Impact of urine preservation methods and duration of storage on measured levels of environmental contaminants

Collection of urine samples in human studies involves choices regarding shipping, sample preservation, and storage that may ultimately influence future analysis. As more studies collect and archive urine samples to evaluate environmental exposures in the future, we were interested in assessing the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology 2006-01, Vol.16 (1), p.39
Hauptverfasser: Hoppin, Jane A, Ulmer, Ross, Calafat, Antonia M, Barr, Dana B, Baker, Susan V, Meltzer, Helle M, Rønningen, Kjersti S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology
container_volume 16
creator Hoppin, Jane A
Ulmer, Ross
Calafat, Antonia M
Barr, Dana B
Baker, Susan V
Meltzer, Helle M
Rønningen, Kjersti S
description Collection of urine samples in human studies involves choices regarding shipping, sample preservation, and storage that may ultimately influence future analysis. As more studies collect and archive urine samples to evaluate environmental exposures in the future, we were interested in assessing the impact of urine preservative, storage temperature, and time since collection on nonpersistent contaminants in urine samples. In spiked urine samples stored in three types of urine vacutainers (no preservative, boric acid, and chlorhexidine), we measured five groups of contaminants to assess the levels of these analytes at five time points (0, 24, 48, and 72 h, and 1 week) and at two temperatures (room temperature and 4 degrees C). The target chemicals were bisphenol A (BPA), metabolites of organophosphate (OP), carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides, chlorinated phenols, and phthalate monoesters, and were measured using five different mass spectrometry-based methods. Three samples were analyzed at each time point, with the exception of BPA. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate effects of storage time, temperature, and preservative. Stability was summarized with percent change in mean concentration from time 0. In general, most analytes were stable under all conditions with changes in mean concentration over time, temperature, and preservative being generally less than 20%, with the exception of the OP metabolites in the presence of boric acid. The effect of storage temperature was less important than time since collection. The precision of the laboratory measurements was high allowing us to observe small differences, which may not be important when categorizing individuals into broader exposure groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.jes.7500435
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219530947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>979408811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2195309473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNir9PwzAQRi1EpZYfa-dT9wYbxw2ZKyrYO3SrrOZaEsXncGfn7ydAxcz0Pn3vKbU0ujDavjxJV3QoReW0Lq27UQvjXL3Wm_Jw-7etmas7kW5KymqjFyq8h8GfEsQzZG4JYWAU5NGnNhIETB-xEfDUQJP595xSSZH9BeEn8ZIZG-hxxF6-LdLYcqSAlHwPpzghtOQpyYOanX0v-HjlvVrtXvfbt_XA8TOjpGMXM9Okjs-mdlbXZWX_FX0Bo45Rfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219530947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of urine preservation methods and duration of storage on measured levels of environmental contaminants</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hoppin, Jane A ; Ulmer, Ross ; Calafat, Antonia M ; Barr, Dana B ; Baker, Susan V ; Meltzer, Helle M ; Rønningen, Kjersti S</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoppin, Jane A ; Ulmer, Ross ; Calafat, Antonia M ; Barr, Dana B ; Baker, Susan V ; Meltzer, Helle M ; Rønningen, Kjersti S</creatorcontrib><description>Collection of urine samples in human studies involves choices regarding shipping, sample preservation, and storage that may ultimately influence future analysis. As more studies collect and archive urine samples to evaluate environmental exposures in the future, we were interested in assessing the impact of urine preservative, storage temperature, and time since collection on nonpersistent contaminants in urine samples. In spiked urine samples stored in three types of urine vacutainers (no preservative, boric acid, and chlorhexidine), we measured five groups of contaminants to assess the levels of these analytes at five time points (0, 24, 48, and 72 h, and 1 week) and at two temperatures (room temperature and 4 degrees C). The target chemicals were bisphenol A (BPA), metabolites of organophosphate (OP), carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides, chlorinated phenols, and phthalate monoesters, and were measured using five different mass spectrometry-based methods. Three samples were analyzed at each time point, with the exception of BPA. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate effects of storage time, temperature, and preservative. Stability was summarized with percent change in mean concentration from time 0. In general, most analytes were stable under all conditions with changes in mean concentration over time, temperature, and preservative being generally less than 20%, with the exception of the OP metabolites in the presence of boric acid. The effect of storage temperature was less important than time since collection. The precision of the laboratory measurements was high allowing us to observe small differences, which may not be important when categorizing individuals into broader exposure groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-0631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-064X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tuxedo: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Bisphenol A ; Contaminants ; Epidemiology ; Exposure ; Insecticides ; Mass spectrometry ; Metabolites ; Organophosphates ; Phenols ; Phthalates ; Preservatives ; Pyrethroids ; Sample preservation ; Urine ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of exposure science &amp; environmental epidemiology, 2006-01, Vol.16 (1), p.39</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jan 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoppin, Jane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulmer, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calafat, Antonia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Dana B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Susan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meltzer, Helle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rønningen, Kjersti S</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of urine preservation methods and duration of storage on measured levels of environmental contaminants</title><title>Journal of exposure science &amp; environmental epidemiology</title><description>Collection of urine samples in human studies involves choices regarding shipping, sample preservation, and storage that may ultimately influence future analysis. As more studies collect and archive urine samples to evaluate environmental exposures in the future, we were interested in assessing the impact of urine preservative, storage temperature, and time since collection on nonpersistent contaminants in urine samples. In spiked urine samples stored in three types of urine vacutainers (no preservative, boric acid, and chlorhexidine), we measured five groups of contaminants to assess the levels of these analytes at five time points (0, 24, 48, and 72 h, and 1 week) and at two temperatures (room temperature and 4 degrees C). The target chemicals were bisphenol A (BPA), metabolites of organophosphate (OP), carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides, chlorinated phenols, and phthalate monoesters, and were measured using five different mass spectrometry-based methods. Three samples were analyzed at each time point, with the exception of BPA. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate effects of storage time, temperature, and preservative. Stability was summarized with percent change in mean concentration from time 0. In general, most analytes were stable under all conditions with changes in mean concentration over time, temperature, and preservative being generally less than 20%, with the exception of the OP metabolites in the presence of boric acid. The effect of storage temperature was less important than time since collection. The precision of the laboratory measurements was high allowing us to observe small differences, which may not be important when categorizing individuals into broader exposure groups.</description><subject>Bisphenol A</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Organophosphates</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Phthalates</subject><subject>Preservatives</subject><subject>Pyrethroids</subject><subject>Sample preservation</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1559-0631</issn><issn>1559-064X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNir9PwzAQRi1EpZYfa-dT9wYbxw2ZKyrYO3SrrOZaEsXncGfn7ydAxcz0Pn3vKbU0ujDavjxJV3QoReW0Lq27UQvjXL3Wm_Jw-7etmas7kW5KymqjFyq8h8GfEsQzZG4JYWAU5NGnNhIETB-xEfDUQJP595xSSZH9BeEn8ZIZG-hxxF6-LdLYcqSAlHwPpzghtOQpyYOanX0v-HjlvVrtXvfbt_XA8TOjpGMXM9Okjs-mdlbXZWX_FX0Bo45Rfw</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Hoppin, Jane A</creator><creator>Ulmer, Ross</creator><creator>Calafat, Antonia M</creator><creator>Barr, Dana B</creator><creator>Baker, Susan V</creator><creator>Meltzer, Helle M</creator><creator>Rønningen, Kjersti S</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Impact of urine preservation methods and duration of storage on measured levels of environmental contaminants</title><author>Hoppin, Jane A ; Ulmer, Ross ; Calafat, Antonia M ; Barr, Dana B ; Baker, Susan V ; Meltzer, Helle M ; Rønningen, Kjersti S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2195309473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bisphenol A</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Organophosphates</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Phthalates</topic><topic>Preservatives</topic><topic>Pyrethroids</topic><topic>Sample preservation</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoppin, Jane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulmer, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calafat, Antonia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Dana B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Susan V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meltzer, Helle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rønningen, Kjersti S</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of exposure science &amp; environmental epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoppin, Jane A</au><au>Ulmer, Ross</au><au>Calafat, Antonia M</au><au>Barr, Dana B</au><au>Baker, Susan V</au><au>Meltzer, Helle M</au><au>Rønningen, Kjersti S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of urine preservation methods and duration of storage on measured levels of environmental contaminants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of exposure science &amp; environmental epidemiology</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><pages>39-</pages><issn>1559-0631</issn><eissn>1559-064X</eissn><abstract>Collection of urine samples in human studies involves choices regarding shipping, sample preservation, and storage that may ultimately influence future analysis. As more studies collect and archive urine samples to evaluate environmental exposures in the future, we were interested in assessing the impact of urine preservative, storage temperature, and time since collection on nonpersistent contaminants in urine samples. In spiked urine samples stored in three types of urine vacutainers (no preservative, boric acid, and chlorhexidine), we measured five groups of contaminants to assess the levels of these analytes at five time points (0, 24, 48, and 72 h, and 1 week) and at two temperatures (room temperature and 4 degrees C). The target chemicals were bisphenol A (BPA), metabolites of organophosphate (OP), carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides, chlorinated phenols, and phthalate monoesters, and were measured using five different mass spectrometry-based methods. Three samples were analyzed at each time point, with the exception of BPA. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate effects of storage time, temperature, and preservative. Stability was summarized with percent change in mean concentration from time 0. In general, most analytes were stable under all conditions with changes in mean concentration over time, temperature, and preservative being generally less than 20%, with the exception of the OP metabolites in the presence of boric acid. The effect of storage temperature was less important than time since collection. The precision of the laboratory measurements was high allowing us to observe small differences, which may not be important when categorizing individuals into broader exposure groups.</abstract><cop>Tuxedo</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1038/sj.jes.7500435</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-0631
ispartof Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2006-01, Vol.16 (1), p.39
issn 1559-0631
1559-064X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219530947
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Bisphenol A
Contaminants
Epidemiology
Exposure
Insecticides
Mass spectrometry
Metabolites
Organophosphates
Phenols
Phthalates
Preservatives
Pyrethroids
Sample preservation
Urine
Variance analysis
title Impact of urine preservation methods and duration of storage on measured levels of environmental contaminants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20urine%20preservation%20methods%20and%20duration%20of%20storage%20on%20measured%20levels%20of%20environmental%20contaminants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20exposure%20science%20&%20environmental%20epidemiology&rft.au=Hoppin,%20Jane%20A&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.pages=39-&rft.issn=1559-0631&rft.eissn=1559-064X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.jes.7500435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E979408811%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219530947&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true