High‐Resolution Field Mapping and Analysis of the August–October 2016 Coseismic Surface Faulting (Central Italy Earthquakes): Slip Distribution, Parameterization, and Comparison With Global Earthquakes
We focus on the coseismic surface faulting exposed along the Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove fault system (VBF, central Italy), that activated during the 24 August 2016, Amatrice earthquake (Mw 6.0) and soon after reactivated during the 26 October Visso (Mw 5.9) and 30 October Norcia events (Mw 6.5 mainshock)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tectonics (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.417-439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 439 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | Tectonics (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Brozzetti, F. Boncio, P. Cirillo, D. Ferrarini, F. Nardis, R. Testa, A. Liberi, F. Lavecchia, G. |
description | We focus on the coseismic surface faulting exposed along the Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove fault system (VBF, central Italy), that activated during the 24 August 2016, Amatrice earthquake (Mw 6.0) and soon after reactivated during the 26 October Visso (Mw 5.9) and 30 October Norcia events (Mw 6.5 mainshock). We systematically recognized the coseismic surface ruptures of the aforesaid earthquakes, which document the repeated surface faulting on the same seismogenic structure in close temporal succession. We surveyed 1,747 evidence of coseismic ruptures, 325 fault plane attitudes along the Vettoretto‐Redentore segment, and over 4,000 data along the entire VBF that were organized in a GIS‐database. This data set allowed us to estimate the coseismic surface rupture length (SRL), maximum (MD) and average (AD) displacement associated with the Mw 6.0 and Mw 6.5 events. We found that the SRL and MD associated with the former are respectively 5.8 km and 28.5 cm and AD reaches 12.7 cm. For the mainshock, the values of SRL ≥ 22 km and MD = 222 cm were measured. The cumulative, post‐30 October parameters are SRL = 30 km, MD = 240 cm, AD = 36 cm. Despite that the MD of the Mw 6.0 event differs by ~1 order of magnitude respect to the mainshock MD, the two slip profiles display a similar multiscale sinuosity showing a significant control of the long‐term fault segmentation on the coseismic rupturing. Comparing the obtained coseismic parameters with literature global earthquakes data highlights some peculiarities of the 2016 central Italy surface rupture pattern, which suggest caution in applying empirical relationships to highly segmented seismogenic faults.
Key Points
Large data sets of coseismic ruptures, collected along the Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault after the 24 August and 30 October 2016 earthquakes, allow a comparison of the associate surface faulting
Coseismic slip distribution reveals the segmentation pattern and hierarchical organization of a regional fault system in the Apennines
Coseismic parameters of the surface rupture of Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault suggest caution in applying empirical regressions to segmented faults |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018TC005305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2195930970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2195930970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4110-fc16cef4b14a71bf6f96d78d0d189ce5398a36a95ea022adf81bcaf5d3479f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQh0Voodu0tz6AIJcW4nRk-Z96W5zdJJCS0hh6NGNb2lWitRxJpmxPeYRAnisvkSepN9tDTr3MwPDxzY8ZQj4xOGEQi68xsKIqAVIO6QGZMZEkkZjqGzKDOC-iPIH8HXnv_Q0AS9Ism5Gnc71aP98__JTemjFo29Ollqaj33EYdL-i2Hd03qPZeu2pVTSsJZ2Pq9GH5_vHqzbYRjo6Lc5oab3UfqNbej06ha2kSxxN2Ek-l7IPDg29CJOJLtCF9d2It9J_-UavjR7oqfbB6eYlwTH9gQ43Mkin_-B-sotR2s2ATvsp4y8d1vTM2GZyvrJ9IG8VGi8__uuHpFouqvI8urw6uyjnlxEmjEGkWpa1UiUNSzBnjcqUyLq86KBjhWhlykWBPEORSoQ4xk4VrGlRpR1PcqGAH5KjvXZw9m6UPtQ3dnTTkXwdM5EKDiLfUcd7qnXWeydVPTi9QbetGdS7f9Wv_zXhfI__1kZu_8vW1aKsYgYc-F_nspw2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195930970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High‐Resolution Field Mapping and Analysis of the August–October 2016 Coseismic Surface Faulting (Central Italy Earthquakes): Slip Distribution, Parameterization, and Comparison With Global Earthquakes</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Brozzetti, F. ; Boncio, P. ; Cirillo, D. ; Ferrarini, F. ; Nardis, R. ; Testa, A. ; Liberi, F. ; Lavecchia, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brozzetti, F. ; Boncio, P. ; Cirillo, D. ; Ferrarini, F. ; Nardis, R. ; Testa, A. ; Liberi, F. ; Lavecchia, G.</creatorcontrib><description>We focus on the coseismic surface faulting exposed along the Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove fault system (VBF, central Italy), that activated during the 24 August 2016, Amatrice earthquake (Mw 6.0) and soon after reactivated during the 26 October Visso (Mw 5.9) and 30 October Norcia events (Mw 6.5 mainshock). We systematically recognized the coseismic surface ruptures of the aforesaid earthquakes, which document the repeated surface faulting on the same seismogenic structure in close temporal succession. We surveyed 1,747 evidence of coseismic ruptures, 325 fault plane attitudes along the Vettoretto‐Redentore segment, and over 4,000 data along the entire VBF that were organized in a GIS‐database. This data set allowed us to estimate the coseismic surface rupture length (SRL), maximum (MD) and average (AD) displacement associated with the Mw 6.0 and Mw 6.5 events. We found that the SRL and MD associated with the former are respectively 5.8 km and 28.5 cm and AD reaches 12.7 cm. For the mainshock, the values of SRL ≥ 22 km and MD = 222 cm were measured. The cumulative, post‐30 October parameters are SRL = 30 km, MD = 240 cm, AD = 36 cm. Despite that the MD of the Mw 6.0 event differs by ~1 order of magnitude respect to the mainshock MD, the two slip profiles display a similar multiscale sinuosity showing a significant control of the long‐term fault segmentation on the coseismic rupturing. Comparing the obtained coseismic parameters with literature global earthquakes data highlights some peculiarities of the 2016 central Italy surface rupture pattern, which suggest caution in applying empirical relationships to highly segmented seismogenic faults.
Key Points
Large data sets of coseismic ruptures, collected along the Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault after the 24 August and 30 October 2016 earthquakes, allow a comparison of the associate surface faulting
Coseismic slip distribution reveals the segmentation pattern and hierarchical organization of a regional fault system in the Apennines
Coseismic parameters of the surface rupture of Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault suggest caution in applying empirical regressions to segmented faults</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018TC005305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>2016 Central Italy seismic sequence ; coseismic and long‐term slip profiles along a seismogenic fault ; coseismic ground ruptures survey and analysis ; coseismic parameters of the 2016 Italy earthquakes ; Data ; Earthquakes ; Fault lines ; Geographical information systems ; Parameterization ; Parameters ; Profiles ; Seismic activity</subject><ispartof>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.417-439</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4110-fc16cef4b14a71bf6f96d78d0d189ce5398a36a95ea022adf81bcaf5d3479f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4110-fc16cef4b14a71bf6f96d78d0d189ce5398a36a95ea022adf81bcaf5d3479f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6726-4073 ; 0000-0003-3726-0116 ; 0000-0002-4129-5779 ; 0000-0003-0887-4629 ; 0000-0002-0879-4920 ; 0000-0003-1279-5333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018TC005305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018TC005305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brozzetti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boncio, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrarini, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liberi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavecchia, G.</creatorcontrib><title>High‐Resolution Field Mapping and Analysis of the August–October 2016 Coseismic Surface Faulting (Central Italy Earthquakes): Slip Distribution, Parameterization, and Comparison With Global Earthquakes</title><title>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>We focus on the coseismic surface faulting exposed along the Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove fault system (VBF, central Italy), that activated during the 24 August 2016, Amatrice earthquake (Mw 6.0) and soon after reactivated during the 26 October Visso (Mw 5.9) and 30 October Norcia events (Mw 6.5 mainshock). We systematically recognized the coseismic surface ruptures of the aforesaid earthquakes, which document the repeated surface faulting on the same seismogenic structure in close temporal succession. We surveyed 1,747 evidence of coseismic ruptures, 325 fault plane attitudes along the Vettoretto‐Redentore segment, and over 4,000 data along the entire VBF that were organized in a GIS‐database. This data set allowed us to estimate the coseismic surface rupture length (SRL), maximum (MD) and average (AD) displacement associated with the Mw 6.0 and Mw 6.5 events. We found that the SRL and MD associated with the former are respectively 5.8 km and 28.5 cm and AD reaches 12.7 cm. For the mainshock, the values of SRL ≥ 22 km and MD = 222 cm were measured. The cumulative, post‐30 October parameters are SRL = 30 km, MD = 240 cm, AD = 36 cm. Despite that the MD of the Mw 6.0 event differs by ~1 order of magnitude respect to the mainshock MD, the two slip profiles display a similar multiscale sinuosity showing a significant control of the long‐term fault segmentation on the coseismic rupturing. Comparing the obtained coseismic parameters with literature global earthquakes data highlights some peculiarities of the 2016 central Italy surface rupture pattern, which suggest caution in applying empirical relationships to highly segmented seismogenic faults.
Key Points
Large data sets of coseismic ruptures, collected along the Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault after the 24 August and 30 October 2016 earthquakes, allow a comparison of the associate surface faulting
Coseismic slip distribution reveals the segmentation pattern and hierarchical organization of a regional fault system in the Apennines
Coseismic parameters of the surface rupture of Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault suggest caution in applying empirical regressions to segmented faults</description><subject>2016 Central Italy seismic sequence</subject><subject>coseismic and long‐term slip profiles along a seismogenic fault</subject><subject>coseismic ground ruptures survey and analysis</subject><subject>coseismic parameters of the 2016 Italy earthquakes</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><issn>0278-7407</issn><issn>1944-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQh0Voodu0tz6AIJcW4nRk-Z96W5zdJJCS0hh6NGNb2lWitRxJpmxPeYRAnisvkSepN9tDTr3MwPDxzY8ZQj4xOGEQi68xsKIqAVIO6QGZMZEkkZjqGzKDOC-iPIH8HXnv_Q0AS9Ism5Gnc71aP98__JTemjFo29Ollqaj33EYdL-i2Hd03qPZeu2pVTSsJZ2Pq9GH5_vHqzbYRjo6Lc5oab3UfqNbej06ha2kSxxN2Ek-l7IPDg29CJOJLtCF9d2It9J_-UavjR7oqfbB6eYlwTH9gQ43Mkin_-B-sotR2s2ATvsp4y8d1vTM2GZyvrJ9IG8VGi8__uuHpFouqvI8urw6uyjnlxEmjEGkWpa1UiUNSzBnjcqUyLq86KBjhWhlykWBPEORSoQ4xk4VrGlRpR1PcqGAH5KjvXZw9m6UPtQ3dnTTkXwdM5EKDiLfUcd7qnXWeydVPTi9QbetGdS7f9Wv_zXhfI__1kZu_8vW1aKsYgYc-F_nspw2</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Brozzetti, F.</creator><creator>Boncio, P.</creator><creator>Cirillo, D.</creator><creator>Ferrarini, F.</creator><creator>Nardis, R.</creator><creator>Testa, A.</creator><creator>Liberi, F.</creator><creator>Lavecchia, G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-4073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-0116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-5779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-4629</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-4920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-5333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>High‐Resolution Field Mapping and Analysis of the August–October 2016 Coseismic Surface Faulting (Central Italy Earthquakes): Slip Distribution, Parameterization, and Comparison With Global Earthquakes</title><author>Brozzetti, F. ; Boncio, P. ; Cirillo, D. ; Ferrarini, F. ; Nardis, R. ; Testa, A. ; Liberi, F. ; Lavecchia, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4110-fc16cef4b14a71bf6f96d78d0d189ce5398a36a95ea022adf81bcaf5d3479f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>2016 Central Italy seismic sequence</topic><topic>coseismic and long‐term slip profiles along a seismogenic fault</topic><topic>coseismic ground ruptures survey and analysis</topic><topic>coseismic parameters of the 2016 Italy earthquakes</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brozzetti, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boncio, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrarini, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardis, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liberi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavecchia, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brozzetti, F.</au><au>Boncio, P.</au><au>Cirillo, D.</au><au>Ferrarini, F.</au><au>Nardis, R.</au><au>Testa, A.</au><au>Liberi, F.</au><au>Lavecchia, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High‐Resolution Field Mapping and Analysis of the August–October 2016 Coseismic Surface Faulting (Central Italy Earthquakes): Slip Distribution, Parameterization, and Comparison With Global Earthquakes</atitle><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>417-439</pages><issn>0278-7407</issn><eissn>1944-9194</eissn><abstract>We focus on the coseismic surface faulting exposed along the Mt. Vettore‐Mt. Bove fault system (VBF, central Italy), that activated during the 24 August 2016, Amatrice earthquake (Mw 6.0) and soon after reactivated during the 26 October Visso (Mw 5.9) and 30 October Norcia events (Mw 6.5 mainshock). We systematically recognized the coseismic surface ruptures of the aforesaid earthquakes, which document the repeated surface faulting on the same seismogenic structure in close temporal succession. We surveyed 1,747 evidence of coseismic ruptures, 325 fault plane attitudes along the Vettoretto‐Redentore segment, and over 4,000 data along the entire VBF that were organized in a GIS‐database. This data set allowed us to estimate the coseismic surface rupture length (SRL), maximum (MD) and average (AD) displacement associated with the Mw 6.0 and Mw 6.5 events. We found that the SRL and MD associated with the former are respectively 5.8 km and 28.5 cm and AD reaches 12.7 cm. For the mainshock, the values of SRL ≥ 22 km and MD = 222 cm were measured. The cumulative, post‐30 October parameters are SRL = 30 km, MD = 240 cm, AD = 36 cm. Despite that the MD of the Mw 6.0 event differs by ~1 order of magnitude respect to the mainshock MD, the two slip profiles display a similar multiscale sinuosity showing a significant control of the long‐term fault segmentation on the coseismic rupturing. Comparing the obtained coseismic parameters with literature global earthquakes data highlights some peculiarities of the 2016 central Italy surface rupture pattern, which suggest caution in applying empirical relationships to highly segmented seismogenic faults.
Key Points
Large data sets of coseismic ruptures, collected along the Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault after the 24 August and 30 October 2016 earthquakes, allow a comparison of the associate surface faulting
Coseismic slip distribution reveals the segmentation pattern and hierarchical organization of a regional fault system in the Apennines
Coseismic parameters of the surface rupture of Mt. Vettore‐Bove fault suggest caution in applying empirical regressions to segmented faults</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018TC005305</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-4073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-0116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-5779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-4629</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0879-4920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-5333</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7407 |
ispartof | Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2019-02, Vol.38 (2), p.417-439 |
issn | 0278-7407 1944-9194 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2195930970 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence coseismic and long‐term slip profiles along a seismogenic fault coseismic ground ruptures survey and analysis coseismic parameters of the 2016 Italy earthquakes Data Earthquakes Fault lines Geographical information systems Parameterization Parameters Profiles Seismic activity |
title | High‐Resolution Field Mapping and Analysis of the August–October 2016 Coseismic Surface Faulting (Central Italy Earthquakes): Slip Distribution, Parameterization, and Comparison With Global Earthquakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T14%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%E2%80%90Resolution%20Field%20Mapping%20and%20Analysis%20of%20the%20August%E2%80%93October%202016%20Coseismic%20Surface%20Faulting%20(Central%20Italy%20Earthquakes):%20Slip%20Distribution,%20Parameterization,%20and%20Comparison%20With%20Global%20Earthquakes&rft.jtitle=Tectonics%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Brozzetti,%20F.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=417-439&rft.issn=0278-7407&rft.eissn=1944-9194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018TC005305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2195930970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195930970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |