Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis
Using job characteristics theory as a framework, we calculated meta‐analytic effect sizes between meaningful work and various outcomes and tested a mediated model of meaningful work predicting proximal and distal outcomes with meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM). From 44 articles (N ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management studies 2019-05, Vol.56 (3), p.500-528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 500 |
container_title | Journal of management studies |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Allan, Blake A. Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra Sterling, Haley M. Tay, Louis |
description | Using job characteristics theory as a framework, we calculated meta‐analytic effect sizes between meaningful work and various outcomes and tested a mediated model of meaningful work predicting proximal and distal outcomes with meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM). From 44 articles (N = 23,144), we found that meaningful work had large correlations (r = 0.70+) with work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction; moderate to large correlations (r = 0.44 to −0.49) with life satisfaction, life meaning, general health, and withdrawal intentions; and small to moderate correlations (r = −0.19 to 0.33) with organizational citizenship behaviours, self‐rated job performance, and negative affect. The best MASEM fitting model was meaningful work predicting work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction and these variables subsequently predicting self‐rated performance, organizational citizenship behaviours, and withdrawal intentions. This meta‐analysis provides estimated effect sizes between meaningful work and its outcomes and reveals how meaningful work relates directly and indirectly to key outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joms.12406 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2204533300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2204533300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-b876abe987afcf6cf24153b1d6dc4d44f2c1d425d02f2e92f432f44f598e8b193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsXn2DBm7B1ksxmd72VYv1DSw8qHkM2m8jWbVOTLtKbj-Az-iSmrmd_MAwM3wzDR8g5hRGNuVq6VRhRhiAOyICiyFOBhTgkAwDGUsYLOCYnISwhBnMYkNGi22q3MiFxNpkbtW7Wr7Zrkxfn366TcRxt1ffn13it2l1owik5sqoN5uyvD8nz9OZpcpfOFrf3k_Es1Qgg0qrIhapMWeTKaiu0ZUgzXtFa1BprRMs0rZFlNTDLTMks8lhos7IwRUVLPiQX_d2Nd--dCVu5dJ2PTwTJGGDGOQeI1GVPae9C8MbKjW9Wyu8kBbn3Ifc-5K-PCNMe_mhas_uHlA-L-WO_8wMs2GHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2204533300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Allan, Blake A. ; Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra ; Sterling, Haley M. ; Tay, Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Allan, Blake A. ; Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra ; Sterling, Haley M. ; Tay, Louis</creatorcontrib><description>Using job characteristics theory as a framework, we calculated meta‐analytic effect sizes between meaningful work and various outcomes and tested a mediated model of meaningful work predicting proximal and distal outcomes with meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM). From 44 articles (N = 23,144), we found that meaningful work had large correlations (r = 0.70+) with work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction; moderate to large correlations (r = 0.44 to −0.49) with life satisfaction, life meaning, general health, and withdrawal intentions; and small to moderate correlations (r = −0.19 to 0.33) with organizational citizenship behaviours, self‐rated job performance, and negative affect. The best MASEM fitting model was meaningful work predicting work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction and these variables subsequently predicting self‐rated performance, organizational citizenship behaviours, and withdrawal intentions. This meta‐analysis provides estimated effect sizes between meaningful work and its outcomes and reveals how meaningful work relates directly and indirectly to key outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joms.12406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Citizenship ; job attitudes ; Job characteristics ; job characteristics theory ; job outcomes ; Job performance ; Job satisfaction ; Life satisfaction ; Meaning ; meaningful work ; Meta-analysis ; Negative emotions ; Organizational citizenship behaviour ; wellbeing ; Work ; work engagement</subject><ispartof>Journal of management studies, 2019-05, Vol.56 (3), p.500-528</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for the Advancement of Management Studies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-b876abe987afcf6cf24153b1d6dc4d44f2c1d425d02f2e92f432f44f598e8b193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-b876abe987afcf6cf24153b1d6dc4d44f2c1d425d02f2e92f432f44f598e8b193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoms.12406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoms.12406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allan, Blake A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, Haley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Louis</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis</title><title>Journal of management studies</title><description>Using job characteristics theory as a framework, we calculated meta‐analytic effect sizes between meaningful work and various outcomes and tested a mediated model of meaningful work predicting proximal and distal outcomes with meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM). From 44 articles (N = 23,144), we found that meaningful work had large correlations (r = 0.70+) with work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction; moderate to large correlations (r = 0.44 to −0.49) with life satisfaction, life meaning, general health, and withdrawal intentions; and small to moderate correlations (r = −0.19 to 0.33) with organizational citizenship behaviours, self‐rated job performance, and negative affect. The best MASEM fitting model was meaningful work predicting work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction and these variables subsequently predicting self‐rated performance, organizational citizenship behaviours, and withdrawal intentions. This meta‐analysis provides estimated effect sizes between meaningful work and its outcomes and reveals how meaningful work relates directly and indirectly to key outcomes.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>job attitudes</subject><subject>Job characteristics</subject><subject>job characteristics theory</subject><subject>job outcomes</subject><subject>Job performance</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Life satisfaction</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>meaningful work</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Negative emotions</subject><subject>Organizational citizenship behaviour</subject><subject>wellbeing</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>work engagement</subject><issn>0022-2380</issn><issn>1467-6486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsXn2DBm7B1ksxmd72VYv1DSw8qHkM2m8jWbVOTLtKbj-Az-iSmrmd_MAwM3wzDR8g5hRGNuVq6VRhRhiAOyICiyFOBhTgkAwDGUsYLOCYnISwhBnMYkNGi22q3MiFxNpkbtW7Wr7Zrkxfn366TcRxt1ffn13it2l1owik5sqoN5uyvD8nz9OZpcpfOFrf3k_Es1Qgg0qrIhapMWeTKaiu0ZUgzXtFa1BprRMs0rZFlNTDLTMks8lhos7IwRUVLPiQX_d2Nd--dCVu5dJ2PTwTJGGDGOQeI1GVPae9C8MbKjW9Wyu8kBbn3Ifc-5K-PCNMe_mhas_uHlA-L-WO_8wMs2GHU</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Allan, Blake A.</creator><creator>Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra</creator><creator>Sterling, Haley M.</creator><creator>Tay, Louis</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis</title><author>Allan, Blake A. ; Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra ; Sterling, Haley M. ; Tay, Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-b876abe987afcf6cf24153b1d6dc4d44f2c1d425d02f2e92f432f44f598e8b193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>job attitudes</topic><topic>Job characteristics</topic><topic>job characteristics theory</topic><topic>job outcomes</topic><topic>Job performance</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Life satisfaction</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>meaningful work</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Negative emotions</topic><topic>Organizational citizenship behaviour</topic><topic>wellbeing</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>work engagement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allan, Blake A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, Haley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tay, Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of management studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allan, Blake A.</au><au>Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra</au><au>Sterling, Haley M.</au><au>Tay, Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management studies</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>500-528</pages><issn>0022-2380</issn><eissn>1467-6486</eissn><abstract>Using job characteristics theory as a framework, we calculated meta‐analytic effect sizes between meaningful work and various outcomes and tested a mediated model of meaningful work predicting proximal and distal outcomes with meta‐analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM). From 44 articles (N = 23,144), we found that meaningful work had large correlations (r = 0.70+) with work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction; moderate to large correlations (r = 0.44 to −0.49) with life satisfaction, life meaning, general health, and withdrawal intentions; and small to moderate correlations (r = −0.19 to 0.33) with organizational citizenship behaviours, self‐rated job performance, and negative affect. The best MASEM fitting model was meaningful work predicting work engagement, commitment, and job satisfaction and these variables subsequently predicting self‐rated performance, organizational citizenship behaviours, and withdrawal intentions. This meta‐analysis provides estimated effect sizes between meaningful work and its outcomes and reveals how meaningful work relates directly and indirectly to key outcomes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/joms.12406</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2380 |
ispartof | Journal of management studies, 2019-05, Vol.56 (3), p.500-528 |
issn | 0022-2380 1467-6486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2204533300 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Behavior Citizenship job attitudes Job characteristics job characteristics theory job outcomes Job performance Job satisfaction Life satisfaction Meaning meaningful work Meta-analysis Negative emotions Organizational citizenship behaviour wellbeing Work work engagement |
title | Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A55%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20Meaningful%20Work:%20A%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management%20studies&rft.au=Allan,%20Blake%20A.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=500-528&rft.issn=0022-2380&rft.eissn=1467-6486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joms.12406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2204533300%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2204533300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |