Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry
We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of production research 2019-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1772-1796 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1772 |
container_title | International journal of production research |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Basu, Preetam Liu, Qindong Stallaert, Jan |
description | We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2197359155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2197359155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMoOKc_QQh47sxH06Y3ZfgFEw8qeAtpmm4dbVKTFOm_N7UTb-YSSJ4nL3kAuMRohRFH1wgRlLOUrgjCfIUZ4gVCR2CBaZYljPOPY7CYmGSCTsGZ93sUF-PpAjy_Dn3fjlDtZGNgJ43c6k6bAAffmC3shwBtHxproLImOKmCh19N2MHG1NZ18udK-rHrdHDjOTipZev1xWFfgvf7u7f1Y7J5eXha324SRQsWEpxWKlUVogUpK1TUdU5YPCIyQyglJStySipeUp3WldSE56SmkqkyY7iiXBG6BFfzu72zn4P2Qezt4EwcKQiONiswY5FiM6Wc9d7pWvSu6aQbBUZiKid-y4mpnDiUix6cPR3_3Pg_KytiUcIIjcjNjBwyfFnXViLIsbWudtKoqNH_p3wDla6ALg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2197359155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Basu, Preetam ; Liu, Qindong ; Stallaert, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Basu, Preetam ; Liu, Qindong ; Stallaert, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-588X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>buyback contracts ; Numerical analysis ; Order quantity ; put option ; Retail stores ; Risk management ; semi-variance ; Suppliers ; Supply chain management ; Supply chains ; Utilities</subject><ispartof>International journal of production research, 2019-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1772-1796</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,59652,60441</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basu, Preetam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qindong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallaert, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</title><title>International journal of production research</title><description>We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.</description><subject>buyback contracts</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Order quantity</subject><subject>put option</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>semi-variance</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><issn>0020-7543</issn><issn>1366-588X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMoOKc_QQh47sxH06Y3ZfgFEw8qeAtpmm4dbVKTFOm_N7UTb-YSSJ4nL3kAuMRohRFH1wgRlLOUrgjCfIUZ4gVCR2CBaZYljPOPY7CYmGSCTsGZ93sUF-PpAjy_Dn3fjlDtZGNgJ43c6k6bAAffmC3shwBtHxproLImOKmCh19N2MHG1NZ18udK-rHrdHDjOTipZev1xWFfgvf7u7f1Y7J5eXha324SRQsWEpxWKlUVogUpK1TUdU5YPCIyQyglJStySipeUp3WldSE56SmkqkyY7iiXBG6BFfzu72zn4P2Qezt4EwcKQiONiswY5FiM6Wc9d7pWvSu6aQbBUZiKid-y4mpnDiUix6cPR3_3Pg_KytiUcIIjcjNjBwyfFnXViLIsbWudtKoqNH_p3wDla6ALg</recordid><startdate>20190319</startdate><enddate>20190319</enddate><creator>Basu, Preetam</creator><creator>Liu, Qindong</creator><creator>Stallaert, Jan</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190319</creationdate><title>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</title><author>Basu, Preetam ; Liu, Qindong ; Stallaert, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>buyback contracts</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Order quantity</topic><topic>put option</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>semi-variance</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basu, Preetam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qindong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallaert, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basu, Preetam</au><au>Liu, Qindong</au><au>Stallaert, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle><date>2019-03-19</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1772</spage><epage>1796</epage><pages>1772-1796</pages><issn>0020-7543</issn><eissn>1366-588X</eissn><abstract>We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7543 |
ispartof | International journal of production research, 2019-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1772-1796 |
issn | 0020-7543 1366-588X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2197359155 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Taylor & Francis |
subjects | buyback contracts Numerical analysis Order quantity put option Retail stores Risk management semi-variance Suppliers Supply chain management Supply chains Utilities |
title | Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supply%20chain%20management%20using%20put%20option%20contracts%20with%20information%20asymmetry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20research&rft.au=Basu,%20Preetam&rft.date=2019-03-19&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1772&rft.epage=1796&rft.pages=1772-1796&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.eissn=1366-588X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2197359155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2197359155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |