Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach
Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 geophysics, geosystems : G3, 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.792-813 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 813 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 792 |
container_title | Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Kioka, A. Tsuji, T. Otsuka, H. Ashi, J. |
description | Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle.
Key Points
Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach
Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores
Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018GC007890 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2194018612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2194018612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmNw4wNE4srASZs15TZVoyBt4sCfa5WmjtqpS0rTCu3bk20cduJkP_snP_kRcsvggQFPHzkwmWcAiUzhjEyY4GLGgSfnJ_0lufJ-A8BiIeSEdGscamWRZs5qtEOvhsZZ2li6Hqv9sBqbwVNn6PtYblXfBHS_-XKtVtahf6KLgI1dixXN0ekat41WLVX2oLt65w960XW9U7q-JhdGtR5v_uqUfD4vP7KX2eotf80Wq5mKo1jMkJXCJFxyySKlVVVqk0AptRAodRqnaLBKRRwZBSqaAysBDDPCiJgzbVQSTcnd8W6w_R7RD8XGjb0NlgVnaRySmjMeqPsjpXvnfY-m6PomvLkrGBT7TIvTTAMeHfGfpsXdv2yR5_mSMwki-gXGHHhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194018612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kioka, A. ; Tsuji, T. ; Otsuka, H. ; Ashi, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kioka, A. ; Tsuji, T. ; Otsuka, H. ; Ashi, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle.
Key Points
Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach
Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores
Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-2027</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GC007890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bridges ; Carbon cycle ; chemical thermodynamics ; Conduits ; Evaluation ; gaseous and dissolved methane ; Geochemistry ; In situ measurement ; Logging ; Methane ; Methane budget ; methane concentration ; Mud ; Mud volcanoes ; Pore water ; rock physics ; Seismic data ; Seismic wave velocities ; Seismic waves ; Seismological data ; Subduction ; Subduction zones ; submarine mud volcano ; Volcanic gases ; Volcanism ; Volcanoes ; Wave velocity ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3, 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.792-813</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6770-6129 ; 0000-0002-0922-1112 ; 0000-0002-5740-5995 ; 0000-0003-0951-4596</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GC007890$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GC007890$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11543,27903,27904,45553,45554,46030,46454</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kioka, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuka, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashi, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</title><title>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3</title><description>Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle.
Key Points
Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach
Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores
Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle</description><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>chemical thermodynamics</subject><subject>Conduits</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>gaseous and dissolved methane</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>In situ measurement</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane budget</subject><subject>methane concentration</subject><subject>Mud</subject><subject>Mud volcanoes</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>rock physics</subject><subject>Seismic data</subject><subject>Seismic wave velocities</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>Seismological data</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>submarine mud volcano</subject><subject>Volcanic gases</subject><subject>Volcanism</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1525-2027</issn><issn>1525-2027</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmNw4wNE4srASZs15TZVoyBt4sCfa5WmjtqpS0rTCu3bk20cduJkP_snP_kRcsvggQFPHzkwmWcAiUzhjEyY4GLGgSfnJ_0lufJ-A8BiIeSEdGscamWRZs5qtEOvhsZZ2li6Hqv9sBqbwVNn6PtYblXfBHS_-XKtVtahf6KLgI1dixXN0ekat41WLVX2oLt65w960XW9U7q-JhdGtR5v_uqUfD4vP7KX2eotf80Wq5mKo1jMkJXCJFxyySKlVVVqk0AptRAodRqnaLBKRRwZBSqaAysBDDPCiJgzbVQSTcnd8W6w_R7RD8XGjb0NlgVnaRySmjMeqPsjpXvnfY-m6PomvLkrGBT7TIvTTAMeHfGfpsXdv2yR5_mSMwki-gXGHHhA</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Kioka, A.</creator><creator>Tsuji, T.</creator><creator>Otsuka, H.</creator><creator>Ashi, J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-6129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-1112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-4596</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</title><author>Kioka, A. ; Tsuji, T. ; Otsuka, H. ; Ashi, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>chemical thermodynamics</topic><topic>Conduits</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>gaseous and dissolved methane</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>In situ measurement</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane budget</topic><topic>methane concentration</topic><topic>Mud</topic><topic>Mud volcanoes</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>rock physics</topic><topic>Seismic data</topic><topic>Seismic wave velocities</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>Seismological data</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>submarine mud volcano</topic><topic>Volcanic gases</topic><topic>Volcanism</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kioka, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuka, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashi, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kioka, A.</au><au>Tsuji, T.</au><au>Otsuka, H.</au><au>Ashi, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</atitle><jtitle>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>813</epage><pages>792-813</pages><issn>1525-2027</issn><eissn>1525-2027</eissn><abstract>Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle.
Key Points
Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach
Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores
Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GC007890</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-6129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-1112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-4596</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-2027 |
ispartof | Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3, 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.792-813 |
issn | 1525-2027 1525-2027 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2194018612 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bridges Carbon cycle chemical thermodynamics Conduits Evaluation gaseous and dissolved methane Geochemistry In situ measurement Logging Methane Methane budget methane concentration Mud Mud volcanoes Pore water rock physics Seismic data Seismic wave velocities Seismic waves Seismological data Subduction Subduction zones submarine mud volcano Volcanic gases Volcanism Volcanoes Wave velocity Weight |
title | Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Concentration%20in%20Mud%20Conduits%20of%20Submarine%20Mud%20Volcanoes:%20A%20Coupled%20Geochemical%20and%20Geophysical%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Geochemistry,%20geophysics,%20geosystems%20:%20G3&rft.au=Kioka,%20A.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=813&rft.pages=792-813&rft.issn=1525-2027&rft.eissn=1525-2027&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GC007890&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2194018612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194018612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |