Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer

Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) coun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.599-609
Hauptverfasser: CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA, POKORNY, BOŠTJAN, BOTTERO, ELISA, FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA, MATTIOLI, LUCA, APOLLONIO, MARCO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 609
container_issue 3
container_start_page 599
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 83
creator CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA
POKORNY, BOŠTJAN
BOTTERO, ELISA
FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA
MATTIOLI, LUCA
APOLLONIO, MARCO
description Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.21623
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2194683126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26695329</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26695329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUgIMoOKcX70LBm9CZl7RJcxzTzclEEEVvIc1eR0vXzqRj7N-bWfXo6R3e970HHyGXQEdAKbutduvViIFg_IgMQHEZswzkMRmEJYvTBD5OyZn3FaUcIBMDwqbGdq3z0bgo0HZls4rm601tms50ZdtEU1PWW4dR2UQvLUZ3iO6cnBSm9njxM4fkbXr_OnmIF8-z-WS8iC1PFY8lX_LwQhVLmqkUc15QLqiVADJlMhN5YpIkoyhQLlWeWwOJlYgJChsEmvEhue7vblz7uUXf6arduia81AxUIjIOTATqpqesa713WOiNK9fG7TVQfWiiD030d5MAQw_vyhr3_5D68f1p9utc9U7lQ6g_hwmhUs4U_wKZHGtd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194683126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA ; POKORNY, BOŠTJAN ; BOTTERO, ELISA ; FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA ; MATTIOLI, LUCA ; APOLLONIO, MARCO</creator><creatorcontrib>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA ; POKORNY, BOŠTJAN ; BOTTERO, ELISA ; FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA ; MATTIOLI, LUCA ; APOLLONIO, MARCO</creatorcontrib><description>Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age factors ; Annual variations ; Body mass ; Capreolus capreolus ; central Italy ; Climatic conditions ; corpus luteum ; Counting ; Deer ; Elevation ; Environmental factors ; Females ; fetus ; Fetuses ; Implantation ; implantation failure ; litter size ; Ovulation ; Population Ecology ; Reliability aspects ; Reproduction ; reproductive performance ; roe deer ; Snow cover ; Success ; Wildlife management ; Winter</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.599-609</ispartof><rights>2018 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2018</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2981-5516</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26695329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26695329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOTTERO, ELISA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATTIOLI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>APOLLONIO, MARCO</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Capreolus capreolus</subject><subject>central Italy</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>corpus luteum</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>fetus</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>implantation failure</subject><subject>litter size</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Population Ecology</subject><subject>Reliability aspects</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>reproductive performance</subject><subject>roe deer</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUgIMoOKcX70LBm9CZl7RJcxzTzclEEEVvIc1eR0vXzqRj7N-bWfXo6R3e970HHyGXQEdAKbutduvViIFg_IgMQHEZswzkMRmEJYvTBD5OyZn3FaUcIBMDwqbGdq3z0bgo0HZls4rm601tms50ZdtEU1PWW4dR2UQvLUZ3iO6cnBSm9njxM4fkbXr_OnmIF8-z-WS8iC1PFY8lX_LwQhVLmqkUc15QLqiVADJlMhN5YpIkoyhQLlWeWwOJlYgJChsEmvEhue7vblz7uUXf6arduia81AxUIjIOTATqpqesa713WOiNK9fG7TVQfWiiD030d5MAQw_vyhr3_5D68f1p9utc9U7lQ6g_hwmhUs4U_wKZHGtd</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</creator><creator>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</creator><creator>BOTTERO, ELISA</creator><creator>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</creator><creator>MATTIOLI, LUCA</creator><creator>APOLLONIO, MARCO</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-5516</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</title><author>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA ; POKORNY, BOŠTJAN ; BOTTERO, ELISA ; FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA ; MATTIOLI, LUCA ; APOLLONIO, MARCO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Capreolus capreolus</topic><topic>central Italy</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>corpus luteum</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>fetus</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>implantation failure</topic><topic>litter size</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Population Ecology</topic><topic>Reliability aspects</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>reproductive performance</topic><topic>roe deer</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOTTERO, ELISA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATTIOLI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>APOLLONIO, MARCO</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</au><au>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</au><au>BOTTERO, ELISA</au><au>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</au><au>MATTIOLI, LUCA</au><au>APOLLONIO, MARCO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>599-609</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21623</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-5516</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.599-609
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2194683126
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adults
Age factors
Annual variations
Body mass
Capreolus capreolus
central Italy
Climatic conditions
corpus luteum
Counting
Deer
Elevation
Environmental factors
Females
fetus
Fetuses
Implantation
implantation failure
litter size
Ovulation
Population Ecology
Reliability aspects
Reproduction
reproductive performance
roe deer
Snow cover
Success
Wildlife management
Winter
title Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A52%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Affecting%20Implantation%20Failure%20in%20Roe%20Deer&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=CHIRICHELLA,%20ROBERTA&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=599-609&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21623&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26695329%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194683126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26695329&rfr_iscdi=true