A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development
•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets. Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-manag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land use policy 2019-03, Vol.82, p.595-608 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 608 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 595 |
container_title | Land use policy |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Mai, Thanh Mushtaq, Shahbaz Loch, Adam Reardon-Smith, K. An-Vo, Duc-Anh |
description | •Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets.
Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2195862409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837718313267</els_id><sourcerecordid>2195862409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwHyxxTvAzD26looBUiQtI3CzH3rQOaRJsp6j_nlRF4shpDzszu_MhhClJKaHZXZO2urNjgKFvU0ZomRKaEiLO0IwWOU9kLsU5mhGWiaTgeX6JrkJoCCFZSdkMfSxwOIQIu4Dj1nWfrttgPQy-12aLY4-_dQSPo9cW7vHKdfYoaGEPXm8A173HYQxRu05XLWA7Ldp-2EEXr9FFrdsAN79zjt5Xj2_L52T9-vSyXKwTw0UWE5PXIqfWFpUklSkKU9EypxVnghWiFpCROpN1zSyUsmBAOUhRcsmtFEKwkvM5uj3lTj9_jRCiavrRd9NJxejkyZgg5aQqTirj-xA81Grwbqf9QVGijhxVo_44qiNHRaiaOE7Wh5MVphZ7B14F46AzYJ0HE5Xt3f8hP48MgYc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195862409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mai, Thanh ; Mushtaq, Shahbaz ; Loch, Adam ; Reardon-Smith, K. ; An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creator><creatorcontrib>Mai, Thanh ; Mushtaq, Shahbaz ; Loch, Adam ; Reardon-Smith, K. ; An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creatorcontrib><description>•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets.
Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Constraints ; Dynamic complexity ; Feedback loops ; Interest groups ; Land use ; Leverage ; Markets ; Murray-Darling Basin ; Participation ; Risk management ; Scarcity ; Sustainable development ; System effectiveness ; Trade ; Trade policy ; Transaction costs ; Water markets ; Water resources management ; Water scarcity</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2019-03, Vol.82, p.595-608</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7528-7139 ; 0000-0002-1436-8768 ; 0000-0002-0997-3058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718313267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mai, Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon-Smith, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creatorcontrib><title>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets.
Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.</description><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Dynamic complexity</subject><subject>Feedback loops</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leverage</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Murray-Darling Basin</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><subject>Water markets</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwHyxxTvAzD26looBUiQtI3CzH3rQOaRJsp6j_nlRF4shpDzszu_MhhClJKaHZXZO2urNjgKFvU0ZomRKaEiLO0IwWOU9kLsU5mhGWiaTgeX6JrkJoCCFZSdkMfSxwOIQIu4Dj1nWfrttgPQy-12aLY4-_dQSPo9cW7vHKdfYoaGEPXm8A173HYQxRu05XLWA7Ldp-2EEXr9FFrdsAN79zjt5Xj2_L52T9-vSyXKwTw0UWE5PXIqfWFpUklSkKU9EypxVnghWiFpCROpN1zSyUsmBAOUhRcsmtFEKwkvM5uj3lTj9_jRCiavrRd9NJxejkyZgg5aQqTirj-xA81Grwbqf9QVGijhxVo_44qiNHRaiaOE7Wh5MVphZ7B14F46AzYJ0HE5Xt3f8hP48MgYc</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Mai, Thanh</creator><creator>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</creator><creator>Loch, Adam</creator><creator>Reardon-Smith, K.</creator><creator>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-7139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-8768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-3058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</title><author>Mai, Thanh ; Mushtaq, Shahbaz ; Loch, Adam ; Reardon-Smith, K. ; An-Vo, Duc-Anh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-c7f471dd8b50bc88cb1971b324284f4e60f65ff2de9582e13e549353d54442933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Dynamic complexity</topic><topic>Feedback loops</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leverage</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Murray-Darling Basin</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><topic>Water markets</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mai, Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reardon-Smith, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mai, Thanh</au><au>Mushtaq, Shahbaz</au><au>Loch, Adam</au><au>Reardon-Smith, K.</au><au>An-Vo, Duc-Anh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>595</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>595-608</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>•Water trade is a key water scarcity risk-management tool for water users.•Behaviour of water markets is controlled by a number of interacting feedback loops.•Systems thinking offers a holistic approach to developing sustainable water markets.
Water trading has become a key water scarcity risk-management tool for irrigators. Effective and enduring water trade systems require approaches that can cope with dynamic complexity and enable the inclusion of multiple stakeholders. Previous efforts to improve water trade systems have largely focused on reductionist approaches, which examine system components in isolation neglecting their interconnected nature. Such approaches to water trade system assessment are at risk of maladaptation resulting in increased market inefficiencies, transaction costs and market failure through barriers to participation. Using a systems thinking approach, we develop a conceptual model of a generalised water trade system in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB or the Basin). The model visualises the Basin's water trade systems as a whole and identifies feedback mechanisms likely to influence trade development and endurance. We argue that such a conceptual model provides an effective communication tool for achieving a better understanding of market dynamics and alignment of stakeholder priorities to improve enduring market use. It can also serve as an assessment/evaluation tool for water trade policy and identify key leverage points for systemic interventions.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-7139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-8768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-3058</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-8377 |
ispartof | Land use policy, 2019-03, Vol.82, p.595-608 |
issn | 0264-8377 1873-5754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2195862409 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Constraints Dynamic complexity Feedback loops Interest groups Land use Leverage Markets Murray-Darling Basin Participation Risk management Scarcity Sustainable development System effectiveness Trade Trade policy Transaction costs Water markets Water resources management Water scarcity |
title | A systems thinking approach to water trade: Finding leverage for sustainable development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systems%20thinking%20approach%20to%20water%20trade:%20Finding%20leverage%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Mai,%20Thanh&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=595-608&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2195862409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195862409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837718313267&rfr_iscdi=true |