Tropical invertebrate response to marine reserves varies with protection duration, habitat type, and exploitation history

Macroinvertebrates play a critical role in marine processes, are important in global fisheries, and make up the vast majority of ocean biodiversity, yet are largely overlooked in fisheries stock assessment and conservation. Marine reserves are a heavily advocated method for promoting recovery of mar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquatic conservation 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.511-520
Hauptverfasser: Gillespie, Kyle M., Vincent, Amanda C.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 520
container_issue 3
container_start_page 511
container_title Aquatic conservation
container_volume 29
creator Gillespie, Kyle M.
Vincent, Amanda C.J.
description Macroinvertebrates play a critical role in marine processes, are important in global fisheries, and make up the vast majority of ocean biodiversity, yet are largely overlooked in fisheries stock assessment and conservation. Marine reserves are a heavily advocated method for promoting recovery of marine biodiversity, but the design of reserves and the methods for evaluating their performance often neglect invertebrate taxa, instead assessing changes in fish abundance or biomass. The purpose of this study is to (1) measure the impacts of no‐take marine reserves on marine macroinvertebrates, (2) identify the correlates of changes to macroinvertebrate abundance, and (3) determine if the typical taxa used to measure reserve success (finfish) can predict changes in invertebrate abundance. Non‐coral, non‐sponge, macroinvertebrates were sampled inside and outside of 10 community‐managed marine reserves in the Central Philippines and compared with abundances found at distant fished sites. Using generalized linear mixed effects models with multimodel inference, positive reserve effects were found in exploited invertebrate taxa both inside and outside of reserves (1.5–2.3 times greater abundances), but no effect was found in unfished taxa. Habitat composition and complexity were consistently associated with higher invertebrate abundance. Most surprisingly, invertebrate abundance was not consistently predicted by that of fish. These results indicate fish, in isolation, may not be an ideal indicator for biodiversity response to reserves, and habitat considerations are important when creating reserves that support invertebrates. These results are particularly relevant to practitioners in developing regions, where community‐managed reserves are common and invertebrates are important in fisheries.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aqc.3019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2193437312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2193437312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-bbf9a10dd42ee3603195977491dea332a64b2761fc3863d0ebeb85a4c6f3bdff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlqwzAQhkVpoWla6CMIeukhTrV4iY4hdINAKaRnIdljouBajqQ49dtXTnrtaf4Zvtl-hO4pmVNC2JPal3NOqLhAE0qESEiRZZejzlhS5JRfoxvvd4QQkdN8goaNs50pVYNN24MLoJ0KgB34zrYecLD4WznTnkrgevC4j3kMRxO2uHM2QBmMbXF1iJ1RzPBWaRNUwGHoYIZVW2H46Ro71kZwa3ywbrhFV7VqPNz9xSn6ennerN6S9cfr-2q5TkomuEi0roWipKpSBsBzwqnIRFGkglagOGcqTzWLj9UlX-S8IqBBLzKVlnnNdVXXfIoeznPjrfsD-CB39uDauFIyKnjKC05ZpB7PVOms9w5q2TkTPx8kJXI0VkZj5WhsRJMzejQNDP9ycvm5OvG_Uwx8mA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193437312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tropical invertebrate response to marine reserves varies with protection duration, habitat type, and exploitation history</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gillespie, Kyle M. ; Vincent, Amanda C.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Kyle M. ; Vincent, Amanda C.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Macroinvertebrates play a critical role in marine processes, are important in global fisheries, and make up the vast majority of ocean biodiversity, yet are largely overlooked in fisheries stock assessment and conservation. Marine reserves are a heavily advocated method for promoting recovery of marine biodiversity, but the design of reserves and the methods for evaluating their performance often neglect invertebrate taxa, instead assessing changes in fish abundance or biomass. The purpose of this study is to (1) measure the impacts of no‐take marine reserves on marine macroinvertebrates, (2) identify the correlates of changes to macroinvertebrate abundance, and (3) determine if the typical taxa used to measure reserve success (finfish) can predict changes in invertebrate abundance. Non‐coral, non‐sponge, macroinvertebrates were sampled inside and outside of 10 community‐managed marine reserves in the Central Philippines and compared with abundances found at distant fished sites. Using generalized linear mixed effects models with multimodel inference, positive reserve effects were found in exploited invertebrate taxa both inside and outside of reserves (1.5–2.3 times greater abundances), but no effect was found in unfished taxa. Habitat composition and complexity were consistently associated with higher invertebrate abundance. Most surprisingly, invertebrate abundance was not consistently predicted by that of fish. These results indicate fish, in isolation, may not be an ideal indicator for biodiversity response to reserves, and habitat considerations are important when creating reserves that support invertebrates. These results are particularly relevant to practitioners in developing regions, where community‐managed reserves are common and invertebrates are important in fisheries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biodiversity ; Communities ; Composition ; coral ; Corals ; Duration ; Exploitation ; Fish ; Fisheries ; fishing ; Habitats ; Invertebrates ; Macroinvertebrates ; Marine invertebrates ; Marine parks ; marine protected area ; Nature reserves ; Potential resources ; reef ; Stock assessment ; Tropical climate ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.511-520</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-bbf9a10dd42ee3603195977491dea332a64b2761fc3863d0ebeb85a4c6f3bdff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-bbf9a10dd42ee3603195977491dea332a64b2761fc3863d0ebeb85a4c6f3bdff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4221-3173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.3019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.3019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Kyle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Amanda C.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Tropical invertebrate response to marine reserves varies with protection duration, habitat type, and exploitation history</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Macroinvertebrates play a critical role in marine processes, are important in global fisheries, and make up the vast majority of ocean biodiversity, yet are largely overlooked in fisheries stock assessment and conservation. Marine reserves are a heavily advocated method for promoting recovery of marine biodiversity, but the design of reserves and the methods for evaluating their performance often neglect invertebrate taxa, instead assessing changes in fish abundance or biomass. The purpose of this study is to (1) measure the impacts of no‐take marine reserves on marine macroinvertebrates, (2) identify the correlates of changes to macroinvertebrate abundance, and (3) determine if the typical taxa used to measure reserve success (finfish) can predict changes in invertebrate abundance. Non‐coral, non‐sponge, macroinvertebrates were sampled inside and outside of 10 community‐managed marine reserves in the Central Philippines and compared with abundances found at distant fished sites. Using generalized linear mixed effects models with multimodel inference, positive reserve effects were found in exploited invertebrate taxa both inside and outside of reserves (1.5–2.3 times greater abundances), but no effect was found in unfished taxa. Habitat composition and complexity were consistently associated with higher invertebrate abundance. Most surprisingly, invertebrate abundance was not consistently predicted by that of fish. These results indicate fish, in isolation, may not be an ideal indicator for biodiversity response to reserves, and habitat considerations are important when creating reserves that support invertebrates. These results are particularly relevant to practitioners in developing regions, where community‐managed reserves are common and invertebrates are important in fisheries.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>coral</subject><subject>Corals</subject><subject>Duration</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>fishing</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Macroinvertebrates</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>marine protected area</subject><subject>Nature reserves</subject><subject>Potential resources</subject><subject>reef</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMlqwzAQhkVpoWla6CMIeukhTrV4iY4hdINAKaRnIdljouBajqQ49dtXTnrtaf4Zvtl-hO4pmVNC2JPal3NOqLhAE0qESEiRZZejzlhS5JRfoxvvd4QQkdN8goaNs50pVYNN24MLoJ0KgB34zrYecLD4WznTnkrgevC4j3kMRxO2uHM2QBmMbXF1iJ1RzPBWaRNUwGHoYIZVW2H46Ro71kZwa3ywbrhFV7VqPNz9xSn6ennerN6S9cfr-2q5TkomuEi0roWipKpSBsBzwqnIRFGkglagOGcqTzWLj9UlX-S8IqBBLzKVlnnNdVXXfIoeznPjrfsD-CB39uDauFIyKnjKC05ZpB7PVOms9w5q2TkTPx8kJXI0VkZj5WhsRJMzejQNDP9ycvm5OvG_Uwx8mA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Gillespie, Kyle M.</creator><creator>Vincent, Amanda C.J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-3173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Tropical invertebrate response to marine reserves varies with protection duration, habitat type, and exploitation history</title><author>Gillespie, Kyle M. ; Vincent, Amanda C.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2939-bbf9a10dd42ee3603195977491dea332a64b2761fc3863d0ebeb85a4c6f3bdff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>coral</topic><topic>Corals</topic><topic>Duration</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>fishing</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Macroinvertebrates</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>marine protected area</topic><topic>Nature reserves</topic><topic>Potential resources</topic><topic>reef</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Kyle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Amanda C.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillespie, Kyle M.</au><au>Vincent, Amanda C.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tropical invertebrate response to marine reserves varies with protection duration, habitat type, and exploitation history</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>511-520</pages><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Macroinvertebrates play a critical role in marine processes, are important in global fisheries, and make up the vast majority of ocean biodiversity, yet are largely overlooked in fisheries stock assessment and conservation. Marine reserves are a heavily advocated method for promoting recovery of marine biodiversity, but the design of reserves and the methods for evaluating their performance often neglect invertebrate taxa, instead assessing changes in fish abundance or biomass. The purpose of this study is to (1) measure the impacts of no‐take marine reserves on marine macroinvertebrates, (2) identify the correlates of changes to macroinvertebrate abundance, and (3) determine if the typical taxa used to measure reserve success (finfish) can predict changes in invertebrate abundance. Non‐coral, non‐sponge, macroinvertebrates were sampled inside and outside of 10 community‐managed marine reserves in the Central Philippines and compared with abundances found at distant fished sites. Using generalized linear mixed effects models with multimodel inference, positive reserve effects were found in exploited invertebrate taxa both inside and outside of reserves (1.5–2.3 times greater abundances), but no effect was found in unfished taxa. Habitat composition and complexity were consistently associated with higher invertebrate abundance. Most surprisingly, invertebrate abundance was not consistently predicted by that of fish. These results indicate fish, in isolation, may not be an ideal indicator for biodiversity response to reserves, and habitat considerations are important when creating reserves that support invertebrates. These results are particularly relevant to practitioners in developing regions, where community‐managed reserves are common and invertebrates are important in fisheries.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.3019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-3173</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-7613
ispartof Aquatic conservation, 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.511-520
issn 1052-7613
1099-0755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2193437312
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abundance
Biodiversity
Communities
Composition
coral
Corals
Duration
Exploitation
Fish
Fisheries
fishing
Habitats
Invertebrates
Macroinvertebrates
Marine invertebrates
Marine parks
marine protected area
Nature reserves
Potential resources
reef
Stock assessment
Tropical climate
Zoobenthos
title Tropical invertebrate response to marine reserves varies with protection duration, habitat type, and exploitation history
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A33%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tropical%20invertebrate%20response%20to%20marine%20reserves%20varies%20with%20protection%20duration,%20habitat%20type,%20and%20exploitation%20history&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Gillespie,%20Kyle%20M.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=511-520&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.3019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193437312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193437312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true