Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach

Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3 geophysics, geosystems : G3, 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.792-813
Hauptverfasser: Kioka, A., Tsuji, T., Otsuka, H., Ashi, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 813
container_issue 2
container_start_page 792
container_title Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3
container_volume 20
creator Kioka, A.
Tsuji, T.
Otsuka, H.
Ashi, J.
description Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle. Key Points Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018GC007890
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2194018612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2194018612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmNw4wNE4srASZs15TZVoyBt4sCfa5WmjtqpS0rTCu3bk20cduJkP_snP_kRcsvggQFPHzkwmWcAiUzhjEyY4GLGgSfnJ_0lufJ-A8BiIeSEdGscamWRZs5qtEOvhsZZ2li6Hqv9sBqbwVNn6PtYblXfBHS_-XKtVtahf6KLgI1dixXN0ekat41WLVX2oLt65w960XW9U7q-JhdGtR5v_uqUfD4vP7KX2eotf80Wq5mKo1jMkJXCJFxyySKlVVVqk0AptRAodRqnaLBKRRwZBSqaAysBDDPCiJgzbVQSTcnd8W6w_R7RD8XGjb0NlgVnaRySmjMeqPsjpXvnfY-m6PomvLkrGBT7TIvTTAMeHfGfpsXdv2yR5_mSMwki-gXGHHhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2194018612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kioka, A. ; Tsuji, T. ; Otsuka, H. ; Ashi, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kioka, A. ; Tsuji, T. ; Otsuka, H. ; Ashi, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle. Key Points Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-2027</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GC007890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bridges ; Carbon cycle ; chemical thermodynamics ; Conduits ; Evaluation ; gaseous and dissolved methane ; Geochemistry ; In situ measurement ; Logging ; Methane ; Methane budget ; methane concentration ; Mud ; Mud volcanoes ; Pore water ; rock physics ; Seismic data ; Seismic wave velocities ; Seismic waves ; Seismological data ; Subduction ; Subduction zones ; submarine mud volcano ; Volcanic gases ; Volcanism ; Volcanoes ; Wave velocity ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3, 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.792-813</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6770-6129 ; 0000-0002-0922-1112 ; 0000-0002-5740-5995 ; 0000-0003-0951-4596</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GC007890$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GC007890$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11543,27903,27904,45553,45554,46030,46454</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kioka, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuka, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashi, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</title><title>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3</title><description>Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle. Key Points Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle</description><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>chemical thermodynamics</subject><subject>Conduits</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>gaseous and dissolved methane</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>In situ measurement</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane budget</subject><subject>methane concentration</subject><subject>Mud</subject><subject>Mud volcanoes</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>rock physics</subject><subject>Seismic data</subject><subject>Seismic wave velocities</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>Seismological data</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>submarine mud volcano</subject><subject>Volcanic gases</subject><subject>Volcanism</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1525-2027</issn><issn>1525-2027</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmNw4wNE4srASZs15TZVoyBt4sCfa5WmjtqpS0rTCu3bk20cduJkP_snP_kRcsvggQFPHzkwmWcAiUzhjEyY4GLGgSfnJ_0lufJ-A8BiIeSEdGscamWRZs5qtEOvhsZZ2li6Hqv9sBqbwVNn6PtYblXfBHS_-XKtVtahf6KLgI1dixXN0ekat41WLVX2oLt65w960XW9U7q-JhdGtR5v_uqUfD4vP7KX2eotf80Wq5mKo1jMkJXCJFxyySKlVVVqk0AptRAodRqnaLBKRRwZBSqaAysBDDPCiJgzbVQSTcnd8W6w_R7RD8XGjb0NlgVnaRySmjMeqPsjpXvnfY-m6PomvLkrGBT7TIvTTAMeHfGfpsXdv2yR5_mSMwki-gXGHHhA</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Kioka, A.</creator><creator>Tsuji, T.</creator><creator>Otsuka, H.</creator><creator>Ashi, J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-6129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-1112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-4596</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</title><author>Kioka, A. ; Tsuji, T. ; Otsuka, H. ; Ashi, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4345-e1b5f7282813acadbcf70b8c55e8c949efed9543fa0a3601b00f1f5f5421cfa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>chemical thermodynamics</topic><topic>Conduits</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>gaseous and dissolved methane</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>In situ measurement</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane budget</topic><topic>methane concentration</topic><topic>Mud</topic><topic>Mud volcanoes</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>rock physics</topic><topic>Seismic data</topic><topic>Seismic wave velocities</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>Seismological data</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>submarine mud volcano</topic><topic>Volcanic gases</topic><topic>Volcanism</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kioka, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuka, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashi, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kioka, A.</au><au>Tsuji, T.</au><au>Otsuka, H.</au><au>Ashi, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach</atitle><jtitle>Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>792</spage><epage>813</epage><pages>792-813</pages><issn>1525-2027</issn><eissn>1525-2027</eissn><abstract>Mud volcanoes are among the largest geological sources releasing methane gas. Numerous studies have revealed their origins and compositions released from submarine mud volcanoes. However, quantification of the amount of gas inside submarine mud volcanoes has been challenging due to the difficulty of in situ measurements, which has hampered better evaluation for their contribution to the global methane budget. Here we provide a coupled geochemical and geophysical model that bridges bulk methane concentrations and seismic wave velocities in the mud conduit of submarine mud volcano. This model is applicable to most submarine mud volcanoes and is able to estimate methane concentration at the upper several hundreds of meters in the mud conduits using downhole logging data or seismic data. Our calculation for submarine mud volcanoes in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Nankai plate subduction zones shows that the weight fractions of gaseous and dissolved methane in total weight of sediment are 1,000–3,500 ppm within their mud conduits, which are much higher than previously expected from pore‐water evidence from conventional shallow subsurface sampling. Although more definitive calculations cannot be made until the model parameters are better constrained, our approach provides an opportunity for re‐estimating the global methane budget in submarine mud volcanoes, shedding new light upon the impact of submarine mud volcanism on carbon cycle. Key Points Gaseous and dissolved methane in the conduits of submarine mud volcanoes is studied by a new coupled geochemical and geophysical approach Studied submarine mud volcanoes showed higher methane concentrations than expected from conventional measurements of sediment cores Our new approach helps reassess a global methane budget in offshore mud volcanoes and their role on global carbon cycle</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GC007890</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-6129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-1112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-4596</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-2027
ispartof Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems : G3, 2019-02, Vol.20 (2), p.792-813
issn 1525-2027
1525-2027
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2194018612
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bridges
Carbon cycle
chemical thermodynamics
Conduits
Evaluation
gaseous and dissolved methane
Geochemistry
In situ measurement
Logging
Methane
Methane budget
methane concentration
Mud
Mud volcanoes
Pore water
rock physics
Seismic data
Seismic wave velocities
Seismic waves
Seismological data
Subduction
Subduction zones
submarine mud volcano
Volcanic gases
Volcanism
Volcanoes
Wave velocity
Weight
title Methane Concentration in Mud Conduits of Submarine Mud Volcanoes: A Coupled Geochemical and Geophysical Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Concentration%20in%20Mud%20Conduits%20of%20Submarine%20Mud%20Volcanoes:%20A%20Coupled%20Geochemical%20and%20Geophysical%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Geochemistry,%20geophysics,%20geosystems%20:%20G3&rft.au=Kioka,%20A.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=792&rft.epage=813&rft.pages=792-813&rft.issn=1525-2027&rft.eissn=1525-2027&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GC007890&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2194018612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2194018612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true