Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study
Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca) Malacca), 2019-02, Vol.9 (1), p.713 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 713 |
container_title | International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Laaziri, Majida Benmoussa, Khaoula Khoulji, Samira Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb Yamami, Abir El |
description | Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which could make the choice of front-end framework for the developer tricky. In this context, this paper focuses on an effective analysis of two of today's most popular front-end frameworks, Boostrap and Foundation, The results show that our analysis can be beneficial for developers to select the appropriate front end framework to customize their web applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp713-722 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2205380281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2205380281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-a04f80b4835ff29a9200819ad8130d927fbaa51108c41b046cf584f8acc3cccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EElXpJyBZYp3iR5zY7KqKl6jEBtbWxLFRQhsHOykKX4_bsmA2czW6czVzELqmZEmpUPS2aa2xy71q6LLvS8qzkrEzNGNEykyWRJ7_05doEWNLUsmiYErM0Muqg-3003QfuPJ-iAF6DF2NnR-7GobGd0l2Q2YPswA7--3DZ8R3GLDxux5C8uwtjsNYT1fowsE22sVfn6P3h_u39VO2eX18Xq82maGqGDIguZOkyiUXzjEFiqVzqIJaUk5qxUpXAQhKiTQ5rUheGCdkWgFjuDGm5nN0c8rtg_8abRx068eQ_oiaMSK4JCxFzZE4uUzwMQbrdB-aHYRJU6KP6PQRnT6g00d0OqHjvwYHZPc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2205380281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Laaziri, Majida ; Benmoussa, Khaoula ; Khoulji, Samira ; Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb ; Yamami, Abir El</creator><creatorcontrib>Laaziri, Majida ; Benmoussa, Khaoula ; Khoulji, Samira ; Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb ; Yamami, Abir El</creatorcontrib><description>Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which could make the choice of front-end framework for the developer tricky. In this context, this paper focuses on an effective analysis of two of today's most popular front-end frameworks, Boostrap and Foundation, The results show that our analysis can be beneficial for developers to select the appropriate front end framework to customize their web applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2088-8708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2088-8708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp713-722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Yogyakarta: IAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</publisher><subject>Applications programs ; Comparative studies ; Websites</subject><ispartof>International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca), 2019-02, Vol.9 (1), p.713</ispartof><rights>Copyright IAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science Feb 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-a04f80b4835ff29a9200819ad8130d927fbaa51108c41b046cf584f8acc3cccd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laaziri, Majida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benmoussa, Khaoula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoulji, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamami, Abir El</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study</title><title>International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca)</title><description>Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which could make the choice of front-end framework for the developer tricky. In this context, this paper focuses on an effective analysis of two of today's most popular front-end frameworks, Boostrap and Foundation, The results show that our analysis can be beneficial for developers to select the appropriate front end framework to customize their web applications.</description><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>2088-8708</issn><issn>2088-8708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EElXpJyBZYp3iR5zY7KqKl6jEBtbWxLFRQhsHOykKX4_bsmA2czW6czVzELqmZEmpUPS2aa2xy71q6LLvS8qzkrEzNGNEykyWRJ7_05doEWNLUsmiYErM0Muqg-3003QfuPJ-iAF6DF2NnR-7GobGd0l2Q2YPswA7--3DZ8R3GLDxux5C8uwtjsNYT1fowsE22sVfn6P3h_u39VO2eX18Xq82maGqGDIguZOkyiUXzjEFiqVzqIJaUk5qxUpXAQhKiTQ5rUheGCdkWgFjuDGm5nN0c8rtg_8abRx068eQ_oiaMSK4JCxFzZE4uUzwMQbrdB-aHYRJU6KP6PQRnT6g00d0OqHjvwYHZPc</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Laaziri, Majida</creator><creator>Benmoussa, Khaoula</creator><creator>Khoulji, Samira</creator><creator>Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb</creator><creator>Yamami, Abir El</creator><general>IAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study</title><author>Laaziri, Majida ; Benmoussa, Khaoula ; Khoulji, Samira ; Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb ; Yamami, Abir El</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-a04f80b4835ff29a9200819ad8130d927fbaa51108c41b046cf584f8acc3cccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laaziri, Majida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benmoussa, Khaoula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoulji, Samira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamami, Abir El</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laaziri, Majida</au><au>Benmoussa, Khaoula</au><au>Khoulji, Samira</au><au>Mohamed Larbi, Kerkeb</au><au>Yamami, Abir El</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca)</jtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>713</spage><pages>713-</pages><issn>2088-8708</issn><eissn>2088-8708</eissn><abstract>Most modern web applications use some kind of front-end frameworks for designing and creating content in a faster and more efficient way, which saves valuable time when creating responsive web sites. There are many front-end frameworks that vary enormously in terms of features and benefits, which could make the choice of front-end framework for the developer tricky. In this context, this paper focuses on an effective analysis of two of today's most popular front-end frameworks, Boostrap and Foundation, The results show that our analysis can be beneficial for developers to select the appropriate front end framework to customize their web applications.</abstract><cop>Yogyakarta</cop><pub>IAES Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</pub><doi>10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp713-722</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2088-8708 |
ispartof | International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca), 2019-02, Vol.9 (1), p.713 |
issn | 2088-8708 2088-8708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2205380281 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Applications programs Comparative studies Websites |
title | Analyzing bootsrap and foundation font-end frameworks : a comparative study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20bootsrap%20and%20foundation%20font-end%20frameworks%20:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20electrical%20and%20computer%20engineering%20(Malacca,%20Malacca)&rft.au=Laaziri,%20Majida&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=713&rft.pages=713-&rft.issn=2088-8708&rft.eissn=2088-8708&rft_id=info:doi/10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp713-722&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2205380281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2205380281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |