‘Rural’ rhetoric in 1930s unemployment relief schemes
This article examines the role of particular ideas of the countryside in unemployment relief schemes. While interwar thinking on the countryside has received attention, it has not been examined in the specific context of unemployment relief. This article uses four case studies from North East Englan...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Rural history 2019-04, Vol.30 (1), p.53-69 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 69 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 53 |
| container_title | Rural history |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | O’Donnell, Ronan Petts, David |
| description | This article examines the role of particular ideas of the countryside in unemployment relief schemes. While interwar thinking on the countryside has received attention, it has not been examined in the specific context of unemployment relief. This article uses four case studies from North East England, namely the Team Valley Trading Estate (Gateshead), Hamsterley Forest Instructional Centre (Durham), Swarland model village (Northumberland) and Heartbreak Hill (Cleveland). All four projects took different approaches to the unemployment problem, but all used some form of rural rhetoric. The ways in which the projects deployed images of the countryside creatively recombined a wide range of ideas to suit their needs rather than being rigidly confined by particular schools of thought. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0956793319000049 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2199078117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0956793319000049</cupid><sourcerecordid>2199078117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1731510db7d505c26132a0afc2daf7d6a830ea258bf01c31c72dbb343c0da9e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwF3AdfTemUwms5TiHxQEf9ZhMnNjU_JTZ5JFd30Mfb0-iSktuBDv5i7O-c6Bw9glwjUCqptX0DJVWgjUMF6ij9gEE5XEkMr0mE12crzTT9lZCMvRIhSXE6a3m6-XwZt6u_mO_IL6zlc2qtoItYAQDS01q7pbN9T2kae6ojIKdkENhXN2Upo60MXhT9n7_d3b7DGePz88zW7nsRUp9DEqgRLBFcpJkJanKLgBU1ruTKlcajIBZLjMihLQCrSKu6IQibDgjCYQU3a1z1357nOg0OfLbvDtWJlz1BpUhmPHlOHeZX0XgqcyX_mqMX6dI-S7hfI_C42MODCmKXzlPug3-n_qB_w3aDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2199078117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Rural’ rhetoric in 1930s unemployment relief schemes</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>O’Donnell, Ronan ; Petts, David</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Ronan ; Petts, David</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the role of particular ideas of the countryside in unemployment relief schemes. While interwar thinking on the countryside has received attention, it has not been examined in the specific context of unemployment relief. This article uses four case studies from North East England, namely the Team Valley Trading Estate (Gateshead), Hamsterley Forest Instructional Centre (Durham), Swarland model village (Northumberland) and Heartbreak Hill (Cleveland). All four projects took different approaches to the unemployment problem, but all used some form of rural rhetoric. The ways in which the projects deployed images of the countryside creatively recombined a wide range of ideas to suit their needs rather than being rigidly confined by particular schools of thought.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0956793319000049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural education ; Case studies ; Countryside ; Great Depression ; Rhetoric ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Social history ; Teams ; Trading ; Unemployment</subject><ispartof>Rural history, 2019-04, Vol.30 (1), p.53-69</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1731510db7d505c26132a0afc2daf7d6a830ea258bf01c31c72dbb343c0da9e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1731510db7d505c26132a0afc2daf7d6a830ea258bf01c31c72dbb343c0da9e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0956793319000049/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,27911,27912,55615</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Ronan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petts, David</creatorcontrib><title>‘Rural’ rhetoric in 1930s unemployment relief schemes</title><title>Rural history</title><addtitle>Rural History</addtitle><description>This article examines the role of particular ideas of the countryside in unemployment relief schemes. While interwar thinking on the countryside has received attention, it has not been examined in the specific context of unemployment relief. This article uses four case studies from North East England, namely the Team Valley Trading Estate (Gateshead), Hamsterley Forest Instructional Centre (Durham), Swarland model village (Northumberland) and Heartbreak Hill (Cleveland). All four projects took different approaches to the unemployment problem, but all used some form of rural rhetoric. The ways in which the projects deployed images of the countryside creatively recombined a wide range of ideas to suit their needs rather than being rigidly confined by particular schools of thought.</description><subject>Agricultural education</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Countryside</subject><subject>Great Depression</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Social history</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Trading</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><issn>0956-7933</issn><issn>1474-0656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFYfwF3AdfTemUwms5TiHxQEf9ZhMnNjU_JTZ5JFd30Mfb0-iSktuBDv5i7O-c6Bw9glwjUCqptX0DJVWgjUMF6ij9gEE5XEkMr0mE12crzTT9lZCMvRIhSXE6a3m6-XwZt6u_mO_IL6zlc2qtoItYAQDS01q7pbN9T2kae6ojIKdkENhXN2Upo60MXhT9n7_d3b7DGePz88zW7nsRUp9DEqgRLBFcpJkJanKLgBU1ruTKlcajIBZLjMihLQCrSKu6IQibDgjCYQU3a1z1357nOg0OfLbvDtWJlz1BpUhmPHlOHeZX0XgqcyX_mqMX6dI-S7hfI_C42MODCmKXzlPug3-n_qB_w3aDY</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>O’Donnell, Ronan</creator><creator>Petts, David</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>‘Rural’ rhetoric in 1930s unemployment relief schemes</title><author>O’Donnell, Ronan ; Petts, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-1731510db7d505c26132a0afc2daf7d6a830ea258bf01c31c72dbb343c0da9e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural education</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Countryside</topic><topic>Great Depression</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Social history</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Trading</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Ronan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petts, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Rural history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Donnell, Ronan</au><au>Petts, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Rural’ rhetoric in 1930s unemployment relief schemes</atitle><jtitle>Rural history</jtitle><addtitle>Rural History</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>53-69</pages><issn>0956-7933</issn><eissn>1474-0656</eissn><abstract>This article examines the role of particular ideas of the countryside in unemployment relief schemes. While interwar thinking on the countryside has received attention, it has not been examined in the specific context of unemployment relief. This article uses four case studies from North East England, namely the Team Valley Trading Estate (Gateshead), Hamsterley Forest Instructional Centre (Durham), Swarland model village (Northumberland) and Heartbreak Hill (Cleveland). All four projects took different approaches to the unemployment problem, but all used some form of rural rhetoric. The ways in which the projects deployed images of the countryside creatively recombined a wide range of ideas to suit their needs rather than being rigidly confined by particular schools of thought.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0956793319000049</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0956-7933 |
| ispartof | Rural history, 2019-04, Vol.30 (1), p.53-69 |
| issn | 0956-7933 1474-0656 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2199078117 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural education Case studies Countryside Great Depression Rhetoric Rural areas Rural communities Social history Teams Trading Unemployment |
| title | ‘Rural’ rhetoric in 1930s unemployment relief schemes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A11%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Rural%E2%80%99%20rhetoric%20in%201930s%20unemployment%20relief%20schemes&rft.jtitle=Rural%20history&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Donnell,%20Ronan&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=53-69&rft.issn=0956-7933&rft.eissn=1474-0656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0956793319000049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2199078117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2199078117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0956793319000049&rfr_iscdi=true |