RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION
Previous research has demonstrated that work team characteristics can be related to effectiveness (Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993). This study provides a replication with professional knowledge worker jobs, different measures of effectiveness, and work units that varied in the degree to which m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Personnel psychology 1996-06, Vol.49 (2), p.429-452 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 452 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 429 |
| container_title | Personnel psychology |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | CAMPION, MICHAEL A. PAPPER, ELLEN M. MEDSKER, GINA J. |
| description | Previous research has demonstrated that work team characteristics can be related to effectiveness (Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993). This study provides a replication with professional knowledge worker jobs, different measures of effectiveness, and work units that varied in the degree to which members identified as a team. Data were collected from 357 employees, 93 managers, and archival records for 60 teams in a financial services organization. Team characteristics were measured with questionnaires completed by employees and managers. Effectiveness measures included immediate manager judgments at two points in time, senior and peer manager judgments, employee judgments, and archival records of employee satisfaction and performance appraisals. Results were similar to previous findings in that most team characteristics were related to most effectiveness criteria. Relationships were strongest for process characteristics, followed by job design, context, interdependence, and other characteristics. Further, work units higher on single‐team identity were higher on many team characteristics and effectiveness measures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_220134709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9768620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4109-5fb35125e5f3837b537ac7afc4972329d11a7c06c0f32557853e50b33ed944ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtPgzAYhhujifPwH8i8Zrb9WgreGGTdRpxsAdyMNw1gSYaHKWxx-_cWMd554XfTtH3et82DUJ_gATFzWQ2IYMx2uDAHnucMNjkmLnYGuwPU-706RD2Mgdjcpc4xOmmaCpuhzO2hx1hO_TScRYl1I9OllJG1nMW3Vir9OyuY-LEfpDIOkzQMEsuPhpYcjWSQhgsZySS5snwrlvNpGHx3dMBDKqPE7M7QUZm9NPr8Zz1F9yOZBhN7OhubwNQuGMGezcscOKFc8xJcEDkHkRUiKwvmCQrUeyIkEwV2ClwC5Vy4HDTHOYB-8hjTBZyiftf7Xq8_trrZqGq9rd_Mk4pSTIAJ7Bno4i-IOMAwCEwdQ111VFGvm6bWpXqvV69ZvVcEq1a4qlRrVbVWVStc_QhXOxO-7sKfqxe9_0dSzeU8YbT9pN01rJqN3v02ZPWzcgQIrpbRWC2G8RAoC1QEX8mJjXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220134709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>CAMPION, MICHAEL A. ; PAPPER, ELLEN M. ; MEDSKER, GINA J.</creator><creatorcontrib>CAMPION, MICHAEL A. ; PAPPER, ELLEN M. ; MEDSKER, GINA J.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has demonstrated that work team characteristics can be related to effectiveness (Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993). This study provides a replication with professional knowledge worker jobs, different measures of effectiveness, and work units that varied in the degree to which members identified as a team. Data were collected from 357 employees, 93 managers, and archival records for 60 teams in a financial services organization. Team characteristics were measured with questionnaires completed by employees and managers. Effectiveness measures included immediate manager judgments at two points in time, senior and peer manager judgments, employee judgments, and archival records of employee satisfaction and performance appraisals. Results were similar to previous findings in that most team characteristics were related to most effectiveness criteria. Relationships were strongest for process characteristics, followed by job design, context, interdependence, and other characteristics. Further, work units higher on single‐team identity were higher on many team characteristics and effectiveness measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Communication ; Employees ; Employment ; Financial services ; Group dynamics ; Job design ; Job Development ; Performance appraisal ; Productivity ; Psychological aspects ; Records (Forms) ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Self Management ; Social Psychology ; Studies ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Personnel psychology, 1996-06, Vol.49 (2), p.429-452</ispartof><rights>Copyright Personnel Psychology, Inc. Summer 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4109-5fb35125e5f3837b537ac7afc4972329d11a7c06c0f32557853e50b33ed944ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4109-5fb35125e5f3837b537ac7afc4972329d11a7c06c0f32557853e50b33ed944ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CAMPION, MICHAEL A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAPPER, ELLEN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDSKER, GINA J.</creatorcontrib><title>RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION</title><title>Personnel psychology</title><description>Previous research has demonstrated that work team characteristics can be related to effectiveness (Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993). This study provides a replication with professional knowledge worker jobs, different measures of effectiveness, and work units that varied in the degree to which members identified as a team. Data were collected from 357 employees, 93 managers, and archival records for 60 teams in a financial services organization. Team characteristics were measured with questionnaires completed by employees and managers. Effectiveness measures included immediate manager judgments at two points in time, senior and peer manager judgments, employee judgments, and archival records of employee satisfaction and performance appraisals. Results were similar to previous findings in that most team characteristics were related to most effectiveness criteria. Relationships were strongest for process characteristics, followed by job design, context, interdependence, and other characteristics. Further, work units higher on single‐team identity were higher on many team characteristics and effectiveness measures.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Financial services</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Job design</subject><subject>Job Development</subject><subject>Performance appraisal</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Records (Forms)</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>0031-5826</issn><issn>1744-6570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFtPgzAYhhujifPwH8i8Zrb9WgreGGTdRpxsAdyMNw1gSYaHKWxx-_cWMd554XfTtH3et82DUJ_gATFzWQ2IYMx2uDAHnucMNjkmLnYGuwPU-706RD2Mgdjcpc4xOmmaCpuhzO2hx1hO_TScRYl1I9OllJG1nMW3Vir9OyuY-LEfpDIOkzQMEsuPhpYcjWSQhgsZySS5snwrlvNpGHx3dMBDKqPE7M7QUZm9NPr8Zz1F9yOZBhN7OhubwNQuGMGezcscOKFc8xJcEDkHkRUiKwvmCQrUeyIkEwV2ClwC5Vy4HDTHOYB-8hjTBZyiftf7Xq8_trrZqGq9rd_Mk4pSTIAJ7Bno4i-IOMAwCEwdQ111VFGvm6bWpXqvV69ZvVcEq1a4qlRrVbVWVStc_QhXOxO-7sKfqxe9_0dSzeU8YbT9pN01rJqN3v02ZPWzcgQIrpbRWC2G8RAoC1QEX8mJjXI</recordid><startdate>199606</startdate><enddate>199606</enddate><creator>CAMPION, MICHAEL A.</creator><creator>PAPPER, ELLEN M.</creator><creator>MEDSKER, GINA J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Personnel Psychology, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199606</creationdate><title>RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION</title><author>CAMPION, MICHAEL A. ; PAPPER, ELLEN M. ; MEDSKER, GINA J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4109-5fb35125e5f3837b537ac7afc4972329d11a7c06c0f32557853e50b33ed944ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Financial services</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Job design</topic><topic>Job Development</topic><topic>Performance appraisal</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Records (Forms)</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CAMPION, MICHAEL A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAPPER, ELLEN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDSKER, GINA J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CAMPION, MICHAEL A.</au><au>PAPPER, ELLEN M.</au><au>MEDSKER, GINA J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION</atitle><jtitle>Personnel psychology</jtitle><date>1996-06</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>429-452</pages><issn>0031-5826</issn><eissn>1744-6570</eissn><abstract>Previous research has demonstrated that work team characteristics can be related to effectiveness (Campion, Medsker, & Higgs, 1993). This study provides a replication with professional knowledge worker jobs, different measures of effectiveness, and work units that varied in the degree to which members identified as a team. Data were collected from 357 employees, 93 managers, and archival records for 60 teams in a financial services organization. Team characteristics were measured with questionnaires completed by employees and managers. Effectiveness measures included immediate manager judgments at two points in time, senior and peer manager judgments, employee judgments, and archival records of employee satisfaction and performance appraisals. Results were similar to previous findings in that most team characteristics were related to most effectiveness criteria. Relationships were strongest for process characteristics, followed by job design, context, interdependence, and other characteristics. Further, work units higher on single‐team identity were higher on many team characteristics and effectiveness measures.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-5826 |
| ispartof | Personnel psychology, 1996-06, Vol.49 (2), p.429-452 |
| issn | 0031-5826 1744-6570 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_220134709 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Communication Employees Employment Financial services Group dynamics Job design Job Development Performance appraisal Productivity Psychological aspects Records (Forms) Resistance (Psychology) Self Management Social Psychology Studies Teams |
| title | RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RELATIONS%20BETWEEN%20WORK%20TEAM%20CHARACTERISTICS%20AND%20EFFECTIVENESS:%20A%20REPLICATION%20AND%20EXTENSION&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20psychology&rft.au=CAMPION,%20MICHAEL%20A.&rft.date=1996-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=429-452&rft.issn=0031-5826&rft.eissn=1744-6570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E9768620%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220134709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |