Soils from intercropped fields have a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava, caused by Scytalidium lignicola
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the natural suppressive capacity of soils from forest, and monocropping and intercropping systems, against root rot, caused by Scytalidium lignicola, in a greenhouse experiment. We used soils from a tropical dry forest (FOR) and two intercropping an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of phytopathology 2019-04, Vol.167 (4), p.209-217 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 217 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Journal of phytopathology |
container_volume | 167 |
creator | Medeiros, Erika Valente Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara de Barros, Jamilly Alves Duda, Gustavo Pereira Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva Sales Júnior, Rui |
description | The objective of the present study was to evaluate the natural suppressive capacity of soils from forest, and monocropping and intercropping systems, against root rot, caused by Scytalidium lignicola, in a greenhouse experiment. We used soils from a tropical dry forest (FOR) and two intercropping and two monoculture systems. The first intercrop was maize and beans (CORNCOWP), and the second intercrop was cassava, pigeon peas and beans (CASPIGPCOWP). The first monoculture was beans, and the second was passion fruit. The intercropping soils showed a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava than the monoculture because such soils were able to reduce disease severity by about 50%. Bean soil in the monoculture showed less microbial biomass carbon than in the intercrop, with means of 10.05 and 38.2 mg/kg, respectively. The higher density of bacteria and fungal populations, microbial biomass, urease and arylsulphatase activities correlated with a decrease in disease severity. Soils from the intercrops produced changes in soil quality, primarily in the population and density of microorganisms, enzymatic activities, total organic carbon and nutrients, reducing disease severity in cassava plants. These effects were validated by multivariate principal component analysis and showed three distinct groups: one FOR, one intercropping and one monocropping. The majority of vectors were in the direction of FOR and intercropping soils. We have provided some of the first data related to the beneficial effects of intercropping on the suppression of black root rot in cassava, which is validated through different attributes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jph.12788 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2197210596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2197210596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-262f928d174716d3fa8eaa927a21c274c803f2801bb75331cd37eebce658326e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4MoOKcH_4OAJ8Fu-dE26VGGOmWgMD2HNE3XzGypSTsp-McbrVff4b13-Lzvgw8AlxjNcKz5tm1mmDDOj8AEp7RIUErTYzBBBcUJZjw7BWchbBEiiCI0AV9rZ2yAtXc7aPad9sq7ttUVrI22VYCNPGgoYWM2jfZQyVYq0w2wczD0bet1CLC0Ur1D71wXWxdTIhaCPMibuPQhZpUDXKuhk9ZUpt9BazZ7o5yV5-Ckljboi785BW_3d6-LZbJ6fnhc3K4SRQrGE5KTuiC8wixlOK9oLbmWsiBMEqwISxVHtCYc4bJkGaVYVZRpXSqdZ5ySXNMpuBpzW-8-eh06sXW938eXguCCEYyyIo_U9UhFBSF4XYvWm530g8BI_MgVUa74lRvZ-ch-GquH_0Hx9LIcL74BnmZ8ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2197210596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soils from intercropped fields have a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava, caused by Scytalidium lignicola</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Medeiros, Erika Valente ; Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara ; de Barros, Jamilly Alves ; Duda, Gustavo Pereira ; Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos ; Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz ; Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva ; Sales Júnior, Rui</creator><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Erika Valente ; Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara ; de Barros, Jamilly Alves ; Duda, Gustavo Pereira ; Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos ; Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz ; Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva ; Sales Júnior, Rui</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the natural suppressive capacity of soils from forest, and monocropping and intercropping systems, against root rot, caused by Scytalidium lignicola, in a greenhouse experiment. We used soils from a tropical dry forest (FOR) and two intercropping and two monoculture systems. The first intercrop was maize and beans (CORNCOWP), and the second intercrop was cassava, pigeon peas and beans (CASPIGPCOWP). The first monoculture was beans, and the second was passion fruit. The intercropping soils showed a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava than the monoculture because such soils were able to reduce disease severity by about 50%. Bean soil in the monoculture showed less microbial biomass carbon than in the intercrop, with means of 10.05 and 38.2 mg/kg, respectively. The higher density of bacteria and fungal populations, microbial biomass, urease and arylsulphatase activities correlated with a decrease in disease severity. Soils from the intercrops produced changes in soil quality, primarily in the population and density of microorganisms, enzymatic activities, total organic carbon and nutrients, reducing disease severity in cassava plants. These effects were validated by multivariate principal component analysis and showed three distinct groups: one FOR, one intercropping and one monocropping. The majority of vectors were in the direction of FOR and intercropping soils. We have provided some of the first data related to the beneficial effects of intercropping on the suppression of black root rot in cassava, which is validated through different attributes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1785</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jph.12788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Beans ; Biomass ; Black root ; Cassava ; Continuous cropping ; Corn ; disease supression ; Enzymatic activity ; extracellular soil enzyme ; Forests ; Intercropping ; Microorganisms ; Monoculture ; Nutrients ; Organic carbon ; Passion fruit ; Peas ; Pigeonpeas ; Plant diseases ; Population density ; Principal components analysis ; Root rot ; Soil contamination ; soil microbial biomass ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; soil‐borne pathogens ; Total organic carbon ; Tropical forests ; Urease</subject><ispartof>Journal of phytopathology, 2019-04, Vol.167 (4), p.209-217</ispartof><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-262f928d174716d3fa8eaa927a21c274c803f2801bb75331cd37eebce658326e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-262f928d174716d3fa8eaa927a21c274c803f2801bb75331cd37eebce658326e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5033-9745 ; 0000-0001-5543-9414 ; 0000-0001-6696-2454 ; 0000-0001-7325-4915 ; 0000-0002-9544-2527 ; 0000-0002-0998-4945 ; 0000-0001-9097-0649</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjph.12788$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjph.12788$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Erika Valente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros, Jamilly Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duda, Gustavo Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sales Júnior, Rui</creatorcontrib><title>Soils from intercropped fields have a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava, caused by Scytalidium lignicola</title><title>Journal of phytopathology</title><description>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the natural suppressive capacity of soils from forest, and monocropping and intercropping systems, against root rot, caused by Scytalidium lignicola, in a greenhouse experiment. We used soils from a tropical dry forest (FOR) and two intercropping and two monoculture systems. The first intercrop was maize and beans (CORNCOWP), and the second intercrop was cassava, pigeon peas and beans (CASPIGPCOWP). The first monoculture was beans, and the second was passion fruit. The intercropping soils showed a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava than the monoculture because such soils were able to reduce disease severity by about 50%. Bean soil in the monoculture showed less microbial biomass carbon than in the intercrop, with means of 10.05 and 38.2 mg/kg, respectively. The higher density of bacteria and fungal populations, microbial biomass, urease and arylsulphatase activities correlated with a decrease in disease severity. Soils from the intercrops produced changes in soil quality, primarily in the population and density of microorganisms, enzymatic activities, total organic carbon and nutrients, reducing disease severity in cassava plants. These effects were validated by multivariate principal component analysis and showed three distinct groups: one FOR, one intercropping and one monocropping. The majority of vectors were in the direction of FOR and intercropping soils. We have provided some of the first data related to the beneficial effects of intercropping on the suppression of black root rot in cassava, which is validated through different attributes.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Black root</subject><subject>Cassava</subject><subject>Continuous cropping</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>disease supression</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>extracellular soil enzyme</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Intercropping</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Passion fruit</subject><subject>Peas</subject><subject>Pigeonpeas</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Root rot</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>soil microbial biomass</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>soil‐borne pathogens</subject><subject>Total organic carbon</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>Urease</subject><issn>0931-1785</issn><issn>1439-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4MoOKcH_4OAJ8Fu-dE26VGGOmWgMD2HNE3XzGypSTsp-McbrVff4b13-Lzvgw8AlxjNcKz5tm1mmDDOj8AEp7RIUErTYzBBBcUJZjw7BWchbBEiiCI0AV9rZ2yAtXc7aPad9sq7ttUVrI22VYCNPGgoYWM2jfZQyVYq0w2wczD0bet1CLC0Ur1D71wXWxdTIhaCPMibuPQhZpUDXKuhk9ZUpt9BazZ7o5yV5-Ckljboi785BW_3d6-LZbJ6fnhc3K4SRQrGE5KTuiC8wixlOK9oLbmWsiBMEqwISxVHtCYc4bJkGaVYVZRpXSqdZ5ySXNMpuBpzW-8-eh06sXW938eXguCCEYyyIo_U9UhFBSF4XYvWm530g8BI_MgVUa74lRvZ-ch-GquH_0Hx9LIcL74BnmZ8ew</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Medeiros, Erika Valente</creator><creator>Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara</creator><creator>de Barros, Jamilly Alves</creator><creator>Duda, Gustavo Pereira</creator><creator>Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos</creator><creator>Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz</creator><creator>Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva</creator><creator>Sales Júnior, Rui</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-9745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-9414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6696-2454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-2527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0998-4945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-0649</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Soils from intercropped fields have a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava, caused by Scytalidium lignicola</title><author>Medeiros, Erika Valente ; Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara ; de Barros, Jamilly Alves ; Duda, Gustavo Pereira ; Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos ; Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz ; Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva ; Sales Júnior, Rui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2978-262f928d174716d3fa8eaa927a21c274c803f2801bb75331cd37eebce658326e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Black root</topic><topic>Cassava</topic><topic>Continuous cropping</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>disease supression</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>extracellular soil enzyme</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Intercropping</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Passion fruit</topic><topic>Peas</topic><topic>Pigeonpeas</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Root rot</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>soil microbial biomass</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>soil‐borne pathogens</topic><topic>Total organic carbon</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>Urease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Erika Valente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros, Jamilly Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duda, Gustavo Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sales Júnior, Rui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medeiros, Erika Valente</au><au>Notaro, Krystal de Alcantara</au><au>de Barros, Jamilly Alves</au><au>Duda, Gustavo Pereira</au><au>Moraes, Marcele de Cássia Henriques dos Santos</au><au>Ambrósio, Márcia Michelle de Queiroz</au><au>Negreiros, Andreia Mitsa Paiva</au><au>Sales Júnior, Rui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soils from intercropped fields have a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava, caused by Scytalidium lignicola</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>167</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>209-217</pages><issn>0931-1785</issn><eissn>1439-0434</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was to evaluate the natural suppressive capacity of soils from forest, and monocropping and intercropping systems, against root rot, caused by Scytalidium lignicola, in a greenhouse experiment. We used soils from a tropical dry forest (FOR) and two intercropping and two monoculture systems. The first intercrop was maize and beans (CORNCOWP), and the second intercrop was cassava, pigeon peas and beans (CASPIGPCOWP). The first monoculture was beans, and the second was passion fruit. The intercropping soils showed a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava than the monoculture because such soils were able to reduce disease severity by about 50%. Bean soil in the monoculture showed less microbial biomass carbon than in the intercrop, with means of 10.05 and 38.2 mg/kg, respectively. The higher density of bacteria and fungal populations, microbial biomass, urease and arylsulphatase activities correlated with a decrease in disease severity. Soils from the intercrops produced changes in soil quality, primarily in the population and density of microorganisms, enzymatic activities, total organic carbon and nutrients, reducing disease severity in cassava plants. These effects were validated by multivariate principal component analysis and showed three distinct groups: one FOR, one intercropping and one monocropping. The majority of vectors were in the direction of FOR and intercropping soils. We have provided some of the first data related to the beneficial effects of intercropping on the suppression of black root rot in cassava, which is validated through different attributes.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jph.12788</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-9745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-9414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6696-2454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-2527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0998-4945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9097-0649</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-1785 |
ispartof | Journal of phytopathology, 2019-04, Vol.167 (4), p.209-217 |
issn | 0931-1785 1439-0434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2197210596 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural practices Beans Biomass Black root Cassava Continuous cropping Corn disease supression Enzymatic activity extracellular soil enzyme Forests Intercropping Microorganisms Monoculture Nutrients Organic carbon Passion fruit Peas Pigeonpeas Plant diseases Population density Principal components analysis Root rot Soil contamination soil microbial biomass Soil properties Soil quality soil‐borne pathogens Total organic carbon Tropical forests Urease |
title | Soils from intercropped fields have a higher capacity to suppress black root rot in cassava, caused by Scytalidium lignicola |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T01%3A25%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soils%20from%20intercropped%20fields%20have%20a%20higher%20capacity%20to%20suppress%20black%20root%20rot%20in%20cassava,%20caused%20by%20Scytalidium%20lignicola&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phytopathology&rft.au=Medeiros,%20Erika%20Valente&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=209-217&rft.issn=0931-1785&rft.eissn=1439-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jph.12788&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2197210596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2197210596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |