The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued
In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the conseq...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leiden journal of international law 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.645-669 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 669 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | Leiden journal of international law |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | NOUWEN, SARAH M. H. |
description | In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0922156505002918 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219564123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0922156505002918</cupid><sourcerecordid>1401493291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-bb126837339f3e03c7b68edbd556397cd2c012b00885b07295a855290912e093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANws7oG1Xf9xQxG0lYpQ1Ug9GidxIKVJipNI9O1x1AoOiNMedr6d2UHomsAtASLvVqApJVxw4ABUE3WCRmQiVaSFVqdoNKyjYX-OLtp2AwBagRqh1-Td4dXOZaXd4rjpfYeLxuNV6by3eOGa2mFb57gLsnlV9XXZ7XFT4MTut42_xwP-4L1rO7y2Aak7HNvWhVN1V9a9yy_RWWG3rbs6zjFKnh6TeBYtXqbz-GERZYzILkpTQoVikjFdMAcsk6lQLk9zzgXTMstpBoSmAErxFCTV3CrOqQZNqAPNxujmcHbnm88-xDGb8EwdHA0lmosJoSyIyEGU-aZtvSvMzpeV9XtDwAw1mj81BiY6MGXbua8fwPoPIyST3Ijp0jxzuZ6yZGlmQc-OHrZKfZm_ud8k_7t8A3Z1gQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219564123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creatorcontrib><description>In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-1565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0922156505002918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Arrest Warrant case ; Arrest warrants ; CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS ; hybrid courts ; Immunity from prosecution ; immunity ratione materiae and personae ; International courts ; International crime ; international criminal courts ; International law ; International relations ; Jurisdiction ; Military withdrawals ; Peace negotiations ; Presidents ; Sovereignty ; Special Court for Sierra Leone ; Taylor</subject><ispartof>Leiden journal of international law, 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.645-669</ispartof><rights>2005 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-bb126837339f3e03c7b68edbd556397cd2c012b00885b07295a855290912e093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0922156505002918/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creatorcontrib><title>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</title><title>Leiden journal of international law</title><addtitle>Leiden Journal of International Law</addtitle><description>In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Arrest Warrant case</subject><subject>Arrest warrants</subject><subject>CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS</subject><subject>hybrid courts</subject><subject>Immunity from prosecution</subject><subject>immunity ratione materiae and personae</subject><subject>International courts</subject><subject>International crime</subject><subject>international criminal courts</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Military withdrawals</subject><subject>Peace negotiations</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Special Court for Sierra Leone</subject><subject>Taylor</subject><issn>0922-1565</issn><issn>1478-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANws7oG1Xf9xQxG0lYpQ1Ug9GidxIKVJipNI9O1x1AoOiNMedr6d2UHomsAtASLvVqApJVxw4ABUE3WCRmQiVaSFVqdoNKyjYX-OLtp2AwBagRqh1-Td4dXOZaXd4rjpfYeLxuNV6by3eOGa2mFb57gLsnlV9XXZ7XFT4MTut42_xwP-4L1rO7y2Aak7HNvWhVN1V9a9yy_RWWG3rbs6zjFKnh6TeBYtXqbz-GERZYzILkpTQoVikjFdMAcsk6lQLk9zzgXTMstpBoSmAErxFCTV3CrOqQZNqAPNxujmcHbnm88-xDGb8EwdHA0lmosJoSyIyEGU-aZtvSvMzpeV9XtDwAw1mj81BiY6MGXbua8fwPoPIyST3Ijp0jxzuZ6yZGlmQc-OHrZKfZm_ud8k_7t8A3Z1gQU</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</title><author>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-bb126837339f3e03c7b68edbd556397cd2c012b00885b07295a855290912e093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Arrest Warrant case</topic><topic>Arrest warrants</topic><topic>CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS</topic><topic>hybrid courts</topic><topic>Immunity from prosecution</topic><topic>immunity ratione materiae and personae</topic><topic>International courts</topic><topic>International crime</topic><topic>international criminal courts</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Military withdrawals</topic><topic>Peace negotiations</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Special Court for Sierra Leone</topic><topic>Taylor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</atitle><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle><addtitle>Leiden Journal of International Law</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>645-669</pages><issn>0922-1565</issn><eissn>1478-9698</eissn><abstract>In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0922156505002918</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-1565 |
ispartof | Leiden journal of international law, 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.645-669 |
issn | 0922-1565 1478-9698 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_219564123 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Agreements Arrest Warrant case Arrest warrants CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS hybrid courts Immunity from prosecution immunity ratione materiae and personae International courts International crime international criminal courts International law International relations Jurisdiction Military withdrawals Peace negotiations Presidents Sovereignty Special Court for Sierra Leone Taylor |
title | The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A09%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Special%20Court%20for%20Sierra%20Leone%20and%20the%20Immunity%20of%20Taylor:%20The%20Arrest%20Warrant%20Case%20Continued&rft.jtitle=Leiden%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=NOUWEN,%20SARAH%20M.%20H.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=645-669&rft.issn=0922-1565&rft.eissn=1478-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0922156505002918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1401493291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219564123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0922156505002918&rfr_iscdi=true |