Metacomprehension effects situated within an anchoring and adjustment framework
Low accuracy levels are often obtained when readers are asked to predict test performance over reading materials. Three investigations further explore the information readers use to make predictions during metacomprehension. Our results show that readers’ estimates are influenced by factors such as...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Metacognition and learning 2008-12, Vol.3 (3), p.175-188 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 188 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 175 |
| container_title | Metacognition and learning |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Linderholm, Tracy Zhao, Qin Therriault, David J. Cordell-McNulty, Kristi |
| description | Low accuracy levels are often obtained when readers are asked to predict test performance over reading materials. Three investigations further explore the information readers use to make predictions during metacomprehension. Our results show that readers’ estimates are influenced by factors such as their initial impression of the reading task, based in part on their perceptions surrounding text genre and test item type. To explain these and other published results, a new framework for investigating metacomprehension using Tversky and Kahneman’s (Science, 185:1124–1131,
1974
) anchoring and adjustment heuristic as a guide is proposed. We argue that readers anchor comprehension test performance on factors such as self-perceptions of reading ability and/or perceptions of the reading task and then insufficiently adjust their predictions to reflect the demands of the specific reading task at hand such as text difficulty. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11409-008-9025-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219891694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ817560</ericid><sourcerecordid>1897205111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4098dd7cca7616bfc37f618deb79881a07df1ba2c4c1b2d17047ae155aca340d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AMFD8V7NpGnSHmVZv1jZi55Dmg_b1X6YpCz-e1Mq60kYmIF5Z96ZB6FLwDeAMb_1ABSXKcZFWmKSp3CEFpDnLAWWwfGhJtkpOvN-hzGllJEF2r6YIFXfDs7UpvNN3yXGWqOCT3wTRhmMTvZNqJsukVOoundN9x4rnUi9G31oTRcS62Rr9r37OEcnVn56c_Gbl-jtfv26ekw324en1d0mVRSTkMZbC625UpIzYJVVGbcMCm0qXhYFSMy1hUoSRRVURAPHlEsTn5BKZhTrbImu572D679G44PY9aProqUgUBYlsJJGEcwi5XrvnbFicE0r3bcALCZsYsYmIjYxYRMQZ67mGeMaddCvnwvgOcOxTea2HyYOxv35_r_zB6ezelQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219891694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metacomprehension effects situated within an anchoring and adjustment framework</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Linderholm, Tracy ; Zhao, Qin ; Therriault, David J. ; Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</creator><creatorcontrib>Linderholm, Tracy ; Zhao, Qin ; Therriault, David J. ; Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</creatorcontrib><description>Low accuracy levels are often obtained when readers are asked to predict test performance over reading materials. Three investigations further explore the information readers use to make predictions during metacomprehension. Our results show that readers’ estimates are influenced by factors such as their initial impression of the reading task, based in part on their perceptions surrounding text genre and test item type. To explain these and other published results, a new framework for investigating metacomprehension using Tversky and Kahneman’s (Science, 185:1124–1131,
1974
) anchoring and adjustment heuristic as a guide is proposed. We argue that readers anchor comprehension test performance on factors such as self-perceptions of reading ability and/or perceptions of the reading task and then insufficiently adjust their predictions to reflect the demands of the specific reading task at hand such as text difficulty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-1631</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9025-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Cognitive Processes ; College Preparation ; Course Content ; Distance Education ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Familiarity ; Investigations ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Theories ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Nontraditional Education ; Performance evaluation ; Prediction ; Predictions ; Reading Ability ; Reading Achievement ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Materials ; Reading Tests ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Student Attitudes ; Teaching and Teacher Education ; Test Format ; Test Items ; Word Processing</subject><ispartof>Metacognition and learning, 2008-12, Vol.3 (3), p.175-188</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4098dd7cca7616bfc37f618deb79881a07df1ba2c4c1b2d17047ae155aca340d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4098dd7cca7616bfc37f618deb79881a07df1ba2c4c1b2d17047ae155aca340d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11409-008-9025-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11409-008-9025-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ817560$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linderholm, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therriault, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</creatorcontrib><title>Metacomprehension effects situated within an anchoring and adjustment framework</title><title>Metacognition and learning</title><addtitle>Metacognition Learning</addtitle><description>Low accuracy levels are often obtained when readers are asked to predict test performance over reading materials. Three investigations further explore the information readers use to make predictions during metacomprehension. Our results show that readers’ estimates are influenced by factors such as their initial impression of the reading task, based in part on their perceptions surrounding text genre and test item type. To explain these and other published results, a new framework for investigating metacomprehension using Tversky and Kahneman’s (Science, 185:1124–1131,
1974
) anchoring and adjustment heuristic as a guide is proposed. We argue that readers anchor comprehension test performance on factors such as self-perceptions of reading ability and/or perceptions of the reading task and then insufficiently adjust their predictions to reflect the demands of the specific reading task at hand such as text difficulty.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Preparation</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Nontraditional Education</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reading Ability</subject><subject>Reading Achievement</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Materials</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching and Teacher Education</subject><subject>Test Format</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Word Processing</subject><issn>1556-1623</issn><issn>1556-1631</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AMFD8V7NpGnSHmVZv1jZi55Dmg_b1X6YpCz-e1Mq60kYmIF5Z96ZB6FLwDeAMb_1ABSXKcZFWmKSp3CEFpDnLAWWwfGhJtkpOvN-hzGllJEF2r6YIFXfDs7UpvNN3yXGWqOCT3wTRhmMTvZNqJsukVOoundN9x4rnUi9G31oTRcS62Rr9r37OEcnVn56c_Gbl-jtfv26ekw324en1d0mVRSTkMZbC625UpIzYJVVGbcMCm0qXhYFSMy1hUoSRRVURAPHlEsTn5BKZhTrbImu572D679G44PY9aProqUgUBYlsJJGEcwi5XrvnbFicE0r3bcALCZsYsYmIjYxYRMQZ67mGeMaddCvnwvgOcOxTea2HyYOxv35_r_zB6ezelQ</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Linderholm, Tracy</creator><creator>Zhao, Qin</creator><creator>Therriault, David J.</creator><creator>Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Metacomprehension effects situated within an anchoring and adjustment framework</title><author>Linderholm, Tracy ; Zhao, Qin ; Therriault, David J. ; Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-4098dd7cca7616bfc37f618deb79881a07df1ba2c4c1b2d17047ae155aca340d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Preparation</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Nontraditional Education</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reading Ability</topic><topic>Reading Achievement</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Materials</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching and Teacher Education</topic><topic>Test Format</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Word Processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linderholm, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therriault, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Metacognition and learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linderholm, Tracy</au><au>Zhao, Qin</au><au>Therriault, David J.</au><au>Cordell-McNulty, Kristi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ817560</ericid><atitle>Metacomprehension effects situated within an anchoring and adjustment framework</atitle><jtitle>Metacognition and learning</jtitle><stitle>Metacognition Learning</stitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>175-188</pages><issn>1556-1623</issn><eissn>1556-1631</eissn><abstract>Low accuracy levels are often obtained when readers are asked to predict test performance over reading materials. Three investigations further explore the information readers use to make predictions during metacomprehension. Our results show that readers’ estimates are influenced by factors such as their initial impression of the reading task, based in part on their perceptions surrounding text genre and test item type. To explain these and other published results, a new framework for investigating metacomprehension using Tversky and Kahneman’s (Science, 185:1124–1131,
1974
) anchoring and adjustment heuristic as a guide is proposed. We argue that readers anchor comprehension test performance on factors such as self-perceptions of reading ability and/or perceptions of the reading task and then insufficiently adjust their predictions to reflect the demands of the specific reading task at hand such as text difficulty.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11409-008-9025-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1556-1623 |
| ispartof | Metacognition and learning, 2008-12, Vol.3 (3), p.175-188 |
| issn | 1556-1623 1556-1631 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_219891694 |
| source | Education Source (EBSCOhost); SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Academic Achievement Cognitive Processes College Preparation Course Content Distance Education Education Educational Psychology Familiarity Investigations Learning and Instruction Learning Theories Memory Metacognition Nontraditional Education Performance evaluation Prediction Predictions Reading Ability Reading Achievement Reading Comprehension Reading Materials Reading Tests Resistance (Psychology) Student Attitudes Teaching and Teacher Education Test Format Test Items Word Processing |
| title | Metacomprehension effects situated within an anchoring and adjustment framework |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A11%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metacomprehension%20effects%20situated%20within%20an%20anchoring%20and%20adjustment%20framework&rft.jtitle=Metacognition%20and%20learning&rft.au=Linderholm,%20Tracy&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=175-188&rft.issn=1556-1623&rft.eissn=1556-1631&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11409-008-9025-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1897205111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219891694&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ817560&rfr_iscdi=true |