Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer
Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) coun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.599-609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 609 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA POKORNY, BOŠTJAN BOTTERO, ELISA FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA MATTIOLI, LUCA APOLLONIO, MARCO |
description | Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.21623 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2194683126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26695329</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26695329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUgIMoOKcX70LBm9CZl7RJcxzTzclEEEVvIc1eR0vXzqRj7N-bWfXo6R3e970HHyGXQEdAKbutduvViIFg_IgMQHEZswzkMRmEJYvTBD5OyZn3FaUcIBMDwqbGdq3z0bgo0HZls4rm601tms50ZdtEU1PWW4dR2UQvLUZ3iO6cnBSm9njxM4fkbXr_OnmIF8-z-WS8iC1PFY8lX_LwQhVLmqkUc15QLqiVADJlMhN5YpIkoyhQLlWeWwOJlYgJChsEmvEhue7vblz7uUXf6arduia81AxUIjIOTATqpqesa713WOiNK9fG7TVQfWiiD030d5MAQw_vyhr3_5D68f1p9utc9U7lQ6g_hwmhUs4U_wKZHGtd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194683126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA ; POKORNY, BOŠTJAN ; BOTTERO, ELISA ; FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA ; MATTIOLI, LUCA ; APOLLONIO, MARCO</creator><creatorcontrib>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA ; POKORNY, BOŠTJAN ; BOTTERO, ELISA ; FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA ; MATTIOLI, LUCA ; APOLLONIO, MARCO</creatorcontrib><description>Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age factors ; Annual variations ; Body mass ; Capreolus capreolus ; central Italy ; Climatic conditions ; corpus luteum ; Counting ; Deer ; Elevation ; Environmental factors ; Females ; fetus ; Fetuses ; Implantation ; implantation failure ; litter size ; Ovulation ; Population Ecology ; Reliability aspects ; Reproduction ; reproductive performance ; roe deer ; Snow cover ; Success ; Wildlife management ; Winter</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.599-609</ispartof><rights>2018 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2018</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2981-5516</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26695329$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26695329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOTTERO, ELISA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATTIOLI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>APOLLONIO, MARCO</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Capreolus capreolus</subject><subject>central Italy</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>corpus luteum</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>fetus</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>implantation failure</subject><subject>litter size</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Population Ecology</subject><subject>Reliability aspects</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>reproductive performance</subject><subject>roe deer</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAUgIMoOKcX70LBm9CZl7RJcxzTzclEEEVvIc1eR0vXzqRj7N-bWfXo6R3e970HHyGXQEdAKbutduvViIFg_IgMQHEZswzkMRmEJYvTBD5OyZn3FaUcIBMDwqbGdq3z0bgo0HZls4rm601tms50ZdtEU1PWW4dR2UQvLUZ3iO6cnBSm9njxM4fkbXr_OnmIF8-z-WS8iC1PFY8lX_LwQhVLmqkUc15QLqiVADJlMhN5YpIkoyhQLlWeWwOJlYgJChsEmvEhue7vblz7uUXf6arduia81AxUIjIOTATqpqesa713WOiNK9fG7TVQfWiiD030d5MAQw_vyhr3_5D68f1p9utc9U7lQ6g_hwmhUs4U_wKZHGtd</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</creator><creator>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</creator><creator>BOTTERO, ELISA</creator><creator>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</creator><creator>MATTIOLI, LUCA</creator><creator>APOLLONIO, MARCO</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-5516</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</title><author>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA ; POKORNY, BOŠTJAN ; BOTTERO, ELISA ; FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA ; MATTIOLI, LUCA ; APOLLONIO, MARCO</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-73d31869fd0895eb3f0360c711752786b4a4480e6e7d9bbca14c7ee4e6c089083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Capreolus capreolus</topic><topic>central Italy</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>corpus luteum</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>fetus</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>implantation failure</topic><topic>litter size</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Population Ecology</topic><topic>Reliability aspects</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>reproductive performance</topic><topic>roe deer</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOTTERO, ELISA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATTIOLI, LUCA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>APOLLONIO, MARCO</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHIRICHELLA, ROBERTA</au><au>POKORNY, BOŠTJAN</au><au>BOTTERO, ELISA</au><au>FLAJŠMAN, KATARINA</au><au>MATTIOLI, LUCA</au><au>APOLLONIO, MARCO</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>599-609</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Reproductive performance is one of the most important life-history traits that should be routinely studied and considered in adaptive wildlife management. In the case of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), a species with delayed implantation, which complicates studies on fetuses, corpora lutea (CL) counting is the only alternative for routine monitoring. However, because of a possible implantation failure, the reliability of this method is questionable, and factors influencing implantation success have been poorly understood so far. We analyzed 2,594 intact uteri of roe deer hunted from 2006–2015 in an Apennine population, central Italy, during winter (mid-Jan to mid-Mar). By comparing the number of CL and fetuses in the same individuals (i.e., success in blastocyst implantation), we revealed a mean implantation failure of 8.6% in a pooled sample set (regardless of the age and origin of animals), with a high inter-annual variability (range = 3.6–19.8%). Contrary to adults (x̄ ± SE = 11.1 ± 1.9%), the implantation failure in yearlings was low (4.4 ± 1.9%). Implantation success was affected by individual maternal characteristics (positive effect of body mass and negative effect of age), climatic condition in summer (positive effect of July temperature up to 23.4°C, and negative effect above this threshold), winter harshness (negative effect of snow cover duration), and altitude (negative relation with the elevation). Reproductive performance of adult female roe deer cannot be adequately measured by CL counts because of high inter-annual variability in implantation failure and important effects of female attributes and environmental factors. However, for yearlings, which also express the highest variability in the ovulation rates, CL counts provide important information on their reproductive outcome because they have low implantation failure.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21623</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-5516</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.599-609 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2194683126 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adults Age factors Annual variations Body mass Capreolus capreolus central Italy Climatic conditions corpus luteum Counting Deer Elevation Environmental factors Females fetus Fetuses Implantation implantation failure litter size Ovulation Population Ecology Reliability aspects Reproduction reproductive performance roe deer Snow cover Success Wildlife management Winter |
title | Factors Affecting Implantation Failure in Roe Deer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A52%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Affecting%20Implantation%20Failure%20in%20Roe%20Deer&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=CHIRICHELLA,%20ROBERTA&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=599-609&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21623&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26695329%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194683126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26695329&rfr_iscdi=true |