Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry

We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of production research 2019-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1772-1796
Hauptverfasser: Basu, Preetam, Liu, Qindong, Stallaert, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1796
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1772
container_title International journal of production research
container_volume 57
creator Basu, Preetam
Liu, Qindong
Stallaert, Jan
description We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2197359155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2197359155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMoOKc_QQh47sxH06Y3ZfgFEw8qeAtpmm4dbVKTFOm_N7UTb-YSSJ4nL3kAuMRohRFH1wgRlLOUrgjCfIUZ4gVCR2CBaZYljPOPY7CYmGSCTsGZ93sUF-PpAjy_Dn3fjlDtZGNgJ43c6k6bAAffmC3shwBtHxproLImOKmCh19N2MHG1NZ18udK-rHrdHDjOTipZev1xWFfgvf7u7f1Y7J5eXha324SRQsWEpxWKlUVogUpK1TUdU5YPCIyQyglJStySipeUp3WldSE56SmkqkyY7iiXBG6BFfzu72zn4P2Qezt4EwcKQiONiswY5FiM6Wc9d7pWvSu6aQbBUZiKid-y4mpnDiUix6cPR3_3Pg_KytiUcIIjcjNjBwyfFnXViLIsbWudtKoqNH_p3wDla6ALg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2197359155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Basu, Preetam ; Liu, Qindong ; Stallaert, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Basu, Preetam ; Liu, Qindong ; Stallaert, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-588X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>buyback contracts ; Numerical analysis ; Order quantity ; put option ; Retail stores ; Risk management ; semi-variance ; Suppliers ; Supply chain management ; Supply chains ; Utilities</subject><ispartof>International journal of production research, 2019-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1772-1796</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2018</rights><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,59652,60441</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basu, Preetam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qindong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallaert, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</title><title>International journal of production research</title><description>We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.</description><subject>buyback contracts</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Order quantity</subject><subject>put option</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>semi-variance</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><issn>0020-7543</issn><issn>1366-588X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMoOKc_QQh47sxH06Y3ZfgFEw8qeAtpmm4dbVKTFOm_N7UTb-YSSJ4nL3kAuMRohRFH1wgRlLOUrgjCfIUZ4gVCR2CBaZYljPOPY7CYmGSCTsGZ93sUF-PpAjy_Dn3fjlDtZGNgJ43c6k6bAAffmC3shwBtHxproLImOKmCh19N2MHG1NZ18udK-rHrdHDjOTipZev1xWFfgvf7u7f1Y7J5eXha324SRQsWEpxWKlUVogUpK1TUdU5YPCIyQyglJStySipeUp3WldSE56SmkqkyY7iiXBG6BFfzu72zn4P2Qezt4EwcKQiONiswY5FiM6Wc9d7pWvSu6aQbBUZiKid-y4mpnDiUix6cPR3_3Pg_KytiUcIIjcjNjBwyfFnXViLIsbWudtKoqNH_p3wDla6ALg</recordid><startdate>20190319</startdate><enddate>20190319</enddate><creator>Basu, Preetam</creator><creator>Liu, Qindong</creator><creator>Stallaert, Jan</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190319</creationdate><title>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</title><author>Basu, Preetam ; Liu, Qindong ; Stallaert, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-14dc4cd0392bd09ff7254dc2a60042b59732d8b3e4fdae2872f3a5cb651d38c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>buyback contracts</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Order quantity</topic><topic>put option</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>semi-variance</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basu, Preetam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Qindong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stallaert, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basu, Preetam</au><au>Liu, Qindong</au><au>Stallaert, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production research</jtitle><date>2019-03-19</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1772</spage><epage>1796</epage><pages>1772-1796</pages><issn>0020-7543</issn><eissn>1366-588X</eissn><abstract>We study the problem of hedging demand uncertainty in a supply chain consisting of a risk-neutral supplier and a risk-averse retailer under a buyback contract. We use semi-variance of the possible profit values as a measure of the retailer's risk attitude. We first study the setting where the supplier can observe the risk type of the retailer and find that in this case the supplier can design a buyback contract that extracts the maximum profit for the supplier. When the retailer's type is unobservable, a new contract needs to be designed (the 'option buyback contract') and we show that in this case the retailers will self-select and chose an order quantity that maximises the total supply chain profit. Through numerical computations, we analyse the dynamics between the benefits of hedging risk, information rent and the retailer's type, and outline cases when, depending on the shape of the reservation utilities of the retailers, it is too costly for the supplier to manage risk. In conclusion, our results show that whereas semi-variance has appealing properties as a measure of risk, its use introduces analytical challenges that can only be overcome through numerical computation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7543
ispartof International journal of production research, 2019-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1772-1796
issn 0020-7543
1366-588X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2197359155
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Taylor & Francis
subjects buyback contracts
Numerical analysis
Order quantity
put option
Retail stores
Risk management
semi-variance
Suppliers
Supply chain management
Supply chains
Utilities
title Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T09%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supply%20chain%20management%20using%20put%20option%20contracts%20with%20information%20asymmetry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20research&rft.au=Basu,%20Preetam&rft.date=2019-03-19&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1772&rft.epage=1796&rft.pages=1772-1796&rft.issn=0020-7543&rft.eissn=1366-588X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00207543.2018.1508900&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2197359155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2197359155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true