AMERICA'S RAILROAD DEPRECIATION DEBATE, 1907 TO 1913: A STUDY OF DIVERGENCE IN EARLY 20th CENTURY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 1907, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) released new reporting rules that would require railroads to change from betterment to depreciation accounting for equipment. The new rules set off a firestorm of protest because the railroads felt they were already recognizing physical deprecia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Accounting historians journal 2006-06, Vol.33 (1), p.89-124
1. Verfasser: Heier, Jan R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title The Accounting historians journal
container_volume 33
creator Heier, Jan R.
description In June 1907, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) released new reporting rules that would require railroads to change from betterment to depreciation accounting for equipment. The new rules set off a firestorm of protest because the railroads felt they were already recognizing physical depreciation through the current system. The ICC, however, was looking at the concept of economic depreciation to match the cost of equipment with revenue over the life of the asset in much the same way that industry was beginning to account for its fixed assets. Such economic depreciation, it was felt, would give the rate-setting ICC more stable reported incomes to determine return on assets and the investing public a better feel for the results of railroad operations. The debate began in a cordial fashion but deteriorated into bitter name-calling, civil disobedience, and litigation that challenged both the accounting rules and the authority of the ICC to issue and require them. The ICC partially won the debate, yet railroads were able to keep betterment accounting for track structures another 70 years before the full convergence of industry and railroad accounting standards occurred.
doi_str_mv 10.2308/0148-4184.33.1.89
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219630773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A147476830</galeid><jstor_id>40698558</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A147476830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b172ea681a3214aede478b299039f10c28cf25297cafb557a96500b2082678fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1r20AQhpfSQt00P6CHwtJLL5Uy-yHtbm8baeMIHKnIcsGnZS2vUhvHSiWl0H-fNQ45hTkMM_M-MwMvQl8IxJSBvALCZcSJ5DFjMYmleodmlFERcZ7K92j2Ov-IPo3jHgASBukM_dN3pi4y_X2Ja10s6krnODe_apMVuimqMhTXujE_MFEgcFOFTNhPrPGyWeVrXN3gvPht6rkpM4OLEhtdL9aYwvQHZ6ZsVvUa6yyrVmVTlPMA6TLXdb78jD507jD6y5d8gVY3psluo0U1D98sopYJMkUbIqh3qSSOUcKd33ou5IYqBUx1BFoq244mVInWdZskEU6lCcCGgqSpkN2WXaBv572PQ__3yY-T3fdPwzGctJSolIEQLIiis-jeHbzdHbt-Glx7749-cIf-6LtdaGvCBRepZBD08Rv6EFv_sGvfBMgZaId-HAff2cdh9-CG_5aAPdlnT_bYkz2WMUusVIH5emb249QPrwCHVMkkkewZ-0GJjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219630773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AMERICA'S RAILROAD DEPRECIATION DEBATE, 1907 TO 1913: A STUDY OF DIVERGENCE IN EARLY 20th CENTURY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Heier, Jan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heier, Jan R.</creatorcontrib><description>In June 1907, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) released new reporting rules that would require railroads to change from betterment to depreciation accounting for equipment. The new rules set off a firestorm of protest because the railroads felt they were already recognizing physical depreciation through the current system. The ICC, however, was looking at the concept of economic depreciation to match the cost of equipment with revenue over the life of the asset in much the same way that industry was beginning to account for its fixed assets. Such economic depreciation, it was felt, would give the rate-setting ICC more stable reported incomes to determine return on assets and the investing public a better feel for the results of railroad operations. The debate began in a cordial fashion but deteriorated into bitter name-calling, civil disobedience, and litigation that challenged both the accounting rules and the authority of the ICC to issue and require them. The ICC partially won the debate, yet railroads were able to keep betterment accounting for track structures another 70 years before the full convergence of industry and railroad accounting standards occurred.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-4184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-4468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2308/0148-4184.33.1.89</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lakewood Ranch: The Academy of Accounting Historians</publisher><subject>20th century ; Accountancy ; Accounting ; Accounting and auditing ; Accounting changes ; Accounting depreciation ; Accounting methods ; Accounting policies ; Accounting procedures ; Accounting systems ; Annual reports ; Civil disobedience ; Depreciation ; Depreciation costs ; Depreciation methods ; Financial reporting ; Fixed assets ; History ; Innovations ; Interstate commerce ; Interstate Commerce Act-US ; Modernization ; Rail industry ; Rail lines ; Railroads ; Reporting requirements ; Return on assets ; Tariffs ; Technique</subject><ispartof>The Accounting historians journal, 2006-06, Vol.33 (1), p.89-124</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Academy of Accounting Historians</rights><rights>Copyright Academy of Accounting Historians Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b172ea681a3214aede478b299039f10c28cf25297cafb557a96500b2082678fd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40698558$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40698558$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heier, Jan R.</creatorcontrib><title>AMERICA'S RAILROAD DEPRECIATION DEBATE, 1907 TO 1913: A STUDY OF DIVERGENCE IN EARLY 20th CENTURY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS</title><title>The Accounting historians journal</title><description>In June 1907, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) released new reporting rules that would require railroads to change from betterment to depreciation accounting for equipment. The new rules set off a firestorm of protest because the railroads felt they were already recognizing physical depreciation through the current system. The ICC, however, was looking at the concept of economic depreciation to match the cost of equipment with revenue over the life of the asset in much the same way that industry was beginning to account for its fixed assets. Such economic depreciation, it was felt, would give the rate-setting ICC more stable reported incomes to determine return on assets and the investing public a better feel for the results of railroad operations. The debate began in a cordial fashion but deteriorated into bitter name-calling, civil disobedience, and litigation that challenged both the accounting rules and the authority of the ICC to issue and require them. The ICC partially won the debate, yet railroads were able to keep betterment accounting for track structures another 70 years before the full convergence of industry and railroad accounting standards occurred.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Accountancy</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting and auditing</subject><subject>Accounting changes</subject><subject>Accounting depreciation</subject><subject>Accounting methods</subject><subject>Accounting policies</subject><subject>Accounting procedures</subject><subject>Accounting systems</subject><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Civil disobedience</subject><subject>Depreciation</subject><subject>Depreciation costs</subject><subject>Depreciation methods</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Fixed assets</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Interstate commerce</subject><subject>Interstate Commerce Act-US</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Rail industry</subject><subject>Rail lines</subject><subject>Railroads</subject><subject>Reporting requirements</subject><subject>Return on assets</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Technique</subject><issn>0148-4184</issn><issn>2327-4468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1r20AQhpfSQt00P6CHwtJLL5Uy-yHtbm8baeMIHKnIcsGnZS2vUhvHSiWl0H-fNQ45hTkMM_M-MwMvQl8IxJSBvALCZcSJ5DFjMYmleodmlFERcZ7K92j2Ov-IPo3jHgASBukM_dN3pi4y_X2Ja10s6krnODe_apMVuimqMhTXujE_MFEgcFOFTNhPrPGyWeVrXN3gvPht6rkpM4OLEhtdL9aYwvQHZ6ZsVvUa6yyrVmVTlPMA6TLXdb78jD507jD6y5d8gVY3psluo0U1D98sopYJMkUbIqh3qSSOUcKd33ou5IYqBUx1BFoq244mVInWdZskEU6lCcCGgqSpkN2WXaBv572PQ__3yY-T3fdPwzGctJSolIEQLIiis-jeHbzdHbt-Glx7749-cIf-6LtdaGvCBRepZBD08Rv6EFv_sGvfBMgZaId-HAff2cdh9-CG_5aAPdlnT_bYkz2WMUusVIH5emb249QPrwCHVMkkkewZ-0GJjg</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Heier, Jan R.</creator><general>The Academy of Accounting Historians</general><general>Academy of Accounting Historians</general><general>American Accounting Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>AMERICA'S RAILROAD DEPRECIATION DEBATE, 1907 TO 1913: A STUDY OF DIVERGENCE IN EARLY 20th CENTURY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS</title><author>Heier, Jan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b172ea681a3214aede478b299039f10c28cf25297cafb557a96500b2082678fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Accountancy</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting and auditing</topic><topic>Accounting changes</topic><topic>Accounting depreciation</topic><topic>Accounting methods</topic><topic>Accounting policies</topic><topic>Accounting procedures</topic><topic>Accounting systems</topic><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Civil disobedience</topic><topic>Depreciation</topic><topic>Depreciation costs</topic><topic>Depreciation methods</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Fixed assets</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Interstate commerce</topic><topic>Interstate Commerce Act-US</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Rail industry</topic><topic>Rail lines</topic><topic>Railroads</topic><topic>Reporting requirements</topic><topic>Return on assets</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heier, Jan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Accounting historians journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heier, Jan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AMERICA'S RAILROAD DEPRECIATION DEBATE, 1907 TO 1913: A STUDY OF DIVERGENCE IN EARLY 20th CENTURY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS</atitle><jtitle>The Accounting historians journal</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>89-124</pages><issn>0148-4184</issn><eissn>2327-4468</eissn><abstract>In June 1907, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) released new reporting rules that would require railroads to change from betterment to depreciation accounting for equipment. The new rules set off a firestorm of protest because the railroads felt they were already recognizing physical depreciation through the current system. The ICC, however, was looking at the concept of economic depreciation to match the cost of equipment with revenue over the life of the asset in much the same way that industry was beginning to account for its fixed assets. Such economic depreciation, it was felt, would give the rate-setting ICC more stable reported incomes to determine return on assets and the investing public a better feel for the results of railroad operations. The debate began in a cordial fashion but deteriorated into bitter name-calling, civil disobedience, and litigation that challenged both the accounting rules and the authority of the ICC to issue and require them. The ICC partially won the debate, yet railroads were able to keep betterment accounting for track structures another 70 years before the full convergence of industry and railroad accounting standards occurred.</abstract><cop>Lakewood Ranch</cop><pub>The Academy of Accounting Historians</pub><doi>10.2308/0148-4184.33.1.89</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-4184
ispartof The Accounting historians journal, 2006-06, Vol.33 (1), p.89-124
issn 0148-4184
2327-4468
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219630773
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Free E- Journals
subjects 20th century
Accountancy
Accounting
Accounting and auditing
Accounting changes
Accounting depreciation
Accounting methods
Accounting policies
Accounting procedures
Accounting systems
Annual reports
Civil disobedience
Depreciation
Depreciation costs
Depreciation methods
Financial reporting
Fixed assets
History
Innovations
Interstate commerce
Interstate Commerce Act-US
Modernization
Rail industry
Rail lines
Railroads
Reporting requirements
Return on assets
Tariffs
Technique
title AMERICA'S RAILROAD DEPRECIATION DEBATE, 1907 TO 1913: A STUDY OF DIVERGENCE IN EARLY 20th CENTURY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AMERICA'S%20RAILROAD%20DEPRECIATION%20DEBATE,%201907%20TO%201913:%20A%20STUDY%20OF%20DIVERGENCE%20IN%20EARLY%2020th%20CENTURY%20ACCOUNTING%20STANDARDS&rft.jtitle=The%20Accounting%20historians%20journal&rft.au=Heier,%20Jan%20R.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=89-124&rft.issn=0148-4184&rft.eissn=2327-4468&rft_id=info:doi/10.2308/0148-4184.33.1.89&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA147476830%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219630773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A147476830&rft_jstor_id=40698558&rfr_iscdi=true