A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development

•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets. Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-manag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2019-03, Vol.82, p.595-608
Hauptverfasser: Mai, Thanh, Mushtaq, Shahbaz, Loch, Adam, Reardon-Smith, K., An-Vo, Duc-Anh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 608
container_issue
container_start_page 595
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 82
creator Mai, Thanh
Mushtaq, Shahbaz
Loch, Adam
Reardon-Smith, K.
An-Vo, Duc-Anh
description •Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets. Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2195862409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837718313267</els_id><sourcerecordid>2195862409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwHyxxTvAzD26looBUiQtI3CzH3rQOaRJsp6j_nlRF4shpDzszu_MhhClJKaHZXZO2urNjgKFvU0ZomRKaEiLO0IwWOU9kLsU5mhGWiaTgeX6JrkJoCCFZSdkMfSxwOIQIu4Dj1nWfrttgPQy-12aLY4-_dQSPo9cW7vHKdfYoaGEPXm8A173HYQxRu05XLWA7Ldp-2EEXr9FFrdsAN79zjt5Xj2_L52T9-vSyXKwTw0UWE5PXIqfWFpUklSkKU9EypxVnghWiFpCROpN1zSyUsmBAOUhRcsmtFEKwkvM5uj3lTj9_jRCiavrRd9NJxejkyZgg5aQqTirj-xA81Grwbqf9QVGijhxVo_44qiNHRaiaOE7Wh5MVphZ7B14F46AzYJ0HE5Xt3f8hP48MgYc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195862409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mai, Thanh ; Mushtaq, Shahbaz ; Loch, Adam ; Reardon-Smith, K. ; An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creator><creatorcontrib>Mai, Thanh ; Mushtaq, Shahbaz ; Loch, Adam ; Reardon-Smith, K. ; An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creatorcontrib><description>•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets. Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Constraints ; Dynamic complexity ; Feedback loops ; Interest groups ; Land use ; Leverage ; Markets ; Murray-Darling Basin ; Participation ; Risk management ; Scarcity ; Sustainable development ; System effectiveness ; Trade ; Trade policy ; Transaction costs ; Water markets ; Water resources management ; Water scarcity</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2019-03, Vol.82, p.595-608</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7528-7139 ; 0000-0002-1436-8768 ; 0000-0002-0997-3058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718313267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mai, Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon-Smith, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creatorcontrib><title>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets. Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.</description><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Dynamic complexity</subject><subject>Feedback loops</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Murray-Darling Basin</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>Water markets</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwHyxxTvAzD26looBUiQtI3CzH3rQOaRJsp6j_nlRF4shpDzszu_MhhClJKaHZXZO2urNjgKFvU0ZomRKaEiLO0IwWOU9kLsU5mhGWiaTgeX6JrkJoCCFZSdkMfSxwOIQIu4Dj1nWfrttgPQy-12aLY4-_dQSPo9cW7vHKdfYoaGEPXm8A173HYQxRu05XLWA7Ldp-2EEXr9FFrdsAN79zjt5Xj2_L52T9-vSyXKwTw0UWE5PXIqfWFpUklSkKU9EypxVnghWiFpCROpN1zSyUsmBAOUhRcsmtFEKwkvM5uj3lTj9_jRCiavrRd9NJxejkyZgg5aQqTirj-xA81Grwbqf9QVGijhxVo_44qiNHRaiaOE7Wh5MVphZ7B14F46AzYJ0HE5Xt3f8hP48MgYc</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Mai, Thanh</creator><creator>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</creator><creator>Loch, Adam</creator><creator>Reardon-Smith, K.</creator><creator>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-7139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-8768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-3058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</title><author>Mai, Thanh ; Mushtaq, Shahbaz ; Loch, Adam ; Reardon-Smith, K. ; An-Vo, Duc-Anh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Dynamic complexity</topic><topic>Feedback loops</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Murray-Darling Basin</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>Water markets</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mai, Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon-Smith, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mai, Thanh</au><au>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</au><au>Loch, Adam</au><au>Reardon-Smith, K.</au><au>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>595</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>595-608</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets. Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-7139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-8768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-3058</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2019-03, Vol.82, p.595-608
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2195862409
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Constraints
Dynamic complexity
Feedback loops
Interest groups
Land use
Leverage
Markets
Murray-Darling Basin
Participation
Risk management
Scarcity
Sustainable development
System effectiveness
Trade
Trade policy
Transaction costs
Water markets
Water resources management
Water scarcity
title A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systems%20thinking%20approach%20to%20water%20trade:%20Finding%20leverage%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Mai,%20Thanh&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=595-608&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2195862409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195862409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837718313267&rfr_iscdi=true