A Review Of Sampling Procedures Available For Ipm Decision-Making Of Forest And Shade Tree Insects In North America

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs attempt to reduce insect associated losses to acceptable levels using multiple techniques that are effective, economically viable, and ecologically compatible. Sampling is the cornerstone of any IPM program, and significant effort has been devoted to the dev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arboriculture & urban forestry 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.38-47
Hauptverfasser: Fettig, J., Fidgen, Jeffrey, Salom, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Arboriculture & urban forestry
container_volume 31
creator Fettig, J.
Fidgen, Jeffrey
Salom, Scott
description Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs attempt to reduce insect associated losses to acceptable levels using multiple techniques that are effective, economically viable, and ecologically compatible. Sampling is the cornerstone of any IPM program, and significant effort has been devoted to the development, theory, and application of sampling methods. Relatively few IPM programs exist for managing forest and shade tree pests despite the availability of sampling procedures that are potentially useful for control decision-making. The majority of these sampling procedures are published on defoliating insects (58% of all publications). The most commonly referenced defoliators are the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.); Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough); spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens); and western spruce budworm, C. occidentalis Freeman. These four species alone account for 35% of all sampling publications relevant to IPM programs. The second largest group is bud, shoot, and root insects (16%) followed closely by wood- and bark-boring insects (11%). The piercing­sucking feeding group (10%) and seed and cone insects (5%) have relatively few sampling procedures available. Ninety-two percent of the species represented are predominately forest pests, with the order Lepidoptera and family Tortricidae most commonly reported. A significant opportunity exists for developing similar tools to aid in control decision-making for a large number of other pests. Current trends suggest that efforts should concentrate on species important to the urban forest and intensively managed forest plantations.
doi_str_mv 10.48044/jauf.2005.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220311024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>778656141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1065-22b6d07a4655ab0323d724517eadf3fd5c2c55b22e40c4e5b56cb64454f0230d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw5WxxT9j4kbTHqFCoVCii5Ww59oam5IXdFPHvcYHDaA47uzv6CLlOIBYTEOJ2p4cyZgAyDjohI5ZIGUGWTU7JKJlyGUk2zc7Jhfc7AJExwUfE5_QVDxV-0VVJ17rp66p9py-uM2gHh57mB13VuqiRzjtHF31D79BUvura6El_HMNhMYzQ72neWrreaot04xDpovVo9j44fe7cfkvzBl1l9CU5K3Xt8erfx-Rtfr-ZPUbL1cNili8jk0AqI8aK1EKmRSqlLoAzbkNnmWSobclLKw0zUhaMoQAjUBYyNUUqhBQlMA6Wj8nN393edZ9DKKh23eDa8FIxBjxJICAYk_gvZFznvcNS9a5qtPtWCahfrurIVR25qiD-A09Zah8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220311024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Review Of Sampling Procedures Available For Ipm Decision-Making Of Forest And Shade Tree Insects In North America</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fettig, J. ; Fidgen, Jeffrey ; Salom, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Fettig, J. ; Fidgen, Jeffrey ; Salom, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs attempt to reduce insect associated losses to acceptable levels using multiple techniques that are effective, economically viable, and ecologically compatible. Sampling is the cornerstone of any IPM program, and significant effort has been devoted to the development, theory, and application of sampling methods. Relatively few IPM programs exist for managing forest and shade tree pests despite the availability of sampling procedures that are potentially useful for control decision-making. The majority of these sampling procedures are published on defoliating insects (58% of all publications). The most commonly referenced defoliators are the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.); Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough); spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens); and western spruce budworm, C. occidentalis Freeman. These four species alone account for 35% of all sampling publications relevant to IPM programs. The second largest group is bud, shoot, and root insects (16%) followed closely by wood- and bark-boring insects (11%). The piercing­sucking feeding group (10%) and seed and cone insects (5%) have relatively few sampling procedures available. Ninety-two percent of the species represented are predominately forest pests, with the order Lepidoptera and family Tortricidae most commonly reported. A significant opportunity exists for developing similar tools to aid in control decision-making for a large number of other pests. Current trends suggest that efforts should concentrate on species important to the urban forest and intensively managed forest plantations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-5297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-0778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2005.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: International Society of Arboriculture</publisher><ispartof>Arboriculture &amp; urban forestry, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.38-47</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Society of Arboriculture Jan 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fettig, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidgen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salom, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>A Review Of Sampling Procedures Available For Ipm Decision-Making Of Forest And Shade Tree Insects In North America</title><title>Arboriculture &amp; urban forestry</title><description>Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs attempt to reduce insect associated losses to acceptable levels using multiple techniques that are effective, economically viable, and ecologically compatible. Sampling is the cornerstone of any IPM program, and significant effort has been devoted to the development, theory, and application of sampling methods. Relatively few IPM programs exist for managing forest and shade tree pests despite the availability of sampling procedures that are potentially useful for control decision-making. The majority of these sampling procedures are published on defoliating insects (58% of all publications). The most commonly referenced defoliators are the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.); Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough); spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens); and western spruce budworm, C. occidentalis Freeman. These four species alone account for 35% of all sampling publications relevant to IPM programs. The second largest group is bud, shoot, and root insects (16%) followed closely by wood- and bark-boring insects (11%). The piercing­sucking feeding group (10%) and seed and cone insects (5%) have relatively few sampling procedures available. Ninety-two percent of the species represented are predominately forest pests, with the order Lepidoptera and family Tortricidae most commonly reported. A significant opportunity exists for developing similar tools to aid in control decision-making for a large number of other pests. Current trends suggest that efforts should concentrate on species important to the urban forest and intensively managed forest plantations.</description><issn>1935-5297</issn><issn>2155-0778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw5WxxT9j4kbTHqFCoVCii5Ww59oam5IXdFPHvcYHDaA47uzv6CLlOIBYTEOJ2p4cyZgAyDjohI5ZIGUGWTU7JKJlyGUk2zc7Jhfc7AJExwUfE5_QVDxV-0VVJ17rp66p9py-uM2gHh57mB13VuqiRzjtHF31D79BUvura6El_HMNhMYzQ72neWrreaot04xDpovVo9j44fe7cfkvzBl1l9CU5K3Xt8erfx-Rtfr-ZPUbL1cNili8jk0AqI8aK1EKmRSqlLoAzbkNnmWSobclLKw0zUhaMoQAjUBYyNUUqhBQlMA6Wj8nN393edZ9DKKh23eDa8FIxBjxJICAYk_gvZFznvcNS9a5qtPtWCahfrurIVR25qiD-A09Zah8</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Fettig, J.</creator><creator>Fidgen, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Salom, Scott</creator><general>International Society of Arboriculture</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>A Review Of Sampling Procedures Available For Ipm Decision-Making Of Forest And Shade Tree Insects In North America</title><author>Fettig, J. ; Fidgen, Jeffrey ; Salom, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1065-22b6d07a4655ab0323d724517eadf3fd5c2c55b22e40c4e5b56cb64454f0230d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fettig, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidgen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salom, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Arboriculture &amp; urban forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fettig, J.</au><au>Fidgen, Jeffrey</au><au>Salom, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Review Of Sampling Procedures Available For Ipm Decision-Making Of Forest And Shade Tree Insects In North America</atitle><jtitle>Arboriculture &amp; urban forestry</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>38-47</pages><issn>1935-5297</issn><eissn>2155-0778</eissn><abstract>Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs attempt to reduce insect associated losses to acceptable levels using multiple techniques that are effective, economically viable, and ecologically compatible. Sampling is the cornerstone of any IPM program, and significant effort has been devoted to the development, theory, and application of sampling methods. Relatively few IPM programs exist for managing forest and shade tree pests despite the availability of sampling procedures that are potentially useful for control decision-making. The majority of these sampling procedures are published on defoliating insects (58% of all publications). The most commonly referenced defoliators are the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.); Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough); spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens); and western spruce budworm, C. occidentalis Freeman. These four species alone account for 35% of all sampling publications relevant to IPM programs. The second largest group is bud, shoot, and root insects (16%) followed closely by wood- and bark-boring insects (11%). The piercing­sucking feeding group (10%) and seed and cone insects (5%) have relatively few sampling procedures available. Ninety-two percent of the species represented are predominately forest pests, with the order Lepidoptera and family Tortricidae most commonly reported. A significant opportunity exists for developing similar tools to aid in control decision-making for a large number of other pests. Current trends suggest that efforts should concentrate on species important to the urban forest and intensively managed forest plantations.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>International Society of Arboriculture</pub><doi>10.48044/jauf.2005.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-5297
ispartof Arboriculture & urban forestry, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.38-47
issn 1935-5297
2155-0778
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_220311024
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title A Review Of Sampling Procedures Available For Ipm Decision-Making Of Forest And Shade Tree Insects In North America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Review%20Of%20Sampling%20Procedures%20Available%20For%20Ipm%20Decision-Making%20Of%20Forest%20And%20Shade%20Tree%20Insects%20In%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Arboriculture%20&%20urban%20forestry&rft.au=Fettig,%20J.&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=38-47&rft.issn=1935-5297&rft.eissn=2155-0778&rft_id=info:doi/10.48044/jauf.2005.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E778656141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220311024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true