Clinical challenge: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) or pseudo-HIT in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome

Treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) and thrombosis in some cases that represents a clinical challenge, which, if unrecognized, may lead to treatment delay or disease progression with potentially lethal outcome. We present a case of a 19-year-old patient with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis 2008-10, Vol.26 (2), p.142-146
Hauptverfasser: Perunicic, Jovan, Antonijevic, Nebojsa M., Miljic, Predrag, Djordjevic, Valentina, Mikovic, Danijela, Kovac, Mirjana, Djokic, Milan, Mrdovic, Igor, Nikolic, Aleksandra, Vasiljevic, Zorana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) and thrombosis in some cases that represents a clinical challenge, which, if unrecognized, may lead to treatment delay or disease progression with potentially lethal outcome. We present a case of a 19-year-old patient with antiphospholipid syndrome, factor V (FV) Leiden mutation in heterozygous state, and venous thromboembolism. The patient was subjected to intravenous infusions of unfractionated heparin (UFH), and 16 days after the beginning of the treatment, his condition worsened, with thrombocytopenia and extension of thrombosis. Whereas the patient had a high clinical score for HIT II, functional and antigenic assays for the presence of HIT antibodies were negative. After repeated negative functional and antigenic assays, pseudo-HIT was suspected and nadroparin was introduced, which resulted in further worsening of the clinical presentation. Disease remission, along with complete normalization of platelet count, was finally accomplished with the introduction of lepirudin. The presence of multiple comorbid states, such as antiphospholipid syndrome, can potentially make laboratory confirmation of disease more difficult in patients with HIT II. In our opinion, it is of great importance that HIT II diagnosis be primarily clinical and that laboratory test results are carefully interpreted, especially when HIT is indicated by high clinical score values.
ISSN:0929-5305
1573-742X
DOI:10.1007/s11239-007-0076-y