The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued

In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the conseq...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Leiden journal of international law 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.645-669
1. Verfasser: NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 669
container_issue 3
container_start_page 645
container_title Leiden journal of international law
container_volume 18
creator NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.
description In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0922156505002918
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219564123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0922156505002918</cupid><sourcerecordid>1401493291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-bb126837339f3e03c7b68edbd556397cd2c012b00885b07295a855290912e093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANws7oG1Xf9xQxG0lYpQ1Ug9GidxIKVJipNI9O1x1AoOiNMedr6d2UHomsAtASLvVqApJVxw4ABUE3WCRmQiVaSFVqdoNKyjYX-OLtp2AwBagRqh1-Td4dXOZaXd4rjpfYeLxuNV6by3eOGa2mFb57gLsnlV9XXZ7XFT4MTut42_xwP-4L1rO7y2Aak7HNvWhVN1V9a9yy_RWWG3rbs6zjFKnh6TeBYtXqbz-GERZYzILkpTQoVikjFdMAcsk6lQLk9zzgXTMstpBoSmAErxFCTV3CrOqQZNqAPNxujmcHbnm88-xDGb8EwdHA0lmosJoSyIyEGU-aZtvSvMzpeV9XtDwAw1mj81BiY6MGXbua8fwPoPIyST3Ijp0jxzuZ6yZGlmQc-OHrZKfZm_ud8k_7t8A3Z1gQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219564123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creatorcontrib><description>In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-1565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0922156505002918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Arrest Warrant case ; Arrest warrants ; CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS ; hybrid courts ; Immunity from prosecution ; immunity ratione materiae and personae ; International courts ; International crime ; international criminal courts ; International law ; International relations ; Jurisdiction ; Military withdrawals ; Peace negotiations ; Presidents ; Sovereignty ; Special Court for Sierra Leone ; Taylor</subject><ispartof>Leiden journal of international law, 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.645-669</ispartof><rights>2005 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-bb126837339f3e03c7b68edbd556397cd2c012b00885b07295a855290912e093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0922156505002918/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creatorcontrib><title>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</title><title>Leiden journal of international law</title><addtitle>Leiden Journal of International Law</addtitle><description>In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Arrest Warrant case</subject><subject>Arrest warrants</subject><subject>CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS</subject><subject>hybrid courts</subject><subject>Immunity from prosecution</subject><subject>immunity ratione materiae and personae</subject><subject>International courts</subject><subject>International crime</subject><subject>international criminal courts</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Military withdrawals</subject><subject>Peace negotiations</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Special Court for Sierra Leone</subject><subject>Taylor</subject><issn>0922-1565</issn><issn>1478-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANws7oG1Xf9xQxG0lYpQ1Ug9GidxIKVJipNI9O1x1AoOiNMedr6d2UHomsAtASLvVqApJVxw4ABUE3WCRmQiVaSFVqdoNKyjYX-OLtp2AwBagRqh1-Td4dXOZaXd4rjpfYeLxuNV6by3eOGa2mFb57gLsnlV9XXZ7XFT4MTut42_xwP-4L1rO7y2Aak7HNvWhVN1V9a9yy_RWWG3rbs6zjFKnh6TeBYtXqbz-GERZYzILkpTQoVikjFdMAcsk6lQLk9zzgXTMstpBoSmAErxFCTV3CrOqQZNqAPNxujmcHbnm88-xDGb8EwdHA0lmosJoSyIyEGU-aZtvSvMzpeV9XtDwAw1mj81BiY6MGXbua8fwPoPIyST3Ijp0jxzuZ6yZGlmQc-OHrZKfZm_ud8k_7t8A3Z1gQU</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</title><author>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-bb126837339f3e03c7b68edbd556397cd2c012b00885b07295a855290912e093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Arrest Warrant case</topic><topic>Arrest warrants</topic><topic>CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS</topic><topic>hybrid courts</topic><topic>Immunity from prosecution</topic><topic>immunity ratione materiae and personae</topic><topic>International courts</topic><topic>International crime</topic><topic>international criminal courts</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Military withdrawals</topic><topic>Peace negotiations</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Special Court for Sierra Leone</topic><topic>Taylor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOUWEN, SARAH M. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued</atitle><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle><addtitle>Leiden Journal of International Law</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>645-669</pages><issn>0922-1565</issn><eissn>1478-9698</eissn><abstract>In its Taylor decision the Special Court for Sierra Leone denied immunity ratione personae to the, at the time of the indictment, President of Liberia. This article first analyzes the legal reasoning of that decision. The Court's finding that it is an international court is approved; the consequence it attaches to that finding is criticized. The decision is then presented as an illustration of the negative consequences of relying upon controversial elements of the ICJ's Arrest Warrant case. It is suggested that instead of the distinction between national and international courts, the difference between criminal responsibility and procedural immunity could have been the basis for the reasoning of the ICJ and Special Court.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0922156505002918</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0922-1565
ispartof Leiden journal of international law, 2005-10, Vol.18 (3), p.645-669
issn 0922-1565
1478-9698
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219564123
source PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Agreements
Arrest Warrant case
Arrest warrants
CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS
hybrid courts
Immunity from prosecution
immunity ratione materiae and personae
International courts
International crime
international criminal courts
International law
International relations
Jurisdiction
Military withdrawals
Peace negotiations
Presidents
Sovereignty
Special Court for Sierra Leone
Taylor
title The Special Court for Sierra Leone and the Immunity of Taylor: The Arrest Warrant Case Continued
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A09%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Special%20Court%20for%20Sierra%20Leone%20and%20the%20Immunity%20of%20Taylor:%20The%20Arrest%20Warrant%20Case%20Continued&rft.jtitle=Leiden%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=NOUWEN,%20SARAH%20M.%20H.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=645-669&rft.issn=0922-1565&rft.eissn=1478-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0922156505002918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1401493291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219564123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0922156505002918&rfr_iscdi=true