1LI0jhpDSdMGFrJ0op0jm6Oc_vQfQ4WdmrbDSHuCooxwikrhMyiuj0qEzqAYJ3qg290GBUlampZxZbV1HKkyZF--dqO_zr1ul4e_A80SX-0</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Chen, Gaopan</creator><creator>Luo, Haimei</creator><creator>Kang, Chengxi</creator><creator>Luo, Guihai</creator><creator>Zhou, Yan</creator><creator>Pan, Guoshun</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-0195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Application of surface analysis in study on removal mechanism and abrasive selection during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing</title><author>Chen, Gaopan ; Luo, Haimei ; Kang, Chengxi ; Luo, Guihai ; Zhou, Yan ; Pan, Guoshun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-f7b8a17769d6e51581d6e173f3447046e26691546c69989bcf9ec6028c1d9be83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>abrasive selection</topic><topic>Abrasives</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Atomic force microscopes</topic><topic>Atomic force microscopy</topic><topic>Cerium oxides</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Chemical-mechanical polishing</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Fused silica</topic><topic>Infrared analysis</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Photoelectrons</topic><topic>Precision machining</topic><topic>removal mechanism</topic><topic>Repair & maintenance</topic><topic>Silica gel</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>surface analysis</topic><topic>Surface analysis (chemical)</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Gaopan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Haimei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Chengxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Guihai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Guoshun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Surface and interface analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Gaopan</au><au>Luo, Haimei</au><au>Kang, Chengxi</au><au>Luo, Guihai</au><au>Zhou, Yan</au><au>Pan, Guoshun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of surface analysis in study on removal mechanism and abrasive selection during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing</atitle><jtitle>Surface and interface analysis</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>583</epage><pages>576-583</pages><issn>0142-2421</issn><eissn>1096-9918</eissn><abstract>In this work, surface analysis technology is employed to investigate the removal mechanism and the selection of abrasive during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). Morphology of abrasives is inspected by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The atomic force microscope (AFM) is used to determine the surface roughness (Rq) and undulating (PV) of the polished fused silica surface. The results show that abrasive morphology has a tremendous influence on removal rate (MRR) and PV but has little effect on the Rq. The AFM and infrared spectroscopy (IR) analysis show that a soft layer, called “silica gel membrane (SGM),” existed on the polished surface is the critical reason for the differences of MRR, Rq, and PV during CMP. For three kinds of micro‐ceria abrasives, the abrasive with a rougher surface gets more opportunities to contact the surface of fused silica, yielding higher MRR. Regarding different kinds of nano‐abrasives, there are more SGM induced by nano‐ceria abrasive resulting from higher chemical reaction rate. The element contaminations on the polished fused silica have been assessed using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and the results suggest that there are depths of 3.6 and 5.4‐nm element contaminations on the polished surface of fused silica with nano‐ceria and nano‐alumina abrasives, respectively. While the surface polished by nano‐silica is free of heterogeneous element contaminations. Based on study results, a novel polishing slurry is designed by modifying the chemical composition of nano‐silica. Comparing with ceria‐based slurry, the silica‐based slurry has better removal efficiency, and surface quality in fused silica precision machining.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sia.6625</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-0195</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-2421 |
ispartof | Surface and interface analysis, 2019-05, Vol.51 (5), p.576-583 |
issn | 0142-2421 1096-9918 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2206127894 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | abrasive selection Abrasives Aluminum oxide Atomic force microscopes Atomic force microscopy Cerium oxides Chemical composition Chemical reactions Chemical-mechanical polishing Contamination Fused silica Infrared analysis Infrared spectroscopy Morphology Organic chemistry Photoelectrons Precision machining removal mechanism Repair & maintenance Silica gel Silicon dioxide Slurries Spectrum analysis surface analysis Surface analysis (chemical) Surface properties Surface roughness Technology assessment |
title | Application of surface analysis in study on removal mechanism and abrasive selection during fused silica chemical mechanical polishing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A21%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20surface%20analysis%20in%20study%20on%20removal%20mechanism%20and%20abrasive%20selection%20during%20fused%20silica%20chemical%20mechanical%20polishing&rft.jtitle=Surface%20and%20interface%20analysis&rft.au=Chen,%20Gaopan&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=583&rft.pages=576-583&rft.issn=0142-2421&rft.eissn=1096-9918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sia.6625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2206127894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2206127894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |