Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation
Surface water treatment plants are major energy consumers in all countries. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels and the growth in demand for energy resulting from the needs of development have prompted optimisation of the use of energy. SWTPs are responsible for the supply of tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.22 (4), p.3347-3370 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3370 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 3347 |
container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | De, Paulami Majumder, Mrinmoy |
description | Surface water treatment plants are major energy consumers in all countries. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels and the growth in demand for energy resulting from the needs of development have prompted optimisation of the use of energy. SWTPs are responsible for the supply of treated water to consumers. Although a significant amount of the total energy produced is consumed by WTPs, the utilisation of this resource is variable, and sufficient amounts of it remain unutilised or wasted in the treatment process. Energy resources supplied to a WTP must be optimally allocated. At present, no mechanism exists to ensure this, and allocation is performed as and when it is needed, with no regulation or control. As a result, much energy is returned unutilised. This results in excess expenditures and affects carbon emissions from the plant because both too much and too little utilisation of energy in running water treatment equipment can result in the generation of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Unnecessary consumption of energy reduces its availability for other users. Thus, the economy, the environment, and social well-being are affected by the non-optimal utilisation of energy. This problem is common to all parts of the world but is especially acute in developing countries. Lack of intelligent allocation methods compromises the sustainability not only of the plant but also of the dependent population. Here, nature-based optimisation algorithms (OAs) and a modified analytical hierarchy process (mAHP), an objective multi-criteria decision-making method, were utilised to conduct intelligent, automatic allocation of energy among elements of wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). OAs are used to weight elements according to their relative capacity to ensure reliability and restrict risk to plants (resulting in a reliability–risk index); energy is allocated accordingly using mAHP. Tested at a working WTP in India, it minimised energy wastage down to 0.037% of total energy. This is the first attempt to combine mAHP and aggregated output from two OAs to optimise energy use in a WTP (based on the novel reliability–risk index). Our method builds on the concepts of multi-criteria decision making and metaheuristics optimisation algorithms to develop a new procedure for cognitive allocation of energy ensuring optimal performance while minimising the use of energy. Our decision support system can help maximise productivity, and safeguard sustainability, of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2197694715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2197694715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a86bf16026bd01c7994f827534634c56282e2e30bb9ba400e96a852df3ccb9993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEYRYMoWKsv4CrgOpqfSTJZluIfFNyouAuZNClTZpKapNa-vWNHcefqu4t77gcHgEuCrwnG8iYTLESNMFEIY1YptDsCE8IlQ1RJfjxkVkvEa_52Cs5yXmNMsaJiAl5nXRetKW0MMHrogkurPWwDzNvkjXVwZ4pLsCRnSu9CgZvOhJKhjwn25rPtt_0vZGPILn0cts7BiTdddhc_dwpe7m6f5w9o8XT_OJ8tkGWSFmRq0XgiMBXNEhMrlap8TSVnlWCV5YLW1FHHcNOoxlQYOyVMzenSM2sbpRSbgqtxd5Pi-9blotdxm8LwUlOipFCVJHxo0bFlU8w5Oa83qe1N2muC9bc_PfrTgz998Kd3A8RGKA_lsHLpb_of6gttrnR-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2197694715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>De, Paulami ; Majumder, Mrinmoy</creator><creatorcontrib>De, Paulami ; Majumder, Mrinmoy</creatorcontrib><description>Surface water treatment plants are major energy consumers in all countries. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels and the growth in demand for energy resulting from the needs of development have prompted optimisation of the use of energy. SWTPs are responsible for the supply of treated water to consumers. Although a significant amount of the total energy produced is consumed by WTPs, the utilisation of this resource is variable, and sufficient amounts of it remain unutilised or wasted in the treatment process. Energy resources supplied to a WTP must be optimally allocated. At present, no mechanism exists to ensure this, and allocation is performed as and when it is needed, with no regulation or control. As a result, much energy is returned unutilised. This results in excess expenditures and affects carbon emissions from the plant because both too much and too little utilisation of energy in running water treatment equipment can result in the generation of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Unnecessary consumption of energy reduces its availability for other users. Thus, the economy, the environment, and social well-being are affected by the non-optimal utilisation of energy. This problem is common to all parts of the world but is especially acute in developing countries. Lack of intelligent allocation methods compromises the sustainability not only of the plant but also of the dependent population. Here, nature-based optimisation algorithms (OAs) and a modified analytical hierarchy process (mAHP), an objective multi-criteria decision-making method, were utilised to conduct intelligent, automatic allocation of energy among elements of wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). OAs are used to weight elements according to their relative capacity to ensure reliability and restrict risk to plants (resulting in a reliability–risk index); energy is allocated accordingly using mAHP. Tested at a working WTP in India, it minimised energy wastage down to 0.037% of total energy. This is the first attempt to combine mAHP and aggregated output from two OAs to optimise energy use in a WTP (based on the novel reliability–risk index). Our method builds on the concepts of multi-criteria decision making and metaheuristics optimisation algorithms to develop a new procedure for cognitive allocation of energy ensuring optimal performance while minimising the use of energy. Our decision support system can help maximise productivity, and safeguard sustainability, of plants and their stakeholders. However, time-dependent, nonlinear dynamics in continuously operating WTPs should be tested in future work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analytic hierarchy process ; Cognitive ability ; Consumers ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Developing countries ; Dynamical systems ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Energy ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy resources ; Energy sources ; Energy utilization ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Expenditures ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Intelligence ; LDCs ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Nonlinear systems ; Optimization ; Productivity ; Reliability ; Scarcity ; Social well being ; Support systems ; Surface water ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development ; Time dependence ; Treated water ; Wastage ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment ; Water treatment plants ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.22 (4), p.3347-3370</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Environment, Development and Sustainability is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a86bf16026bd01c7994f827534634c56282e2e30bb9ba400e96a852df3ccb9993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a86bf16026bd01c7994f827534634c56282e2e30bb9ba400e96a852df3ccb9993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6231-5989</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De, Paulami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumder, Mrinmoy</creatorcontrib><title>Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>Surface water treatment plants are major energy consumers in all countries. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels and the growth in demand for energy resulting from the needs of development have prompted optimisation of the use of energy. SWTPs are responsible for the supply of treated water to consumers. Although a significant amount of the total energy produced is consumed by WTPs, the utilisation of this resource is variable, and sufficient amounts of it remain unutilised or wasted in the treatment process. Energy resources supplied to a WTP must be optimally allocated. At present, no mechanism exists to ensure this, and allocation is performed as and when it is needed, with no regulation or control. As a result, much energy is returned unutilised. This results in excess expenditures and affects carbon emissions from the plant because both too much and too little utilisation of energy in running water treatment equipment can result in the generation of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Unnecessary consumption of energy reduces its availability for other users. Thus, the economy, the environment, and social well-being are affected by the non-optimal utilisation of energy. This problem is common to all parts of the world but is especially acute in developing countries. Lack of intelligent allocation methods compromises the sustainability not only of the plant but also of the dependent population. Here, nature-based optimisation algorithms (OAs) and a modified analytical hierarchy process (mAHP), an objective multi-criteria decision-making method, were utilised to conduct intelligent, automatic allocation of energy among elements of wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). OAs are used to weight elements according to their relative capacity to ensure reliability and restrict risk to plants (resulting in a reliability–risk index); energy is allocated accordingly using mAHP. Tested at a working WTP in India, it minimised energy wastage down to 0.037% of total energy. This is the first attempt to combine mAHP and aggregated output from two OAs to optimise energy use in a WTP (based on the novel reliability–risk index). Our method builds on the concepts of multi-criteria decision making and metaheuristics optimisation algorithms to develop a new procedure for cognitive allocation of energy ensuring optimal performance while minimising the use of energy. Our decision support system can help maximise productivity, and safeguard sustainability, of plants and their stakeholders. However, time-dependent, nonlinear dynamics in continuously operating WTPs should be tested in future work.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Energy utilization</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Social well being</subject><subject>Support systems</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Treated water</subject><subject>Wastage</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEYRYMoWKsv4CrgOpqfSTJZluIfFNyouAuZNClTZpKapNa-vWNHcefqu4t77gcHgEuCrwnG8iYTLESNMFEIY1YptDsCE8IlQ1RJfjxkVkvEa_52Cs5yXmNMsaJiAl5nXRetKW0MMHrogkurPWwDzNvkjXVwZ4pLsCRnSu9CgZvOhJKhjwn25rPtt_0vZGPILn0cts7BiTdddhc_dwpe7m6f5w9o8XT_OJ8tkGWSFmRq0XgiMBXNEhMrlap8TSVnlWCV5YLW1FHHcNOoxlQYOyVMzenSM2sbpRSbgqtxd5Pi-9blotdxm8LwUlOipFCVJHxo0bFlU8w5Oa83qe1N2muC9bc_PfrTgz998Kd3A8RGKA_lsHLpb_of6gttrnR-</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>De, Paulami</creator><creator>Majumder, Mrinmoy</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6231-5989</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation</title><author>De, Paulami ; Majumder, Mrinmoy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a86bf16026bd01c7994f827534634c56282e2e30bb9ba400e96a852df3ccb9993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Energy utilization</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Social well being</topic><topic>Support systems</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Treated water</topic><topic>Wastage</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De, Paulami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumder, Mrinmoy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De, Paulami</au><au>Majumder, Mrinmoy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3347</spage><epage>3370</epage><pages>3347-3370</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>Surface water treatment plants are major energy consumers in all countries. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels and the growth in demand for energy resulting from the needs of development have prompted optimisation of the use of energy. SWTPs are responsible for the supply of treated water to consumers. Although a significant amount of the total energy produced is consumed by WTPs, the utilisation of this resource is variable, and sufficient amounts of it remain unutilised or wasted in the treatment process. Energy resources supplied to a WTP must be optimally allocated. At present, no mechanism exists to ensure this, and allocation is performed as and when it is needed, with no regulation or control. As a result, much energy is returned unutilised. This results in excess expenditures and affects carbon emissions from the plant because both too much and too little utilisation of energy in running water treatment equipment can result in the generation of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Unnecessary consumption of energy reduces its availability for other users. Thus, the economy, the environment, and social well-being are affected by the non-optimal utilisation of energy. This problem is common to all parts of the world but is especially acute in developing countries. Lack of intelligent allocation methods compromises the sustainability not only of the plant but also of the dependent population. Here, nature-based optimisation algorithms (OAs) and a modified analytical hierarchy process (mAHP), an objective multi-criteria decision-making method, were utilised to conduct intelligent, automatic allocation of energy among elements of wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). OAs are used to weight elements according to their relative capacity to ensure reliability and restrict risk to plants (resulting in a reliability–risk index); energy is allocated accordingly using mAHP. Tested at a working WTP in India, it minimised energy wastage down to 0.037% of total energy. This is the first attempt to combine mAHP and aggregated output from two OAs to optimise energy use in a WTP (based on the novel reliability–risk index). Our method builds on the concepts of multi-criteria decision making and metaheuristics optimisation algorithms to develop a new procedure for cognitive allocation of energy ensuring optimal performance while minimising the use of energy. Our decision support system can help maximise productivity, and safeguard sustainability, of plants and their stakeholders. However, time-dependent, nonlinear dynamics in continuously operating WTPs should be tested in future work.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6231-5989</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2020-04, Vol.22 (4), p.3347-3370 |
issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2197694715 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Analytic hierarchy process Cognitive ability Consumers Decision analysis Decision making Developing countries Dynamical systems Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic Geology Economic Growth Energy Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy resources Energy sources Energy utilization Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Management Expenditures Fossil fuels Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Intelligence LDCs Multiple criteria decision making Nonlinear systems Optimization Productivity Reliability Scarcity Social well being Support systems Surface water Sustainability Sustainable Development Time dependence Treated water Wastage Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water treatment Water treatment plants Weight |
title | Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A10%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Allocation%20of%20energy%20in%20surface%20water%20treatment%20plants%20for%20maximum%20energy%20conservation&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=De,%20Paulami&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3347&rft.epage=3370&rft.pages=3347-3370&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2197694715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2197694715&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |