Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California

We consider the adoption of biologically integrated agricultural practices from the perspective of farm management style. Adoption decisions for farming practices must fit into a broader farm decision-making context that incorporates economic, environmental, social, family and personal consideration...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable agriculture and food systems 2004-12, Vol.19 (4), p.237-247
Hauptverfasser: Brodt, Sonja, Klonsky, Karen, Tourte, Laura, Duncan, Roger, Hendricks, Lonnie, Ohmart, Cliff, Verdegaal, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 247
container_issue 4
container_start_page 237
container_title Renewable agriculture and food systems
container_volume 19
creator Brodt, Sonja
Klonsky, Karen
Tourte, Laura
Duncan, Roger
Hendricks, Lonnie
Ohmart, Cliff
Verdegaal, Paul
description We consider the adoption of biologically integrated agricultural practices from the perspective of farm management style. Adoption decisions for farming practices must fit into a broader farm decision-making context that incorporates economic, environmental, social, family and personal considerations, as well as use of agricultural information sources. Drawing from a study of California almond and winegrape growers, we demonstrate that management styles differ substantially among farmers, these differences affect use of information sources and adoption of biologically based practices on the farm, and such adoption does not negatively affect crop performance. We used Q-methodology, a method for eliciting qualitative data using a variant of factor analysis, to identify three distinct management styles among a purposive sample of 40 growers. The Environmental Stewards' management style places higher priority on conservation of natural resources than on getting the highest possible yields or profits. Production Maximizers, with a different style, prioritize more traditional goals of producing the highest possible yields and quality and focusing resources on the farm rather than on outside concerns. Networking Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, value learning about innovative techniques in social contexts such as informational field days, evaluate new information with a business-like attitude and enjoy off-farm interests. A two-season mail survey of farming practices and information sources demonstrated that differences in management styles affect the adoption of practices. Environmental Stewards were more likely to practice biological pest control and encourage wildlife and less likely to use the most toxic chemicals. Production Maximizers had a greater tendency to use prophylactic and broad-spectrum chemicals, while Networking Entrepreneurs preferred more innovative biological pest controls but tended to avoid time-consuming cultural practices. Production Maximizers were distinguished by less use of more social forms of communication, such as attending field days and talking with other growers. Crop health and quality indicators showed that almost all growers were managing their crops very successfully, regardless of management style or choice of practices. These results hold important implications for efforts to increase the adoption of sustainable agriculture, especially by showing that contents and methods of outreach efforts must vary to accommodate divers
doi_str_mv 10.1079/RAFS200488
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220377494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1079_RAFS200488</cupid><jstor_id>44490412</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44490412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-c6a0d6b288b7811570d608485950502d0c3d918004c1f247b99112eba725883c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9PwyAUxxujiTq9eDdpPBqrQGHQ41zcXLbE3xcvhFLaMFuYwBL334t2mRdPPPL5vPeFlyRnEFxDQIub59HkBQGAGdtLjiDFKIMU5vu7GpDD5Nj7JQCIFTQ_SvTM1O1aGalSW6e1cF3aCSMa1SkTUh82bQQmFZVdBR2LKJXatrbRUrTtJtUmqMaJoKrfZm2adOWEDFoqH2E6Fq2urTNanCQHtWi9Ot2eg-Rtcvc6vs8WD9PZeLTIZE5IyORQgGpYIsZKyiAkNN4Aw4wUBBCAKiDzqoAs_lHCGmFaFgWESJWCIsJYLvNBctHPXTn7uVY-8KVdOxMjOUIgpxQXOEqXvSSd9d6pmq-c7oTbcAj4zyb53yajfN7LSx-s25kY4wJgiCLPeq59UF87LtwHH9KcEj6cPvGnZzx_nL_f8mn0r7bhoiudrhr198R_4r8BuEyMdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220377494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Brodt, Sonja ; Klonsky, Karen ; Tourte, Laura ; Duncan, Roger ; Hendricks, Lonnie ; Ohmart, Cliff ; Verdegaal, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Brodt, Sonja ; Klonsky, Karen ; Tourte, Laura ; Duncan, Roger ; Hendricks, Lonnie ; Ohmart, Cliff ; Verdegaal, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>We consider the adoption of biologically integrated agricultural practices from the perspective of farm management style. Adoption decisions for farming practices must fit into a broader farm decision-making context that incorporates economic, environmental, social, family and personal considerations, as well as use of agricultural information sources. Drawing from a study of California almond and winegrape growers, we demonstrate that management styles differ substantially among farmers, these differences affect use of information sources and adoption of biologically based practices on the farm, and such adoption does not negatively affect crop performance. We used Q-methodology, a method for eliciting qualitative data using a variant of factor analysis, to identify three distinct management styles among a purposive sample of 40 growers. The Environmental Stewards' management style places higher priority on conservation of natural resources than on getting the highest possible yields or profits. Production Maximizers, with a different style, prioritize more traditional goals of producing the highest possible yields and quality and focusing resources on the farm rather than on outside concerns. Networking Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, value learning about innovative techniques in social contexts such as informational field days, evaluate new information with a business-like attitude and enjoy off-farm interests. A two-season mail survey of farming practices and information sources demonstrated that differences in management styles affect the adoption of practices. Environmental Stewards were more likely to practice biological pest control and encourage wildlife and less likely to use the most toxic chemicals. Production Maximizers had a greater tendency to use prophylactic and broad-spectrum chemicals, while Networking Entrepreneurs preferred more innovative biological pest controls but tended to avoid time-consuming cultural practices. Production Maximizers were distinguished by less use of more social forms of communication, such as attending field days and talking with other growers. Crop health and quality indicators showed that almost all growers were managing their crops very successfully, regardless of management style or choice of practices. These results hold important implications for efforts to increase the adoption of sustainable agriculture, especially by showing that contents and methods of outreach efforts must vary to accommodate diverse farm management styles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1079/RAFS200488</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAAEZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>adoption ; Agricultural economics ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; almonds ; Crops ; Entrepreneurs ; Environmental stewardship ; extension ; Factor analysis ; Family farms ; Farm management ; farm management style ; Farming ; Farming systems ; Farms ; Integrated agricultural systems ; Integrated pest management ; Irrigation management ; Management philosophies ; Management styles ; Natural resources ; Networking ; Pest control ; pest control advisers (PCA) ; Pests ; Q-methodology ; Research Papers ; Resource conservation ; Sustainable agriculture ; Wildlife ; winegrapes</subject><ispartof>Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2004-12, Vol.19 (4), p.237-247</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004</rights><rights>CAB International 2004</rights><rights>Copyright CABI Publishing Dec 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-c6a0d6b288b7811570d608485950502d0c3d918004c1f247b99112eba725883c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-c6a0d6b288b7811570d608485950502d0c3d918004c1f247b99112eba725883c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1742170504000304/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brodt, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonsky, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tourte, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendricks, Lonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmart, Cliff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdegaal, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California</title><title>Renewable agriculture and food systems</title><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><description>We consider the adoption of biologically integrated agricultural practices from the perspective of farm management style. Adoption decisions for farming practices must fit into a broader farm decision-making context that incorporates economic, environmental, social, family and personal considerations, as well as use of agricultural information sources. Drawing from a study of California almond and winegrape growers, we demonstrate that management styles differ substantially among farmers, these differences affect use of information sources and adoption of biologically based practices on the farm, and such adoption does not negatively affect crop performance. We used Q-methodology, a method for eliciting qualitative data using a variant of factor analysis, to identify three distinct management styles among a purposive sample of 40 growers. The Environmental Stewards' management style places higher priority on conservation of natural resources than on getting the highest possible yields or profits. Production Maximizers, with a different style, prioritize more traditional goals of producing the highest possible yields and quality and focusing resources on the farm rather than on outside concerns. Networking Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, value learning about innovative techniques in social contexts such as informational field days, evaluate new information with a business-like attitude and enjoy off-farm interests. A two-season mail survey of farming practices and information sources demonstrated that differences in management styles affect the adoption of practices. Environmental Stewards were more likely to practice biological pest control and encourage wildlife and less likely to use the most toxic chemicals. Production Maximizers had a greater tendency to use prophylactic and broad-spectrum chemicals, while Networking Entrepreneurs preferred more innovative biological pest controls but tended to avoid time-consuming cultural practices. Production Maximizers were distinguished by less use of more social forms of communication, such as attending field days and talking with other growers. Crop health and quality indicators showed that almost all growers were managing their crops very successfully, regardless of management style or choice of practices. These results hold important implications for efforts to increase the adoption of sustainable agriculture, especially by showing that contents and methods of outreach efforts must vary to accommodate diverse farm management styles.</description><subject>adoption</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>almonds</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Environmental stewardship</subject><subject>extension</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Family farms</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>farm management style</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Integrated agricultural systems</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Irrigation management</subject><subject>Management philosophies</subject><subject>Management styles</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Networking</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>pest control advisers (PCA)</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Q-methodology</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Resource conservation</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>winegrapes</subject><issn>1742-1705</issn><issn>1742-1713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9PwyAUxxujiTq9eDdpPBqrQGHQ41zcXLbE3xcvhFLaMFuYwBL334t2mRdPPPL5vPeFlyRnEFxDQIub59HkBQGAGdtLjiDFKIMU5vu7GpDD5Nj7JQCIFTQ_SvTM1O1aGalSW6e1cF3aCSMa1SkTUh82bQQmFZVdBR2LKJXatrbRUrTtJtUmqMaJoKrfZm2adOWEDFoqH2E6Fq2urTNanCQHtWi9Ot2eg-Rtcvc6vs8WD9PZeLTIZE5IyORQgGpYIsZKyiAkNN4Aw4wUBBCAKiDzqoAs_lHCGmFaFgWESJWCIsJYLvNBctHPXTn7uVY-8KVdOxMjOUIgpxQXOEqXvSSd9d6pmq-c7oTbcAj4zyb53yajfN7LSx-s25kY4wJgiCLPeq59UF87LtwHH9KcEj6cPvGnZzx_nL_f8mn0r7bhoiudrhr198R_4r8BuEyMdA</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Brodt, Sonja</creator><creator>Klonsky, Karen</creator><creator>Tourte, Laura</creator><creator>Duncan, Roger</creator><creator>Hendricks, Lonnie</creator><creator>Ohmart, Cliff</creator><creator>Verdegaal, Paul</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>CABI Publishing</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California</title><author>Brodt, Sonja ; Klonsky, Karen ; Tourte, Laura ; Duncan, Roger ; Hendricks, Lonnie ; Ohmart, Cliff ; Verdegaal, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-c6a0d6b288b7811570d608485950502d0c3d918004c1f247b99112eba725883c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>adoption</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>almonds</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Environmental stewardship</topic><topic>extension</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Family farms</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>farm management style</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Integrated agricultural systems</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Irrigation management</topic><topic>Management philosophies</topic><topic>Management styles</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Networking</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>pest control advisers (PCA)</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Q-methodology</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Resource conservation</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>winegrapes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brodt, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonsky, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tourte, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendricks, Lonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohmart, Cliff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdegaal, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brodt, Sonja</au><au>Klonsky, Karen</au><au>Tourte, Laura</au><au>Duncan, Roger</au><au>Hendricks, Lonnie</au><au>Ohmart, Cliff</au><au>Verdegaal, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California</atitle><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle><addtitle>Renew. Agric. Food Syst</addtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>237-247</pages><issn>1742-1705</issn><eissn>1742-1713</eissn><coden>AJAAEZ</coden><abstract>We consider the adoption of biologically integrated agricultural practices from the perspective of farm management style. Adoption decisions for farming practices must fit into a broader farm decision-making context that incorporates economic, environmental, social, family and personal considerations, as well as use of agricultural information sources. Drawing from a study of California almond and winegrape growers, we demonstrate that management styles differ substantially among farmers, these differences affect use of information sources and adoption of biologically based practices on the farm, and such adoption does not negatively affect crop performance. We used Q-methodology, a method for eliciting qualitative data using a variant of factor analysis, to identify three distinct management styles among a purposive sample of 40 growers. The Environmental Stewards' management style places higher priority on conservation of natural resources than on getting the highest possible yields or profits. Production Maximizers, with a different style, prioritize more traditional goals of producing the highest possible yields and quality and focusing resources on the farm rather than on outside concerns. Networking Entrepreneurs, on the other hand, value learning about innovative techniques in social contexts such as informational field days, evaluate new information with a business-like attitude and enjoy off-farm interests. A two-season mail survey of farming practices and information sources demonstrated that differences in management styles affect the adoption of practices. Environmental Stewards were more likely to practice biological pest control and encourage wildlife and less likely to use the most toxic chemicals. Production Maximizers had a greater tendency to use prophylactic and broad-spectrum chemicals, while Networking Entrepreneurs preferred more innovative biological pest controls but tended to avoid time-consuming cultural practices. Production Maximizers were distinguished by less use of more social forms of communication, such as attending field days and talking with other growers. Crop health and quality indicators showed that almost all growers were managing their crops very successfully, regardless of management style or choice of practices. These results hold important implications for efforts to increase the adoption of sustainable agriculture, especially by showing that contents and methods of outreach efforts must vary to accommodate diverse farm management styles.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1079/RAFS200488</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-1705
ispartof Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2004-12, Vol.19 (4), p.237-247
issn 1742-1705
1742-1713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220377494
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects adoption
Agricultural economics
Agricultural management
Agricultural practices
Agriculture
almonds
Crops
Entrepreneurs
Environmental stewardship
extension
Factor analysis
Family farms
Farm management
farm management style
Farming
Farming systems
Farms
Integrated agricultural systems
Integrated pest management
Irrigation management
Management philosophies
Management styles
Natural resources
Networking
Pest control
pest control advisers (PCA)
Pests
Q-methodology
Research Papers
Resource conservation
Sustainable agriculture
Wildlife
winegrapes
title Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T04%3A26%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20farm%20management%20style%20on%20adoption%20of%20biologically%20integrated%20farming%20practices%20in%20California&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems&rft.au=Brodt,%20Sonja&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=237-247&rft.issn=1742-1705&rft.eissn=1742-1713&rft.coden=AJAAEZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1079/RAFS200488&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44490412%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220377494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1079_RAFS200488&rft_jstor_id=44490412&rfr_iscdi=true